healthcare interventions

医疗保健干预
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探索和了解社区成员在门诊诊所的韧性,考虑各种维度和类型的弹性。
    方法:横断面研究。
    方法:这项研究于2023年9月至12月在沙特门诊进行,包括通过系统随机抽样选择的384名个体。使用了各种工具,如社会凝聚力和信任量表,社区复原力评估工具,社区心理体验评估,环境恢复力评估,经济弹性指数,康纳-戴维森弹性量表,简短的弹性量表,成人弹性量表和医疗保健弹性指数。
    结果:参与者表现出强大的整体弹性水平,总Connor-Davidson弹性量表评分63.0±9.0。此外,他们在总短暂复原力量表中表现出了值得称赞的复原力水平(56.04±8.6),成人弹性量表(82.5±7.2)和医疗保健弹性指数(45.8±5.5)。这些发现为研究人群的心理和情感幸福感提供了重要的见解,强调他们在不同生活领域的适应能力和应对机制。
    结论:这项研究为门诊环境中韧性的多维性质提供了有价值的见解。横截面设计为未来的纵向调查奠定了基础,强调需要采取整体方法来理解和促进复原力。
    结论:这项研究对参与者及其社区具有直接意义。通过揭示值得称赞的复原力水平,强调了门诊人群中普遍存在的适应能力和应对机制。这种洞察力增强了个人的心理和情感幸福感,对整体韧性和公共力量做出积极贡献。此外,这项研究揭示了沙特阿拉伯社区成员的韧性与国际先进护理社区的关系,提供对他们工作的洞察力。
    有目的地选择在过去6个月内接受过门诊服务的患者,以确保不同年龄的患者。本研究的性别和社会经济背景。
    OBJECTIVE: This study explores and understands community members\' resilience in outpatient clinics, considering various dimensions and types of resilience.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: This study was conducted in Saudi outpatient clinics from September to December 2023 and included 384 individuals chosen through systematic random sampling. Various tools were used, such as Social Cohesion and Trust Scale, Community Resilience Assessment Tool, Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, Environmental Resilience Assessment, Economic Resilience Index, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Resilience Scale for Adults and Healthcare Resilience Index.
    RESULTS: Participants displayed a robust overall resilience level, as indicated by Total Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score of 63.0 ± 9.0. Additionally, they demonstrated commendable levels of resilience in Total Brief Resilience Scale (56.04 ± 8.6), Resilience Scale for Adults (82.5 ± 7.2) and Healthcare Resilience Index (45.8 ± 5.5). These findings offer significant insights into psychological and emotional well-being of the study population, highlighting their adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms across various life domains.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insights into the multidimensional nature of resilience in outpatient settings. The cross-sectional design sets the groundwork for future longitudinal investigations, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to understanding and promoting resilience.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study holds immediate implications for participants and their communities. It underscores the adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms prevalent in the outpatient population by revealing commendable resilience levels. This insight enhances individuals\' psychological and emotional well-being, contributing positively to the overall resilience and communal strength. Additionally, this study sheds light on how resilience among community members in Saudi Arabia relates to international advanced nursing communities, providing insight into their work.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who have received outpatient services in the past 6 months were purposively chosen to ensure a diverse representation across age, gender and socio-economic backgrounds in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:观察性研究的系统评价可能会受到偏差的影响,这些偏差会导致对真实干预效果的低估或高估。文献中已经报道了几种工具试图表征潜在偏差。我们在这项研究中的目的是确定特定研究的偏见可能影响干预对医疗保健创新奖第1轮护理总成本(TCOC)的影响程度。
    方法:我们回顾了82项关于创新对医疗保险TCOC影响的统计评估。我们开发了五种偏差风险度量,并使用元回归评估了它们对TCOC影响的影响。
    结果:大多数评估使用倾向评分匹配来创建比较组。三分之一的非随机干预措施被认为有一定的偏倚效应风险,这主要是由于他们招募治疗组的方式。35%的患者在倾向评分调整后仍存在一定程度的协变量失衡.然而,在TCOC效应的多变量分析中,我们检查的偏见威胁都没有(比较组构造方法,偏见的风险,或协变量失衡程度)对HCIA1创新效应的大小有重大影响。与倾向得分匹配相比,使用倾向得分加权的评估产生了更大但不精确的储蓄效果。
    结论:我们的结果表明,HCIA1TCOC效应大小不太可能受到我们考虑的偏倚类型的系统性影响。与现有风险工具使用的主观质量评级相比,基于特定研究设计特征评估偏差风险对于识别有问题的特征可能更有用。
    Systematic reviews of observational studies can be affected by biases that lead to under- or over-estimates of true intervention effects. Several tools have been reported in the literature that attempt to characterize potential bias. Our objective in this study was to determine the extent to which study-specific bias may have influenced intervention impacts on total costs of care (TCOC) in round 1 of the Health Care Innovation Awards.
