Patch Tests

修补程序测试
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    香料材料广泛用于日常生活中的各种类型的产品中,其中许多可以是接触敏化剂。据报道,对香料的接触过敏在世界范围内很常见。与其他接触过敏原如金属和防腐剂不同,消费品中的香料材料可以作为单一的香料化学品或以被称为天然复合物质的混合物的形式存在。由于芳香材料的复杂性和已知引起接触敏化的大量芳香物质,选择合适的材料进行补丁测试是具有挑战性的。在不同的基线系列中另外引入了新兴的香料标记物,用于筛选以提高香料接触过敏检测的速率。此外,基础知识不断更新,临床观点,暴露源,以及有关香料使用的规定。在使用香料测试材料进行补丁测试时避免陷阱也至关重要,不应忽视。因此,这篇综述旨在更新知识,为香水接触过敏的诊断和管理提供高质量的整体方法。
    Fragrance materials are widely used in various types of products in daily life and many of them can be contact sensitizers. Contact allergy to fragrances has been reported to be common worldwide. Unlike other groups of contact allergens such as metals and preservatives, fragrance materials in consumer products can be present as single fragrance chemicals or in the form of mixtures known as natural complex substances. Due to the complexity of the fragrance materials and the high number of fragrance substances known to cause contact sensitization, selecting suitable materials for patch testing is challenging. Emerging fragrance markers have been additionally introduced in different baseline series for screening to enhance the rate of fragrance contact allergy detection. Moreover, there have been continual updates on basic knowledge, clinical perspectives, sources of exposure, and regulations on the use of fragrance materials. Avoiding pitfalls while performing patch testing with fragrance test materials is also crucial and should not be overlooked. Therefore, this review aims to update knowledge to provide a high-quality holistic approach to fragrance contact allergy diagnosis and management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    眼睑皮炎(ED)影响美容上重要的区域,并导致患者痛苦。尽管正在进行和最近的研究努力,ED仍然是一个多学科问题,需要进一步表征。我们旨在评估ED患者的特应性眼睑皮炎(AED)频率并进行临床分析。从01.01.1980到01.02.2024,使用以下搜索策略搜索PubMed数据库:(眼睑或眶周或眼周)和(皮炎或湿疹)。包括斑贴测试的ED患者的研究。使用JBISUMARI软件进行比例荟萃分析。我们纳入了欧洲的65项研究,北美,亚洲和澳大利亚,共有21,793名接受斑贴测试的ED患者。在经过斑贴测试的ED患者中,有27.5%(95%CI0.177,0.384)的AED报告。在8453例报告有病变分布的ED患者中,有51.6%(95%CI0.408,0.623)发现孤立性ED。包括430例孤立性AED患者。我们的荟萃分析表明,经过斑贴测试的ED患者的AED频率超过了先前估计的10%。在成年患者中发现了孤立的AED,参加接触过敏诊所。未来的研究需要阐明成人孤立性AED的全球患病率和自然史。
    Eyelid dermatitis (ED) affects a cosmetically significant area and leads to patients\' distress. Despite ongoing and recent research efforts, ED remains a multidisciplinary problem that needs further characterization. We aimed to evaluate the atopic eyelid dermatitis (AED) frequency in ED patients and to perform their clinical profiling. PubMed databases were searched from 01.01.1980 till 01.02.2024 to PRISMA guidelines using a search strategy: (eyelid OR periorbital OR periocular) AND (dermatitis or eczema). Studies with patch-tested ED patients were included. Proportional meta-analysis was performed using JBI SUMARI software. We included 65 studies across Europe, North America, Asia and Australia, with a total of 21,793 patch-tested ED patients. AED was reported in 27.5% (95% CI 0.177, 0.384) of patch-tested ED patients. Isolated ED was noted in 51.6% (95% CI 0.408, 0.623) of 8453 ED patients with reported lesion distribution, including 430 patients with isolated AED. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the AED frequency in patch-tested ED patients exceeded the previous estimate of 10%. Isolated AED was noted in adult patients, attending contact allergy clinics. Future studies are needed to elucidate the global prevalence and natural history of isolated AED in adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议使用斑贴试验(PT)来确定非即时皮肤药物不良反应(NICADR)的罪魁祸首。我们最近报道说,在NICADR患者中,第(D)2天的一次独特的PT读数与第D4天的第二次晚期读数相比,错过了几乎一半(45.3%)的阳性PT.
