coronavirus disease 2019

冠状病毒病 2019
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于轻度COVID-19与随后发展的孤立性视神经炎(ON)与髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白(MOG-ON)和水通道蛋白4(AQP4-ON)特异性抗体之间关系的研究有限,特别是在同一受影响人群中直接比较这些条件的病例对照研究。
    对COVID-19高峰和随后几个月的初始MOG-ON和AQP4-ON病例的回顾性分析。患者被分类为可能的COVID-19相关ON(PCRON)或非COVID-19相关ON(NCRON)。这项研究比较了流行病学,合并症,和这些群体之间的临床特征。
    与AQP4-ON患者相比,MOG-ON患者倾向于在时间上更接近于轻度COVID-19感染(6.87±6.25周vs.11.06±5.84周;p=0.038),与AQP4-ON患者相比,MON-ON患者在COVID-19后6周内出现症状的比例明显更高(15/23[65.2%]与5/17[29.4%];p=0.025)。比较MOG-ON和AQP4-ON患者,MOG-ON患者在ON发作前更有可能最近感染(73.1%vs.30%;p=0.007),并且具有更好的峰值和治疗后视力(p=0.01;p<0.001)。相比之下,AQP4-ON患者常表现为结缔组织病合并症(30.0%vs.0%,p=0.004)和抗核抗体异常(40.0%vs.7.7%,p=0.012)。在MOG-ON患者中,PCRON的动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病(AVDs)发病率增加(53.3%vs.9.1%,p=0.036),磷脂抗体异常(60.0%vs.18.2%,p=0.04),和双侧视力障碍(66.7%vs.9.1%,p=0.005)。多因素分析确定AVDs(OR=15.21,p=0.043)和双侧受累(OR=25.15,p=0.015)是与COVID-19相关MOG-ON的独立因素,两者都是PCRON的良好鉴别器(AUC=0.879)。在AQP4-ON患者中,PCRON和NCRON组之间没有发现差异。
    轻度COVID-19比AQP4-ON更可能与MOG-ON相关。COVID-19感染后6周内发生的MOG-ON可能与COVID-19感染有关。AVDs可能对COVID-19患者的MOG-ON有协同作用,值得进一步研究。与COVID-19相关的MOG-ON经常影响双眼,急性视觉功能损伤可能很严重,但总体预后良好。
    UNASSIGNED: Research on the relationship between mild COVID-19 and the subsequent development of isolated optic neuritis (ON) with antibodies specific to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-ON) and aquaporin 4 (AQP4-ON) is limited, particularly case-control studies that directly compare these conditions within the same affected population.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis of initial MOG-ON and AQP4-ON cases during the COVID-19 peak and subsequent months. Patients were classified as possible COVID-19 related ON (PCRON) or non-COVID-19 related ON (NCRON). The study compared epidemiology, comorbidities, and clinical features between these groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with MOG-ON tended to develop ON symptoms closer in time to a mild COVID-19 infection compared to those with AQP4-ON (6.87 ± 6.25 weeks vs. 11.06 ± 5.84 weeks; p = 0.038), a significantly higher proportion of patients with MON-ON developing symptoms within 6 weeks after COVID-19 compared to those with AQP4-ON (15/23 [65.2%] vs. 5/17 [29.4%]; p = 0.025). Comparing MOG-ON and AQP4-ON patients, MOG-ON patients were more likely to have a recent infection before ON onset (73.1% vs. 30%; p = 0.007) and had better peak and post-treatment visual acuity (p = 0.01; p < 0.001). In contrast, AQP4-ON patients frequently showed comorbid connective tissue diseases (30.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.004) and antinuclear antibody abnormalities (40.0% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.012). Among MOG-ON patients, PCRON had increased rates of atherosclerotic vascular diseases (AVDs) (53.3% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.036), phospholipid antibody abnormalities (60.0% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.04), and bilateral visual impairment (66.7% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis pinpointed AVDs (OR = 15.21, p = 0.043) and bilateral involvement (OR = 25.15, p = 0.015) as independent factors related to COVID-19 associated MOG-ON, with both being good discriminators for PCRON (AUC = 0.879). No differences were found between the PCRON and NCRON groups in AQP4-ON patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Mild COVID-19 is more likely associated with MOG-ON than AQP4-ON. MOG-ON that develops within 6 weeks following a COVID-19 infection may be associated with the COVID-19 infection. AVDs may have a synergistic effect on MOG-ON in patients with COVID-19, which warrants further investigation. COVID-19 related MOG-ON often affects both eyes, and acute visual function damage can be severe, but generally has a good prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)再感染妇女的妊娠结局。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括在2022年10月1日至2023年8月15日期间在上海第一妇婴医院(上海,中国)。我们收集他们的临床资料,比较再感染组和原发感染组的不良妊娠结局发生频率,比如早产,胎儿生长受限(FGR),妊娠高血压疾病(HDP),常见的妊娠相关疾病,出生体重,和新生儿病房入院。
    结果:我们观察到在怀孕期间感染COVID-19的1,405名妇女的再感染率为7.7%。早产的发生频率没有显著差异,FGR,HDP,其他常见的妊娠相关疾病,出生体重,或再感染组和单一感染组之间的新生儿单元入院率。我们所有的参与者都没有接种疫苗,都有轻微的症状.
