donor

捐赠者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    建议使用正常人免疫球蛋白(NHIG)进行被动免疫接种,作为禁忌接种的高风险麻疹接触者的暴露后预防(PEP)。然而,NHIG中麻疹特异性抗体的浓度取决于合并供体血浆中的抗体水平.有人担心,随着时间的推移,澳大利亚人群的麻疹免疫力可能会下降,献血者的水平会逐渐下降,影响麻疹PEP产生有效NHIG所需的水平。澳大利亚血浆置换供体的横断面研究使用年龄分层,回收血清标本的随机样本,2019年10月至11月收集(n=1199)。麻疹特异性IgG抗体通过ELISA定量(Enzygnost抗麻疹病毒IgG,Siemens),阴性和模棱两可的标本(n=149)也进行了斑块减少中和测试(PRNT)。平均抗体水平(光密度值)从年龄较大到年龄较小的出生队列逐渐下降,从2.09[±0.09,95%CI]到0.58[±0.04,95%CI]出生在1940-1959和1990-2001(p<0.0001)。这项研究表明,年轻的澳大利亚捐献者平均麻疹特异性IgG水平明显较低。虽然目前的NHIG选择政策针对年长的捐助者,随着年轻的出生队列成为越来越大的贡献捐助者的比例,NHIG的麻疹特异性抗体浓度将逐渐降低。因此,我们建议在澳大利亚和其他在最年轻的献血者出生前消除麻疹的国家中监测未来献血者和NHIG产品的麻疹特异性抗体水平。
    Passive immunisation with normal human immunoglobulin (NHIG) is recommended as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for higher-risk measles contacts where vaccination is contraindicated. However, the concentration of measles-specific antibodies in NHIG depends on antibody levels within pooled donor plasma. There are concerns that measles immunity in the Australian population may be declining over time and that blood donors\' levels will progressively decrease, impacting levels required to produce effective NHIG for measles PEP. A cross-sectional study of Australian plasmapheresis donors was performed using an age-stratified, random sample of recovered serum specimens, collected between October and November 2019 (n = 1199). Measles-specific IgG antibodies were quantified by ELISA (Enzygnost anti-measles virus IgG, Siemens), and negative and equivocal specimens (n = 149) also underwent plaque reduction neutralisation testing (PRNT). Mean antibody levels (optical density values) progressively decreased from older to younger birth cohorts, from 2.09 [±0.09, 95% CI] to 0.58 [±0.04, 95% CI] in donors born in 1940-1959 and 1990-2001, respectively (p < 0.0001). This study shows that mean measles-specific IgG levels are significantly lower in younger Australian donors. While current NHIG selection policies target older donors, as younger birth cohorts become an increasingly larger proportion of contributing donors, measles-specific antibody concentrations of NHIG will progressively reduce. We therefore recommend monitoring measles-specific antibody levels in future donors and NHIG products in Australia and other countries that eliminated measles before the birth of their youngest blood donors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了评估供体配子的利用率,患者满意度,和使用供体配子进行治疗的患者的生育治疗结果,根据配子供体的期望种族和种族进行分层。
    方法:调查研究对象:计划在2015年至2020年间在美国东南部的一家学术生育诊所使用供体精子和/或供体卵母细胞进行治疗的患者。
    无主要结果指标:供体配子的利用率,对供体配子选择和生育治疗结果的满意度按患者的种族和种族分层,以及他们的配子捐赠者。
    结果:四百五十名患者符合纳入条件,有170名(38%)对调查做出了回应。在受访者中,59%希望非西班牙裔白配子供体,20%希望非西班牙裔黑配子供体。与寻求非西班牙裔白人配子供体的个体相比,寻求非西班牙裔黑人配子供体的患者使用供体配子的几率较低(OR=0.13,95%CI0.04-0.40)。在评估对供体配子选择的满意度时,寻求非西班牙裔黑人配子供体的患者报告的满意度低于寻求非西班牙裔白人配子供体的患者(OR0.19,95%CI[0.09-0.43]).在评估生育结果时,与非西班牙裔白人患者(OR=0.18,95%CI0.07-0.46)和寻求非西班牙裔白人配子供体的个体相比,非西班牙裔黑人患者和使用非西班牙裔黑人配子供体的成功受孕几率较低。(OR=0.26,95%CI0.09-0.75),分别。
    结论:寻求非西班牙裔黑人供体配子的患者利用率较低,对配子供体选择的满意度较低,与寻求非西班牙裔白人配子捐赠者的人相比,受孕几率较低。这些发现强调了捐助者配子银行内部需要更多的种族多样性,以及通过机构和生育诊所提供的捐助者池中。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate donor gamete utilization, patient satisfaction, and fertility treatment outcomes of patients pursuing treatment with donor gametes stratified by the desired race as well as ethnicity of the gamete donor.
