renal stones

肾结石
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    流行病学研究报道了代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)与尿石症的风险之间的关联。然而,风险的大小以及该风险是否随MASLD的严重程度而变化仍不确定.我们对观察性研究进行了荟萃分析,以量化MASLD与尿石症之间的关联程度。我们系统地搜索了PubMed,Scopus,和WebofScience从数据库开始到2024年3月31日,使用预定义的关键字来识别相关的观察性研究,其中成像方法或调查问卷诊断为MASLD和尿石症。使用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。我们确定了7项横断面研究和1项前瞻性队列研究,收集了来自不同国家的248,936名成年人的数据。MASLD与尿石症的患病率增加显著相关(合并随机效应比值比1.87,95%CI1.34-2.60;I2=91%)。在那些根据年龄调整结果的研究中,这种关联仍然很重要,性别,种族,肥胖,糖尿病,和其他潜在的混杂因素。MASLD的超声检查严重程度与尿石症之间呈正分级相关。单前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析显示,MAFLD与发生尿石症的风险无关(合并随机效应风险比1.08,95%CI0.90-1.30),尽管在男性中报告了显著的关联。敏感性分析没有改变这些发现。漏斗图没有显示任何显著的发表偏倚。此更新的荟萃分析提供了MASLD与尿石症之间存在显着关联的证据。MASLD是否与发生尿石症的高风险相关还有待确定。
    Epidemiological studies have reported an association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and the risk of urolithiasis. However, the magnitude of the risk and whether this risk varies with the severity of MASLD remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to quantify the magnitude of the association between MASLD and urolithiasis. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception to March 31, 2024, using predefined keywords to identify relevant observational studies in which imaging methods or survey questionnaires diagnosed MASLD and urolithiasis. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modelling. We identified seven cross-sectional studies and one prospective cohort study with aggregate data on 248,936 adults from different countries. MASLD was significantly associated with an increased risk of prevalent urolithiasis (pooled random-effects odds ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.34-2.60; I2 = 91%). This association remained significant in those studies whose results were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, obesity, diabetes, and other potential confounders. There was a positive graded association between the ultrasonographic severity of MASLD and urolithiasis. Meta-analysis of the single prospective cohort study showed that MAFLD was not associated with risk of developing incident urolithiasis (pooled random-effects hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.90-1.30), although a significant association was reported in men. Sensitivity analyses did not modify these findings. The funnel plot did not reveal any significant publication bias. This updated meta-analysis provides evidence for a significant association between MASLD and the presence of urolithiasis. Whether MASLD is associated with a higher risk of developing incident urolithiasis remains to be established.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们试图前瞻性地评估先前失败的SWL对上尿路结石治疗后的URS结局的影响。
    方法:在2021年5月至2023年5月之间,有136例输尿管近端结石<1.5cm和肾结石<2.5cm的患者被前瞻性地分配到非SWL组,其中包括在URS之前没有SWL失败史的患者,和一个后SWL组,其中包括在URS之前有SWL失败史的患者.成功率是主要结果。比较两组患者的围手术期资料。
    结果:术后SWL组无结石率为83.3%,非SWL组为81.3%,术后SWL组8.3%和非SWL组9.4%有临床上不显著的残留片段。两组间结石清除率或成功率无显著差异。术中透视时间无显著差异,手术时间,术中结石外观,围手术期并发症,或在两个组之间检测到输尿管粘膜中存在嵌入的碎片。
    结论:与接受原发性URS的患者相比,接受上尿路结石抢救URS的患者无结石率相似,成功率,手术时间,透视次数,并发症发生率无明显差异。
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to prospectively evaluate the impact of previously failed SWL on subsequent URS outcomes in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones.
    METHODS: Between May 2021 and May 2023, one hundred thirty-six patients with proximal ureteral stones < 1.5 cm and renal stones < 2.5 cm who were candidates for URS were prospectively assigned to a non-SWL group, which included patients without a history of failed SWL before URS, and a post-SWL group, which included patients with a history of failed SWL before URS. The success rate was the primary outcome. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared.