    We reviewed 82 statistical evaluations of innovation impacts on Medicare TCOC. We developed five risk-of-bias measures and assessed their influence on TCOC impacts using meta-regression.
    The majority of evaluations used propensity score matching to create their comparison groups. One third of the non-randomized interventions were judged to have some risk of biased effects due largely to the way they recruited their treatment groups, and 35% had some degree of covariate imbalance remaining after propensity score adjustments. However, in the multivariable analysis of TCOC effects, none of the bias threats we examined (comparison group construction method, risk of bias, or degree of covariate imbalance) had a major impact on the magnitude of HCIA1 innovation effects. Evaluations using propensity score weighting produced larger but imprecise savings effects compared to propensity score matching.
    Our results suggest that it is unlikely that HCIA1 TCOC effect sizes were systematically affected by the types of bias we considered. Assessing the risk of bias based on specific study design features is likely to be more useful for identifying problematic characteristics than the subjective quality ratings used by existing risk tools.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    土著健康正在成为全球的重中之重。目的是确保平等的健康机会,重点关注面临历史差异的土著居民。土著社区的有效卫生干预措施必须纳入土著知识,信仰,和世界观在文化上是合适的。
    Indigenous health is becoming a top priority globally. The aim is to ensure equal health opportunities, with a focus on Indigenous populations who have faced historical disparities. Effective health interventions in Indigenous communities must incorporate Indigenous knowledge, beliefs, and worldviews to be culturally appropriate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管与不孕症有关的问题会影响男性和女性,妇女经常成为污名化和排斥的受害者,使他们容易受到情感上的痛苦和折磨。由于这些社会心理问题,它们不仅需要生物医学治疗,还有心理上的,社会,和精神支持。不幸的是,许多患有不孕症的女性没有得到全面的治疗。这篇综述的目的是检索对不孕症妇女进行整体医疗干预的现有证据。在全球数据库中搜索了2010年至2018年间在世界任何地方发表的文章,这些文章探讨了针对被诊断患有不孕症的女性的整体医疗干预措施。共评估了18篇符合纳入标准的文章,并进行数据提取。研究结果表明,与生物医学管理一起管理不育妇女所采用的干预措施包括:咨询;认知行为疗法;接受和承诺疗法;教育干预;精神干预;以情感为中心的治疗/干预和身心综合干预。这项审查的结果对医疗保健专业人员有意义,以确保加纳和非洲诊断为不孕症的妇女的整体护理。
    Although issues pertaining to infertility affect both males and females, women often become victims of stigmatization and rejection, making them susceptible to emotional pain and suffering. Due to these psychosocial problems, they require not only biomedical treatment, but also psychological, social, and spiritual support. Unfortunately, many women with infertility are not treated holistically. The aim of this review was to retrieve existing evidence of holistic healthcare interventions for women with infertility. Global databases were searched for articles published anywhere in the world between 2010 to 2018 that explored holistic healthcare interventions for women diagnosed with infertility. A total of 18 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed, and data extraction was performed. Findings revealed that interventions adopted in managing infertile women alongside the bio-medical management included: counseling; cognitive behavioral therapy; acceptance and commitment therapy; educational interventions; spiritual interventions; emotionally focused therapy/intervention and integrative body-mind-spirit interventions. The results of this review have implications for healthcare professionals to ensure holistic care of women diagnosed with infertility in Ghana and Africa at large.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:电子健康记录(EHR)中的数据通常结构和标准化较差,这阻碍了数据重用。研究描述了一些增加和改进结构化和标准化数据的干预措施的例子,如指导方针和政策,培训和用户友好的EHR界面。然而,人们对将这些知识转化为实际解决方案知之甚少。我们的研究旨在指定最有效和可行的干预措施,以实现更好的结构化和标准化的EHR数据注册,并描述成功实施干预措施的实际例子。
    方法:使用概念图方法来确定在荷兰医院中被认为有效或已成功实施的可行干预措施。与首席医疗信息官和首席护理信息官举行了一个焦点小组。在确定干预措施后,使用Groupwands™进行多维缩放和聚类分析来对分类的干预措施进行分类,用于概念映射的在线工具。结果显示为Go-Zone图和聚类图。Follows,进行了半结构化访谈,以描述成功干预的实际例子.