    METHODS: Survey study.
    METHODS: Clinic.
    METHODS: Patients planning to undergo treatment using donor sperm and/or donor oocytes at a single academic fertility clinic in the Southeastern United States between 2015 and 2020.
    METHODS: None.
    METHODS: Utilization rates of donor gametes, satisfaction with donor gamete selection, and fertility treatment outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity of patient, as well as that of their gamete donor.
    RESULTS: Four hundred fifty patients were eligible for inclusion and 170 (38%) responded to the survey. Among the respondents, 59% desired a non-Hispanic White gamete donor and 20% desired a non-Hispanic Black gamete donor. Patients seeking a non-Hispanic Black gamete donor had lower odds of using donor gametes (Odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.40) compared with individuals seeking a non-Hispanic White gamete donor. When evaluating satisfaction with donor gamete selection, patients seeking a non-Hispanic Black gamete donor reported lower satisfaction compared with individuals seeking a non-Hispanic White gamete donor (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.43). When evaluating fertility outcomes, Non-Hispanic Black patients and those using non-Hispaninc Black gamete donors were found to have lower odds of successful conception compared with non-Hispanic White patients (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46) and individuals seeking non-Hispanic White gamete donors (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.75), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients seeking non-Hispanic Black donor gametes have lower utilization rates, less satisfaction with gamete donor selection, and lower odds of conception when compared with those seeking non-Hispanic White gamete donors. These findings highlight the need for more racial diversity within donor gamete banks, as well as within the donor pools available through agencies and fertility clinics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:捐赠的眼部组织的可用性可以节省并增强移植受者的视力;然而,目前对纸巾的需求超过了现有供应。角膜供体短缺导致等待时间增加,延迟手术,延长视力障碍,增加了需要眼组织移植的患者的不便。以前开发了一个基于网络的应用程序,以方便轻松直观地提交潜在的捐助者信息。
    目的:本研究的主要目的是评估卫生保健专业人员对潜在应用的态度,并根据用户反馈和通过应用的捐赠者注册情况评估其有效性。
    方法:研究人员使用了混合方法方法,从文献综述开始,以确定与捐助方采购相关的挑战。进行了利益相关者访谈,以评估医疗保健专业人员对应用程序的看法。通过问卷调查收集用户反馈,调查,和访谈来评估应用程序的可用性和影响。分析了对报告的潜在捐助者的评估和问卷答复。
    结果:该申请的最终版本成功报道了24位真正的角膜捐献者。在64位使用该应用程序与潜在捐赠者进行交流的医疗保健提供者中,其中32人仅出于测试目的提交了试用条目。其余8名卫生保健专业人员报告了潜在的捐助者;然而,这些人不符合捐献者资格标准.大多数参与者认为该应用程序对用户友好,并表示愿意在将来使用它。为布局分配了正面评级,外观,目的,和应用程序的特定功能。受访者强调了通过SMS文本消息自动发送通知,以及整合捐赠者资格和组织收集的所有必要文档,这是该应用程序最有价值的功能。
    结论:研究表明,供体报告应用为提高组织供体的采购提供了有希望的解决方案。此应用程序简化了报告过程,减少文书工作,促进沟通,并收集了有价值的数据进行分析。
    BACKGROUND: The availability of donated eye tissue saves and enhances vision in transplant recipients; however, the current demand for tissue surpasses the available supply. Corneal donor shortages lead to increased wait times, delayed surgeries, prolonged visual impairment, and increased inconvenience to patients requiring eye tissue transplantation. A web-based application was previously developed to facilitate easy and intuitive submission of potential donor information.
    OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives of this study were to assess health care professionals\' attitudes toward the potential application and evaluate its effectiveness based on user feedback and donor registrations through the application.
    METHODS: Researchers used a mixed methods approach, commencing with a literature review to identify challenges associated with donor procurement. Stakeholder interviews were conducted to gauge health care professionals\' perspectives regarding the application. User feedback was collected through questionnaires, surveys, and interviews to assess the application\'s usability and impact. An assessment of the reported potential donors and questionnaire responses were analyzed.
    RESULTS: The final version of the application successfully reported 24 real cornea donors. Among 64 health care providers who used the application to communicate about potential donors, 32 of them submitted trial entries exclusively for testing purposes. The remaining 8 health care professionals reported potential donors; however, these individuals did not meet the donor qualification criteria. The majority of participants found the application user-friendly and expressed their readiness to use it in the future. Positive ratings were assigned to the layout, appearance, purpose, and specific features of the application. Respondents highlighted the automatic sending of notifications via SMS text messages and the integration of all necessary documents for donor qualification and tissue collection as the most valuable functions of the application.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that donor reporting applications offer promising solutions to enhance tissue donor procurement. This application streamlined the reporting process, reduced paperwork, facilitated communication, and collected valuable data for analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:供者的应激性心肌病可能会影响移植物的功能和寿命。本研究旨在探讨超声心动图左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%,和/或器官供体中存在左心室局部室壁运动异常(RWMA),以及短期和长期的肝脏和肾脏移植物存活。我们的次要目标是将移植物存活与供体和受体特征联系起来。
    方法:2006年至2016年,所有在Sahlgrenska大学医院进行肝脏和肾脏捐献的献血者都通过Scandiatransplant登记册与其接受者进行匹配。研究的结果是移植物存活,重新移植,和接受者死亡。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线来绘制到事件的时间。采用多因素Cox回归检验独立性。
    结果:在2006年6月至2016年11月期间,在Sahlgrenska大学医院有370个肝脏供体和312个肾脏供体(与458个受体相匹配)的超声心动图记录。通过超声心动图检查左心室功能障碍的患者,有102名肝脏和72名肾脏捐献者。单变量生存分析显示,与没有LV功能障碍的供体相比,具有LV功能障碍的供体的短期和长期移植物存活率没有统计学差异。捐赠者年龄>65岁,受者再移植和受者肝肿瘤是肝移植预后较差的预测因素(p<0.05)。供体年龄>65,供体高血压,受体再移植,受者诊断为糖尿病或肾炎/肾小球肾炎与肾移植的移植物存活率呈负相关(p<.05)。
    结论:我们发现在肝脏和肾脏移植中供体LV功能障碍与短期和长期移植物存活之间没有显著关联。表明来自这些供体的肝脏和肾脏可以安全移植。
    OBJECTIVE: Stress cardiomyopathy in donors can potentially affect graft function and longevity. This study aims to investigate the association between echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and/or the presence of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in organ donors, and short- and long-term liver and kidney graft survival. Our secondary aim was to link graft survival with donor and recipient characteristics.
    METHODS: All donors considered for liver and kidney donation with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2006 and 2016 were matched with their recipients through the Scandiatransplant register. The studied outcomes were graft survival, re-transplantation, and recipient death. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot time to event. Multivariate Cox-regression was used to test independence.