    目的:评估D4上PT读数与D3上PT读数的敏感性变化。
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性(2020年7月至2023年6月)单中心研究,研究对象是患有PT的患者,其NICADR的读数为两个。我们比较了D3的读数和D4的第二次读数对可疑药物(主要结果)和同时测试的相关药物(次要结果)。
    结果:在研究期间,249名患者接受了D3和D4读数的贴片测试。关于主要结果,13.7%的患者在D3时的第一次读数为阳性,和D4时的读数为24.9%的患者(p<0.0001)。关于次要结果,D3时仅9.6%的患者PT均为阳性,D4时则为24.9%(p<0.0001).考虑到评估的药物类别,没有观察到统计学差异。然而,我们强调,D3读数检测到所有卡马西平阳性PT(n=3),而克林霉素阳性PT(n=4)仅在D4的第二次读数的帮助下被鉴定。
    结论:这项研究表明,与单一D3读数相比,额外的D4读数增强了PT识别罪魁祸首药物及相关药物的敏感性.进一步的研究应该复制这些发现,并评估D4上单次阅读PT的医学经济平衡和安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Patch tests (PTs) are recommended to identify the culprit drug in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions (NICADRs). We recently reported that, in patients with NICADRs, a unique reading of PTs at day (D)2 compared with an additional second late reading at D4 missed almost half (45.3%) of the positive PTs.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in sensitivity of the PT reading on D4 compared with the reading on D3.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective (July 2020-June 2023) monocentric study of patients who had PTs with two readings for a NICADR. We compared reading on D3 and the second reading on D4 for the suspected drug (primary outcome) and for the related drugs tested simultaneously (secondary outcome).
    RESULTS: During the study period, 249 patients underwent patch testing with D3 and D4 readings. Regarding the primary outcome, the first reading at D3 was positive for 13.7% of patients, and the reading at D4 for 24.9% of patients (p < 0.0001). Regarding the secondary outcome, only 9.6% of patients had all their positive PT at D3 compared with 24.9% of patients at D4 (p < 0.0001). Considering the evaluated drug classes, no statistical difference was observed. However, we highlight that D3 reading detected all positive carbamazepine PTs (n = 3) while positive clindamycin PTs (n = 4) were identified only with the help of the second reading on D4.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, an additional D4 reading compared with a single D3 reading enhanced the sensitivity of PTs to identify culprit drugs and related. Further studies should replicate these findings and evaluate the medico-economic balance and safety of a single reading of PTs on D4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)是否与特应性有关存在争议。湿疹与ACD风险的研究好坏参半,关于其他特应性疾病的文献很少。目的:我们的研究检查了几种特应性疾病的患病率,包括过敏性鼻炎,湿疹,哮喘,ACD患者的食物过敏,并将其与无ACD患者进行比较。方法:我们回顾性分析年龄≥18岁的ACD成年患者(n=162),斑贴检测结果为阳性,并记录任何特应性病史,包括儿童湿疹,哮喘,过敏性鼻炎,免疫球蛋白E介导的食物过敏。从我们的电子病历系统(年龄和性别匹配)中比较了我们的ACD队列和没有ACD的对照组(n=163)之间特应性疾病的患病率。结果:在我们的ACD患者中,53(33%)患有过敏性鼻炎,22人(14%)有儿童湿疹,32(20%)患有哮喘,和8(5%)有食物过敏。我们观察到,与对照组相比,ACD组的总体特应性(n=76)的几率增加(比值比[OR]1.88;p=0.007)。变应性鼻炎是最高的危险因素(n=53),OR为12.64(p<0.001)。ACD组儿童湿疹(n=22)也增加(OR2.4;p=0.026)。ACD组发生哮喘和食物过敏的几率也增加;然而,与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义(OR1.76[p=0.071]和OR2.76[p=0.139],分别)。结论:ACD患者患湿疹的几率增加,过敏性鼻炎,和总体特应性条件。未发现哮喘和食物过敏具有统计学上的显着相关性。深入研究ACD中特应性危险因素的大型研究对于证实这些发现很重要。
