Peripheral and autonomic neuropathy are common disease manifestations in systemic amyloidosis. The neurofilament light chain (NfL), a neuron-specific biomarker, is released into the blood and cerebrospinal fluid after neuronal damage. There is a need for an early and sensitive blood biomarker for polyneuropathy, and this systematic review provides an overview on the value of NfL in the early detection of neuropathy, central nervous system involvement, the monitoring of neuropathy progression, and treatment effects in systemic amyloidosis. A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed on 14 February 2024 for studies investigating NfL levels in patients with systemic amyloidosis and transthyretin gene-variant (TTRv) carriers. Only studies containing original data were included. Included were thirteen full-text articles and five abstracts describing 1604 participants: 298 controls and 1306 TTRv carriers or patients with or without polyneuropathy. Patients with polyneuropathy demonstrated higher NfL levels compared to healthy controls and asymptomatic carriers. Disease onset was marked by rising NfL levels. Following the initiation of transthyretin gene-silencer treatment, NfL levels decreased and remained stable over an extended period. NfL is not an outcome biomarker, but an early and sensitive disease-process biomarker for neuropathy in systemic amyloidosis. Therefore, NfL has the potential to be used for the early detection of neuropathy, monitoring treatment effects, and monitoring disease progression in patients with systemic amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVE: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a subtype of painful neuropathies defined by dysfunction of the Aδ and unmyelinated C fibers. It presents with both neuropathic pain and dysautonomia symptoms, posing a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. To address this challenge, research has been conducted to identify autoantibodies and define their association with phenotypes.
METHODS: Eleven cases of anti-plexin-D1 seropositive SFN were reviewed, along with relevant literature, in attempt to better define anti-plexin-D1 SFN demographics, symptoms, associated medical conditions, and therapeutics.
RESULTS: Anti-plexin-D1 SFN typically presents in female patients, with neuropathic pain, normal skin biopsy findings, and normal nerve conduction studies. Anti-plexin-D1 shows an association with concurrent chronic pain, with almost half of the patients undergoing an interventional procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-plexin-D1 represents a unique subgroup of SFN, defined by distinct demographics, phenotype, biopsy findings, and therapeutic management.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular diseases (NMD) emerged as one of the main side effects of the COVID-19 vaccination. We pooled and summarized the evidence on the clinical features and outcomes of NMD associated with COVID-19 vaccination.
METHODS: We comprehensively searched three databases, Medline, Embase, and Scopus, using the key terms covering \"Neuromuscular disease\" AND \"COVID-19 vaccine\", and pooled the individual patient data extracted from the included studies.
RESULTS: A total of 258 NMD cases following COVID-19 have been reported globally, of which 171 cases were Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), 40 Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS), 22 Myasthenia Gravis (MG), 19 facial nerve palsy (FNP), 5 single fiber neuropathy, and 1 Tolosa-Hunt syndrome. All (100%) SFN patients and 58% of FNP patients were female; in the remaining NMDs, patients were predominantly male, including MG (82%), GBS (63%), and PTS (62.5%). The median time from vaccine to symptom was less than 2 weeks in all groups. Symptoms mainly appeared following the first dose of vector vaccine, but there was no specific pattern for mRNA-based.
CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccines might induce some NMDs, mainly in adults. The age distribution and gender characteristics of affected patients may differ based on the NMD type. About two-thirds of the cases probably occur less than 2 weeks after vaccination.

