negative pressure wound therapy

负压伤口治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    负压伤口治疗(NPWT)由于其多模式作用机制而被广泛用于伤口愈合策略。虽然NPWT对伤口愈合的积极印象是公认的,它对减少细菌负荷的影响仍然模棱两可。本研究使用体外猪皮肤模型调查NPWT在减少生物负载方面的功效,重点对金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌的影响。采用定制的负压室来施加变化的负压。将猪皮肤切成5X5cm的正方形,并使用活检穿孔器产生三个各自6mm的标准化伤口。然后,用稀释为1:10,000的金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌细菌悬浮液感染伤口,以获得1.5×104CFU/ml的终浓度,并置于负压室中。孵化后,细菌计数表示为每毫升菌落形成单位(CFU)。对于金黄色葡萄球菌在120小时,CFU中位数,每个殖民地的平均面积,与-250mmHg和-50mmHg相比,-80mmHg的总生长面积明显较低,提示压力依赖性抑制细菌增殖的最佳负压。在120小时分析表皮葡萄球菌时,对负压的反应相似,但不太清楚,次要CFU为-100mmHg。与金黄色葡萄球菌对照组相比,间歇性负压对表皮葡萄球菌生长的影响显示每小时间隔治疗的中值CFU显著较低。这项研究为NPWT对细菌负荷的影响提供了有价值的见解,强调需要进一步研究以重新制定其在管理受污染伤口中的作用。
    Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been widely adopted in wound healing strategies due to its multimodal mechanism of action. While NPWT\'s positive impression on wound healing is well-established, its effect on bacterial load reduction remains equivocal. This study investigates NPWT\'s efficacy in reducing bioburden using an in vitro porcine skin model, focusing on the impact of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Custom-made negative pressure chambers were employed to apply varying negative pressures. Porcine skin was cut into 5 × 5 cm squares and three standardized wounds of 6 mm each were created using a biopsy punch. Then, wounds were infected with S. aureus and S. epidermidis bacterial suspensions diluted 1:10,000 to obtain a final concentration of 1.5 × 104 CFU/ml and were placed in negative pressure chambers. After incubation, bacterial counts were expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) per ml. For S. aureus at 120 hours, the median CFU, mean area per colony, and total growth area were notably lower at -80 mmHg when compared to -250 mmHg and -50 mmHg, suggesting an optimal negative pressure for the pressure-dependent inhibition of the bacterial proliferation. While analyzing S. epidermidis at 120 hours, the response to the negative pressure was similar but less clear, with the minor CFU at -100 mmHg. The influence of intermittent negative pressure on the S. epidermidis growth showed notably lower median CFU with the interval therapy every hour compared to the S. aureus control group. This study contributes valuable insights into NPWT\'s influence on the bacterial load, emphasizing the need for further research to reformulate its role in managing contaminated wounds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    咽部皮肤瘘(PCF)是咽部和皮肤之间的异常连接,可在喉切除术后发生。它会对患者的康复产生重大的负面影响,延迟伤口愈合,需要长时间的无口服(NPO)状态,降低生活质量。传统上,PCF的治疗依赖于保守措施或手术干预.然而,负压伤口治疗(NPWT)提供了一种有希望的替代方法。该病例研究涉及三名接受喉切除术并发生术后PCF的患者。所有患者均接受改良的抽吸导管和低负压(20-40mmHg)的NPWT。有了NPWT,所有患者均实现伤口完全闭合,愈合时间从两周到六周不等。这表明与传统方法相比,NPWT可以显着加速PCF的愈合。然而,在颈部区域保持气密敷料可能是具有挑战性的。这项研究强调了NPWT在喉切除术后更快地闭合PCF的潜力。需要进一步的研究来优化NPWT应用技术,探索对长期结果的影响,并建立更广泛的临床使用指南。
    Pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is an abnormal connection between the pharynx and skin that can occur after laryngectomy surgery. It can have a significant negative impact on patient recovery, delaying wound healing, requiring prolonged nil-per-oral (NPO) status, and reducing quality of life. Traditionally, the management of PCF has relied on conservative measures or surgical intervention. However, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) offers a promising alternative approach. This case study involves three patients who underwent laryngectomy and developed postoperative PCF. All patients received NPWT with a modified suction catheter and low negative pressure (20-40 mmHg). With NPWT, all patients achieved complete wound closure, with healing times ranging from two weeks to six weeks. This suggests that NPWT may significantly accelerate PCF healing compared to traditional methods. However, maintaining an airtight dressing on the neck region can be challenging. This study highlights the potential of NPWT for faster PCF closure after laryngectomy. Further research is needed to optimize NPWT application techniques, explore the impact on long-term outcomes, and establish guidelines for broader clinical use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    手术部位并发症(SSC)对患者构成重大风险,可能导致严重的后果甚至生命损失。虽然先前的研究表明,闭合切口负压治疗(ciNPT)可以减少各种手术领域的伤口并发症,其在腹部切口中的有效性仍不确定。为了解决这个差距,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估ciNPT对腹部开放手术患者术后结局和医疗保健利用的影响.
    使用PubMed进行系统的文献检索,EMBASE,QUOSA是针对英文出版物进行的,将ciNPT与2005年1月至2021年8月期间接受腹部外科手术的患者的护理敷料标准进行比较。研究参与者的特点,外科手术,使用的敷料,治疗持续时间,术后结果,并提取后续数据。采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。使用风险比总结二分结局,使用均值差异评估连续结局。
    文献检索确定了22项纳入分析的研究。SSC的相对风险(RR)显着降低(RR:0.568,P=0.003),手术部位感染(SSI)(RR:0.512,P<.001),浅表SSI(RR:0.373,P<.001),深SSI(RR:0.368,P=.033),开裂(RR:0.581,P=0.042)与ciNPT使用相关。ciNPT的使用还与再入院风险降低和住院时间减少2.6天相关(P<.001)。
    这些研究结果表明,在接受腹部开放手术的患者中使用ciNPT可以帮助减少SSC和相关的住院时间以及再次入院。该摘要的先前版本在米兰举行的2023年欧洲伤口管理协会(EWMA)会议上提出,意大利,并在下面列出的网站上在线发布。EWMA允许将摘要与完整的手稿一起重新出版。https://日记帐。cambridgegemedia.com.au/application/files/9116/8920/7316/JWM_Abstracts_LR.PDF。
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical site complications (SSCs) pose a significant risk to patients, potentially leading to severe consequences or even loss of life. While previous research has shown that closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) can reduce wound complications in various surgical fields, its effectiveness in abdominal incisions remains uncertain. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the impact of ciNPT on postsurgical outcomes and health care utilization in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT with standard of care dressings for patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures between January 2005 and August 2021. Characteristics of study participants, surgical procedures, dressings used, duration of treatment, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized using risk ratios and continuous outcomes were assessed using mean differences.
    UNASSIGNED: The literature search identified 22 studies for inclusion in the analysis. Significant reductions in relative risk (RR) of SSC (RR: 0.568, P = .003), surgical site infection (SSI) (RR: 0.512, P < .001), superficial SSI (RR: 0.373, P < .001), deep SSI (RR: 0.368, P =.033), and dehiscence (RR: 0.581, P = .042) were associated with ciNPT use. ciNPT use was also associated with a reduced risk of readmission and a 2.6-day reduction in hospital length of stay (P < .001).
