背景:心理健康护士的工作可能无法预测,压力和复杂的环境,可能导致精疲力竭和高员工流失率。临床监督是两个或两个以上人员之间的正式和专业协议,旨在加强个人能力和组织优势。有效的临床监督已被认为是减少心理健康护理工作场所问题的一种方法,但是目前没有这方面的综合证据。本次范围审查的关键目标是确定,绘制和分析有关临床监督对心理健康护士的劳动力结果的影响的可用证据报告。
方法:将在系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目之后进行范围审查-范围审查扩展方法,以探索心理健康护士的临床监督。从Medline搜索学术文献,CINAHL,Embase和PsycINFO将与通过Google获取的灰色文献相结合,以确定潜在的相关研究。搜索策略确定的研究将使用Covidence进行管理,两位作者将筛选所有已识别的文章。将对纳入研究的参考列表进行手工搜索,以确定搜索策略遗漏的任何潜在相关研究。
方法:包含预定义类别(例如作者,发布日期,测量的劳动力结果)将用于总结本范围审查中包括的研究。此外,叙述性综合方法将用于报告纳入研究的结果并提供进一步分析.
背景:这项范围界定审查协议描述了将使用对公开信息进行二次分析的研究,因此,不需要道德批准。这项研究的结果将通过发表在同行评审的学术期刊和相关的会议演讲中传播。
BACKGROUND: Mental health nurses work in potentially unpredictable, stressful and complex environments that can lead to burn-out and high staff turnover. Clinical supervision is a formal and professional agreement between two or more people that aims to strengthen individuals\' competencies and organisational strengths. Effective clinical supervision has been noted as a method of reducing workplace issues within mental health nursing, but there is not currently a synthesis of evidence in this area. The key objective of this scoping
review is to identify, map and analyse the available evidence reporting on the impact of clinical supervision on workforce outcomes for mental health nurses.
METHODS: A scoping
review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping
Review Extension method will be conducted exploring clinical supervision for mental health nurses. A search for academic literature from Medline, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO will be combined with grey literature sourced through Google to identify potentially relevant studies. Studies identified by the search strategy will be managed using Covidence, and two authors will screen all identified articles. Reference lists of included studies will be handsearched to identify any potentially relevant studies missed by the search strategy.
METHODS: A summary tool including predefined categories (such as author, date published, workforce outcome measured) will be used to summarise the included studies in this scoping
review. Additionally, a narrative synthesis approach will be used to report the outcomes of included studies and provide further analysis.
BACKGROUND: This scoping
review protocol described research that will use secondary analysis of publicly available information, and therefore, does not require ethics approval. The findings of this research will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal and relevant conference presentations.