Early onset ataxias (EOAs) are a heterogeneous group of rare neurological disorders that not only involve the central and peripheral nervous system but also involve other organs. They are mainly manifested by degeneration or abnormal development of the cerebellum occurring before the age of 25 years and typically the pattern of inheritance is autosomal recessive.The diagnosis of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias (ARCAs) is confirmed by the clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological examination, neuroimaging findings, and mutation analysis when the causative gene is detected. Correct diagnosis is crucial for appropriate genetic counseling, estimating the prognosis, and, in some cases, pharmacological intervention. The wide variety of genotypes with a heterogeneous phenotypic manifestation makes the diagnostic work-up challenging, time-consuming, and expensive, not only for the clinician but also for the children and their parents. In this review, we focused on the step-by-step approach in which cerebellar ataxia is a prominent sign. We also outline the most common disorders in ataxias with early-onset manifestations.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of an inherited predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML has important clinical implications for treatment decisions, surveillance, and care of at-risk relatives. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recently incorporated recommendations for germline genetic evaluation of patients with MDS/AML on the basis of personal and family history features, but the practicality of implementing these recommendations has not been studied.
METHODS: A hereditary hematology quality improvement (QI) committee was formed to implement these guidelines in a prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with MDS/AML. Referral for germline genetic testing was recommended for patients meeting NCCN guideline criteria. Referral patterns and genetic evaluation outcomes were compared with a historical cohort of patients with MDS/AML. Barriers to evaluation were identified.
RESULTS: Of the 90 patients with MDS/AML evaluated by the QI committee, 59 (66%) met criteria for germline evaluation. Implementation of the QI committee led to more referrals for germline evaluation in accordance with NCCN guidelines (31% v 14%, P = .03). However, the majority of those meeting criteria were never referred due to high medical acuity or being deceased or in hospice at the time of QI committee recommendations. Despite this, two (17%) of the 12 patients undergoing genetic testing were diagnosed with a hereditary myeloid malignancy syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: Current NCCN guidelines resulted in two thirds of patients with MDS/AML meeting criteria for germline evaluation. A hereditary hematology-focused QI committee aided initial implementation and modestly improved NCCN guideline adherence. However, the high morbidity and mortality and prolonged inpatient stays associated with MDS/AML challenged traditional outpatient genetic counseling models. Further improvements in guideline adherence require innovating new models of genetic counseling and testing for this patient population.

BACKGROUND: The CanRisk tool, which operationalises the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) is used by Clinical Geneticists, Genetic Counsellors, Breast Oncologists, Surgeons and Family History Nurses for breast cancer risk assessments both nationally and internationally. There are currently no guidelines with respect to the day-to-day clinical application of CanRisk and differing inputs to the model can result in different recommendations for practice.
METHODS: To address this gap, the UK Cancer Genetics Group in collaboration with the Association of Breast Surgery and the CanGene-CanVar programme held a workshop on 16th of May 2023, with the aim of establishing best practice guidelines.
RESULTS: Using a pre-workshop survey followed by structured discussion and in-meeting polling, we achieved consensus for UK best practice in use of CanRisk in making recommendations for breast cancer surveillance, eligibility for genetic testing and the input of available information to undertake an individualised risk assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Whilst consensus recommendations were achieved, the meeting highlighted some of the barriers limiting the use of CanRisk in clinical practice and identified areas that require further work and collaboration with relevant national bodies and policy makers to incorporate wider use of CanRisk into routine breast cancer risk assessments.

OBJECTIVE: This document addresses the clinical application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies for prenatal genetic diagnosis and aims to establish clinical practice recommendations in Spain to ensure uniformity in implementing these technologies into prenatal care.
METHODS: A joint committee of expert obstetricians and geneticists was created to review the existing literature on fetal NGS for genetic diagnosis and to make recommendations for Spanish healthcare professionals.
RESULTS: This guideline summarises technical aspects of NGS technologies, clinical indications in prenatal setting, considerations regarding findings to be reported, genetic counselling considerations as well as data storage and protection policies.
CONCLUSIONS: This document provides updated recommendations for the use of NGS diagnostic tests in prenatal diagnosis. These recommendations should be periodically reviewed as our knowledge of the clinical utility of NGS technologies, applied during pregnancy, may advance.

