BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the efficacy of reverse and antegrade thread lifting vectors in conjunction with thread selection for correcting nasolabial folds and marionette lines, aiming to enhance treatment precision and effectiveness.
METHODS: Three female patients aged 43, 48, and 53, presenting with primary concerns regarding nasolabial folds, underwent distinct treatment regimens utilizing various types of threads and vectors. Additionally, video demonstrations were recorded to showcase the procedural techniques employed in each case.
RESULTS: The outcomes of the thread lifting procedures demonstrated significant improvements in the correction of the nasolabial fold and marionette line.
CONCLUSIONS: Innovative thread insertion techniques involve entry points above the zygomatic arch and threading toward the temple hairline for lateral face lifting. These utilize barbs to pull skin and underlying tissues. The reversal technique involves inserting threads in a criss-cross pattern, forming a fibrous structure that may prolong the duration of results. Various thread combinations, considering factors such as composition, thickness, and barb size, provide customized procedures. This research introduces clinical applications, including temple area hairline lifting for nasolabial fold and marionette line correction, reverse vectors targeting nasolabial folds and marionette lines, and antegrade approaches from the lateral side.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Cutegel® MAX (Cutegel) in the correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds (NLFS) compared to Restylane® (Restylane, control).
UNASSIGNED: This study was a 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled clinical trial. Qualified participants with moderate-to-severe NLFs were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive Cutegel or Restylane. For the primary efficacy endpoint, the response rate was defined as the percentage of subjects exhibiting an improvement of at least one-point based on blinded evaluation of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 24 weeks after injection. Other secondary efficacy endpoints and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Of 340 subjects randomized, 317 completed the week 52 visit. In the per protocol set (PPS), the blinded evaluator-assessed response rates at week 24 were 81.17% for Cutegel versus 77.56% for Restylane (p =  0.327). The between-group treatment differences in response rates were 3.60% [95% confidence interval (CI) = (-5.39%, 12.60%)], which demonstrated the noninferiority of Cutegel. Other secondary efficacy endpoints supported this. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: Similar to Restylane, Cutegel was effective and well tolerated in correcting moderate-to-severe NLFs among the Chinese population.
Nasolabial folds (NLFs) are among the early indicators of facial aging process. In the past, rhytidectomy has been considered a safe procedure, yet it continues to carry risks such as hematoma, skin necrosis, nerve injury, and infection. With the ongoing development of biomaterials including hyaluronic acid (HA), minimally invasive injection procedures for the aesthetic correction of NLFs have become the preferred choice in recent years. The widespread use of HA has resulted in the development of various types of commercial HA fillers, such as Cutegel and Restylane. It is well known that HA filler products produce varying effects, attributable to differences in their components and physical properties. Previous studies have established that Restylane is a safe and effective HA dermal filler for the correction of NLFs. However, there is a lack of studies on both the cosmetic results and safety data for Cutegel in the published literature. Therefore, a randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled clinical trial was conducted at seven Chinese hospitals to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cutegel for the correction of moderate-to-severe NLFs, compared to the approved Restylane in China. Among the 340 randomized subjects, 170 subjects received Cutegel, and 169 subjects received Restylane. Both groups reported similar improvements in WSRS (the between-group treatment differences in response rates exceeded the prespecified noninferiority margins), and also in other efficacy evaluations. Additionally, the two treatment groups showed similar safety profiles. In summary, Cutegel proved to be well tolerated and effective in this randomized, active-controlled clinical study, demonstrating its noninferiority to Restylane and validating its use as an alternative treatment for Chinese subjects with moderate-to-severe NLFs.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acids (HAs) can have very different actions not only depending on injector and host factors but also depending on their molecular weight. Whereas short chain HA has immunological activity long chain HA influences fibroblasts and may stimulate them to produce collagen. Although this is generally thought to be a positive feature it may be disadvantageous in certain localizations.
METHODS: We have encountered 23 patients who developed fibrous tissue next to the nasolabial folds accentuating them and becoming very obvious while smiling. Hyaluronidase injection did not reduce this mass.
RESULTS: Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection led to rapid improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Fibrotic tissue reaction not responding to hyaluronidase may be the result of HA injection and can effectively be treated with intralesional steroid injection.

BACKGROUND: Injection cosmetics have become popular in recent years. The nasolabial fold is one of the most important and dangerous regions in the midface, and its three-dimensional relationship with the facial artery remains unclear.
METHODS: Fifty-two cadavers infused with lead oxide contrast medium via the external carotid arteries were scanned by computed tomography (CT). The three-dimensional model was reconstructed using Mimics and Origin software, and the relevant data were calculated using validated algorithms.
RESULTS: There were three facial artery types according to its course in relation to the nasolabial fold. In the most common type, accounting for 83.7% of specimens, the facial artery evolves into an angular artery, with a horizontal distance between facial artery and nasolabial fold of - 1.90 ± 2.40, - 3.90 ± 2.95, - 5.18 ± 3.42, - 5.59 ± 3.53, - 5.59 ± 3.83, - 6.07 ± 4.10, - 6.92 ± 3.70, - 6.79 ± 3.37, - 4.52 ± 3.20, and - 2.76 ± 3.60 (mm) from the nasal ala to the oral commissure and a vertical distance of - 4.03 ± 2.56, - 3.27 ± 2.27, - 2.81 ± 2.57, - 2.1 ± 2.64, - 1.5 ± 3.32, - 0.71 ± 3.99, 0.92 ± 4.43, 0.4 ± 5.31, - 4.14 ± 5.14, - 7.05 ± 4.74 (mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The facial artery is vulnerable to damage when injecting filler in the nasolabial fold. For the upper 1/3 of the nasolabial fold, the supraperiosteal layer is recommended for injection, while for the lower 2/3 of the nasolabial fold, the dermal layer along the nasolabial fold is recommended.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