    结论:我们的研究表明SARS-CoV-2再感染与不良妊娠结局之间没有显著关联。
    BACKGROUND: To assess pregnancy outcomes in women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included pregnant women who contracted coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) once or twice during pregnancy and who gave birth between 1 October 2022 and 15 August 2023 in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (Shanghai, China). We collected their clinical data and compared the frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes between the reinfection group and the primary infection group, such as preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (FGR), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), common pregnancy-related conditions, birth weight, and neonatal unit admission.
    RESULTS: We observed a 7.7% reinfection rate among the 1,405 women who contracted COVID-19 during pregnancy. There were no significant differences in the frequency of preterm birth, FGR, HDP, other common pregnancy-related conditions, birth weight, or rate of neonatal unit admission between the reinfection and single infection groups. All our participants were unvaccinated, and all had mild symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no significant association between SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起,产生了深远的全球影响,全球数百万例确诊病例和死亡病例。虽然大多数病例是温和的,一个子集进展为严重的呼吸系统并发症和死亡,有血栓栓塞等因素,年龄,和潜在的健康状况增加了风险。血管内皮损伤与严重的预后有关,但具体的生物标志物仍然难以捉摸。本研究调查了syndecan-1(SDC-1),内皮损伤的标志,作为COVID-19的潜在预后因素,重点是日本人群,以其人口老龄化和高发合并症而闻名。
    方法:对日本福岛县2020年2月至2021年8月间收治的COVID-19患者进行了多中心回顾性研究。测量SDC-1水平以及其他临床和实验室参数。结果包括血栓形成,28天存活,并评估了疾病的严重程度,根据既定指南对疾病严重程度进行分类.
    结果:SDC-1水平与疾病严重程度相关。死于COVID-19的患者SDC-1水平高于幸存者,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分析表明,SDC-1水平可能是死亡率的预测因子(AUC0.714).K-M分析还显示,基于10.65ng/mL的SDC-1截止值,生存率存在显着差异。
    结论:这项研究表明,SDC-1可能是评估COVID-19严重程度和预测住院28天内死亡率的有价值的生物标志物,特别是在日本人口中。然而,需要进一步调查以评估SDC-1水平的纵向变化,验证其对长期生存的预测价值,并考虑其对新病毒变体的适用性。
    结论:SDC-1正在成为评估日本人群COVID-19严重程度和预期寿命的潜在生物标志物,在持续的抗击病毒的斗争中,为改善风险分层和患者管理提供了希望。
    BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has had a profound global impact, with millions of confirmed cases and deaths worldwide. While most cases are mild, a subset progresses to severe respiratory complications and death, with factors such as thromboembolism, age, and underlying health conditions increasing the risk. Vascular endothelial damage has been implicated in severe outcomes, but specific biomarkers remain elusive. This study investigated syndecan-1 (SDC-1), a marker of endothelial damage, as a potential prognostic factor for COVID-19, focusing on the Japanese population, which is known for its aging demographics and high prevalence of comorbidities.
    METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of COVID-19 patients in Fukushima Prefecture in Japan who were admitted between February 2020 and August 2021 was conducted. SDC-1 levels were measured along with other clinical and laboratory parameters. Outcomes including thrombosis, 28-day survival, and disease severity were assessed, and disease severity was categorized according to established guidelines.