    RESULTS: There were 370 liver donors and 312 kidney donors (matched with 458 recipients) with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between June 2006 and November 2016. Of patients with LV dysfunction by echocardiography, there were 102 liver- and 72 kidney donors. Univariate survival analyses showed no statistical difference in the short- and long-term graft survival from donors with LV dysfunction compared to donors without. Donor age > 65 years, recipient re-transplantation and recipient liver tumor were predictors of worse outcome in liver transplants (p < .05). Donor age > 65, donor hypertension, recipient re-transplantation, and a recipient diagnosis of diabetes or nephritis/glomerulonephritis had a negative association with graft survival in kidney transplants (p < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant association between donor LV dysfunction and short- and long-term graft survival in liver and kidney transplants, suggesting that livers and kidneys from such donors can be safely transplanted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在各种肝脏疾病中观察到性别特异性差异,但是性别对肝移植(LT)后肝细胞癌(HCC)预后的影响仍有待确定。这项研究是中国首次在全国范围内对性别在HCC患者LT后结局中的作用进行调查。
    方法:分析了2015年1月至2020年12月在中国肝移植注册中心注册的HCC受者的数据。捐赠者之间的联系,收件人,或按性别划分的供体-受体移植模式和LT后结局采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行研究.进一步研究了与不同性别的供体-受体移植模式相关的存活率。
    结果:在这项研究的3,769名患者中,1-,3-,肝移植后HCC患者的5年总生存率(OS)为96.1%,86.4%,78.5%,分别,在女性接受者中,和95.8%,79.0%,70.7%,分别,在PSM后的男性接受者中(P=0.009)。然而,有女性供者和男性供者的受者之间的OS具有可比性.多因素分析显示,男性受者性别是肝移植术后生存的危险因素(HR=1.381,P=0.046)。在供体-受体移植模式中,男性-男性供者-受者移植模式与移植后存活最差相关(P<0.05).
    结论:我们的研究结果强调,女性接受者的LT后结局明显优于男性接受者,男性-男性供者-受者移植模式与LT术后生存最差相关.来自男性捐赠者的肝脏可能为女性接受者提供最大的益处。我们的结果表明,性别应被视为器官分配的关键因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Sex-specific differences are observed in various liver diseases, but the influence of sex on the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains to be determined. This study is the first Chinese nationwide investigation of the role of sex in post-LT outcomes in patients with HCC.
    METHODS: Data for recipients with HCC registered in the China Liver Transplant Registry between January 2015 and December 2020 were analyzed. The associations between donor, recipient, or donor-recipient transplant patterns by sex and the post-LT outcomes were studied with propensity score matching (PSM). The survival associated with different sex-based donor-recipient transplant patterns was further studied.
    RESULTS: Among 3,769 patients enrolled in this study, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with HCC after LT were 96.1%, 86.4%, and 78.5%, respectively, in female recipients, and 95.8%, 79.0%, and 70.7%, respectively, in male recipients after PSM (P = 0.009). However, the OS was comparable between recipients with female donors and male donors. Multivariate analysis indicated that male recipient sex was a risk factor for post-LT survival (HR = 1.381, P = 0.046). Among the donor-recipient transplant patterns, the male-male donor-recipient transplant pattern was associated with the poorest post-LT survival (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted that the post-LT outcomes of female recipients were significantly superior to those of male recipients, and the male-male donor-recipient transplant pattern was associated with the poorest post-LT survival. Livers from male donors may provide the most benefit to female recipients. Our results indicate that sex should be considered as a critical factor in organ allocation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在阐明供体和受体年龄组合对接受肺移植的患者短期生存率的影响。
    我们回顾性回顾了南京医科大学附属无锡市人民医院2017-2020年所有成人(≥18岁)数据库的数据,肺移植受者,以及他们的相关捐赠者。使用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型分析了供体和受体年龄对生存的影响。还基于接受者和供体年龄进行亚组分析。
    不同的供体和受体年龄组合影响术后短期生存率。当接受者≤55岁时,年轻供者年龄组术后30天生存率明显高于老年供者年龄组(P=0.040);当供者年龄≤40岁时,年轻受者年龄组的术后生存率明显高于老年受者年龄组(P=0.031,P=0.026,P=0.034,P=0.018,90天,180天,手术后一年,分别)。
    年轻的受者移植后的存活率高于老年受者,这种好处可能会被年长的捐赠者所损害。此外,供体年龄对患者生存率的影响有限,在年轻受者和手术后不久更为明显.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to clarify the effect of donor and recipient age combinations on the short-term survival rates of patients undergoing lung transplantation.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed the 2017-2020 data of the Affiliated Wuxi People\'s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University database for all adults (≥18 years), lung transplant recipients, and their associated donors. The impact of donor and recipient ages on survival was analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Subgroup analysis was also performed based on recipient and donor ages.