Uniparental disomy (UPD)-related imprinting disorders are a group of congenital disorders which can lead to severe birth defects. Their molecular etiology is the occurrence of UPD in the genomic imprinting regions, which may cause disturbed expression of parent-of-origin imprinted genes. With the widespread applications of genetic testing techniques, the prenatal diagnosis of UPD-related imprinted diseases has gradually become clinical routines. However, due to the complicated pathogenesis of such disorders, currently there is still a lack of standards and norms for the understanding, diagnosis, management and genetic counseling. By referring to the relevant guidelines and consensus, the latest progress of research, and opinions from experts in the relevant fields, the writing group has formulated a consensus over the prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling for UPD-related imprinting disorders, with an aim to provide a more accurate and rational evaluation in prenatal clinics.

α-thalassemia is a type of microcytic hypochromic anemia caused by variants of alpha-globin gene, and is one of the most common monogenic disorders in southern China. The population screening model based on hematologic phenotype has achieved great results in areas with high incidence of thalassemia. However, with the continuous decline of the cost of genetic testing and implementation of screening programs for thalassemia gene carriers, more variants in the alpha-globin gene have been discovered, which also brings great challenges to clinical genetic counseling. From the perspective of alpha-globin genetic analysis, this consensus has discussed the contents of pre- and post-test genetic counseling, with an aim to provide standardized guidance for clinicians.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease with a carrier frequency of 1/60 ~ 1/40, is characterized by severe clinical symptoms, high mortality rate, and expensive treatment costs. Carrier screening is of paramount importance to detect high-risk couples, and therefore to reduce the occurrence of SMA. In China, SMA carrier screening has become widespread, though there is still a lack of genetic counseling expertise. This article has focused on the current challenges for SMA carrier screening, including the screening methods, target population, screening procedures, and pre-/post-testing counseling. The aim is to standardize its application and counseling in the clinical practice.

Dystrophinopathies caused by variants of DMD gene are a group of muscular diseases including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Becker muscular dystrophy, and DMD-associated dilated cardiomyopathy. With the advancement of genetic testing techniques and wider implementation of genetic screening, especially the expanded carrier screening, more and more individuals carrying DMD gene variants have been identified, whereas the genetic counseling capacity is relatively insufficient. Currently there is still a lack of professional norms for genetic counseling on dystrophinopathies. In this consensus, the main points to be covered in the pre- and post-test consultation have been discussed, with an aim to provide genetic counseling guidance for the disease diagnosis, treatment, and family reproduction.