    RESULTS: SDC-1 levels were correlated with disease severity. Patients who died from COVID-19 had greater SDC-1 levels than survivors, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis suggested the potential of the SDC-1 level as a predictor of mortality (AUC 0.714). K‒M analysis also revealed a significant difference in survival based on an SDC-1 cutoff of 10.65 ng/mL.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that SDC-1 may serve as a valuable biomarker for assessing COVID-19 severity and predicting mortality within 28 days of hospitalization, particularly in the Japanese population. However, further investigations are required to assess longitudinal changes in SDC-1 levels, validate its predictive value for long-term survival, and consider its applicability to new viral variants.
    CONCLUSIONS: SDC-1 is emerging as a potential biomarker for assessing the severity and life expectancy of COVID-19 in the Japanese population, offering promise for improved risk stratification and patient management in the ongoing fight against the virus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对室内过敏原的敏感性增加了哮喘和过敏性疾病出现的风险。室内过敏原包括室内尘螨(HDM),宠物皮屑,蟑螂(CR),和模具。我们调查了在大流行期间CR敏感性如何受到影响。
    方法:这项研究包括年龄≥18岁的患者,他们在2018年3月至2022年3月期间访问了我们诊所的过敏单元,并接受了空气过敏原的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。患者分为两组:流行前期和大流行期,取决于访问日期。
    结果:总而言之,招募了7,687名患者;排除了5,074名SPT结果阴性的个体。在2,613名特应性患者中,CR灵敏度检测到278例(10.6%)。大流行组的CR敏感性患病率明显高于大流行组(12%vs.8.6%;p<0.05)。CR敏感性患者的哮喘频率高于其他患者(33.1%vs.26%,p=0.011)。此外,具有CR敏感性的个体年龄大于其他人(p=0.001).CR敏感性在男性比女性更常见(44.2%vs.37.7%,p=0.034)。此外,狗和HDM敏感性在具有CR敏感性的个体中比在其他个体中更常见(分别为p=0.004,p<0.001)。
    结论:这项研究揭示了在大流行期间对CR的敏感性增加,并建立了这种敏感性与哮喘发生频率之间的关联。强调了不同国家在CR敏感性方面的差异。此外,HDM和狗敏感性在具有CR敏感性的个体中更常见。
    BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to indoor allergens increases the risks of asthma and the emergence of allergic diseases. Indoor allergens include house dust mite (HDM), pet dander, cockroach (CR), and molds. We investigated how CR sensitivity was affected during the pandemic period.
    METHODS: This study included patients aged ≥18 years who visited the allergy unit of our clinic between March 2018 and March 2022 and who underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) for aeroallergens. Patients were divided into two groups: those of the prepandemic and pandemic periods, depending on the visit dates.
    RESULTS: In all, 7,687 patients were recruited; 5,074 individuals with negative SPT results were excluded. Among the 2,613 atopic patients, CR sensitivity was detected in 278 (10.6%). The prevalence of CR sensitivity was significantly higher in the pandemic group than in the prepandemic group (12% vs. 8.6%; p < 0.05). The frequency of asthma was higher in patients with CR sensitivity than in others (33.1% vs. 26%, p = 0.011). In addition, individuals with CR sensitivity were older than others (p = 0.001). CR sensitivity was more common in males than in females (44.2% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.034). Moreover, dog and HDM sensitivities were more common in individuals with CR sensitivity than in others (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals an increased sensitivity to CR during the pandemic and establishes an association between such sensitivity and the frequency of asthma. Variability in terms of CR sensitivity across different countries is emphasized. In addition, HDM and dog sensitivities were more common in individuals with CR sensitivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的影响尚有争议。2型糖尿病被怀疑可降低ARDS的风险和并发症。然而,2019年冠状病毒病期间(COVID-19),T2DM易感患者ARDS,尤其是那些在家服用胰岛素的人。
    目的:评估T2DM患者门诊使用胰岛素对非COVID-19ARDS结局的影响。
    方法:我们使用全国住院患者样本数据库进行了回顾性队列分析。诊断为ARDS的成年患者分为胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)和非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)组。在应用排除标准并匹配超过20个变量后,我们比较了队列的死亡率,机械通气的持续时间,急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率,停留时间(LOS)住院费用,和其他临床结果。
    结果:在1:1倾向得分匹配之后,该分析包括每组274例患者.值得注意的是,在死亡率方面,IDDM和NIDDM组之间没有统计学上的显着差异(32.8%vs31.0%,P=0.520),中位医院LOS(10天,P=0.537),机械通风的要求,脓毒症的发病率,肺炎或AKI,住院总费用中位数,或出院时的病人性情。
    结论:与替代抗糖尿病药物相比,在非COVID-19ARDS的糖尿病患者中,门诊胰岛素治疗似乎对院内发病率或死亡率没有独立影响.