    UNASSIGNED: Different donor and recipient age combinations affected the short-term postoperative survival rates. When recipients were ≤55 years, the survival rates of the younger donor age group were significantly higher than the older donor age group at 30 days after surgery (P = 0.040); when the donors were ≤40 years, the postoperative survival rates of the younger recipient age group were significantly higher than the older recipient age group (P = 0.031, P = 0.026, P = 0.034, and P = 0.018 for 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 1 year after surgery, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Younger recipients had a higher survival rate after transplantation than older recipients, and this benefit could be compromised by older donors. Furthermore, the influence of donor age on patient survival rate was limited and more pronounced in younger recipients and shortly after surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:供体-受体大小不匹配通常发生在小儿肾移植(KT)中。然而,其对移植物存活的影响尚不清楚。这项研究旨在确定供体-受体大小不匹配对小儿KT移植肾脏长期存活率的影响。
    方法:共纳入241例接受KT的儿科患者。对所有患者的病历进行回顾性分析,根据供体-受体大小不匹配分析供体-受体大小不匹配与移植物功能和长期移植物结局之间的相关性。
    结果:接受KT时的平均体重为34.31±16.85和56.53±16.73kg,分别。平均随访时间为96.49±52.98个月。直到KT后1年,供体-受体体重比(DRBWR)或供体-受体身体表面积比(DRBSR)与移植物功能之间均呈显着正相关。然而,这种相关性在最后一次随访时无法得到证实.使用Fine和Gray的亚分布风险模型进行长期生存分析的结果表明,根据DRBWR或DRBSR,移植肾的存活率没有显着差异。
    结论:儿童KT患者供体-受体大小不匹配不是决定移植肾长期预后的重要因素。
    BACKGROUND: Donor-recipient size mismatching is commonly occurs in pediatric kidney transplantation (KT). However, its effect on graft survival remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the effect of donor-recipient size mismatch on the long-term survival rate of transplant kidneys in pediatric KT.
    METHODS: A total of 241 pediatric patients who received KT were enrolled. The medical records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed, and the correlation between donor-recipient size mismatch and graft function and long-term graft outcome was analyzed according to donor-recipient size mismatch.
    RESULTS: Recipients and donors\' mean body weight at the time of KT were 34.31 ± 16.85 and 56.53 ± 16.73 kg, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 96.49 ± 52.98 months. A significant positive correlation was observed between donor-recipient body weight ratio (DRBWR) or donor-recipient body surface area ratio (DRBSR) and graft function until 1 year after KT. However, this correlation could not be confirmed at the last follow-up. The results of long-term survival analysis using Fine and Gray\'s subdistribution hazard model showed no significant difference of the survival rate of the transplant kidney according to DRBWR or DRBSR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Donor-recipient size mismatch in pediatric KT is not an important factor in determining the long-term prognosis of transplant kidneys.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:紧急医疗护理的主要组成部分是血液。在过去的几年里,加沙地带面临着反复的战争,更加强调献血的重要性。本研究旨在评估医学生的知识,态度,和有关加沙自愿献血的做法(VBD)。
    方法:这项横断面研究使用分层抽样方法对加沙两所医学院的医学生进行调查,Al-Azhar和伊斯兰大学,2022年3月至4月。一份35个项目的自我管理问卷,包括四个部分:人口统计,知识,态度,和实践,被使用。数据采用SPSS25版进行统计分析。
    结果:共调查了329名学生(应答率为89.6%)。中位年龄为20岁(IQR=3)。男性占样本的44.7%。总的来说,54.7%的人对VBD有很好的了解,68.1%的人不知道每次献血之间的等待时间,就献血标准而言,只有30.7%,25.2%的人知道捐赠的适当年龄和体重。此外,学校是最多的信息来源(66.6%)。同时,73.3%的参与者对VBD持积极态度。只有(17.6%)不愿意献血,无论他们与接受者的关系如何。绝大多数(83.3%)从未献血,12.5%的人未来没有计划这样做。最常见的两个原因是缺乏机会和健康问题(31.0%,11.9%,分别)。
    结论:样本医学生对VBD持积极态度,但是他们对献血标准的了解不足,大多数人都没有献血。需要开展充分的提高认识运动,以提高对这一普遍和当地重要主题的认识。
    BACKGROUND: A major component of emergency medical care is blood. The Gaza Strip has faced repeated wars over the last few years, emphasizing the importance of blood donation even more. This study aims to assess medical students\' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding voluntary blood donation in Gaza (VBD).
