Diabetic wounds are more complex than normal chronic wounds because of factors such as hypoxia, reduced local angiogenesis, and prolonged inflammation phase. Fibrous proteins, including collagen, fibrin, laminin, fibronectin, elastin etc., possess excellent inherent properties that make them highly advantageous in the area of wound healing. Accumulating evidence suggests that they contribute to the healing process of diabetic wounds by facilitating the repair and remodel of extracellular matrix, stimulating the development of vascular and granulation tissue, and so on. However, there is currently a lack of a comprehensive review of the application of these proteins in diabetes wounds. An overview of fibrous protein characteristics and the alterations linked to diabetic wounds is given in this article\'s initial section. Next is a summary of the advanced applications of fibrous proteins in the last five years, including acellular dermal matrix, hydrogel, foam, scaffold, and electrospun nanofibrous membrane. These dressings have the ability to actively promote healing in addition to just covering wounds compared to traditional wound dressings like gauze or bandage. Research on fibrous proteins and their role in diabetic wound healing may result in novel therapeutic modalities that lower the incidence of diabetic wounds and thereby enhance the health of diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of stem cell therapy from different sources on the ankle-brachial index, wound closure percentage, and wound closure time in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library\'s Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, extending through June 29, 2023. Quality evaluation was done using the Cochrane\'s bias risk assessment tool (RoB 2.0). Employing a Bayesian approach, the statistical computations was executed with the JAGS software, leveraging the gemtc 0.8-2 and rjags 4-10 libraries, within the R environment 4.1.2. The included interventions came from peripheral blood, bone marrow, placenta, umbilical cord blood, adipose tissue, or others.
RESULTS: A preliminary search identified 2286 articles, of which 23 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were ultimately included. The analysis findings indicated that mesenchymal stem cells derived from the umbilical cord (HUCMSCs) led to a notable enhanced the ankle-brachial index in patients with DFUs compared to standard treatment (MD: 0.2; 95% CI [0.01, 0.36]). HUCMSCs were found to be the optimal therapeutic approach for enhancing the ankle-brachial index (SUCRA = 82.7%). Research on the wound closure percentage revealed that compared to platelet-rich plasma (PRP), processed microvascular tissue (PMVT), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy (ABMSCT), adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), and dehydrated human umbilical cord allograft (EpiCord), Huoxue Shengji Decoction (HXSJD) + ABMSCT (H_Group_hematopoietic) significantly increased the wound closure percentage in DFU patients (P < 0.05). According to the SUCRA ranking, HXSJD + ABMSCT was the best therapeutic method to increase the percentage of wound closure (SUCRA = 93.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study employed a network meta-analysis method, combining direct and indirect comparisons, to analyze the latest clinical data and concluded that umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and the combination of HXSJD + autologous bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell treatment as adjunctive therapies for DFUs may have beneficial effects. Future research needs to focus on this.

UNASSIGNED: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications that induce a high risk of lower extremity amputations and mortality. Compared with the standard of care, few reports analyzed the outcome of surgical treatment mainly for diabetic toe deformities and ulcers. The aim of this study is to collate evidence on the outcomes of interphalangeal resection arthroplasty (IP-RA) in preventing and treating diabetic toe ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joint.
UNASSIGNED: A search strategy has been developed including electronic databases from inception. Only ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joints were included. Noninfected and infected ulcers were also included at any toe location (dorsal/side/plantar). Outcomes were defined as healing rate, time to heal, ulcer recurrence, ulcer transfer, postintervention infection, wound dehiscence, and additional surgeries including amputation. Proportional meta-analysis was conducted for frequency outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Six observational studies comprising 217 patients with 244 IP-RA procedures were included. The mean follow-up period was 23.4 ± 8.2 months. Weighted frequencies were as follows: healing rate (93.6%), ulcer recurrence frequency (4.3%), ulcer transfer frequency (15.4%), postoperative infection (10.5%), wound dehiscence (17.8%), revision surgery (5%), and amputation rate (3.4%). The mean healing time was 4.3 ± 1.8 weeks.
UNASSIGNED: This review suggests that IP-RA is effective in preventing and treating diabetic toe deformities and ulcers with a modest rate of complications for this specific and often challenging clinical presentation.