    BACKGROUND: The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debatable. T2DM was suspected to reduce the risk and complications of ARDS. However, during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), T2DM predisposed patients to ARDS, especially those who were on insulin at home.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of outpatient insulin use in T2DM patients on non-COVID-19 ARDS outcomes.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients diagnosed with ARDS were stratified into insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (DM) (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent DM (NIDDM) groups. After applying exclusion criteria and matching over 20 variables, we compared cohorts for mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and other clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, the analysis included 274 patients in each group. Notably, no statistically significant differences emerged between the IDDM and NIDDM groups in terms of mortality rates (32.8% vs 31.0%, P = 0.520), median hospital LOS (10 d, P = 0.537), requirement for mechanical ventilation, incidence rates of sepsis, pneumonia or AKI, median total hospitalization costs, or patient disposition upon discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to alternative anti-diabetic medications, outpatient insulin treatment does not appear to exert an independent influence on in-hospital morbidity or mortality in diabetic patients with non-COVID-19 ARDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在比较2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)(PLWH)感染者和无HIV感染者(PLWoH)中的流行病学和临床特征。
    方法:这项全国性的描述性流行病学研究于2020年1月至2022年2月在韩国进行。国民健康保险索赔数据,包括整个韩国人口的数据,是通过健康保险审查和评估服务收集的。
    结果:在被诊断为COVID-19的3,653,808人中,有1311人(0.04%)为PLWH。所有PLWH都接受了抗逆转录病毒治疗,26.47%的人患有除HIV感染以外的一种以上潜在疾病。PLWH和PLWoH的总体住院死亡率分别为0.76%和0.25%,分别(P=0.002)。根据Cox比例风险模型,PLWH和PLWoH的住院死亡率(风险比[HR]:1.80,95%置信区间[CI]:0.70~4.67)无显著差异.然而,在PLWH中,进展为重度或危重症COVID-19更为常见(HR:2.70,95%CI:1.37-5.33)。在确诊为COVID-19的PLWH中,多变量Cox回归分析发现年龄(≥60岁)(HR:6.9,95%CI:2.57-18.56)和糖尿病(HR:5.13,95%CI:2.02-13.00)是严重或危重COVID-19的独立危险因素。
    结论:与PLWoH相比,PLWH发生重症或危重症COVID-19的风险明显更高。我们的研究结果表明,有必要实施量身定制的策略,以减少COVID-19对PLWH的影响。
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) with those in people living without HIV (PLWoH).
    METHODS: This nationwide descriptive epidemiological study was conducted in South Korea between January 2020 and February 2022. The National Health Insurance claim data, comprising the data of the entire Korean population, were collected through the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.
    RESULTS: Among 3,653,808 individuals who were diagnosed with COVID-19, 1311 (0.04%) were PLWH. All PLWH received antiretroviral therapy, and 26.47% had more than one underlying disease other than HIV infection. The overall in-hospital mortality rates of PLWH and PLWoH were 0.76% and 0.25%, respectively (P = 0.002). According to the Cox proportional hazard model, no significant difference was observed in the in-hospital mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-4.67) between the PLWH and PLWoH. However, progression to severe or critical COVID-19 was more common in PLWH (HR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.37-5.33). In PLWH diagnosed with COVID-19, a multivariable Cox regression analysis found old age (≥ 60 years) (HR: 6.9, 95% CI: 2.57-18.56) and diabetes mellitus (HR: 5.13, 95% CI: 2.02-13.00) as the independent risk factors for severe or critical COVID-19.