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study used stratified sampling method to survey medical students at Gaza\'s two medical schools, Al-Azhar and Islamic Universities, between March and April 2022. A 35-item self-administered questionnaire with four sections: demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practice, was used. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 25.
    RESULTS: A total of 329 students were surveyed (response rate of 89.6%). The median age was 20 (IQR = 3). Males made up 44.7% of the sample. Overall, 54.7% were found to have good knowledge about VBD, 68.1% did not know the time-to-wait between each whole blood donation, and in terms of blood donation criteria, only 30.7%, 25.2% were aware of the appropriate age and weight for donating. Moreover, school was the source of most information (66.6%). Meanwhile, 73.3% of participants expressed a positive attitude toward VBD. Only (17,6%) did not show a willingness to donate blood regardless of their relationship with the recipient. The vast majority (83.3%) had never donated blood before, and 12.5% had no plans to do so in the future. The two most common reasons for this were the lack of opportunity and health issues (31.0%, 11.9%, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The sampled medical students had a positive attitude toward VBD, but there were deficiencies in their knowledge of blood donation criteria, and most had not donated blood. Adequate awareness campaigns are required to increase awareness about this universally and locally important subject.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    解剖实验室能激起学生强烈的情绪反应,这反过来可以促进同理心的增长,照顾脆弱的其他人,和专业性。尽管如此,对不同实验室模式的相对情绪影响知之甚少。对COVID-19大流行的反应创造了一个机会,可以比较学生在类似课程中的情感经历,在类似课程中,一组学生解剖了捐赠者,另一组学生从被起诉的捐赠者那里学到了东西。这些课程在内容上是相同的,长度,教学设计,和评估。基于解剖(2019年秋季)和基于解剖(2020年秋季)课程的学生完成了先前经过验证的调查,该调查使用定量和定性问题来评估他们对捐赠者和解剖学实验室经验的感受。两个队列中的学生都报告了对经历的总体赞赏。两组经历的负面主题包括感到焦虑,对捐赠者人格化的担忧,和实验室里的身体不适。解剖过程中的学生报告说,与捐赠者和捐赠者的家庭有更强的联系,但也更经常感到厌恶等负面情绪,焦虑,感到孤独。赞成课程的学生报告了更为一致的积极回应,但担心没有尽可能充分地使用捐助者。不管教学设计如何,学生在解剖学实验室有复杂的情感体验,我们的结果表明,这些感觉在解剖的背景下可能更强烈。解剖学医师应促进教育环境,使学生能够学习处理复杂或具有挑战性的情绪。
    The anatomy laboratory can incite strong emotional reactions in students, which can in turn facilitate growth in empathy, care for vulnerable others, and professionalism. Despite this, little is known about the relative emotional impacts of different laboratory modalities. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic created an opportunity to compare the emotional experiences of students in similar courses in which one group of students dissected donors and the other group learned from prosected donors. The courses were otherwise the same in content, length, instructional design, and assessment. Students in the dissection-based (Fall 2019) and prosection-based (Fall 2020) courses completed a previously validated survey that used quantitative and qualitative questions to assess their feelings about the donors and the anatomy laboratory experience. Students in both cohorts reported overall appreciation for having had the experience. Negative themes experienced by both groups included feeling anxiety, worries about depersonalizing donors, and physical discomfort in the laboratory. Students in the dissection course reported stronger connections with the donors and the donors\' families but also more frequently felt negative feelings such as disgust, anxiety, and feeling alone. Students in the prosection course reported more consistently positive responses but worried about not using the donors to the fullest extent possible. Regardless of pedagogical design, students have complex emotional experiences in the anatomy laboratory and our results indicate that these feelings may be more intense in the context of dissection. Anatomists should foster educational settings that enable students to learn to process complex or challenging emotions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: The illicit drug toxicity (overdose) crisis has worsened across Canada, between 2016 and 2021 more than 28 000 individuals have died of drug toxicity. Organ donation from persons who experience drug toxicity death has increased in recent years.
    UNASSIGNED: This study examines whether graft loss after kidney transplantation differed by donor cause of death.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: Provincial transplant program of British Columbia, Canada.