    Background: There is controversy on whether allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is associated with atopy. Research on eczema and the risk of ACD is mixed, and there is sparse literature on other atopic conditions. Objective: Our study examined the prevalence of several atopic conditions, including allergic rhinitis, eczema, asthma, and food allergies in patients with ACD, and compared these to patients without ACD. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients ages ≥ 18 years with ACD (n = 162) with positive patch testing results and documented any history of atopy, including childhood eczema, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy. The prevalence of atopic conditions was compared between our ACD cohort and controls without ACD (n = 163) from our electronic medical records system (age and gender matched). Results: Among our patients with ACD, 53 (33%) had allergic rhinitis, 22 (14%) had childhood eczema, 32 (20%) had asthma, and 8 (5%) had food allergies. We observed that the odds of atopy overall (n = 76) in the ACD group compared with the control group were increased (odds ratio [OR] 1.88; p = 0.007). Allergic rhinitis was the highest risk factor (n = 53) with an OR of 12.64 (p < 0.001). Childhood eczema (n = 22) was also increased in the ACD group (OR 2.4; p = 0.026). The odds of asthma and food allergy in the ACD group were also increased; however, the difference was not statistically significant from the control group (OR 1.76 [p = 0.071] and OR 2.76 [p = 0.139], respectively). Conclusion: Patients with ACD had increased odds of eczema, allergic rhinitis, and atopic conditions overall. Asthma and food allergies were not found to have a statistically significant correlation. Larger studies that delve into atopic risk factors in ACD would be important to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:布地奈德和新戊酸替索可托作为皮质类固醇接触过敏的标志物受到质疑,因为他们无法检测到相当比例的过敏患者。
    目的:探讨丙酸氯倍他索在增强皮质类固醇致敏检测中的潜在作用。
    方法:在2022年1月至2023年12月之间,参加西班牙接触性皮炎和皮肤过敏研究注册中心的患者接受了包括布地奈德在内的扩展基线系列测试,新戊酸替索可托,丙酸氯倍他索0.1%的乙醇和1%的凡士林。
    结果:共检查了4338例患者。24例患者对布地奈德过敏(0.55%,95%CI:0.37-0.82);9例患者对新戊酸替索可托醇过敏(0.21%,95%CI:0.11-0.39);23例患者对氯倍他索过敏(0.53%,95%CI:0.35-0.79)。布地奈德检测到对氯倍他索过敏的患者中只有4例,新戊酸替索可托检测到1例。凡士林或乙醇中的氯倍他索之间的阳性试验数量没有显着差异。
    结论:在西班牙,布地奈德仍然是主要的皮质类固醇过敏标志物,而新戊酸替索可托的作用值得怀疑。在西班牙基线系列中添加丙酸氯倍他索将提高检测对皮质类固醇过敏的患者的能力。
    BACKGROUND: Budesonide and tixocortol pivalate as markers of contact allergy to corticosteroids have been questioned, as they are not able to detect a significant percentage of allergic patients.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential role of clobetasol propionate in enhancing corticosteroid sensitisation detection.
    METHODS: Between January 2022 and December 2023, patients who attended centres involved in the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy were tested with an extended baseline series that included budesonide, tixocortol pivalate, clobetasol propionate 0.1% in ethanol and 1% in petrolatum.
    RESULTS: A total of 4338 patients were tested. Twenty-four patients were allergic to budesonide (0.55%, 95% CI: 0.37-0.82); nine patients were allergic to tixocortol pivalate (0.21%, 95% CI: 0.11-0.39); and 23 patients were allergic to clobetasol (0.53%, 95% CI: 0.35-0.79). Only four of those patients allergic to clobetasol were detected by budesonide and one by tixocortol pivalate. No significant differences in the number of positive tests were found between clobetasol in petrolatum or ethanol.