    CONCLUSIONS: PLWH had a significantly higher risk of developing severe or critical COVID-19 compared with PLWoH. Our findings suggest the need for implementing tailored strategies to decrease the impact of COVID-19 on PLWH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状动脉钙化(CAC)已被确定为主要不良心血管事件的独立危险因素。然而,CAC对COVID-19患者院内死亡率和不良临床结局的影响尚待确定.
    探讨CAC评分与COVID-19患者住院死亡率之间的关系。
    这项回顾性队列研究是在巴博尔医科大学的三级医院进行的,伊朗北部城市,在2021年3月至10月期间,551例确诊的COVID-19患者的临床结局为死亡或出院。人口统计学和临床数据,以及入院时的胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)发现和CAC评分,被系统地收集。该研究利用逻辑回归分析和Kaplan-Meier图来探索CAC评分与住院死亡和不良临床结局之间的关联。
    平均年龄为60.05±12.8。关于CAC评分的显著差异,年龄,高血压病史,高脂血症,心血管疾病,观察到幸存者和非幸存者中的呼吸系统疾病;然而,没有发现性别不同。此外,在多变量分析中,CAC得分大于或等于400[优势比(OR):4.2,95%CI:1.70-10.33,P值:0.002],住院时间(OR:1.31,95%CI:1.13-1.53,P值<0.001),ICU住院时间(OR:2.02,95%CI:1.47-2.77,P值<0.001),入院时严重或严重的COVID-19严重程度(95%CI:1.79-18.29,P值:0.003),研究发现,呼吸系统疾病病史(95%CI:2.18-40,P值:0.003)与住院死亡率的几率较高相关.Log-rank检验还显示,CAC评分大于或等于400的患者与CAC评分小于400的患者之间的入院死亡时间存在显着差异(P值<0.001)。
    在确诊的COVID-19患者中,CAC评分升高是与院内死亡率和不良临床结果相关的关键风险因素。这一发现强调了对CAC得分高的个体进行仔细监测的必要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) has been established as an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the effect of CAC on in-hospital mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 has yet to be determined.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the association between CAC score and in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study was conducted across tertiary hospitals of University of Medical Sciences in Babol, a northern city in Iran, and enroled 551 confirmed COVID-19 patients with definitive clinical outcomes of death or discharge between March and October 2021. Demographic and clinical data, along with chest computed tomography (CT) findings and CAC score on admission, were systematically collected. The study utilized logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier plots to explore the association between CAC score and in-hospital death and adverse clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age was 60.05±12.8. A significant difference regarding CAC score, age, history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, and respiratory diseases among survivors and non-survivors was observed; however, gender was not found to be different. Furthermore, in multivariate analysis, CAC score greater than or equal to 400 [odds ratio (OR): 4.2, 95% CI: 1.70-10.33, P value: 0.002], hospitalization time (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.13-1.53, P value < 0.001), length of ICU stay (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.47-2.77, P value < 0.001), severe or critical COVID-19 severity in time of admission (95% CI: 1.79-18.29, P value: 0.003), and history of respiratory diseases (95% CI: 2.18-40, P value: 0.003) were found to be associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality. Log-rank test also revealed a significant difference regarding the time of admission to death between patients with CAC score greater than or equal to 400 and those with CAC score less than 400 (P value < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Elevated CAC score is a crucial risk factor linked to in-hospital mortality and unfavourable clinical results in confirmed COVID-19 patients. This finding emphasizes the need for careful monitoring of individuals with high CAC scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究2019年原发性冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染患者视网膜微血管的纵向变化。
    一组参与者,从未感染过COVID-19的人,于2022年12月至2023年5月在北京协和医院招募,中国。参与者接受了全面的眼科检查和眼底成像,其中包括彩色眼底摄影,自发荧光摄影,扫频源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)和SS-OCT血管造影(SS-OCTA)。如果参与者在研究期间感染了COVID-19,在感染恢复后1周和2个月内采用一致的影像学方式进行随访.