    UNASSIGNED: Transplant recipients who received kidney transplantation from deceased donors aged 12 to 70 years between 2013 and 2019 (N = 1012).
    UNASSIGNED: Transplant recipient all cause graft loss (graft loss due to any cause including death) was compared by donor cause of death from drug toxicity or other.
    UNASSIGNED: Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of all-cause graft survival, and 3-year complete as well as stratified inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models were conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: Drug toxicity death donors donated to 25% (252/1012) of kidney transplantations. Drug toxicity death donors were more likely to be young, white, males, with fewer comorbidities such as diabetes or hypertension but were more likely to have a terminal serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL or be hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive. Unadjusted 5-year estimate of all-cause graft survival was 97% for recipients of drug toxicity donor kidneys and 83% for recipients of non-drug toxicity donor kidneys (P < .001). Recipients of drug toxicity death donor kidneys had decreased risk of all cause graft loss compared to recipients of non-drug toxicity death donor kidneys (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.77, P = .012). This is primarily due to the reduced risk of all-cause graft loss for recipients of younger (≤35 years) drug toxicity death donor kidneys (HR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00-0.55, P = .015).
    UNASSIGNED: Potential selection bias, potential unmeasured confounding.
    UNASSIGNED: Donation after drug toxicity death is safe and should be considered more broadly to increase deceased donor kidney donation.
    UNASSIGNED: La crise liée à la toxicité des drogues illicites (surdose) s’est aggravée partout au Canada. Entre 2016 et 2021, plus de 28 000 personnes sont mortes en raison de la toxicité des drogues. Les dons d’organes provenant de personnes décédées d’une surdose ont augmenté dans les dernières années.
    UNASSIGNED: Déterminer si la cause de décès du donneur influe sur la survie du greffon après une transplantation rénale.
    UNASSIGNED: Étude de cohorte rétrospective.
    UNASSIGNED: Program provincial de transplantation de la Colombie-Britannique (Canada).
    UNASSIGNED: Des receveurs (N=1012) d’une greffe de rein entre 2013 et 2019 dont l’organe provenait de donneurs décédés âgés de 12 à 70 ans.
    UNASSIGNED: La perte du greffon toutes causes confondues (y compris le décès du receveur) a été comparée selon la cause de décès du donneur, que celle-ci soit attribuable à une surdose ou à une autre cause.
    UNASSIGNED: Des estimations de Kaplan-Meier de la survie de la greffe toutes causes confondues à 5 ans et à 3 ans ont été réalisées, ainsi que des modèles de risques proportionnels de Cox à probabilité inverse de traitements pondérés.
    UNASSIGNED: Les donneurs décédés par surdose comptaient pour 25 % (252/1012) des organes reçus pour les transplantations rénales. Les donneurs dont le décès était attribuable à une surdose étaient plus susceptibles d’être de jeunes hommes blancs présentant moins de comorbidités comme le diabète ou l’hypertension, mais plus susceptibles d’avoir un taux de créatinine sérique terminal d’au moins 1,5 mg/dl ou d’être positifs pour l’hépatite C. L’estimation non corrigée de la survie du greffon toutes causes confondues après 5 ans était de 97 % pour les reins provenant de donneurs décédés d’une surdose et de 83 % pour les reins provenant de donneurs décédés d’une autre cause (p < 0,001). Les receveurs d’un rein provenant d’un donneur décédé par surdose présentaient un plus faible risque de perte du greffon toutes causes confondues comparativement aux receveurs d’un rein de donneur décédé d’une autre cause (risque relatif [RR]: 0,30; intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC 95 %]: 0,12-0,77; p=0,012). Ces résultats sont principalement attribuables à un plus faible risque de perte du greffon toutes causes confondues lorsque le rein provient d’un donneur plus jeune (≤ 35 ans) même si ce dernier est décédé de surdose (RR: 0,05; IC 95 %: 0,00-0,55; p=0,015).
    UNASSIGNED: Possible biais de sélection; possibles facteurs de confusion non mesurés.
    UNASSIGNED: Le don d’organes à la suite d’un décès par surdose est sans danger et devrait être envisagé plus largement afin d’augmenter les dons de reins par des donneurs décédés.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号