    结果:干预措施分为从最高到最低感知有效性的七个类别:(1)有用性和需求教育;(2)战略和(3)战术组织政策;(4)国家政策;(5)监测和调整数据(6)EHR的结构和支持以及(7)注册过程中的支持(独立于EHR)。受访者强调了以下在实践中被证明是成功的干预措施:每个专业都有热情的大使,负责通过提高对结构化和标准化数据注册的直接利益的认识来教育同行;对数据质量进行持续反馈的仪表板;以及支持(自动化)注册过程的EHR功能。
    结论:我们的研究提供了一系列有效和可行的干预措施,包括成功的干预措施的实例。各组织应继续分享其最佳做法,以学习和尝试干预措施,以防止实施无效的干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Data in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) is often poorly structured and standardized, which hampers data reuse. Research described some examples of interventions to increase and improve structured and standardized data, such as guidelines and policies, training and user friendly EHR interfaces. However, little is known about the translation of this knowledge into practical solutions. Our study aimed to specify the most effective and feasible interventions that enable better structured and standardized EHR data registration and described practical examples of successfully implemented interventions.
    METHODS: A concept mapping approach was used to determine feasible interventions that were considered to be effective or have been successfully implemented in Dutch hospitals. A focus group was held with Chief Medical Information Officers and Chief Nursing Information Officers. After interventions were determined, multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were performed to categorize sorted interventions using Groupwisdom™, an online tool for concept mapping. Results are presented as Go-Zone plots and cluster maps. Following, semi-structured interviews were conducted to describe practical examples of successful interventions.
    RESULTS: Interventions were classified into seven clusters ranked from highest to lowest perceived effectiveness: (1) education on usefulness and need; (2) strategic and (3) tactical organizational policies; (4) national policy; (5) monitoring and adjusting data (6) structure of and support from the EHR and (7) support in the registration process (EHR independent). Interviewees emphasized the following interventions proven successful in their practice: an enthusiastic ambassador per specialty who is responsible for educating peers by increasing awareness of the direct benefit of structured and standardized data registration; dashboards for continuous feedback on data quality; and EHR functionalities that support (automating) the registration process.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided a list of effective and feasible interventions including practical examples of interventions that have been successful. Organizations should continue to share their best practices to learn from and attempted interventions to prevent implementation of ineffective interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:囊性纤维化患者生存率的提高导致合并症发生率的增加,其中糖尿病是最常见的。囊性纤维化相关糖尿病影响19%的青少年和高达50%的成年人,尽管他们对这种共病的经历知之甚少。
    UNASSIGNED:调查青少年和成年人与囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的生活和管理经验。
    UASSIGNED:定性证据的系统回顾和主题分析。
    未经评估:六项研究,评为质量好,包括在审查中,数据中出现了四个主要主题:知识和理解;情感和社会影响;平衡两个条件;接受和调整。尽管主要主题反映了青少年和成人的经历,他们的子主题有微妙的变化。参与者最重要的故事是接受囊性纤维化相关糖尿病并将其整合到他们的生活中。这包括他们对可能发生的囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的准备,以及他们努力平衡与囊性纤维化和糖尿病一起生活和管理的竞争需求。
    UNASSIGNED:囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的诊断及其与日常生活的结合对于许多囊性纤维化患者来说具有挑战性。综述结果表明,囊性纤维化相关糖尿病干预措施的预诊断机会,在诊断时,在持续管理期间,这需要整合到常规的囊性纤维化治疗中。