Significance: This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant review focuses on the efficacy of cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products (CAMPs) in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Recent Advances: Although CAMPs have been incorporated into the clinical algorithm for chronic wounds, evidence is lacking to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of these products. Critical Issues: Level 1 RCT studies are the gold standard to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment approaches; however, due to differences in surgical techniques, patient demographics, and compliance, standard-of-care (SOC) outcomes in the wound care space can vary significantly between different RCTs, making it difficult to compare them against each other. Future Directions: To mitigate variability between different RCTs, wound closure outcomes can be reported as risk ratios (RRs). This review of all the currently published RCTs (with a similar trial design) in patients with DFU and RRs confirms that CAMPs adjunct to SOC result in statistically superior wound closure outcomes in DFUs, when compared with SOC alone, with a RR of 1.72 [1.56, 1.90], p < 0.00001. Enough evidence is still lacking to determine a statistical difference between broad categories of cellular/acellular and amniotic/nonamniotic CAMPs, and hence, decision makers should consider published head-to-head comparative studies, real-world evidence, and cost-effectiveness evidence between individual CAMPs to decide on which to use in practice.

UNASSIGNED: Research data suggests that ultrasound-assisted wound debridement (UAWD) can effectively promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). However, existing research is not consistent with this viewpoint. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate the effect of UAWD on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers.
UNASSIGNED: From the establishment of the database to January 2024, we searched 8 databases to study the effectiveness and safety of UAWD in the treatment of DFU. Two authors independently screened the qualifications of the articles, while two authors extracted relevant data. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 18.0 software.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 11 randomized controlled studies were included, with 6 countries and 696 participants participating. Our findings showed that UAWD was associated with a significant benefit in healing rate (OR = 2.60, 95% CI: [1.67, 4.03], P < 0.0001, I2 = 25%), wound healing time (MD = -11.94, 95% CI: [-23.65, -0.23], P = 0.05, I2 = 99%), percentage reduction in wound size (MD = 14.2, 95% CI: [10.8, 17.6], P = 0.47, I2 = 32%), effectiveness of treatment (OR = 10.3, 95% CI: [4.68, 22.66], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Moreover, UAWD did not cause any significant adverse reactions. However, there was no obvious difference in wound blood perfusion (MD = 0.25, 95% CI: [-0.01, 0.52], P = 0.06, I2 = 90%), transcutaneous oxygen partial pressure (MD = 14.34, 95% CI: [-10.03, 38.71], P = 0.25, I2 = 98%).
UNASSIGNED: UAWD can significantly improve wound healing rate, shorten wound healing time, accelerate wound area reduction, and improve clinical treatment effectiveness without significant adverse reactions. Although there is no significant difference in transcutaneous oxygen pressure and wound blood flow perfusion between UAWD and SWC. So we look forward to more scientifically blinded, placebo-controlled, high-quality studies in the future, to enable researchers to obtain more complete and accurate analytical data, in order to improve the scientific and credibility of the evidence.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024501198.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of human amniotic membranes (HAM) in treating venous and diabetic ulcers, which often pose challenges in healing. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, evaluating 10 relevant studies involving 633 participants. Findings revealed that HAM treatment significantly accelerated ulcer closure, demonstrating over 90% complete healing compared to standard care. Despite moderate heterogeneity among studies, the results strongly suggested the effectiveness and safety of HAM therapy for venous and diabetic leg ulcers. Further research with larger study cohorts is recommended to bolster the existing evidence supporting HAM in managing these challenging wounds.