Long term consequences of diabetes mellitus (DM) may include multi-organ complications such as retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, neuronal, and kidney damage. One of the most prevalent complication is diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), occurring in half of all diabetics, and is the main cause of disability globally with profound impact on a patient\'s quality of life. Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) can develop in the pre-diabetes stage preceding large fiber damage in DPN. Asymptomatic SFN is difficult to diagnose in early stages, with sudomotor dysfunction considered one of the earliest manifestations of autonomic neuropathy. Early detection is crucial as it can prevent potential cardiovascular events. Although punch skin biopsy is the gold-standard method for SFN diagnosis, implementation as routine screening is hindered due to its invasive, impractical, and time-consuming nature. Other sudomotor testing modalities, most of which evaluate the postganglionic cholinergic sympathetic nervous system, have been developed with varying sensitivity and specificity for SFN diagnosis. Here, we provide an overview on the general mechanism of DPN, the importance of sudomotor assessment for early detection of autonomic dysfunction in DPN, the benefits and disadvantages of current testing modalities, factors that may affect testing, and the importance of future discoveries on sudomotor testing for successful DPN diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Small fiber neuropathy [SFN] is a common peripheral neurologic disorder with a vast array of implicated etiologies. It has previously been proposed that some forms of immune-mediated small fiber neuropathy are driven by vasculitis, though antinuclear cytoplasmic antibodies [ANCA] antibodies have not commonly been reported in association with SFN, thus far. We present this case series to discuss the observation of a possible novel association between ANCA and SFN.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 6 patients with SFN and ANCA positivity, with and without systemic manifestations. Patients included were diagnosed with SFN by skin biopsy or autonomic function testing and were seropositive for ANCA by ELISA.
RESULTS: Six patients are outlined, including 4 females and 2 males. Antigen specific antibodies were MPO alone in 4 cases, PR3 alone in 1 case and both MPO and PR3 in 1 case. Systemic vasculitis was noted in 2 patients. Five patients received immunosuppression. Three patients experienced partial improvement, while symptoms stabilized in 3 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first series of patients with suspected immune-mediated SFN and ANCA antibody positivity, raising the possibility of ANCA mediated isolated SFN. This is in contradistinction to the more typical ANCA-mediated peripheral neuropathy manifestations of mononeuropathy multiplex or axonal sensorimotor neuropathy. We cannot unequivocally prove ANCA-associated vasculitis [AAV] causality in these cases; however, the stabilization in SFN symptomatology and associated improvement in ANCA antibody titer, after AAV treatment, may be indicative of an association.

Primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) is a chronic, systemic, autoimmune disorder characterized by lymphocytic infiltrates of the exocrine organs, leading to sicca symptoms and parotid enlargement. pSS has been linked to various neurological manifestations, including peripheral neuropathy (PN). We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the currently available evidence regarding pSS-related PN.
A literature search in the PubMed database was performed, and 49 papers were eligible to be included in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
The pooled prevalence of PN in pSS is estimated to be 15.0% (95% confidence interval = 10.7%-20.7%). The mean age of pSS patients at PN diagnosis is 59 years. Among the patients with pSS and PN, 83% are females. Neuropathic symptoms usually precede or lead to the pSS diagnosis at a 2:1 ratio in patients with pSS-related PN. The commonest type of pSS-related PN is distal axonal polyneuropathy (80% of patients with pSS-related PN), followed by sensory ganglionopathy. Peripheral and cranial mononeuropathies-particularly trigeminal-are also frequent. Risk factors for developing PN include increasing age and presence of vasculitis. Immune-mediated pathogenetic mechanisms are discussed. Glucocorticoids are the most commonly used treatment option for managing pSS-related PN, when associated with vasculitis, followed by the use of intravenous immunoglobulin.
PN is very common in pSS patients. Evidence on long-term prognosis of PN in pSS is limited, and further research is needed. Research into the use of immunosuppressive medication in nonvasculitic neuropathies in the context of pSS merits further consideration.

Small fiber neuropathy usually presents with gradual and progressive chronic length-dependent pain. Acute small fiber neuropathy is rarely reported. Three patients with acute onset neuropathic pain after Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S vaccination are described. Two patients were identified at the Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK and one patient in Red de Salud UC Christus, Santiago, Chile. All patients underwent a clinical assessment that included a detailed neurological examination, laboratory investigations, nerve conduction studies, thermal threshold testing, and skin biopsy for intra-epidermal nerve fiber density. Patients seen in Oxford underwent MRI of the brain and spinal cord. Cerebrospinal analysis was not performed. Neuropathic symptoms (burning pain, dysaesthesias) developed in the hands and feet within 2 weeks of vaccination. On clinical examination, there was pinprick and thermal hyposensitivity in the area of neuropathic pain. Laboratory investigation, nerve conduction tests, sympathetic skin responses, and MRI showed no relevant abnormalities. Thermal thresholds were abnormal and intra-epidermal nerve fiber density in the lower leg was reduced. In two cases symptoms persist after several months. Three cases of definite acute small fiber neuropathy after Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S vaccination are described. At follow up, neuropathic pain was present in two of the patients.