    RESULTS: The stone-free rate was 83.3% in the post-SWL group versus 81.3% in the non-SWL group, and 8.3% in the post-SWL group versus 9.4% in the non-SWL group had clinically insignificant residual fragments. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate or success rate between the groups. No significant differences in intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative time, intraoperative stone appearance, perioperative complications, or the presence of embedded fragments in the ureteral mucosa were detected between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients who underwent primary URS, patients who underwent salvage URS for upper urinary tract stones had similar stone-free rates, success rates, operative times, fluoroscopy times, and complication rates without any significant differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)被认为是大尺寸肾结石的标准治疗选择,但存在出血和恢复时间延长等缺点。Mini-PCNL提供了一种侵入性较小的替代方案,但与标准PCNL相比,其对大于2厘米的肾结石的疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较标准PCNL与微型PCNL对2厘米以上肾结石的疗效和安全性。方法这项单中心前瞻性介入研究将在阿查亚·维诺巴·巴韦乡村医院(AVBRH)进行。该研究将包括18至70岁接受单侧PCNL治疗肾结石的患者。肾结石大于2厘米的患者将被纳入。无石率(SFR)数据,手术持续时间,住院时间,手术部位感染,血红蛋白(Hb)下降,需要输血,手术后的发烧将被收集并在两个程序之间进行比较。将使用描述性和分析性统计进行数据的统计分析。结果本研究共纳入32例患者。数据分析将使用IBMSPSSStatisticsforWindows,版本24(2016年发布;IBMCorp.,Armonk,纽约)。结论这项研究将为标准PCNL和mini-PCNL治疗大于2cm的肾结石的疗效和安全性方面的比较结果提供有价值的见解。
    Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered a standard treatment option for large-size renal stones but is associated with drawbacks such as bleeding and prolonged recovery. Mini-PCNL offers a less invasive alternative, but its efficacy compared to standard PCNL for renal stones larger than 2 cm remains under debate. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of standard PCNL versus mini-PCNL for renal stone sizes more than 2 cm. Methods This single-centre prospective interventional study will be conducted at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH). The study will include patients 18 to 70 years of age undergoing unilateral PCNL for renal calculi. Patients with renal stones larger than 2 cm will be enrolled. Data on stone-free rate (SFR), operative duration, hospital stay time, surgical site infection, haemoglobin (Hb) drop, need for blood transfusion, and post-surgery fever will be collected and compared between the two procedures. Statistical analysis of data will be performed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results The study aims to enrol a total of 32 patients. Data analysis will be done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24 (Released 2016; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). Conclusion This study will provide valuable insights into the comparative outcome in terms of efficacy and safety of standard PCNL and mini-PCNL for kidney stones larger than 2 cm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定利用大麦和欧芹来管理沙特阿拉伯人口中的尿石症。
    这是一项基于前瞻性横断面调查的研究。调查包括有关大麦使用的问题,欧芹,和其他治疗尿石症的疗法。带有研究调查链接的WhatsApp®消息已发送给家人,朋友,病人,和居住在沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)的其他熟人。
    共有1014名受访者完成了调查,其中44.8%表示他们使用大麦,38.3%的人表示他们使用欧芹,4.2%的人表示他们使用其他非医疗药物来治疗或预防肾结石。相比之下,只有29.5%的人表示他们使用柠檬酸钾和/或柠檬酸镁,只有14.4%的人表示他们消耗了更多的水来治疗或预防肾结石。
    我们的研究结果表明,在沙特阿拉伯人口中,诸如大麦和欧芹等非常规疗法更常用于治疗尿石症,而不是诸如增加水摄入量和使用柠檬酸钾/柠檬酸镁等既定疗法.有必要进行大规模的临床研究,以评估大麦的疗效和安全性,欧芹,和其他治疗尿石症的非常规疗法。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the utilization of barley and parsley for managing urolithiasis among the Saudi Arabian population.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective cross-sectional survey-based study. The survey comprised questions about the use of barley, parsley, and other therapies for managing urolithiasis. A WhatsApp® message with the link to the study survey was sent out to family, friends, patients, and other acquaintances residing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1014 respondents completed the survey, of which 44.8% indicated that they utilized barley, 38.3% stated that they used parsley, and 4.2% indicated that they utilized other non-medical remedies to treat or prevent kidney stones. In contrast, only 29.5% stated that they utilized potassium citrate and/or magnesium citrate, and only 14.4% indicated that they consumed greater amounts of water to treat or prevent kidney stones.