Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating disease with a broad overlap of symptomatology with Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS). Despite the severity of symptoms and various neurological, cardiovascular, microvascular, and skeletal muscular findings, no biomarkers have been identified. The Transient receptor potential melastatin 3 (TRPM3) channel, involved in pain transduction, thermosensation, transmitter and neuropeptide release, mechanoregulation, vasorelaxation, and immune defense, shows altered function in ME/CFS. Dysfunction of TRPM3 in natural killer (NK) cells, characterized by reduced calcium flux, has been observed in ME/CFS and PCS patients, suggesting a role in ineffective pathogen clearance and potential virus persistence and autoimmunity development. TRPM3 dysfunction in NK cells can be improved by naltrexone in vitro and ex vivo, which may explain the moderate clinical efficacy of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) treatment. We propose that TRPM3 dysfunction may have a broader involvement in ME/CFS pathophysiology, affecting other organs. This paper discusses TRPM3\'s expression in various organs and its potential impact on ME/CFS symptoms, with a focus on small nerve fibers and the brain, where TRPM3 is involved in presynaptic GABA release.

Background: The investigation of C-fiber-evoked ultralow-level responses (ULEPs) at somatic sites is difficult in clinical practice but may be useful in patients with small fiber neuropathy. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate changes in LEPs and ULEPs in patients with fibromyalgia affected or not by abnormal intraepidermal innervation. Methods: We recorded LEPs and ULEPs of the hand, thigh and foot in 13 FM patients with a normal skin biopsy (NFM), 13 patients with a reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (AFM) and 13 age-matched controls. We used a YAP laser, changing the energy and spot size at the pain threshold for LEPs and at the heat threshold for ULEPs. Results: ULEPs occurred at a small number of sites in both the NFM and AFM groups compared to control subjects. The absence of ULEPs during foot stimulation was characteristic of AFM patients. The amplitude of LEPs and ULEPs was reduced in patients with AFM at the three stimulation sites, and a slight reduction was also observed in the NFM group. Conclusions: The present preliminary results confirmed the reliability of LEPs in detecting small fiber impairments. The complete absence of ULEPs in the upper and lower limbs, including the distal areas, could confirm the results of LEPs in patients with small fiber impairments. Further prospective studies in larger case series could confirm the present findings on the sensitivity of LEP amplitude and ULEP imaging in detecting small fiber impairments and the development of IENFD in FM patients.

Currently, there are more than 10 million patients with diabetes mellitus in Japan. Therefore, the need to explore the pathogenesis of diabetes and the complications leading to its cure is becoming increasingly urgent. Pathological examination of pancreatic tissues from patients with type 2 diabetes reveals a decrease in the volume of beta cells because of a combination of various stresses. In human type 2 diabetes, islet amyloid deposition is a unique pathological change characterized by proinflammatory macrophage (M1) infiltration into the islets. The pathological changes in the pancreas with islet amyloid were different according to clinical factors, which suggests that type 2 diabetes can be further subclassified based on islet pathology. On the other hand, diabetic peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent diabetic complication. In early diabetic peripheral neuropathy, M1 infiltration in the sciatic nerve evokes oxidative stress or attenuates retrograde axonal transport, as clearly demonstrated by in vitro live imaging. Furthermore, islet parasympathetic nerve density and beta cell volume were inversely correlated in type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats, suggesting that diabetic peripheral neuropathy itself may contribute to the decrease in beta cell volume. These findings suggest that the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral neuropathy may be interrelated.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate treatment efficacy on composite and non-length-dependent (NLD) punch biopsy specimens from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in pure small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) with trisulfated heparin disaccharide (TS-HDS), fibroblast growth factor-3 (FGFR-3), or Plexin D1 antibodies. SFN has an increasing prevalence, and over 30% of cases may be immune-mediated. TS-HDS, FGFR-3, and Plexin D1 autoantibodies have been shown to be present in 44%-55% of cryptogenic SFN cases, suggesting an immune mechanism. Reports have shown IVIG to be effective for this condition, but some controversy exists based on length-dependent (LD) post-IVIG treatment data in a recent trial.
METHODS: In a retrospective review, all pure SFN cases tested for the 3 antibodies from January 2021 to May 2022 were tabulated, and patients who underwent IVIG treatment were separated and analyzed for changes in epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFD) on skin biopsy, as well as SFN-specific questionnaire and pain scores.
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with pure SFN had antibody testing. Sixty of these (66%) were seropositive, and 31 (34%) were seronegative. Seventeen seropositive patients (13 female patients, 4 male patients, 6 FGFR-3, 2 TS-HDS, 4 Plexin D1, 2 with all 3 antibodies, 1 with FGFR-3 and Plexin D1, 1 with FGFR-3 and TS-HDS, and 1 with TS-HDS and Plexin D1) underwent IVIG treatment. Of these, 2 patients stopped treatment due to side effects, and the remaining 15 completed at least 6 months of IVIG. Of these, 12 had a post-IVIG skin biopsy, and of these, 11 (92%) had a 55.1% improved mean composite ENFD (P = 0.01). NLD-ENFD specimens improved by 42.3% (P = 0.02), and LD-ENFD specimens improved by 99.7% (P = 0.01). Composite ENFD in Plexin D1-SFN patients improved by 139% (P = 0.04). In addition, 14 patients had questionnaires pre-IVIG/post-IVIG, and average pain decreased by 2.7 (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: IVIG shows disease-modifying effect in immune SFN with novel antibodies, especially Plexin D1-SFN, as well as significantly improved pain. NLD-ENFD should be examined as well as LD-ENFD to see this effect. Further randomized controlled trials looking at NLD-ENFD as well as LD-ENFD improvement, along with pain and SFN-specific questionnaires, are needed to confirm these findings.