Objective: The meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions on patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Approach: The authors conducted a comprehensive search across eight databases. The aim was to identify randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of telemedicine for patients with DFU. Methodological qualities of included studies were assessed using Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 to synthesize the findings. Results: Ten studies involving 1,678 patients with DFU were included in the meta-analysis. In comparison to the face-to-face intervention group, telemedicine interventions significantly reduced the amputation rate (risk ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.92, p = 0.02), decreased costs (mean difference [MD] = -4158.51, 95% CI = -7304.69 to -1012.34, p = 0.01), better controlled fasting blood glucose (MD = -0.89, 95% CI = -1.43 to -0.36, p = 0.001), and achieved superior glycated hemoglobin control (MD = -0.71, 95% CI = -1.01 to -0.41, p < 0.00001). No significant differences were observed between the telemedicine group and the face-to-face group in terms of healing rate, mortality, and healing time. Innovations: Our study suggests that telemedicine is a viable strategy for managing DFU. Conclusions: The meta-analysis indicates that telemedicine interventions have a positive effect on DFU. Nevertheless, more well-designed and high-quality studies are needed to reach a conclusion with greater confidence.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a significant threat to individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM), such as lower limb amputation and severe morbidity. Bioengineered skin substitutes (BSS) are alternatives to traditional interventions for treating DFUs, but their efficacy compared to standard wound care (SWC) or other treatment types, such as allografts, remains unknown. A scoping review of human studies was conducted to identify current approaches in the treatment of DFUs using BSS as compared with other treatment options. Systematic searches in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were conducted to identify comparative studies that enrolled 10 or more patients and evaluated wound healing outcomes (closure, time-to-healing, and area reduction). Database searches isolated articles published from 1 December 2012 to 1 December 2022 and were conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The literature search yielded 1312 articles, 24 of which were included for the qualitative analysis. Findings in these studies demonstrated that BSS outperformed SWC in all measured outcomes, suggesting that BSS may be a superior treatment for DFUs. Of the 24 articles, 8 articles compared human amniotic membrane allografts (hAMA) to BSS. Conflicting evidence was observed when comparing BSS and hAMA treatments, highlighting the need for future research.

UNASSIGNED: The aims of this study were to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of the off-label use of topical timolol as an adjunct treatment for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Furthermore, to review and analyse the existing literature regarding the use of topical timolol on wounds of varying aetiologies.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of literature in the English language published between May 1961-May 2021 on the application of topical timolol for hard-to-heal wounds in adults was performed. Each research study was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Studies eligible for inclusion in the review were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, observational studies of at least 4 weeks\' duration, case series and case studies. Search strategies were performed according to PRISMA guidelines and included MeSH terms and keyword searches.
UNASSIGNED: An initial 878 articles were identified from a search of PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS. Of these, 699 were reviewed for eligibility, 19 were read in full-text, and 12 were selected for inclusion in the review. In total, two RCTs and 10 observational studies, including five case studies, were analysed. All studies demonstrated efficacy and safety of topical timolol; however, statistical analysis remained limited by lack of blinding and small sample sizes.
UNASSIGNED: This review concludes with all currently available evidence that topical timolol may be considered as an effective and safe adjunct treatment for refractory wounds, primarily venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Given the overall safety, low cost and ease of application of topical timolol, this review provides evidence in favour of off-label use and should prompt further, more rigorous studies.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a significant challenge in diabetes care, demanding advanced approaches for effective prevention and management. Smart insoles using sensor technology have emerged as promising tools to address the challenges associated with DFU and neuropathy. By recognizing the pivotal role of smart insoles in successful prevention and healthcare management, this scoping review aims to present a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence regarding DFU studies related to smart insoles, offloading sensors, and actuator technologies. This systematic review identified and critically evaluated 11 key studies exploring both sensor technologies and offloading devices in the context of DFU care through searches in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect databases. Predominantly, smart insoles, mobile applications, and wearable technologies were frequently utilized for interventions and patient monitoring in diabetic foot care. Patients emphasized the importance of these technologies in facilitating care management. The pivotal role of offloading devices is underscored by the majority of the studies exhibiting increased efficient monitoring, prevention, prognosis, healing rate, and patient adherence. The findings indicate that, overall, smart insoles and digital technologies are perceived as acceptable, feasible, and beneficial in meeting the specific needs of DFU patients. By acknowledging the promising outcomes, the present scoping review suggests smart technologies can potentially redefine DFU management by emphasizing accessibility, efficacy, and patient centricity.