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study findings indicate that among the Saudi Arabian population, non-conventional therapies such as barley and parsley are more commonly utilized for managing urolithiasis rather than established therapies such as increasing water intake and the use of potassium-citrate/ magnesium-citrate. There is a need to conduct large-scale clinical studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of barley, parsley, and other non-conventional therapies for treating urolithiasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾结石是由肾脏和泌尿道内发育的矿物质和盐形成的固体沉积物。虽然这种情况在成年人中更常见,儿童甚至婴儿也会受到影响。在非洲,儿科肾结石的发病率越来越高,同时在管理这种疾病方面面临着多种挑战。本范围审查旨在概述非洲小儿肾结石的管理方式。本研究利用系统评论和荟萃分析扩展进行范围范围评论(PRISMA-ScR)清单。在三个电子数据库中进行了系统的搜索:PubMed,非洲在线杂志(AJOL),和谷歌学者,整理了1180篇文章。经过广泛的检查,10条符合纳入标准。审查发现草酸钙结石是最常见的类型,占病例的34.03%,其次是wewellite结石和尿酸铵结石。结石最常见的部位是肾脏,最常见的症状是疼痛。腹盆腔超声是最常用的检查方法。在886例肾结石患者中,75.4%通过手术治疗,医学上2.9%,21.7%在没有干预的情况下自发解决。这篇综述确定了改善非洲儿童肾结石管理的机会,包括需要标准化的诊断和治疗方案,以及制定适合非洲背景的循证指南。总的来说,这项范围审查为非洲儿童肾结石的模式和管理提供了有价值的见解,并强调需要进一步研究以改善该地区对这种情况的管理。
    Renal stones are solid deposits formed from minerals and salts that develop within the kidneys and urinary tract. While the condition is more common among adults, children and even infants can also be affected. There is an increasing incidence of paediatric renal stones in Africa alongside multiple challenges faced in managing the condition. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the management modalities of paediatric renal stones in Africa. This study utilised Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. A systematic search was conducted in three electronic databases: PubMed, African Journal Online (AJOL), and Google Scholar, with 1,180 articles curated. After extensive examination, 10 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The review found that calcium oxalate stones were the most prevalent type, accounting for 34.03% of cases, followed by whewellite stones and ammonium urate stones. The most frequent location for stones was the kidney, and the most common symptom was pain. Abdominopelvic ultrasound was the most frequently utilised investigation. Of the 886 patients managed for renal stones, 75.4% were managed surgically, 2.9% medically, and 21.7% spontaneously resolved without intervention. This review identifies opportunities for improving the management of paediatric renal stones in Africa, including the need for standardised diagnostic and treatment protocols and the development of evidence-based guidelines tailored to the African context. Overall, this scoping review provides valuable insights into the patterns and management of paediatric renal stones in Africa and highlights the need for further research to improve the management of this condition in the region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和客观肾结石,也称为肾结石或肾结石,是在肾脏内形成晶体沉积并理想地通过尿道从体内排泄而没有疼痛的情况;但是,较大的结石可能会导致严重的疼痛,需要进一步的医疗援助。绝大多数发生肾结石的病人形成钙质结石,它们是草酸钙或磷酸钙的组合物。其他类型包括尿酸,鸟粪石,还有半胱氨酸.虽然肾结石是沙特人口中最重要的疾病之一,这需要紧急干预以防止严重的长期并发症,在沙特社区发表的关于这种情况的研究有限。鉴于此,我们进行这项研究来评估患病率,发病率,利雅得人群中肾结石的危险因素,沙特阿拉伯。方法这是一项在利雅得进行的横断面研究,沙特阿拉伯在2023年8月至10月之间,旨在评估利雅得省居民中肾结石的患病率和危险因素。数据是通过阿拉伯文和英文的电子问卷收集的,除了在利雅得的各个选定地点的条形码讲义外,还通过社交媒体分发。问卷涉及12个问题,分为三个部分。第一部分获得人口统计信息,而第二部分收集有关参与者过去病史的数据。最后,第三部分旨在评估参与者中肾结石的患病率或其家庭中的任何病史。结果共调查了1043名参与者,其中533人为男性(51.1%)。据报道,肾结石的患病率为98例(9.4%)。36-50岁、51-60岁和>60岁年龄组的个体显示肾结石患病率明显高于年轻年龄组(p<0.001)。发现吸烟者的患病率更高,糖尿病,高血压,和那些患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的人,痛风,慢性肾脏病(CKD),甲状腺功能亢进,和甲状旁腺功能亢进.服用钙补充剂或有肾结石家族史的参与者也发现肾结石的患病率更高。然而,只有高血压,痛风,家族史有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论高血压之间存在直接相关性,痛风,积极的家族史,利雅得省居民的老龄化和肾结石患病率增加。因此,我们鼓励地方当局提高公众对肾结石及其相关危险因素的认识。此外,需要进行进一步的本地研究,以更深入地了解肾结石的患病率,特别是与相关的合并症和疾病本身的模式有关。