    UNASSIGNED: Improved survival rates for people with cystic fibrosis have led to increased rates of co-morbidity, of which diabetes is the most common. Cystic fibrosis related diabetes affects 19% of adolescents and up to 50% of adults, although little is known about their experiences of this co-morbidity.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the experiences of living with and managing cystic fibrosis related diabetes among adolescents and adults.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: Six studies, rated good quality, were included in the review and four main themes emerged from the data: knowledge and understanding; emotional and social impact; balancing both conditions; acceptance and adjustment. Although the main themes reflect adolescent and adult experiences, there were subtle variations in their sub-themes. Participants\' overriding story was of journeying towards acceptance and integration of cystic fibrosis related diabetes into their lives. This included their unpreparedness for the likely onset of cystic fibrosis related diabetes and their struggles to balance the competing demands of living with and managing cystic fibrosis and diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis related diabetes and its incorporation into daily life is challenging for many people with cystic fibrosis. Review findings indicate opportunities for cystic fibrosis related diabetes interventions pre-diagnosis, at diagnosis, and during ongoing management, which need integrating into routine cystic fibrosis care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针对医疗保健干预措施的地理目标区域(TR)的适当优先级对于确保有限医疗保健资源的有效分配至关重要。在划定TR时,两者都“瞄准效率”,即,干预投资的回报,和后勤因素,例如,TR的数量,很重要。然而,现有的划分TR的方法不成比例地优先考虑目标效率。为了解决这个问题,我们探索了在保护规划中发现的一种方法的实用性:软件Marxan和扩展,MinPatch(\'Marxan+MinPatch\'),与我们介绍的一种新方法相比:空间目标算法(STA)。使用模拟和现实世界的数据,我们展示了STA优于MarxanMinPatch的性能,无论是在目标效率方面,还是在充分考虑后勤因素方面。例如,通过设计,和Marxan+MinPatch不同,STA允许用户指定期望数量的TR。更广泛地说,我们发现,虽然Marxan+MinPatch确实考虑了后勤因素,它也有几个限制,包括,但不限于,应用两个单独的软件工具的要求,这是累赘。鉴于这些结果,我们建议可以合理地应用STA,以帮助防止由于使用现有方法的干预措施的针对性而导致的效率低下.
    Appropriate prioritisation of geographic target regions (TRs) for healthcare interventions is critical to ensure the efficient distribution of finite healthcare resources. In delineating TRs, both \'targeting efficiency\', i.e., the return on intervention investment, and logistical factors, e.g., the number of TRs, are important. However, existing approaches to delineate TRs disproportionately prioritise targeting efficiency. To address this, we explored the utility of a method found within conservation planning: the software Marxan and an extension, MinPatch (\'Marxan + MinPatch\'), with comparison to a new method we introduce: the Spatial Targeting Algorithm (STA). Using both simulated and real-world data, we demonstrate superior performance of the STA over Marxan + MinPatch, both with respect to targeting efficiency and with respect to adequate consideration of logistical factors. For example, by design, and unlike Marxan + MinPatch, the STA allows for user-specification of a desired number of TRs. More broadly, we find that, while Marxan + MinPatch does consider logistical factors, it also suffers from several limitations, including, but not limited to, the requirement to apply two separate software tools, which is burdensome. Given these results, we suggest that the STA could reasonably be applied to help prevent inefficiencies arising due to targeting of interventions using currently available approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:在美国,我们有一个医疗保健系统危机,患者和提供者的不满情绪很高。为了改变健康和医疗保健,临床提供者必须精通以人为中心的设计思维(DT)方法。
    目的:综合以人为中心的设计(HCD)和DT文献,以创建健康干预措施。
    方法:我们进行了综合文献综述,重点关注HCD和DT在临床医疗环境中的应用。从成立到2020年11月6日,搜索了四个研究数据库。我们分析了使用的方法,谁在使用框架,包括DT阶段。
    结果:最终分析包括24篇文章。在24份手稿中,6名(25%)是护士主导的,15名(63%)是跨学科的第一作者和最后作者(例如,护理和医学)。总的来说,10/24(42%)包括所有DT方法。当通过方法或方法分析文章时,12(50%)表示他们正在使用HCD方法,5(21%)DT方法,7人(29%)表示他们同时使用HCD方法和DT方法。
    结论:使用DT的人和用于创建医疗保健干预的阶段存在不一致。
    BACKGROUND: In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).
    OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.
    METHODS: We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号