    UNASSIGNED: These findings indicate that use of ciNPT in patients undergoing open abdominal procedures can help reduce SSCs and associated hospital length of stay as well as readmissions.A previous version of this abstract was presented at the 2023 Conference of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) in Milan, Italy and posted online at the site listed below. EWMA permits abstracts to be republished with the complete manuscript. https://journals.cambridgemedia.com.au/application/files/9116/8920/7316/JWM_Abstracts_LR.pdf.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下肢全层皮肤移植(FTSG)重建特别容易发生伤口并发症。负压伤口治疗(NPWT)可促进伤口愈合,但如果它能促进小腿FTSGs的移植,则没有广泛的证据存在。在这个调查员发起的,prospective,随机对照试验,20例下肢皮肤癌的动态FTSG重建患者随机接受NPWT的术后治疗,或常规敷料。作为结果,术后1周皮肤移植的粘连,3个月内任何伤口并发症,包括≥3周的伤口延迟愈合,并比较了额外的术后访视次数。在这两组中,移植物粘附同样良好(p=0.47);80%的NPWT处理的移植物和100%的对照组移植物粘附>90%。术后并发症/伤口延迟愈合的数量没有显着差异(p=0.65);NPWT中70%的患者和对照组中50%的患者出现了伤口并发症。两组患者的数量相等,至少有3次其他对照访问(p=1.0)。这项研究在招募了20名患者后停止,因为没有看到NPWT的好处。最后,研究显示,NPWT对下肢FTSG无益处.
    Full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) reconstructions of lower limbs are especially prone to wound complications. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) enhances wound healing, but no broad evidence exists if it promotes graft take of lower leg FTSGs. In this investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised and controlled trial, 20 patients with ambulatory FTSG reconstruction for lower limb skin cancers were randomised for postoperative treatment with either NPWT, or conventional dressings. As outcomes, adherence of the skin graft 1 week postoperatively, any wound complications within 3 months, including ≥3 weeks delayed wound healing, and the number of additional postoperative visits were compared. In both groups, grafts adhered equally well (p = 0.47); 80% of NPWT-treated and 100% of control group grafts adhered >90%. There was no significant difference in the number of postoperative complications/delayed wound healing (p = 0.65); 70% of patients in the NPWT and 50% in the control group developed a wound complication. Both groups had an equal number of patients with at least three additional control visits (p = 1.0). The study was discontinued after 20 patients were recruited, as no benefit from NPWT was seen. To conclude, the study showed no benefit from NPWT for lower limb FTSGs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术手术部位感染(SSIs)在接受胰腺切除术的患者中仍然是具有挑战性的问题。有趣的是,胰腺切除术后使用负压伤口治疗(NPWT)治疗癌症与SSI降低相关.这项研究的目的是使用国家外科数据库比较远端胰腺切除术或胰十二指肠切除术后切口伤口护理的NPWT和非NPWT的术后结果。方法2005年至2019年,美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)对接受远端胰腺切除术或胰十二指肠切除术的患者进行胰腺诊断使用主要的当前程序术语(CPT)代码。主要结果是NPWT和非NPWT患者组之间的手术部位感染率。次要结果包括脓毒症,感染性休克,重新接纳,再操作。使用多变量逻辑回归比较感兴趣的结果。结果54,457例患者接受了胰腺切除术,其中131例接受了NPWT。多变量分析,在考虑患者特征的同时,包括伤口分类,术后浅表SSI无差异,深SSI,脓毒症,感染性休克,或在NPWT和非NPWT组之间重新接纳。NPWT组的器官空间SSI较高(21%vs12%,p=0.001)。与手术相关的再手术在NPWT组中也很高(14%vs4.3%,p<0.001)。结论NPWT在远端胰腺切除术和胰十二指肠切除术中的使用与器官间隙SSIs增加和再次手术率相关。表面SSI没有差异,深SSI,或重新接纳。这项大样本研究表明,在胰腺切除术后使用NPWT切口伤口护理没有明显的好处。
    Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) continue to be a challenging issue among patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Anecdotally, the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) following pancreatectomy for cancer has been associated with decreased SSIs. The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes of NPWT and non-NPWT for incisional wound care following distal pancreatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic diagnoses using a national surgical database. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried from 2005 to 2019 for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic diagnoses using primary Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The primary outcome was surgical site infection rates between NPWT and non-NPWT patient groups. Secondary outcomes include sepsis, septic shock, readmission, and reoperation. Outcomes of interest were compared using multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 54,457 patients underwent pancreatectomy with 131 receiving NPWT. Multivariate analysis, while accounting for patient characteristics, including wound classification, showed no difference in postoperative superficial SSI, deep SSI, sepsis, septic shock, or readmission between the NPWT and non-NPWT groups. Organ space SSI was higher in the NPWT group (21% vs 12%, p=0.001). Reoperation related to procedure was also high in the NPWT group (14% vs 4.3%, p<0.001). Conclusion The use of NPWT in distal pancreatectomies and pancreatoduodenectomies is associated with increased organ space SSIs and reoperation rates, with no difference in superficial SSI, deep SSI, or readmission. This large sample study shows no significant benefit of using NPWT incisional wound care after pancreatectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有滴注和停留时间的负压伤口疗法(NPWTi-d)越来越多地用于各种范围的伤口。同时,由聚六亚甲基双胍和甜菜碱(PHMB-B)组成的局部伤口冲洗溶液已显示出治疗伤口感染的功效。然而,该溶液作为糖尿病足感染(DFIs)患者NPWTi-d局部滴注溶液的有效性尚未得到彻底研究.这项回顾性研究的目的是评估在NPWTi-d期间使用PHMB-B作为滴注溶液对降低DFI患者的生物负载和改善临床结果的影响。在2017年1月至2022年12月期间,一系列DFI患者接受了NPWTi-d治疗,使用PHMB-B或生理盐水作为滴注溶液。回顾性收集的数据包括人口统计信息,基线伤口特征,和治疗结果。该研究包括PHMB-B组61例患者和生理盐水组73例患者。都被诊断为DFI。与用生理盐水治疗的患者相比,PHMB-B患者的创床准备时间无显著差异(P=0.5034),住院时间(P=0.6783),NPWTi-d应用次数(P=0.1458),系统性抗菌药物给药持续时间(P=0.3567),或住院总费用(P=0.6713)。研究结果表明,使用PHMB-B或生理盐水作为DFI的NPWTi-d滴注溶液显示出希望和有效性。然而,在两种解决方案之间没有观察到临床区别。
    Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) is increasingly used for a diverse range of wounds. Meanwhile, the topical wound irrigation solution consisting of polyhexamethylene biguanide and betaine (PHMB-B) has shown efficacy in managing wound infections. However, the effectiveness of this solution as a topical instillation solution for NPWTi-d in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) has not been thoroughly studied. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of using PHMB-B as the instillation solution during NPWTi-d on reducing bioburden and improving clinical outcomes in patients with DFIs. Between January 2017 and December 2022, a series of patients with DFIs received treatment with NPWTi-d, using either PHMB-B or normal saline as the instillation solution. Data collected retrospectively included demographic information, baseline wound characteristics, and treatment outcomes. The study included 61 patients in the PHMB-B group and 73 patients in the normal saline group, all diagnosed with DFIs. In comparison to patients treated with normal saline, patients with PHMB-B exhibited no significant differences in terms of wound bed preparation time (P = 0.5034), length of hospital stay (P = 0.6783), NPWTi-d application times (P = 0.1458), duration of systematic antimicrobial administration (P = 0.3567), or overall cost of hospitalization (P = 0.6713). The findings of the study suggest that the use of either PHMB-B or normal saline as an instillation solution in NPWTi-d for DFIs shows promise and effectiveness, yet no clinical distinction was observed between the two solutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:小儿烧伤是一个全球性的临床问题,发病率很高。早期辅助负压伤口治疗可提高烧伤患儿的再上皮形成率,然而,在急性烧伤护理中的采用是不一致的。这项调查旨在确定在小儿烧伤的急性管理中实施辅助负压伤口治疗的障碍,并共同设计有针对性的实施策略。
    方法:采用序贯混合方法设计,探讨在急性小儿烧伤护理中实施辅助负压伤口治疗的障碍。向澳大利亚四家主要儿科医院的医疗保健专业人员分发了一份在线问卷,每个都有专门的烧伤服务。根据实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对障碍进行编码。与高级临床医生的半结构化访谈针对当地情况量身定制了实施策略。利益相关者共识会议合并了实施策略和本地流程。
    结果:63名医疗保健专业人员参加了问卷调查,半结构化访谈涉及9名资深烧伤临床医生。我们在所有五个CFIR领域中确定了八个实施障碍,然后共同设计了针对性策略来解决已确定的障碍。障碍包括缺乏可用资源,获得知识和信息的机会有限,个别阶段的变化,患者的需求和资源,关于干预的知识和信念有限,缺乏外部政策,干预复杂性,执行规划差。