OBJECTIVE: Small fiber neuropathy presents a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. To solve this challenge, efforts have been made to identify autoantibodies associated with this condition. Previous literature has often considered tri-sulfated heparin disaccharide (TS-HDS) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) as a singular seropositive group and/or focused primarily on symptomatic associations.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-two small fiber neuropathy patients with a Washington University Sensory Neuropathy panel were selected for TS-HDS seropositivity, FGFR-3 seropositivity, and seronegative controls. Data were collected to on the demographic, symptomatic, and laboratory profiles of each subgroup.
RESULTS: Percent female (P = 0.0043), frequency of neuropathic pain symptoms (P = 0.0074), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.0293), vitamin D (P < 0.0001), and vitamin B12 (P = 0.0033) differed between the groups. Skin biopsy was more frequently normal within both the FGFR-3 and the TS-HDS cohort (P = 0.0253).
CONCLUSIONS: TS-HDS and FGFR-3 display a distinct phenotype from both controls and one another. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) against FGFR-3 and IgM against TS-HDS may be individually valuable markers for the development of distinct clinical phenotypes.

We report the case of a 27-year-old man with transthyretin amyloidosis secondary to the p.Val142Ile mutation with an atypical clinical presentation of predominantly lower limb polyneuropathy without cardiac involvement. p.Val142Ile is mainly associated with cardiopathy, whereas the neuropathic phenotype is mainly associated with p.Val50Met. Our patient belongs to a non-endemic region and due to his lack of support network a possible familial component is unknown. His case represents a diagnostic challenge given the wide heterogeneity of clinical manifestations associated with the disease, with other possible diagnoses of polyneuropathy being reasonably excluded according to prevalence and frequency. The particularly unusual genotype-phenotype association distinguishes this case from the classic description of transthyretin amyloidosis secondary to p.Val142Ile.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: In this study, we intend to evaluate the occurrence of small fiber neuropathy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
UNASSIGNED: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a sensory neuropathy that results from the degeneration of small Aδ and unmyelinated C fibers. SFN manifests positive symptoms, such as tingling, burning, prickling, and aching, and negative symptoms, including numbness, tightness, and coldness. The SFN coexistence with other comorbidities (e.g., fibromyalgia, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease) has been reported in previous studies.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the coexistence of SFN and IBS. Forty-two IBS patients and forty-three healthy individuals were asked to complete the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) questionnaire. Results greater than three (>3) were considered positive. Participants with positive MNSI questionnaire results were examined for any neuropathy signs according to the Utah Early Neuropathy Scale (UENS) examination. The participants with positive results for the questionnaire and examination were checked for the sural and the superficial peroneal nerve conduction study (NCS). Normal NCS represented intact large fibers and the diagnosis of SFN.
UNASSIGNED: Ten participants, 7 (16.7 %) in the IBS group and 3 (6.9 %) in the healthy group, had positive results for the questionnaire. Four participants were positive for the examination, with normal NCS, and were classified as SFN-positive. All four SFN diagnoses were from the IBS group. No one in the healthy group was diagnosed with SFN. We could find a significant statistical difference (p<0.05) between the IBS and healthy groups regarding the prevalence of SFN diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: The co-occurrence of SFN and IBS suggests the possibility of a generalized neuropathy syndrome characterized by widespread neuronal impairment. Thus, any peripheral neuropathy symptom in IBS patients (and potentially other chronic pain disorders) should be evaluated for SFN since timely diagnosis and proper treatment result in a better quality of life for the patients.