    31名患者(61只眼),平均年龄为31.0±7.2岁,有资格参加这项研究。所有参与者在基线数据收集后一个月内感染了轻度COVID-19感染。第一次随访平均感染后10.9±2.0天,第二次随访平均61.0±3.5天。随访期间未观察到临床视网膜微血管病变特征。然而,SS-OCTA分析显示黄斑血管密度(MVD)从基线时的60.76±2.88%显着增加到首次随访时的61.59±3.72%(p=0.015),随后在两个月的随访中恢复到基线水平60.23±3.33%(p=0.162).中央凹无血管区(FAZ)在随访期间保持稳定,基线面积为0.339±0.097mm2,0.342±0.093mm2和0.344±0.098mm2。第一次随访(p=0.09)和第二次随访(p=0.052),分别。中央黄斑厚度,立方体体积和神经节细胞内丛状层在第一次随访时显示出短暂的减少(分别为p<0.001,p=0.039,p=0.002),并在2个月随访时升高至基线水平(分别为p=0.401,p=0.368,p=0.438).
    轻度COVID-19感染可能会暂时和可逆地影响视网膜微血管,以早期恢复阶段视网膜血流短暂增加为特征,感染后两个月恢复到感染前水平。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the longitudinal alterations of retinal microvasculature in patients with primary coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.
    UNASSIGNED: A cohort of participants, who had never been infected with COVID-19, was recruited between December 2022 and May 2023 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital in Beijing, China. Participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations and fundus imaging, which included color fundus photography, autofluorescence photography, swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and SS-OCT angiography (SS-OCTA). If participants were infected with COVID-19 during the study, follow-ups with consistent imaging modality were conducted within one week and two months after recovery from the infection.
    UNASSIGNED: 31 patients (61 eyes), with a mean age of 31.0 ± 7.2 years old, were eligible for this study. All participants contracted mild COVID-19 infection within one month of baseline data collection. The average period was 10.9 ± 2.0 days post-infection for the first follow-up and 61.0 ± 3.5 days for the second follow-up. No clinical retinal microvasculopathy features were observed during the follow-ups. However, SS-OCTA analysis showed a significant increase in macular vessel density (MVD) from 60.76 ± 2.88% at baseline to 61.59 ± 3.72%(p=0.015) at the first follow-up, which subsequently returned to the baseline level of 60.23 ± 3.33% (p=0.162) at the two-month follow-up. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) remained stable during the follow-ups with areas of 0.339 ± 0.097mm2, 0.342 ± 0.093mm2, and 0.344 ± 0.098mm2 at the baseline, first follow-up (p=0.09) and second follow-up (p=0.052), respectively. Central macular thickness, cube volume and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer showed a transient decrease at the first follow-up(p<0.001, p=0.039, p=0.002, respectively), and increased to baseline level at the two-month follow-up(p=0.401, p=0.368, p=0.438, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Mild COVID-19 infection may temporarily and reversibly impact retinal microvasculature, characterized by a transient increase in retinal blood flow during the early recovery phase, which returns to the pre-infection level two months post-infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管指南建议对从严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染中恢复的个体进行疫苗接种,以防止再感染,综合评价研究有限。我们旨在根据主要疫苗接种状态评估疫苗对SARS-CoV-2再感染的有效性,加强疫苗接种状态,和使用的疫苗接种方法。
    方法:这项基于人群的病例对照研究纳入了2020年1月至2022年2月在首尔的所有SARS-CoV-2感染患者。将个体分为病例组(再感染)和对照组(无再感染)。在使用多元回归调整潜在合并症后,使用条件逻辑回归分析数据。
    结果:病例组包括7,678名参与者(平均年龄:32.26岁)。在所有接种疫苗的个体中,与接受基础疫苗接种的患者相比,接受第一次和第二次加强疫苗接种的患者的再感染率降低(比值比[OR]=0.605,P<0.001和OR=0.002,P<0.001).与未接种疫苗的个体相比,接受BNT162b2或mRNA-1273,NVX-CoV2373和异源疫苗接种的患者的再感染率降低(OR=0.546,P<0.001;OR=0.356,P<0.001;OR=0.472,P<0.001)。然而,ChAdOx1-S或Ad26。COV2.S疫苗组的再感染率高于BNT162b2或mRNA-1273疫苗组(OR=4.419,P<0.001)。
    结论:在SARS-CoV-2感染者中,与未接种疫苗相比,基本疫苗系列的完成显示出对再感染的显著保护作用。如果接受了第一次或第二次加强疫苗接种,对再感染的保护作用高于基础疫苗接种;当仅接种BNT162b2或mRNA-1273或异源疫苗时,保护作用高于ChAdOx1-S或Ad26。COV2.仅接种S疫苗。
    BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend vaccination for individuals who have recovered from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection to prevent reinfection, comprehensive evaluation studies are limited. We aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection according to the primary vaccination status, booster vaccination status, and vaccination methods used.