    结论:多种背景因素影响急性小儿烧伤患者负压伤口治疗的摄取。结果将为多状态阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验提供信息。额外资源,教育,培训,更新的策略,和指导方针是成功实施的必要条件。预计辅助负压伤口治疗,结合量身定制的实施策略,将提高采用率和可持续性。
    背景:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册:ACTRN12622000166774。2022年2月1日注册。
    OBJECTIVE: Pediatric burn injuries are a global clinical issue causing significant morbidity. Early adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy improves re-epithelialization rates in children with burns, yet adoption in acute burn care is inconsistent. This investigation aimed to determine barriers to the implementation of adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy for the acute management of pediatric burns and co-design targeted implementation strategies.
    METHODS: A sequential mixed methods design was used explore barriers to adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy implementation in acute pediatric burn care. An online questionnaire was disseminated to healthcare professionals within four major Australian pediatric hospitals, each with a dedicated burns service. Barriers were coded according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured interviews with senior clinicians tailored implementation strategies to local contexts. A stakeholder consensus meeting consolidated implementation strategies and local processes.
    RESULTS: Sixty-three healthcare professionals participated in the questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews involved nine senior burn clinicians. We identified eight implementation barriers across all five CFIR domains then co-designed targeted strategies to address identified barriers. Barriers included lack of available resources, limited access to knowledge and information, individual stage of change, patient needs and resources, limited knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, lack of external policies, intervention complexity, and poor implementation planning.
    CONCLUSIONS: Multiple contextual factors affect negative pressure wound therapy uptake in acute pediatric burn settings. Results will inform a multi-state stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Additional resources, education, training, updated policies, and guidelines are required for successful implementation. It is anticipated that adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy, in conjunction with tailored implementation strategies, will enhance adoption and sustainability.
    BACKGROUND: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12622000166774. Registered 1 February 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脊柱手术后伤口感染可能是一个挑战。已经描述了用于管理感染的脊柱伤口的各种程序。在手术部位感染(SSI)的管理中越来越常见的程序是负压伤口治疗(NPWT)。也称为真空辅助关闭。由于缺乏明确的临床建议,因此本研究旨在更新有关使用NPWT来管理器械脊柱手术后发生的术后SSI的现有证据。
    方法:本系统评价是根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行的:2020PRISMA声明。2024年1月,访问了以下数据库:PubMed,WebofScience,谷歌学者。没有为搜索设置时间约束。访问了所有研究NPWT在治疗术后脊柱伤口感染中的独特用途的临床研究。
    结果:本研究共纳入381例患者。其中52.5%(381例患者中有200例)是女性。平均年龄为52.2±15.2岁。NPWT的平均长度为21.2天(范围为7-90天)。
    结论:NPWT可能是治疗脊柱手术后SSI的一种有价值的辅助治疗方法。需要额外的高质量研究来评估NPWT在脊柱手术后SSI中的疗效和安全性。特别是如果结合禁忌症或危险因素,如术中脑脊液渗漏的存在。
    方法:四级,系统审查。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound infection after spinal surgery might be a challenge to manage. A wide range of procedures have been described for managing infected spinal wounds. An increasingly common procedure in the management of surgical site infections (SSI) is negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), also known as vacuum-assisted closure. As there is a paucity of clear clinical advice the present investigation aims to update current evidence on the use of NPWT to manage postoperative SSI occurring after instrumented spine surgery.
    METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the 2020 PRISMA statement. In January 2024, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. No time constraint was set for the search. All the clinical studies investigating the unique use of NPWT in treating postoperative spinal wound infections were accessed.
    RESULTS: A total of 381 patients were included in the present study. Of them 52.5% (200 of 381 patients) were women. The mean age was 52.2 ± 15.2 years. The average length of the NPWT was 21.2 days (range 7-90 days).
    CONCLUSIONS: NPWT could be a valuable adjuvant therapy for the management of SSI after spine surgery. Additional high-quality investigations are required to assess the efficacy and safety of NPWT in SSI after spine surgery, especially if combined with contraindications or risk factors, such as the presence of intraoperative CSF leak.
    METHODS: Level IV, Systematic review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:负压伤口疗法(NPWT)已成为广泛用于覆盖和积极治疗复杂伤口的工具,包括烧伤.这项研究旨在评估NPWT在上肢和下肢急性烧伤中的有效性,并将结果与我们机构的标准护理(SOC)进行比较。
    方法:在2019年5月至2021年11月期间收治的四肢烧伤占全身表面积(%TBSA)的0.5%至10%之间的患者被纳入本机构,并随机分配至NPWT或SOC(聚己内酯凝胶,脂肪纱布,和棉绒)。进行治疗直至伤口完全愈合。需要皮肤移植的患者,移植后接受额外的NPWT,与初始组分配无关。
    结果:在2019年5月至2021年11月期间,65例烧伤患者被随机分配到NPWT(n=33)或SOC(n=32)治疗中;其中,33例患者(NPWT)和28例患者(SOC)具有完整的数据集,并包括在分析中。两组的年龄相似(39.8±13.7vs.44.8±16.2年,p=0.192),总烧伤大小(3.1±2.3vs.3.4±2.8%TBSA,p=0.721)和治疗的伤口大小(1.9±1.2vs.1.5±0.8%TBSA,p=0.138)。我们发现愈合时间没有差异(11.0±4.9与8.6±3.8,p=0.074,并且在整个研究中敷料更换次数存在显着差异(2.4±1.5vs4.2±1.9,p<0.001)。Kaplan-Meier事件时间分析显示,与SOC组相比,NPWT组的愈合时间或植皮时间差异无统计学意义(p=0.085)。NPWT愈合或植皮的中位时间为10(8-11)天,SOC为9(7-11)天。愈合或皮肤移植的风险比为HR=0.64(0.38-1.08)。时间-事件分析的结果以及PPS上的Kaplan-Meier曲线证实了该结果。我们发现,在二次外科手术中,15.2与21.4%的疼痛或功能结局没有差异。
    结论:在这项研究中,我们发现在检测伤口愈合的时间方面,两组之间没有显着差异。我们还发现伤口闭合的进一步手术没有区别,疼痛和/或疤痕。然而,对于接受NPWT治疗的患者,换药频率明显较低,这可能是一种心理和后勤优势。
    BACKGROUND: Negative-pressure-wound-therapy (NPWT) has become a widely used tool for the coverage and active treatment of complex wounds, including burns. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of NPWT in acute burns of upper and lower extremities and to compare results to the standard-of-care (SOC) at our institution.
    METHODS: Patients that were admitted to our institution between May 2019 and November 2021 with burns on extremities between 0.5 % and 10 % of the total body surface area (%TBSA) were included and randomized to either NPWT or SOC (polyhexanide gel, fatty gauze, and cotton wool). Treatment was performed until complete wound healing. Patients that required skin grafts, received additional NPWT after grafting independent on the initial group allocation.
