healthcare interventions

医疗保健干预
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管与不孕症有关的问题会影响男性和女性,妇女经常成为污名化和排斥的受害者,使他们容易受到情感上的痛苦和折磨。由于这些社会心理问题,它们不仅需要生物医学治疗,还有心理上的,社会,和精神支持。不幸的是,许多患有不孕症的女性没有得到全面的治疗。这篇综述的目的是检索对不孕症妇女进行整体医疗干预的现有证据。在全球数据库中搜索了2010年至2018年间在世界任何地方发表的文章,这些文章探讨了针对被诊断患有不孕症的女性的整体医疗干预措施。共评估了18篇符合纳入标准的文章,并进行数据提取。研究结果表明,与生物医学管理一起管理不育妇女所采用的干预措施包括:咨询;认知行为疗法;接受和承诺疗法;教育干预;精神干预;以情感为中心的治疗/干预和身心综合干预。这项审查的结果对医疗保健专业人员有意义,以确保加纳和非洲诊断为不孕症的妇女的整体护理。
    Although issues pertaining to infertility affect both males and females, women often become victims of stigmatization and rejection, making them susceptible to emotional pain and suffering. Due to these psychosocial problems, they require not only biomedical treatment, but also psychological, social, and spiritual support. Unfortunately, many women with infertility are not treated holistically. The aim of this review was to retrieve existing evidence of holistic healthcare interventions for women with infertility. Global databases were searched for articles published anywhere in the world between 2010 to 2018 that explored holistic healthcare interventions for women diagnosed with infertility. A total of 18 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed, and data extraction was performed. Findings revealed that interventions adopted in managing infertile women alongside the bio-medical management included: counseling; cognitive behavioral therapy; acceptance and commitment therapy; educational interventions; spiritual interventions; emotionally focused therapy/intervention and integrative body-mind-spirit interventions. The results of this review have implications for healthcare professionals to ensure holistic care of women diagnosed with infertility in Ghana and Africa at large.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:囊性纤维化患者生存率的提高导致合并症发生率的增加,其中糖尿病是最常见的。囊性纤维化相关糖尿病影响19%的青少年和高达50%的成年人,尽管他们对这种共病的经历知之甚少。
    UNASSIGNED:调查青少年和成年人与囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的生活和管理经验。
    UASSIGNED:定性证据的系统回顾和主题分析。
    未经评估:六项研究,评为质量好,包括在审查中,数据中出现了四个主要主题:知识和理解;情感和社会影响;平衡两个条件;接受和调整。尽管主要主题反映了青少年和成人的经历,他们的子主题有微妙的变化。参与者最重要的故事是接受囊性纤维化相关糖尿病并将其整合到他们的生活中。这包括他们对可能发生的囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的准备,以及他们努力平衡与囊性纤维化和糖尿病一起生活和管理的竞争需求。
    UNASSIGNED:囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的诊断及其与日常生活的结合对于许多囊性纤维化患者来说具有挑战性。综述结果表明,囊性纤维化相关糖尿病干预措施的预诊断机会,在诊断时,在持续管理期间,这需要整合到常规的囊性纤维化治疗中。
    UNASSIGNED: Improved survival rates for people with cystic fibrosis have led to increased rates of co-morbidity, of which diabetes is the most common. Cystic fibrosis related diabetes affects 19% of adolescents and up to 50% of adults, although little is known about their experiences of this co-morbidity.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the experiences of living with and managing cystic fibrosis related diabetes among adolescents and adults.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: Six studies, rated good quality, were included in the review and four main themes emerged from the data: knowledge and understanding; emotional and social impact; balancing both conditions; acceptance and adjustment. Although the main themes reflect adolescent and adult experiences, there were subtle variations in their sub-themes. Participants\' overriding story was of journeying towards acceptance and integration of cystic fibrosis related diabetes into their lives. This included their unpreparedness for the likely onset of cystic fibrosis related diabetes and their struggles to balance the competing demands of living with and managing cystic fibrosis and diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis related diabetes and its incorporation into daily life is challenging for many people with cystic fibrosis. Review findings indicate opportunities for cystic fibrosis related diabetes interventions pre-diagnosis, at diagnosis, and during ongoing management, which need integrating into routine cystic fibrosis care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:在美国,我们有一个医疗保健系统危机,患者和提供者的不满情绪很高。为了改变健康和医疗保健,临床提供者必须精通以人为中心的设计思维(DT)方法。
    目的:综合以人为中心的设计(HCD)和DT文献,以创建健康干预措施。
    方法:我们进行了综合文献综述,重点关注HCD和DT在临床医疗环境中的应用。从成立到2020年11月6日,搜索了四个研究数据库。我们分析了使用的方法,谁在使用框架,包括DT阶段。
    结果:最终分析包括24篇文章。在24份手稿中,6名(25%)是护士主导的,15名(63%)是跨学科的第一作者和最后作者(例如,护理和医学)。总的来说,10/24(42%)包括所有DT方法。当通过方法或方法分析文章时,12(50%)表示他们正在使用HCD方法,5(21%)DT方法,7人(29%)表示他们同时使用HCD方法和DT方法。
    结论:使用DT的人和用于创建医疗保健干预的阶段存在不一致。
    BACKGROUND: In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).
    OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.
    METHODS: We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统评价的目的是综合癌症患者所使用的干预措施类型的证据,并报告它们与土著社区的相关性以及它们如何与整体健康保持一致。
    方法:进行叙述性综合的系统综述。
    结果:搜索产生了7995条独特记录;纳入了27项研究,评估了20项干预措施。大多数研究是在美国进行的,五个在澳大利亚,一个在秘鲁。研究设计是横截面(n=13);定性(n=5);混合方法(n=4);实验(n=3);和准实验(n=2)。与参与的土著社区的相关性被评为中等至低。干预的目的多种多样,成分,和结果。涉及的目标(1)支持医疗保健之旅,(2)增加知识,(3)提供社会心理支持,(4)促进有关癌症的对话。干预措施的主要内容是社区会议,病人导航,arts,和印刷/在线/音频材料。参与者主要是女性。89%的研究显示了对评估结果的积极影响。没有研究涉及整体健康的所有四个维度(身体,心理,社会,和精神)是许多社区土著健康的核心。
    结论:我们发现的研究代表了少数土著民族和人民,并且在报告与土著社区的接触时不符合相关标准。为了改善癌症生存之旅,我们需要相关的干预措施,文化上安全有效,并尊重世界各地土著人民对健康和保健的不同概念。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence on the types of interventions that have been utilized by Indigenous Peoples living with cancer, and report on their relevance to Indigenous communities and how they align with holistic wellness.
    METHODS: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted.
    RESULTS: The search yielded 7995 unique records; 27 studies evaluating 20 interventions were included. The majority of studies were conducted in USA, with five in Australia and one in Peru. Study designs were cross-sectional (n=13); qualitative (n=5); mixed methods (n=4); experimental (n=3); and quasi-experimental (n=2). Relevance to participating Indigenous communities was rated moderate to low. Interventions were diverse in aims, ingredients, and outcomes. Aims involved (1) supporting the healthcare journey, (2) increasing knowledge, (3) providing psychosocial support, and (4) promoting dialogue about cancer. The main ingredients of the interventions were community meetings, patient navigation, arts, and printed/online/audio materials. Participants were predominately female. Eighty-nine percent of studies showed positive influences on the outcomes evaluated. No studies addressed all four dimensions of holistic wellness (physical, mental, social, and spiritual) that are central to Indigenous health in many communities.
    CONCLUSIONS: Studies we found represented a small number of Indigenous Nations and Peoples and did not meet relevance standards in their reporting of engagement with Indigenous communities. To improve the cancer survivorship journey, we need interventions that are relevant, culturally safe and effective, and honoring the diverse conceptualizations of health and wellness among Indigenous Peoples around the world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Racism towards Black, Indigenous and people of colour continues to exist in the healthcare system. This leads to profound harm for people who use and work within these settings. This is a scoping review to identify anti-racism interventions in outpatient healthcare settings. Searching the peer-reviewed and grey literature, articles were screened for inclusion by at least two independent reviewers. Synthesizing the socio-ecological levels of interventions with inductively identifying themes, a conceptual model for implementing anti-racism interventions in healthcare settings is presented. In total, 37 peer-reviewed articles were included in the review, with 12 empirical studies and 25 theoretical or conceptual papers. Six grey literature documents were also included. Healthcare institutions need to incorporate an explicit, shared language of anti-racism. Anti-racism action should incorporate leadership buy-in and commitment with dedicated resources, support and funding; a multi-level approach beginning with policy and organizational interventions; transparent accountability mechanisms for sustainable change; long-term meaningful partnerships with Black, Indigenous, and people of colour (i.e., racialized communities); and ongoing, mandatory, tailored staff education and training. Decision-makers and staff in healthcare settings have a responsibility to take anti-racism action and may improve the success and sustainability of their efforts by incorporating the foundational principles and strategies identified in this paper.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号