BACKGROUND: Kidney living donation carries risks, yet standardized information provision regarding nephrectomy risks and psychological impacts for candidates remains lacking.
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the benefit of interactive health technology in improving the informed consent process for kidney living donation.
METHODS: The Kidney Hub institutional open portal offers comprehensive information on kidney disease and donation. Individuals willing to start the kidney living donation process at Helsinki University Hospital (January 2019-January 2022) were invited to use the patient-tailored digital care path (Living Donor Digital Care Path) included in the Kidney Hub. This platform provides detailed donation process information and facilitates communication between health care professionals and patients. eHealth literacy was evaluated via the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS), and system utility through Likert-scale surveys with scores of 1-5. Qualitative content analysis addressed an open-ended question.
RESULTS: The Kidney Hub portal received over 8000 monthly visits, including to its sections on donation benefits (n=1629 views) and impact on donors\' lives (n=4850 views). Of 127 living kidney donation candidates, 7 did not use Living Donor Digital Care Path. Users\' ages ranged from 20 to 79 years, and they exchanged over 3500 messages. A total of 74 living donor candidates participated in the survey. Female candidates more commonly searched the internet about kidney donation (n=79 female candidates vs n=48 male candidates; P=.04). The mean eHEALS score correlated with internet use for health decisions (r=0.45; P<.001) and its importance (r=0.40; P=.01). Participants found that the Living Donor Digital Care Path was technically satisfactory (mean SUS score 4.4, SD 0.54) and useful but not pivotal in donation decision-making. Concerns focused on postsurgery coping for donors and recipients.
CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine effectively educates living kidney donor candidates on the donation process. The Living Donor Digital Care Path serves as a valuable eHealth tool, aiding clinicians in standardizing steps toward informed consent.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04791670; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04791670.
UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051166.

The novelty and the essential purpose of this research is the preparation of new anti-inflammatory iron complexes in water green solvent using critical micelle concentration of anionic surface active agent (SAA). Three new anti-inflammatory iron complexes have been prepared. Thiophene-electron (es) donor (D) Schiff base (2-(2-OH-benzylidene)-amino)-4, 5, 6, 7-tetrah ydrobenzo[b] thiophene-3-carbonitrile) has been prepared. Molecular structures of all samples were confirmed based on CNH analysis, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra. The molecular structure of Schiff base is further confirmed by computational chemistry using the DFT-B3LYP method, 6-31G (d) basis set. Observed and simulated 1H NMR, UV-Vis. IR/Raman spectra confirmed the molecular structure of D. This Schiff base is intercalated to ferric chloride (FeCl3) giving pure iron charge transfer complex (CTCs). In vitro and kinetic studies confirmed Fe-CTC complexes had (concentration-dependent) potent antimicrobial-, good anti-inflammatory activities. Free radical scavenging activity nitrous oxide (NO.) of Fe (III)CTCs is attributed to geometry Fe(III) ions as distorted octahedral (either monoclinic or triclinic single crystals) via functional groups (-C]N-O, NH2). Elemental analysis and EDS spectra confirmed strong binding between iron and hetero atoms (N, S, O) of D molecules.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ophthalmologists\' interest and opinions regarding corneal transplantation and donation in Türkiye.
METHODS: An online questionnaire was prepared using Google Forms, and the electronic link to this questionnaire was sent via WhatsApp to ophthalmologists working in Türkiye. Eighteen open-ended/multiple-choice questions were asked about ophthalmologists\' demographic information and their opinions regarding corneal transplantation and donation. The answers were analyzed by transferring the data to Excel.
RESULTS: A total of 195 ophthalmologists participated in the survey. While 68.6% of them stated that they wanted to donate their corneas, 21.1% stated that they were undecided, and 10.3% did not want to donate their corneas. While 93.8% of the participants agreed to have a cornea transplant in case of need, 5.7% of them stated that they were undecided, and 0.5% said that they would not accept a cornea transplant. The most frequent (90.5%) reason for being willing to donate one\'s cornea was to give hope to patients with low vision. The most frequent (46.2%) reason for not wanting to donate one\'s cornea was the unwillingness to have one\'s body/eye integrity impaired. The vast majority (80.8%) of the participants thought that there was not enough corneal donation in Türkiye and that this was mostly (85.9%) due to cultural and/or religious reasons.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in a sample with a high level of education and the most knowledge about corneal transplantation, the willingness to donate corneas may remain below the expected rates. Therefore, it is necessary to alleviate unrealistic concerns and prejudices about corneal donation and transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The decision to become a living donor requires consideration of a complex, interactive array of factors that could be targeted for clinical, policy, and educational interventions. Our objective was to assess how financial barriers interact with motivators, other barriers, and facilitators during this process.