    Background and objective Kidney stones, also referred to as nephrolithiasis or renal calculi, is a condition where crystal depositions are formed within the kidney and ideally excreted from the body via the urethra with no pain; however, larger calculi may cause significant pain and require further medical assistance. The vast majority of patients who develop renal calculi form calcium stones, which are either a composition of calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate. Other types include uric acid, struvite, and cysteine. While kidney stones are one of the most significant diseases among the Saudi population, which require an acute emergency intervention to prevent serious long-term complications, there are limited studies published regarding this condition in Saudi communities. In light of this, we performed this study to assess the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of kidney stones among the population of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between August and October 2023, aiming to estimate the prevalence and risk factors of nephrolithiasis among residents of the Riyadh province. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire in both Arabic and English and distributed via social media in addition to barcode handouts in various selected venues in Riyadh. The questionnaire involved 12 questions categorized into three sections. The first section obtained demographical information while the second section collected data about the past medical history of the participants. Lastly, the third section aimed to assess the prevalence of nephrolithiasis among participants or any history of the condition among their families. Results A total of 1,043 participants were surveyed, of whom 533 were males (51.1%). The prevalence of kidney stones was reported in 98 individuals (9.4%) overall. Individuals in the age groups of 36-50, 51-60, and >60 years showed significantly more renal stone prevalence than those in younger age groups (p<0.001). The prevalence was found to be higher in participants who were smokers, diabetic, hypertensive, and those who suffered from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), gout, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hyperthyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism. Participants who took calcium supplements or had a positive family history of renal stones were found to have a higher prevalence of renal stones as well. However, only hypertension, gout, and family history showed any statistical significance (p<0.05). Conclusions A direct correlation was observed between hypertension, gout, positive family history, and aging and an increased prevalence of kidney stones among the inhabitants of the Riyadh province. Therefore, we encourage the local authorities to raise awareness of kidney stones and their related risk factors among the general public. Moreover, further local studies need to be conducted to gain deeper insights into kidney stone prevalence, especially pertaining to associated comorbidities and the pattern of the disease itself.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在预测肾结石冲击波碎石(SWL)治疗成功率中的应用。
    方法:在本研究中,在2022年5月至2023年8月期间,对100例肾结石患者进行了SWL。将患者分为SWL应答者和非应答者2组。该研究比较了两组患者的基线参数,如年龄,性别,体重指数(BMI),石头尺寸,石头位置,石材密度(HU),皮肤到石头的距离(SSD),肾积水程度和结石弹性成像值。
    结果:无结石率与梗阻程度无统计学意义(p=0.628),结石大小(p=0.390)上花柱位置(p=0.17),中柱位置(p=0.66),和肾盂位置(p=1.0)。然而,关于较低的花坛位置,发现了统计学上显著的关系,石材密度(HU),和使用多变量分析的石头弹性成像值。
    结论:通过剪切波弹性成像(SWE)测量结石密度可作为SWL前决策中HU的替代方法。SWL的成功主要取决于石材场地,HU,和SWE值。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usage of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the prediction of the success rate of shock‑wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment of renal stones.
    METHODS: In the present study, SWL was performed for 100 patients presented with renal stones in the duration from May 2022 to August 2023. The patients were divided into 2 groups SWL responders and non-responders. The study compared between the 2 groups in terms of baseline parameters of the patients as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), stone size, stone location, stone density (HU), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), the degree of hydronephrosis and the stone elastography values.