    METHODS: This population-based case-control study enrolled all SARS-CoV-2-infected patients in Seoul between January 2020 and February 2022. Individuals were categorized into case (reinfection) and control (no reinfection) groups. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression after adjusting for underlying comorbidities using multiple regression.
    RESULTS: The case group included 7,678 participants (average age: 32.26 years). In all vaccinated individuals, patients who received the first and second booster doses showed reduced reinfection rates compared with individuals who received basic vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 0.605, P < 0.001 and OR = 0.002, P < 0.001). Patients who received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, NVX-CoV2373 and heterologous vaccination showed reduced reinfection rates compared with unvaccinated individuals (OR = 0.546, P < 0.001; OR = 0.356, P < 0.001; and OR = 0.472, P < 0.001). However, the ChAdOx1-S or Ad26.COV2.S vaccination group showed a higher reinfection rate than the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination group (OR = 4.419, P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, completion of the basic vaccination series showed significant protection against reinfection compared with no vaccination. If the first or second booster vaccination was received, the protective effect against reinfection was higher than that of basic vaccination; when vaccinated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 only or heterologous vaccination, the protective effect was higher than that of ChAdOx1-S or Ad26.COV2.S vaccination only.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是调查基线炎症,在COVID-19住院患者中,止血指标和新发深静脉血栓形成(DVT)与死亡风险有关。在这项单中心研究中,共有401名COVID-19患者在邵逸夫医院住院,浙江大学医学院于2022年12月1日至2023年1月31日入学。基本信息,第一次实验室检查结果,影像学检查,比较中度和重度亚组患者的结局相关指标。我们发现,在重症COVID-19住院患者中,基线D-二聚体和基线中性粒细胞绝对计数(ANC)水平与新发DVT和死亡相关。基线D-二聚体和基线ANC与死亡率的比值比(OR)为1.18(95%置信区间[CI],1.08-1.28;P<.001)和1.13(95%CI,1.06-1.21;P<.001)。基线ANC与重症住院COVID-19患者的死亡风险相关,无论DVT状态如何。此外,在患有DVT的严重COVID-19住院患者或住院期间死亡患者中,观察到血清中性粒细胞活性显著升高.新发DVT部分介导基线D-二聚体之间的关联(间接效应:0.011,估计介导比例:67.0%),基线ANC(间接效应:0.006,估计中介比例:48.7%),严重COVID-19住院患者的死亡率。总之,在重症COVID-19住院患者,尤其是DVT住院患者中,基线D-二聚体和基线中性粒细胞绝对计数(ANC)水平与死亡率相关.新发DVT部分介导了基线D-二聚体之间的关联,基线ANC,严重COVID-19住院患者的死亡率。
    The purpose of the study was to investigate baseline inflammatory, hemostatic indicators and new-onset deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with the risk of mortality in COVID-19 inpatients. In this single-center study, a total of 401 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were enrolled from December 1, 2022 to January 31, 2023. The basic information, first laboratory examination results, imaging examination, and outcome-related indicators were compared between patients in the moderate and severe subgroups. We found that baseline D-dimer and baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) levels were associated with new-onset DVT and death in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The odds ratio (OR) of baseline D-dimer and baseline ANC with mortality was 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.28; P < .001) and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.06-1.21; P < .001). Baseline ANC was associated with the risk of death in severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients, irrespective of the DVT status. In addition, a significantly higher serum neutrophil activity was observed in severe COVID-19 inpatients with DVT or those deceased during hospital stay. New-onset DVT partially mediated the association between baseline D-dimer (indirect effect: 0.011, estimated mediating proportion: 67.0%), baseline ANC (indirect effect: 0.006, estimated mediating proportion: 48.7%), and mortality in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In summary, baseline D-dimer and baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) levels were associated with the mortality in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19, especially DVT inpatients. New-onset DVT partially mediated the association between baseline D-dimer, baseline ANC, and mortality in severe hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号