    RESULTS: Sixty-five patients suffering from burn injury between May 2019 and November 2021 were randomized into treatment with NPWT (n = 33) or SOC (n = 32); of these, 33 patients (NPWT) and 28 patients (SOC) had complete data sets and were included in the analysis. Both groups were similar regarding age (39.8 ± 13.7 vs. 44.8 ± 16.2 years,p = 0.192), total burn size (3.1 ± 2.3 vs. 3.4 ± 2.8 %TBSA,p = 0.721) and treated wound size (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 %TBSA,p = 0.138). We found no differences regarding healing time (11.0 ± 4.9 vs. 8.6 ± 3.8,p = 0.074, and significant differences in a number of dressing changes throughout the study (2.4 ± 1.5 vs 4.2 ± 1.9,p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis exhibited no statistically significant difference in the time to healing or skin grafting (p = 0.085) in NPWT group compared with SOC group. The median time to healing or skin grafting was 10(8-11) days for NPWT and 9(7-11) days for SOC. The hazard ratio for healing or skin graft was HR= 0.64(0.38-1.08). The results of the time-to-event analysis as well as the Kaplan-Meier curve on the PPS confirmed this result. We found no differences in secondary surgical operations 15.2 vs 21.4 % pain or functional outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no significant difference between the two groups in terms of time to detect wound healing. We also found no difference regarding further operations for wound closure, pain and/or scarring. However, dressing changes were significantly less frequent for patients that were treated with NPWT, which may be a psychological and logistical advantage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Burn injuries are the fourth most common type of trauma worldwide, after traffic injuries, falls and interpersonal violence. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the most critical proangiogenic factors. Failure in angiogenesis is often associated with chronic, non-healing wounds. This study aimed to compare the effect of sterile gauze with normal saline (NaCl) 0.9%, intermittent negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine dressing on increasing VEGF and angiogenesis in deep dermal burn injury. This experimental laboratory study involved six Yorkshire pigs. Twenty burns were made on each pig\'s flank and dorsum areas, which were divided into four treatment groups: sterile gauze with NaCl 0.9%, intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine dressing. Skin biopsies were done on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21 to evaluate VEGF histoscore and mean microvascular density (MVD). We used immunohistochemical staining of VEGF-165 as VEGF\'s protein marker and hematoxylin-eosin (HE) to count the MVD. There was a significant difference in mean VEGF histoscore on evaluation day 14, in which continuous NPWT had the highest score compared to sterile gauze with NaCl 0.9%, intermittent NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine. The elevated VEGF histoscore could significantly increase the MVD.
    Les brûlures représentent la 4ème cause mondiale de traumatisme, après les accidents de la voie publique, les chutes et les violences interhumaines. Le facteur vasculaire de croissance endothéliale (FVCE) est un des principaux facteurs de l’angiogénèse qui, lorsqu’elle dysfonctionne, fait passer les plaies à la chronicité. Cette étude compare les effets de pansements au sérum physiologique (NaCl), des thérapies à pression négative (TPN) continue ou intermittente et de la sulfadiazine argentique (SFDA) sur l’augmentation du FVCE et l’angiogénèse dans les brûlures de 2ème degré profond. Cette étude expérimentale a été conduite sur 6 porcs Yorkshire. Vingt brûlures ont été réalisées sur les flancs et régions dorsales de chacun d’eux, réparties en 4 groupes selon leur traitement : NaCl, TPN intermittente, TPN continue et SFDA. Des biopsies cutanées ont été réalisées à J1, 3, 7, 14 et 21 afin d’évaluer histologiquement le score FVCE (par mesure colorimétrique de FVCE-165) et la densité microvasculaire (par coloration hématoxyline- éosine). À j14, la TPN continue permettait d’obtenir le score FVCE le plus élevé, comparativement aux 3 autres pansements et pourrait augmenter la densité microvasculaire.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号