    RESULTS: There was no statistically significant relation between stone-free rate and degree of obstruction (p = 0.628), stone size (p = 0.390) upper calyceal location (p = 0.17), middle calyceal location (p = 0.66), and renal pelvis location (p = 1.0). Nevertheless, a statistically significant relation was found as regards lower calyceal location, stone density (HU), and stone Elastography values using multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of stone density by shear wave elastography (SWE) can be used as an alternative to HU in decision-making before SWL. SWL success depends mainly on stone site, HU, and SWE values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一般来说,治疗泌尿系结石的方法有很多,其中经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种微创、高效的方法,现在成为泌尿结石的一线管理,特别是在复杂的石头和staghorne结石的情况下。准确评估石材位置,结石形态学,肾积水程度以及泌尿系统异常在经皮肾镜取石术中极为重要。
    本研究的目的是评估S.T.O.N.E评分以及影响PCNL疗效的其他因素。
    对71例肾结石患者的描述性研究,从2022年7月至2023年7月,在河内医科大学医院接受了PCNL和PCNL之前的泌尿系统多层CT扫描。所有患者均获得知情同意书并同意参与研究。这些因素包括石头面积,轨道长度(从皮肤表面到石头中心),尿路扩张的程度,涉及的花簇的数量,石头的密度,肾实质厚度,在MSCT非对比期上测量输尿管壁厚度和脂肪浸润。这些因素用于预测PCNL的有效性,包括结石清除率(SCR)和手术时间。
    患者组的平均年龄为53.8±12.3。男女比例为1.54。以下因素与手术时间之间存在显着差异(p<0.05):结石面积(<400、400-799、800-1599和>1600mm2),尿路扩张的程度(没有或可能有中度或重度扩张),涉及的柱体数量(≤2、3和staghorne结石),肾实质厚度(<18mm和≥18mm)。相比之下,以下因素与手术时间无显著差异(p>0.05):轨道长度(<100和≥100mm),和石材密度(<950和≥950HU)。关于S.T.O.N.E分数(包括五个因素:大小,轨道长度,妨碍,涉及的花簇数量,和评估石材密度),S.T.O.N.之间有很强的相关性E评分与手术时间(p<0.001,r=0.94),和SCR(p=0.001,r=-0.97)。
    对这些因素的评估在预测PCNL的有效性中起着重要作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Generally, there are many methods for the treatment of urinary stones, of which percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive and highly effective method, and now become the first-line management for urinary stones, especially in the cases of complex stones and staghorne calculi. Accurate assessment of stone location, stone morphology, degree of hydronephrosis as well as urinary system abnormalities is extremely important in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy strategy.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the S.T.O.N.E score as well as other factors that influenced the effectiveness of PCNL.
    UNASSIGNED: Descriptive study on 71 patients with kidney stones, who underwent multi-slice CT scan of the urinary system before PCNL and then PCNL at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from July 2022 to July 2023. All patients received the informed consent and agreed to participate in the study. The factors included the stone area, the track length (from the skin surface to the stone central), the degree of urinary tract dilatation, the number of involved calyces, the density of stone, the renal parenchyma thickness, the ureteral wall thickness and fat infiltration measured on MSCT non-contrast phase. These factors were used to predict the effectiveness of PCNL including the stone clearance rate (SCR) and the operation time.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age of the patient group was 53.8±12.3. The male/female ratio was 1.54. There was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the following factors and the operation time: the stone area (<400, 400-799, 800-1599 and >1600 mm2), the degree of urinary tract dilatation (no or might and moderate or severe dilatation), the number of involved calyces (≤ 2, 3 and staghorne calculi), the renal parenchyma thickness (<18 mm and ≥18mm). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the following factors and the surgery time (p>0.05): the track length (<100 and ≥100 mm), and the stone density (<950 and ≥950 HU). Regarding the S.T.O.N.E score (included five factors: Size, Track length, Obstruction, Number of involved calyces, and Evaluation of stone density), there was a strong correlation between S.T.O.N.E score and the surgery time (p<0.001, r=0.94), and the SCR (p=0.001, r=-0.97).