METHODS: Data were obtained from a public survey assessing motivators, barriers, and facilitators of living donation. We used multivariable logistic regression and consensus k-means clustering to assess interactions between financial concerns and other considerations in the decision-making process.
RESULTS: Among 1592 respondents, the average age was 43; 74% were female and 14% and 6% identified as Hispanic and Black, respectively. Among employed respondents (72%), 40% indicated that they would not be able to donate without lost wage reimbursement. Stronger agreement with worries about expenses and dependent care challenges was associated with not being able to donate without lost wage reimbursement (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0-1.3; OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.3, respectively). Four respondent clusters were identified. Cluster 1 had strong motivators and facilitators with minimal barriers. Cluster 2 had barriers related to health concerns, nervousness, and dependent care. Clusters 3 and 4 had financial barriers. Cluster 3 also had anxiety related to surgery and dependent care.
CONCLUSIONS: Financial barriers interact primarily with health and dependent care concerns when considering living organ donation. Targeted interventions to reduce financial barriers and improve provider communication regarding donation-related risks are needed.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is usually regarded as a relative contraindication for deceased kidney donation. The pathological variations because of the changes in the immune environment after kidney transplantation (KT) are unclear, and the recovery of renal function is poorly understood. We present a case of KT from a deceased donor with SLE who was followed-up for one year. Although SLE-related hemangioma developed during the perioperative period, it was cured after interventional treatment. A pre-planned biopsy was performed one year after KT, and it was found that most of the pathological changes and immunofluorescent markers of lupus had resolved. Renal function was stable, and urinary protein and occult blood levels reduced one year after KT.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, we initiated a quality improvement endeavor to increase pediatric heart offer acceptance. This study assessed the effect of these interventions at our center.
METHODS: We evaluted pre- and postimplementation cohorts (January 1, 2008-December 31, 2016 vs January 1, 2017-July 1, 2023) comparing donor heart utilization. Six interventions were iterated over time to increase offer acceptance (\"extended criteria\"): ABO-incompatible transplant, ex vivo perfusion for distanced donors, 3-dimensional total cardiac volume (TCV) assessment, acceptance of hepatitis-C or Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 infected donors, and institutional culture change favoring consideration of donors previously considered unacceptable. Outcomes studied included annual HT volume, median waitlist duration, sequence number at acceptance, and post-transplant clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: During the study period, annual transplant volume increased from 16/year to 25/year pre- and postimplementation. Three hundred thirteen of 389 (80%) listed patients were transplanted. Waitlist duration shortened postimplementation (p = 0.01), as did the percentage of accepted heart offers utilizing at least 1 extended criterion (p < 0.001). Institutional culture change and TCV assessment had the largest impact on donor heart utilization (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001). There was no difference in post-HT intubation or intensive care unit days (p = 0.05-0.9), though post-transplant hospitalization duration (p < 0.001) increased. Post-transplant survival was unaffected by the use of extended criteria hearts (p = 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: We report a successful longitudinal, multifaceted effort to increase organ offer utilization, with institutional culture change and TCV assessments most impactful. The use of extended criteria hearts was not associated with inferior survival.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate donor gamete utilization, patient satisfaction, and fertility treatment outcomes of patients pursuing treatment with donor gametes stratified by the desired race and ethnicity of the gamete donor.
METHODS: Survey study SUBJECTS: Patients planning to undergo treatment using donor sperm and/or donor oocytes at a single academic fertility clinic in the Southeastern United States between 2015 and 2020.
UNASSIGNED: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Utilization rates of donor gametes, satisfaction with donor gamete selection and fertility treatment outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity of patient, as well as that of their gamete donor.
