Chlorination is commonly used to control biofouling organisms, but chlorine rapidly hydrolyzes in seawater to hypochlorite, which undergoes further reaction with bromide, and then with organic matter. These reaction products, collectively termed chlorine-produced oxidants (CPOs), can be toxic to marine biota. Because the lifetime of the most toxic forms is limited to several days, appropriate guideline values need to be based on short-term (acute) toxicity tests, rather than chronic tests. Flow-through toxicity tests that provide continuous CPO exposure are the most appropriate, whereas static-renewal tests generate variable exposure and effects depending on the renewal rate. There are literature data for acute CPO toxicity from flow-through tests, together with values from 2 sensitive 15-min static tests on 30 species from 9 taxonomic groups. These values were used in a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) to derive guideline values that were protective of 99, 95, and 90% of species at 2.2, 7.2, and 13 µg CPO/L respectively. These are the first marine guideline values for chlorine to be derived using SSDs, with all other international guideline values based on the use of assessment factors applied to data for the most sensitive species. In applying these conservative guideline values in field situations, it would need to be demonstrated that concentrations of CPOs would be reduced to below the guideline value within an acceptable mixing zone through both dilution and dissociation. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:754-764. © 2020 SETAC.

The isomerisation of ONOOH to NO(3)(-) and H(+), some oxidations and all hydroxylations and nitrations of aromatic compounds are first-order in ONOOH and zero-order in the compounds that are modified. These reactions are widely believed to proceed via homolysis of ONOOH into HO˙ and NO(2)˙ to an extent of ca. 30%. We review the evidence pro and contra homolysis in studies that involve (1) thermochemical considerations, (2) isomerisation to NO(3)(-) and H(+), (3) decomposition to NO(2)(-) and O(2), (4) HO˙ scavenger studies, (5) deuterium isotope effects, (6) (18)O-scrambling studies, (7) electrochemistry, (8) CIDNP NMR, and (9) photolysis. Our conclusion is that homolysis may be involved to a minor extent of ca. 5%. The initiation of ONOOH isomerisation may be visualised as an out-of-plane vibration of the terminal HO-group relative to the nitrogen. At ONOO(-) concentrations exceeding 0.1 mM and near neutral pH, disproportionation to NO(2)(-) and O(2) occurs; such disproportionations are typical for peroxy acids. For oxidation and nitration of organic substrates, we favour a mechanism involving initial formation of an adduct between the compound to be oxidised or nitrated and ONOOH.

In a laboratory-scale trial, we studied the removal of saxitoxins from water by ozone, granular activated carbon (GAC) and H(2)O(2), and considered the implications of residual toxicity for compliance with the Australian drinking water standards. Cell-free extracts of Anabaena circinalis were added to raw, untreated drinking water obtained from a water supply reservoir to provide a toxicity of 30 microg (STX equivalents)l(-1). Ozone alone, or in combination with H(2)O(2), failed to destroy the highly toxic STX and GTX-2/3, and only partially destroyed dc-STX, and the low-toxicity C-toxins and GTX-5. In all cases, the toxicity of the water was reduced by less than 10%. GAC removed all of the STX, dc-STX and GTXs, but only partially removed the C-toxins. However, the residual toxicity was reduced to the suggested Australian drinking water guideline concentration of 3 microg (STX equivalents)l(-1) without O(3) pre-treatment. Modelling the spontaneous chemical degradation of residual C-toxins following treatment shows that residual toxicity could increase to 10 microgl(-1) after 11 d due to formation of dc-GTXs and would then gradually decay. In all, residual toxicity would exceed the Australian drinking water guideline concentration for a total of 50 d.

Since the introduction of at-home tooth whitening using peroxide-containing agents in 1989, the procedure has been well-received by the public and is becoming one of the most popular cosmetic dental procedures today. To ensure the safety and efficacy of this treatment, the Guidelines for the Acceptance of this category of products by the American Dental Association were developed. This article provides background on the American Dental Association (ADA) Seal of Acceptance Program. It also offers an overview of the ADA Acceptance Program Guidelines for Home-Use Tooth Whitening Products as well as the process through which the document was developed.