    UNASSIGNED: The evaluation of these factors played an important role in the prediction of the effectiveness of PCNL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:医疗器械公司推出了新的TFL机器,包括Soltive(奥林巴斯,Japan),纤维粉尘(量子系统,意大利),和TFLDrive(Coloplast,法国)。这项研究的主要目的是使用这些设备将我们最初的临床经验与TFL进行比较。通过对Thulium光纤激光碎石系统的历史比较,我们的目标是提高我们对实现安全有效的TFL参数的理解和方法。
    方法:此比较分析的数据是从先前发表的三个不同的前瞻性系列中提取的,概述了我们在Soltive(Olympus,Japan),纤维粉尘激光器(量子系统,意大利),和TFLDrive激光(Coloplast,法国)。参数,如石头尺寸,石材密度,激光接通时间(LOT),和激光设置被精心记录。此外,我们评估了每个碎石手术的关键变量,如消融速度(以mm3/s表示)和焦耳/mm3.
    结果:本研究共纳入149例患者。其中,对120例患者进行了有关肾结石的分析。在中值(IQR)结石体积中观察到统计学上的显着差异:TFLDrive为650(127-6027)mm3,1800(682.8-2760)mm3,用于Soltive,和1125(294-4000)mm3的纤维粉尘(p:0.007);而各组之间的石头密度没有差异。在中值(IQR)脉冲能量中发现了显著的变化,频率,和总功率。Soltive组表现出较低的能级(0.3Jvs.0.6J,p:0.002),但脉冲频率明显更高(100Hz与17.5Hz,p:0.003)和总功率(24Wvs.11W,p:0.001)与其他组相比。在所有三组中,激光开启时间没有实质性差异。此外,在中位数J/mm3中观察到统计学上的显着差异,TFLDrive组使用较高的值(24J/mm3,p:0.001),而Soltive组的中位消融速度较高,为1.16mm3/s(p:0.001)。所有组的总体并发症发生率仍然很低,具有可比的无石率。
    结论:通过降低脉冲频率,我们提高了激光效率,但较小的体积导致效率下降,由于增加的倒退和碎片运动。需要进一步的研究来确定和建立适合这项新技术的激光设置。
    OBJECTIVE: Medical device companies have introduced new TFL machines, including Soltive (Olympus, Japan), Fiber Dust (Quanta System, Italy), and TFLDrive (Coloplast, France). The primary objective of this study is to compare our initial clinical experiences with TFL using those devices. Through this historical comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser systems for stone lithotripsy, we aim to advance our understanding and approach toward achieving safe and effective TFL parameters.
    METHODS: The data for this comparative analysis were extracted from three distinct prospective series that were previously published, outlining our initial clinical experience with the Soltive (Olympus, Japan), FiberDust laser (Quanta System, Italy), and TFLDrive laser (Coloplast, France). Parameters such as stone size, stone density, laser-on time (LOT), and laser settings were meticulously recorded. Additionally, we assessed critical variables such as ablation speed (expressed in mm3/s) and Joules/mm3 for each lithotripsy procedure.
    RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 120 patients were subjected to analysis concerning renal stones. Statistically significant differences were observed in the median (IQR) stone volume: 650 (127-6027) mm3 for TFLDrive, 1800 (682.8-2760) mm3 for Soltive, and 1125 (294-4000) mm3 for FiberDust (p: 0.007); while there were no differences regarding stone density among the groups. Significant variations were identified in median (IQR) pulse energy, frequency, and total power. The Soltive group exhibited lower energy levels (0.3 J vs. 0.6 J, p: 0.002) but significantly higher pulse frequency (100 Hz vs. 17.5 Hz, p: 0.003) and total power (24 W vs. 11W, p: 0.001) compared to the other groups. Laser-on time showed no substantial differences across all three groups. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was observed in median J/mm3, with the TFLDrive group using higher values (24 J/mm3, p: 0.001), while the Soltive group demonstrated a higher median ablation speed of 1.16 mm3/s (p: 0.001). The overall complication rate remained low for all groups, with comparable stone-free rates.
    CONCLUSIONS: By reducing pulsed frequency, we improved laser efficiency, but smaller volumes lead to decreased efficiency due to increased retropulsion and fragment movement. Further studies are needed to identify and establish the appropriate laser settings for this new technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size <2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance >11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m2 were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1st 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1st session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2nd session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2).
    UNASSIGNED: SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号