RESULTS: Four hundred fifty patients were eligible for inclusion and 170 (38%) responded to the survey. Amongst the respondents, 59% desired a non-Hispanic White gamete donor and 20% desired a non-Hispanic Black gamete donor. Patients seeking a non-Hispanic Black gamete donor had lower odds of utilizing donor gametes (OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.40) compared to individuals seeking a non-Hispanic White gamete donor. When evaluating satisfaction with donor gamete selection, patients seeking a non-Hispanic Black gamete donor reported lower satisfaction compared to individuals seeking a non-Hispanic White gamete donor (OR 0.19, 95% CI [0.09-0.43]). When evaluating fertility outcomes, Non-Hispanic Black patients and those utilizing non-Hispaninc Black gamete donors were found to have a lower odds of successful conception compared to non-Hispanic White patients (OR=0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.46) and individuals seeking non-Hispanic White gamete donors (OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.75), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients seeking non-Hispanic Black donor gametes have lower utilization rates, less satisfaction with gamete donor selection, and lower odds of conception when compared to those seeking non-Hispanic White gamete donors. These findings highlight the need for more racial diversity within donor gamete banks, as well as within the donor pools available through agencies and fertility clinics.

The global pandemic has resulted in the common occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population. In the post-pandemic era, it is imperative to understand the influence of donor SARS-CoV-2 infection on outcomes after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We retrospectively analysed allo-HSCTs from donors with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection or early recovery stage (ERS) (group 1, n = 65) and late recovery stage (group 2, n = 120). Additionally, we included allo-HSCT from donors without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection as group 0 (n = 194). Transplants from donors with different SARS-CoV-2 infection status had comparable primary engraftment and survival rates. However, group 1 had higher incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), grade II-IV (41.5% vs. 28.1% in group 0 [p = 0.014] and 30.6% in group 2 [p = 0.067]) and grade III-IV (22.2% vs. 9.6% [p = 0.004] in group 0 and 12.2% in group 2 [p = 0.049]). Conversely, the risk of aGvHD in group 2 was similar to that in group 0 (p > 0.5). Multivariable analysis identified group 1 associated with grade II-IV (hazard ratio [HR] 2.307, p = 0.010) and grade III-IV (HR 2.962, p = 0.001) aGvHD, which yielded no significant risk factors for survival. In conclusion, we preliminarily demonstrated donors in the active infection state or ERS of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection were associated with higher incidences of aGvHD in transplants from related donors.

BACKGROUND: Better access to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has broadened the utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV) nucleic acid testing (NAT) positive organs with excellent outcomes. However, DAA therapy has been associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of HBV transmission or reactivation with utilization of HBV core antibody positive (HBcAb+) and HCV NAT positive (HCV+) organs, which presumably required DAA therapy.
METHODS: The number of HBcAb+ donors with delineated HCV NAT status was obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database. The number of unexpected HBV infections from transplanted organs adjudicated as \"proven\" or \"probable\" transmission was obtained from the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee database. A chart review of the donors of \"proven\" or \"probable\" cases was conducted.
RESULTS: From January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, 7735 organs were procured from 3767 HBcAb+ donors and transplanted into 7469 recipients; 545 (14.5%) donors were also HCV+. HBV transmission or reactivation occurred in seven recipients. The rate is not significantly different between recipients of HCV+ (0.18%, 2/1115) and the HCV NAT negative (HCV-) organs (0.08%, 5/6354) (p = 0.28) or between recipients of HCV+ and HCV- livers as well as non-liver organs. HBV transmission or reactivation occurred within a median of 319 (range, 41-1117) days post-transplant in the setting of missing, inadequate, or truncated prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: HBV reactivation associated with DAA therapy for HBcAb+ HCV+ organs is less frequent than reported in the non-transplant population, possibly due to the common use of HBV prophylaxis in the at-risk transplant population.

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (post-Cy) is considered a reasonable therapeutic option for patients who lack matched donor or who urgently need transplant procedure due to high risk disease. We analyzed the results of haplo-SCT performed in years 2018-2023. Eighty one patients (46 males) at median age of 52 years underwent haplo-SCT using peripheral blood as a stem cell source in most cases. Indications included hematological malignancies (acute leukemias in 88% of cases). In 25 cases (31%) transplantation was performed in relapsed/refractory disease. Majority of patients (61%) presented with very high and high disease risk index (DRI). Conditioning regimens were as follows: nonmyeloablative - 46 cases (57%), myeloablative - in 18 (22%) and reduced intensity - 17(20%). 90% of patients engrafted. All patients received unified immunosuppressive treatment (post-Cy/TAC/MMF). Median follow-up time was 12 months The cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 37.5% and 37.6%, respectively. Estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) was 43.1% and donor\'s age was the only factor influencing survival. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.5%, whereas relapse incidence (RI) - 35%. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 44% and was mostly due to infections. Haplo-SCT is a feasible treatment option for hematological patients. Younger donor improves post-transplant survival. Strategies to reduce infection-related mortality and relapse rate remain a challenge.