    CONCLUSIONS: In Spain budesonide remains the main corticosteroid allergy marker whereas the role of tixocortol pivalate is questionable. The addition of clobetasol propionate to the Spanish baseline series would improve the ability to detect patients allergic to corticosteroids.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:异氰酸酯用作聚氨酯(PU)产品的起始材料。它们是相对重要的职业皮肤致敏剂。
    目的:分析19种异氰酸酯测试物质和4,4'-二氨基二苯基甲烷(MDA)的大型异氰酸酯贴片测试系列的结果,4,4'-二苯基甲烷二异氰酸酯(MDI)超敏反应的标志。
    方法:筛选异氰酸酯系列中的阳性反应的测试文件。对有阳性反应的患者进行职业分析,暴露和诊断。
    结果:在2010-2019年,该系列中有53例患者出现阳性反应(338例患者中有16%接受测试)。MDA,公认的MDI过敏筛选物质,30例患者呈阳性,23名患者的内部单体MDI测试物质和19-21名患者的3种不同的聚合MDI测试物质。我们从MDI中诊断出16例职业性过敏性接触性皮炎(OACD),其中包括3例管道修复者。油漆硬化剂中六亚甲基-1,6-二异氰酸酯(HDI)低聚物引起5例OACD,2,4-甲苯二异氰酸酯(TDI;n=3)和异佛尔酮二异氰酸酯(IPDI;n=1)加在一起的情况更多。
    结论:与以前的研究相比,聚合MDI测试物质并不优于单体MDI。在PU管道涂料的固化剂中,不仅会受到环氧产品和丙烯酸酯的影响,还会受到MDI的影响。HDI低聚物是仅次于MDI的第二重要OACD原因。
    BACKGROUND: Isocyanates are used as starting materials of polyurethane (PU) products. They are relatively important occupational skin sensitizers.
    OBJECTIVE: To analyse results of a large isocyanate patch test series of 19 isocyanate test substances and 4,4\'-diaminodiphenylmethane (MDA), a marker of 4,4\'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) hypersensitivity.
    METHODS: Test files were screened for positive reactions in the isocyanate series. Patients with positive reactions were analysed for occupation, exposure and diagnosis.
    RESULTS: In 2010-2019, 53 patients had positive reactions in the series (16% of 338 patients tested). MDA, the well-established screening substance for MDI allergy, was positive in 30 patients, an in-house monomeric MDI test substance in 23 patients and 3 different polymeric MDI test substances in 19-21 patients. We diagnosed 16 cases of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) from MDI including 3 pipe reliners. Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate (HDI) oligomers in paint hardeners caused 5 cases of OACD, more cases than 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (TDI; n = 3) and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI; n = 1) put together.
    CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, polymeric MDI test substances were not superior to a monomeric MDI. Pipe reliners may get sensitised not only by epoxy products and acrylates but also by MDI in hardeners of PU pipe coatings. HDI oligomers were the second most important causes of OACD after MDI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:芳香物质是全球接触过敏的常见原因。香味暴露程度因性别而异,年龄和可能的国家,受化妆品可用性的影响,环境条件和文化习俗。
    目的:系统地回顾和收集连续斑贴测试的欧洲皮炎患者对香料混合物I(FMI)和香料混合物II(FMII)的致敏率。
    方法:共有4134篇关于欧洲皮炎患者斑贴试验结果的出版物,从1981年到2022年发布,根据以前注册和发布的PROSPERO协议进行了系统审查。
    结果:分析了84篇合格的原始文章。香料混合物I(FMI)的致敏总体患病率为6.81%(95%CI:6.37-7.28),FMII为3.64%(95%CI:3.3-4.01)。对FMI的敏感性在中欧和东欧最为普遍,对FMII的敏感性在西欧最为普遍。没有观察到明显的时间趋势。在儿科皮炎患者中,FMI和FMII的致敏患病率分别为4.09%(95%CI:3.37-4.96)和2.17%(95%CI:1.53-3.07).