Objective: To compare the differences between the variation interpretation standards and guidelines issued by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) in 2015 (The 2015ACMG/AMP guideline) and the Deafness Specialist Group of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) in 2018 for hereditary hearing loss (Healing loss, HL) issued the expert specification of the variation interpretation guide (The 2018 HL-EP guideline) in evaluating the pathogenicity of OTOF gene variation in patients with auditory neuropathy. Methods: Thirty-eight auditory neuropathy patients with OTOF gene variant were selected as the study subjects (23 males and 15 females, aged 0.3-25.9 years). Using whole-genome sequencing, whole exome sequencing or target region sequencing (Panel) combined with Sanger sequencing, 38 cases were found to carry more than two OTOF mutation sites. A total of 59 candidate variants were independently interpreted based on the 2015 ACMG/AMP guideline and 2018 HL-EP guideline. Compared with the judgment results in 2015 ACMG/AMP guideline, the variants interpreted as lower pathogenic classifications in the 2018 HL-EP guideline were defined as downgraded variants, and the variants regarded as higher pathogenic classifications were defined as upgraded variants. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 20.0. Results: The concordance rate of variant classification between the guidelines was 72.9%(43/59). The 13.6%(8/59) of variants were upgraded and 13.6% (8/59) of variants downgraded in the classifications of the 2018 HL-EP guideline. A couple of rules saw significant differences between the guidelines (PVS1, PM3, PP2, PP3 and PP5). The distribution of pathogenicity of splicing mutation was statistically different (P=0.013). Conclusions: The 2018 HL-EP guideline is inconsistent with the 2015 ACMG/AMP guideline, when judging the pathogenicity of OTOF gene variants in patients with auditory neuropathy. Through the deletion and refinement of evidence and the breaking of solidification thinking, the 2018 HL-EP guideline makes the pathogenicity grading more traceable and improves the credibility.
目的： 对比2015年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会（American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics，ACMG）和分子病理学会（Association for Molecular Pathology，AMP）发布的变异解读标准与指南（本文中简称2015 ACMG/AMP指南）与2018年临床基因组资源中心（Clinical Genome Resource，ClinGen）耳聋专病小组针对遗传性听力损失（hearing loss，HL）发布的变异解读指南专家规范（本文中简称2018HL专病指南）在评估听神经病患者OTOF基因变异致病性中的异同。 方法： 以38例OTOF基因变异听神经病患者作为研究对象（男23例、女15例，年龄范围0.3~25.9岁），经全基因组重测序、全外显子组测序或目标区域靶向（Panel）测序结合一代Sanger测序验证，38例听神经病患者均检出携带两个以上OTOF变异位点，共计59个候选位点，分别使用2015ACMG/AMP指南以及2018HL专病指南对其致病性进行判断。与2015年指南判断结果相比，2018年指南判断的致病性等级更强定义为升级，更弱定义为降级。采用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计学分析。 结果： 2015 ACMG/AMP指南和2018 HL专病指南的变异分类一致率为72.9%（43/59）。致病性升级变异位点占13.6%（8/59），致病性降级变异位点占13.6%（8/59）。两指南致病性判定不一致主要集中在PVS1、PM3、PP2、PP3以及PP5等级证据的应用上。剪接变异、错义变异、框内插入/缺失以及同义变异致病性分布发生改变，其中剪接变异改变差异具有统计学意义（P=0.013）。 结论： 针对听神经病患者OTOF基因变异进行致病性判断时，2018HL专病指南与2015ACMG/AMP指南存在不一致，2018HL专病指南对证据进行删减及进一步细分，打破常规对于变异类型的固化思维，使得致病性分级更有迹可循，提高可信度。.

BACKGROUND: Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a penetrant cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) associated with the development of many tumor types in young people including osteosarcoma and breast cancer (BC). The McGill Interactive Pediatric OncoGenetic Guidelines (MIPOGG) decision-support tool provides a standardized approach to identify patients at risk of CPSs.
METHODS: We conducted a cost-utility analysis, from the healthcare payer perspective, to compare MIPOGG-guided, physician-guided, and universal genetic testing strategies to detect LFS in female patients diagnosed at an age of less than 18 years with osteosarcoma. We developed a decision tree and discrete-event simulation model to simulate the clinical and cost outcomes of the three genetic referral strategies on a cohort of female children diagnosed with osteosarcoma, especially focused on BC as subsequent cancer. Outcomes included BC incidence, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), healthcare costs, and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs). We conducted probabilistic and scenario analyses to assess the uncertainty surrounding model parameters.
RESULTS: Compared to the physician-guided testing, the MIPOGG-guided strategy was marginally more expensive by $105 (-$516; $743), but slightly more effective by 0.003 (-0.04; 0.045) QALYs. Compared to MIPOGG, the universal testing strategy was $1333 ($732; $1953) more costly and associated with 0.011 (-0.043; 0.064) additional QALYs. The ICUR for the MIPOGG strategy was $33,947/QALY when compared to the physician strategy; the ICUR for universal testing strategy was $118,631/QALY when compared to the MIPOGG strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for clinical and policy decision-making on the cost-effectiveness of genetic referral strategies to identify LFS in the setting of osteosarcoma. MIPOGG-guided strategy was most likely to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold value of $50,000/QALY.