Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: This study explores and understands community members\' resilience in outpatient clinics, considering various dimensions and types of resilience.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study.
METHODS: This study was conducted in Saudi outpatient clinics from September to December 2023 and included 384 individuals chosen through systematic random sampling. Various tools were used, such as Social Cohesion and Trust Scale, Community Resilience Assessment Tool, Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, Environmental Resilience Assessment, Economic Resilience Index, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Resilience Scale for Adults and Healthcare Resilience Index.
RESULTS: Participants displayed a robust overall resilience level, as indicated by Total Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score of 63.0 ± 9.0. Additionally, they demonstrated commendable levels of resilience in Total Brief Resilience Scale (56.04 ± 8.6), Resilience Scale for Adults (82.5 ± 7.2) and Healthcare Resilience Index (45.8 ± 5.5). These findings offer significant insights into psychological and emotional well-being of the study population, highlighting their adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms across various life domains.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insights into the multidimensional nature of resilience in outpatient settings. The cross-sectional design sets the groundwork for future longitudinal investigations, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to understanding and promoting resilience.
CONCLUSIONS: This study holds immediate implications for participants and their communities. It underscores the adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms prevalent in the outpatient population by revealing commendable resilience levels. This insight enhances individuals\' psychological and emotional well-being, contributing positively to the overall resilience and communal strength. Additionally, this study sheds light on how resilience among community members in Saudi Arabia relates to international advanced nursing communities, providing insight into their work.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who have received outpatient services in the past 6 months were purposively chosen to ensure a diverse representation across age, gender and socio-economic backgrounds in this study.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study.
METHODS: This study was conducted in Saudi outpatient clinics from September to December 2023 and included 384 individuals chosen through systematic random sampling. Various tools were used, such as Social Cohesion and Trust Scale, Community Resilience Assessment Tool, Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, Environmental Resilience Assessment, Economic Resilience Index, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Resilience Scale for Adults and Healthcare Resilience Index.
RESULTS: Participants displayed a robust overall resilience level, as indicated by Total Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score of 63.0 ± 9.0. Additionally, they demonstrated commendable levels of resilience in Total Brief Resilience Scale (56.04 ± 8.6), Resilience Scale for Adults (82.5 ± 7.2) and Healthcare Resilience Index (45.8 ± 5.5). These findings offer significant insights into psychological and emotional well-being of the study population, highlighting their adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms across various life domains.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insights into the multidimensional nature of resilience in outpatient settings. The cross-sectional design sets the groundwork for future longitudinal investigations, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to understanding and promoting resilience.
CONCLUSIONS: This study holds immediate implications for participants and their communities. It underscores the adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms prevalent in the outpatient population by revealing commendable resilience levels. This insight enhances individuals\' psychological and emotional well-being, contributing positively to the overall resilience and communal strength. Additionally, this study sheds light on how resilience among community members in Saudi Arabia relates to international advanced nursing communities, providing insight into their work.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who have received outpatient services in the past 6 months were purposively chosen to ensure a diverse representation across age, gender and socio-economic backgrounds in this study.
摘要：
目的：本研究探索和了解社区成员在门诊诊所的韧性，考虑各种维度和类型的弹性。
方法：横断面研究。
方法：这项研究于2023年9月至12月在沙特门诊进行，包括通过系统随机抽样选择的384名个体。使用了各种工具，如社会凝聚力和信任量表，社区复原力评估工具，社区心理体验评估，环境恢复力评估，经济弹性指数，康纳-戴维森弹性量表，简短的弹性量表，成人弹性量表和医疗保健弹性指数。
结果：参与者表现出强大的整体弹性水平，总Connor-Davidson弹性量表评分63.0±9.0。此外,他们在总短暂复原力量表中表现出了值得称赞的复原力水平(56.04±8.6)，成人弹性量表（82.5±7.2）和医疗保健弹性指数（45.8±5.5）。这些发现为研究人群的心理和情感幸福感提供了重要的见解，强调他们在不同生活领域的适应能力和应对机制。
结论：这项研究为门诊环境中韧性的多维性质提供了有价值的见解。横截面设计为未来的纵向调查奠定了基础，强调需要采取整体方法来理解和促进复原力。
结论：这项研究对参与者及其社区具有直接意义。通过揭示值得称赞的复原力水平，强调了门诊人群中普遍存在的适应能力和应对机制。这种洞察力增强了个人的心理和情感幸福感，对整体韧性和公共力量做出积极贡献。此外,这项研究揭示了沙特阿拉伯社区成员的韧性与国际先进护理社区的关系，提供对他们工作的洞察力。
■有目的地选择在过去6个月内接受过门诊服务的患者，以确保不同年龄的患者。本研究的性别和社会经济背景。
方法：横断面研究。
方法：这项研究于2023年9月至12月在沙特门诊进行，包括通过系统随机抽样选择的384名个体。使用了各种工具，如社会凝聚力和信任量表，社区复原力评估工具，社区心理体验评估，环境恢复力评估，经济弹性指数，康纳-戴维森弹性量表，简短的弹性量表，成人弹性量表和医疗保健弹性指数。
结果：参与者表现出强大的整体弹性水平，总Connor-Davidson弹性量表评分63.0±9.0。此外,他们在总短暂复原力量表中表现出了值得称赞的复原力水平(56.04±8.6)，成人弹性量表（82.5±7.2）和医疗保健弹性指数（45.8±5.5）。这些发现为研究人群的心理和情感幸福感提供了重要的见解，强调他们在不同生活领域的适应能力和应对机制。
结论：这项研究为门诊环境中韧性的多维性质提供了有价值的见解。横截面设计为未来的纵向调查奠定了基础，强调需要采取整体方法来理解和促进复原力。
结论：这项研究对参与者及其社区具有直接意义。通过揭示值得称赞的复原力水平，强调了门诊人群中普遍存在的适应能力和应对机制。这种洞察力增强了个人的心理和情感幸福感，对整体韧性和公共力量做出积极贡献。此外,这项研究揭示了沙特阿拉伯社区成员的韧性与国际先进护理社区的关系，提供对他们工作的洞察力。
■有目的地选择在过去6个月内接受过门诊服务的患者，以确保不同年龄的患者。本研究的性别和社会经济背景。