    结论:FMI和FMII的斑贴试验结果阳性的频率仍然很高。致敏在儿童中也很普遍。增强化妆品的监管和标签在避免对香料过敏原的暴露和致敏中起着至关重要的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Fragrance substances are a frequent cause of contact allergy worldwide. Fragrance exposure varies by sex, age and possibly country, influenced by cosmetic availability, environmental conditions and cultural practices.
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and gather prevalence of sensitization to fragrance mix I (FM I) and fragrance mix II (FM II) in consecutively patch tested European dermatitis patients.
    METHODS: A total of 4134 publications on patch test results of European dermatitis patients, published from 1981 to 2022, were systematically reviewed according to a previously registered and published PROSPERO protocol.
    RESULTS: Eighty-four eligible original articles were analysed. Overall prevalence of sensitization to fragrance mix I (FM I) was 6.81% (95% CI: 6.37-7.28), and FM II was 3.64% (95% CI: 3.3-4.01). Sensitization to FM I was most prevalent in Central and Eastern Europe and to FM II in Western Europe. No clear time trends were observed. Among paediatric dermatitis patients, sensitization prevalence for FM I and FM II was 4.09% (95% CI: 3.37-4.96) and 2.17% (95% CI: 1.53-3.07).
    CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of positive patch test results for both FMI and FMII remains high. Sensitization is also prevalent among children. Enhanced regulation and labelling of cosmetic products play a vital role in averting exposure and sensitization to fragrance allergens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Tefillin是犹太人在日常祈祷时佩戴的宗教用品。认识到重铬酸钾敏感性继发的Tefillin皮炎,但数据仍然稀疏。
    目的:了解替福林皮炎的患病率及临床特点。
    方法:2009-2023年在三级皮肤科诊所接受欧洲基线系列斑贴试验并被诊断为替福林皮炎的患者通过文件审查进行鉴定,并记录其临床数据。
    结果:在接受测试的1679名连续男性患者中,25例(1.49%)被诊断为特福林皮炎,占所有重铬酸钾阳性患者的15.34%(163/1679)。使用替福林的平均症状前持续时间为38±16.9年,平均随访时间,3.1±2.9年。患者在与皮箱或皮带直接接触的身体区域出现湿疹皮疹。在32%中发现了id反应,和其他皮革配件的敏感性,44%。14例患者(56%)改用无铬酸盐的替菲林:症状完全缓解了11例(79%),部分缓解了2例。
    结论:回顾性队列设计。
    结论:这是迄今为止对皮革生产中使用的重铬酸钾敏感引起的特福林皮炎的最大研究。转用无铬酸盐的替福林后的预后良好。Tefillin皮炎可能比以前认为的更普遍。
    BACKGROUND: Tefillin are a religious article worn by Jewish men during daily prayer. Tefillin dermatitis secondary to potassium dichromate sensitivity is recognised, but data remain sparse.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of tefillin dermatitis.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent patch testing with the European baseline series in a tertiary dermatology clinic in 2009-2023 and were diagnosed with tefillin dermatitis were identified by file review and their clinical data recorded.
    RESULTS: Of 1679 consecutive male patients tested, 25 (1.49%) were diagnosed with tefillin dermatitis, accounting for 15.34% of all potassium-dichromate-positive patients (163/1679). Mean pre-symptomatic duration of tefillin use was 38 ± 16.9 years, and mean follow-up time, 3.1 ± 2.9 years. Patients presented with an eczematous rash on body areas in direct contact with the leather box or straps of the tefillin. An id reaction was noted in 32%, and sensitivity to other leather accessories, in 44%. Fourteen patients (56%) switched to chromate-free tefillin: symptoms resolved completely in 11 (79%) and partially in 2.
    CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective cohort design.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date of tefillin dermatitis caused by sensitivity to potassium dichromate used in leather production. Prognosis after switching to chromate-free tefillin was good-to-excellent. Tefillin dermatitis may be more prevalent than previously thought.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号