Over the last three decades, skin punch biopsy has become the gold standard for diagnosis of small fiber neuropathies, including autonomic neuropathies commonly seen in diabetics, patients with HIV, and children with hereditary sensory autonomic neuropathies and toxin-induced neuropathy. Clinical, biochemical, electrophysiological tests are inconclusive, making it difficult to diagnose and initiate treatment. A skin punch biopsy is easy to perform in the outpatient clinic, is highly sensitive, and provides an objective diagnosis. Importantly, it helps avoid performing invasive nerve biopsy in patients with small fiber neuropathy, thereby preventing complications such as non-healing of the biopsy site, which is common in these patients. Secondly, the greatest advantage of skin punch biopsies is that they can be repeated any number of times, unlike a nerve biopsy, and are useful to evaluate disease progression and therapeutic response. More recently, its use has been expanded to the diagnosis of large fiber neuropathies, inherited demyelinating neuropathies, etc., obviating the need for a nerve biopsy. The European Federation of Neurological Societies has published guidelines for evaluation to ensure uniformity with regard to the site of biopsy, processing, and quantification. The evaluation of the skin biopsy involves morphometric assessment of the intraepidermal nerve fiber density using PGP 9.5 immunostained sections by bright-field microscopy. This review focuses on the practical aspects of skin punch biopsy and its utility for the practicing pathologist.

Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are an essential aspect of the assessment of patients with peripheral neuropathies. However, conventional NCS do not reflect activation of small afferent fibers, including Aδ and C fibers. A definitive gold standard for laboratory evaluation of these fibers is still needed and therefore, clinical evaluation remains fundamental in patients with small fiber neuropathies (SFN). Several clinical and research techniques have been developed for the assessment of small fiber function, such as (i) microneurography, (ii) laser evoked potentials, (iii) contact heat evoked potentials, (iv) pain-related electrically evoked potentials, (v) quantitative thermal sensory testing, (vi) skin biopsy-intraepidermal nerve fiber density and (vii) corneal confocal microscopy. The first five are physiological techniques, while the last two are morphological. They all have advantages and limitations, but the combined use of an appropriate selection of each of them would lead to gathering invaluable information for the diagnosis of SFN. In this review, we present an update on techniques available for the study of small afferent fibers and their clinical applicability. A summary of the anatomy and important physiological aspects of these pathways, and the clinical manifestations of their dysfunction is also included, in order to have a minimal common background.

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a condition characterized by chronic widespread pain whose pathogenesis is still not fully defined. Evidence based on structural and functional neuroimaging methods, electrophysiological, and morphological - skin biopsy - features demonstrated a central and peripheral nervous system involvement. A dysfunction in nociceptive inputs processing at the central level was highlighted as the primary cause of FM, but other data coming from different laboratories contributed to emphasize again the peripheral origin of FM. In fact, small fibers neuropathy (SFN) was observed in a large number of patients submitted to skin biopsy. The complex interaction between central and peripheral factors is opening a new scenario about the management of this neurological disorder. Whether proximal SFN is an initiating event leading to FM or is the consequence of stress-related insular hyper excitability remains unclear. Mild sufferance of peripheral afferents could function as a trigger for an exaggerated response of the so-called \"salience matrix\" in predisposed individuals. On the other side, the intriguing hypothesis rising from animal models could indicate that the cortical hyper function could cause peripheral small afferent damage. The research should go on the genetic origin of such peripheral and central abnormalities, the acquired facilitating factors, and the presence of different phenotypes in order to search for efficacious treatments, which are still lacking.