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a common and debilitating disease in which the terminals of small diameter sensory axons degenerate, producing sensory loss, and in many patients neuropathic pain. While a substantial number of cases are attributable to diabetes, almost 50% are idiopathic. An underappreciated aspect of the disease is its late onset in most patients. Animal models of human genetic mutations that produce SFN also display age-dependent phenotypes suggesting that aging is an important contributor to the risk of development of the disease. In this review we define how particular sensory neurons are affected in SFN and discuss how aging may drive the disease. We also evaluate how animal models of SFN can define disease mechanisms that will provide insight into early risk detection and suggest novel therapeutic interventions.

BACKGROUND: In almost half of patients suffering from small fiber neuropathies (SFN), the etiology remains elusive. For these patients with \"idiopathic SFN\", symptomatic analgesic therapy is the only option. Reports on a potential genetic background of neuropathic pain syndromes are increasing and particularly in SFN patients, several genetic variants were found mainly located in genes encoding voltage-gated sodium channels. Although up to 30% of SFN patients show genetic alterations, most of these remain of \"unknown pathogenic significance\" and little is known about \"genetic SFN\".
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine clinical characteristics of SFN patients carrying a rare genetic variant of unknown significance in pain-associated genes.
METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, 66 patients with primarily idiopathic SFN were examined and rare gene variants of unknown significance detected in 13/66 (20%) of these. A detailed medical history with focus on pain was recorded and patients filled in standardized questionnaires to assess physical and emotional burden due to pain.
RESULTS: The authors found 13/66 (20%) patients with rare variants of unknown significance located in pain-associated genes who reported pain refractory to analgesic treatment, a higher number of external factors influencing clinical symptoms, and a higher level of physical impairment and emotional stress due to pain compared with patients without such genetic variants.
CONCLUSIONS: Early genetic assessment is recommended to optimize the management of patients with potentially hereditary SFN. Early access to rehabilitation and mental support as well as a consequent elimination of external triggering factors should be granted.
UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Bei etwa der Hälfte der PatientInnen mit Small-Fiber-Neuropathie (SFN) findet sich für die Schmerzsymptomatik keine erklärende und behandelbare Ätiologie. Es häufen sich Berichte zu genetisch-neuropathischen Schmerzsyndromen. Auch einige SFN-PatientInnen weisen Variationen in schmerzassoziierten Genen auf. Teils sind diese bereits als „pathogen“ bestätigt, andere haben eine „unklare pathogenetische Relevanz“. Trotz des hohen Anteils betroffener PatientInnen ist über die genetische SFN bislang wenig bekannt.
UNASSIGNED: In unserer Arbeit fokussierten wir uns auf diese Kohorte: Durch Sammlung klinischer Daten sollten Charakteristika der PatientInnen mit seltenen Varianten unklarer Signifikanz in schmerzassoziierten Genen gesammelt werden.
METHODS: Von 2015 bis 2020 untersuchten wir 66 PatientInnen mit initial „idiopathischer“ SFN. Bei 13/66 (20 %) wurden Varianten unklarer pathogenetischer Relevanz in schmerzassoziierten Genen detektiert. Alle rekrutierten PatientInnen unterzogen sich einer detaillierten Anamneseerhebung mit Fokus auf Schmerz und beantworteten Fragebögen zu Beschwerden und Belastung.
UNASSIGNED: Die Kohorte mit seltener Variante in schmerzassoziierten Genen zeigte gegenüber den anderen PatientInnen subtile klinische Unterschiede: Neben einer höheren physischen und psychischen Belastung konnten eine von außen beeinflussbare Symptomatik und eine herausfordernde Therapie nachgewiesen werden.
CONCLUSIONS: Wir sehen eine frühzeitige genetische Diagnostik bei SFN als essenziell: Durch weitere supportive Maßnahmen wie Vermeidung von Einflussfaktoren, Stärkung der Resilienz und eventuell künftig verfügbare zielgerichtete Therapeutika kann die Versorgung der PatientInnen mit seltener Variante in schmerzassoziierten Genen optimiert werden.