UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在系统地回顾在乳牙中使用不同材料修复医源性穿孔的临床成功。
UNASSIGNED:比较三氧化二矿聚集体(MTA)与其他生物材料在牙髓手术期间修复原始磨牙医源性穿孔。
UNASSIGNED:通过使用三个电子数据库(PubMed,科克伦图书馆,GoogleScholar)以确定评估用于修复原发性磨牙医源性穿孔的不同干预材料的文章。选择标准:报道了临床和影像学成功的原发性磨牙穿孔修复的文章,因为他们的随访期至少1年的结果指标被纳入本审查。随访期不足或未说明的研究和病例报告,在体外,和动物研究被排除在外。
未经评估:两名审阅者(SM,LM)根据纳入和排除标准独立筛选所有标题和摘要。获得所选研究的全文用于第二阶段筛选。通过与第三审稿人(AJ)的讨论达成了共识。数据提取包括研究设计,样本量,病人的年龄,研究的年份,随访期,结果评估标准,用于修复的材料,成功和失败。
UNASSIGNED:本次审查共包括七篇出版物。其中,一个是案例系列,三个是病例报告,三个是介入研究。MTA的综合成功率(80.55%)不如其他材料-预混生物陶瓷,Atelocollagen,和富含钙的混合物(96.07%);同样具有统计学意义(p=0.011)。
未经评估:在我们研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,就临床成功而言,新型仿生材料在原发性磨牙医源性穿孔修复中优于MTA。
UNASSIGNED:本文是首次进行的调查,比较了用于修复乳牙穿孔的不同材料。它可以为进一步研究该主题奠定基础。在没有任何可用的指导方针的情况下,上述研究可以在适当的判断和谨慎的情况下应用于临床。
未经批准:Mungekar-MarkandeyS,MistryL,JawdekarA.在原发性磨牙中使用三氧化二矿物聚集体和其他材料进行医源性穿孔修复的临床成功:系统评价和荟萃分析。IntJClinPediatrDent2022;15(5):610-616。
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed at systematically reviewing the clinical success of repaired iatrogenic perforations using different materials in primary teeth.
UNASSIGNED: To compare mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with other biomaterials for the repair of iatrogenic perforations in primary molars during endodontic procedures.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature search was conducted by using three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) to identify articles that evaluated the different intervention materials for the repair of iatrogenic perforation in primary molars. Selection criteria: The articles reporting perforation repair in primary molars having clinical and radiographic success, as their outcome measures with a follow-up period of at least 1 year were included in this
review. Studies and case reports with insufficient or unstated follow-up periods, in vitro, and animal studies were excluded.
UNASSIGNED: Two reviewers (SM, LM) independently screened all titles and abstracts according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full texts of the selected studies were obtained for the second stage screening. The consensus was achieved by discussion with the third reviewer (AJ). Data extraction included study design, sample size, age of the patient, year of the study, follow-up period, outcome assessment criteria, material for repair, and success and failure.
UNASSIGNED: A total of seven publications were included in this
review. Of which, one was case series, three were case reports, and three were interventional studies. The combined success rate of MTA (80.55%) was inferior to other materials-premixed bioceramics, Atelocollagen, and calcium-enriched mixture (96.07%); the same being statistically significant (p = 0.011).
UNASSIGNED: Within the limitations of our study, it can be concluded that newer biomimetic materials are superior to MTA for iatrogenic perforation repair in primary molars in terms of clinical success.
UNASSIGNED: This paper is a first-of-its-kind investigation comparing different materials used in the repair of perforations in primary molars. It can be a foundation for further research on the topic. In absence of any available guidelines, the above study can be applied in clinical situations with appropriate judgment and caution.
UNASSIGNED: Mungekar-Markandey S, Mistry L, Jawdekar A. Clinical Success of Iatrogenic Perforation Repair Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Other Materials in Primary Molars: A Systematic
Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(5):610-616.