UNASSIGNED: Nasolabial folds are a common sign of aging, accompanied by various manifestations such as skin and tissue loosening, wrinkles, lip corner drooping, mandibular angle loss, platysmal bands, and skin pigmentation changes. Limited research has explored Nanofat injection methods. this study was done with the aim of comparing the effect of fat injection by two methods, conventional and Nanofat, in nasolabial folds.
UNASSIGNED: The study conducted in 2020-2021 at the skin clinic in Ilam, western Iran was a case-control study. Participants were divided into two groups, and lipofilling procedures were performed using conventional and nanofat methods with autologous fat. Data collection utilized a researcher-made questionnaire and radiographic results. Follow-up visits occurred on the 30th, 90th, and 180th days to assess complications and recovery rates. After 6 months, participant\'s photographs were taken and compared with pre-intervention photographs using the GIAS criteria. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS22 version software.
UNASSIGNED: The average age of the participants was 37.80±8.30 yr. The treatment response in the conventional fat injection group was significantly better than the nanofat group (P<0.05). Both groups were satisfied with the treatment methods, but high satisfaction was reported in the conventional group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: Both methods of improving wrinkles were effective, but the improvement and response to treatment in the conventional method was better than the Nanofat method, and its effect was felt by the participants for an average period of 3 months.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid-based dermal fillers are the cornerstones of wrinkle correction and facial contour redefinition.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of EST LF compared with RES L for the treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs).
METHODS: In this prospective, split-face, randomized, investigator and subject-blinded trial, 45 subjects with moderate-to-severe symmetrical NLFs were randomized to EST LF on one side of the face and RES L on the other side and were followed up for 9 months. The primary end point was change in WSRS score from the baseline to Month 1 (M1). Secondary end points included changes in WSRS score at other time points, aesthetic improvement, wrinkle volume quantification, adverse events, and local tolerance.
RESULTS: The efficacy difference between EST LF and RES L at M1 was in favor of EST LF (-0.16, CI, -0.28 to -0.03]), demonstrating its noninferiority. Considering other time points, significant differences were observed at 3 and 6 months for EST LF , assessed with WSRS, GAIS, or NLF volume quantification. Both treatments were well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: EST LF is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of NLFs.

BACKGROUND: Injectable filler, a nonsurgical beauty method, has gained popularity in rejuvenating sagging skin. In this study, polydioxanone (PDO) was utilized as the main component of the ULTRACOL200 filler that helps stimulate collagenesis and provide skin radiant effects. The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ULTRACOL200 with other commercialized products in visually improving dermatological problems.
METHODS: Herein, 31 participants aged between 20 and 59 years were enrolled in the study. 1 mL of the testing product, as well as the quantity for the compared groups was injected into each participants face side individually. Subsequently, skin texture and sunken volume of skin were measured using ANTERA 3D CS imaging technology at three periods: before the application, 4 weeks after the initial application, and 4 weeks after the 2nd application of ULTRACOL200.
RESULTS: The final results of skin texture and wrinkle volume evaluation consistently demonstrated significant enhancement. Consequently, subjective questionnaires were provided to the participants to evaluate the efficacy of the testing product, illustrating satisfactory responses after the twice applications.
CONCLUSIONS: The investigation has contributed substantially to the comprehension of a PDO-based filler (ULTRACOL200) for skin enhancement and provided profound insight for future clinical trials.

The classification of nasolabial folds into three types, each with distinct causative factors and mechanisms, is explored. Age-related changes in facial skin and connective tissues are examined in detail, revealing variations across different facial regions due to variances in tissue firmness and thickness. The innovative \'Reverse Technique,\' involving cog threads to enhance tissue traction and effectiveness in thread-lifting procedures, is introduced. Detailed technical guidelines, anatomical considerations, and safety measures are provided, emphasizing the importance of identifying optimal vectors and fixing points to achieve maximum lifting effects while minimizing potential risks, particularly those associated with vascular structures. Additionally, the \'Cross Technique using volumizing thread\' is discussed, designed to smooth tissue boundaries and rejuvenate sagging areas. Facial anatomy, including the positioning of arteries and ligaments, is underscored as essential for ensuring the safety and efficacy of procedures. In conclusion, this review stands as a comprehensive guide for practitioners, offering insights into innovative thread-lifting methods and their applications in addressing nasolabial folds. The primary focus is on achieving optimal aesthetic results while prioritizing patient safety.

BACKGROUND: Facial fold and groove formation is influenced by the ptosis of the superficial fat compartments in the mid-face region.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to design a facial rejuvenation technique that targets sagging of the mid-face fat compartments and achieves a youthful facial configuration.
METHODS: A total of 102 patients underwent suture net restoration. Each specific ptosis fat compartment was carefully lifted and held at the regional facial ligaments to effectively restore volume distribution. Patient outcomes were evaluated through preoperative and postoperative photography comparison, 3-D photographic analysis, and postoperative evaluations.
RESULTS: Significant mid-cheek rejuvenation was observed. The procedure resulted in a remarkable, 10.89% increase in malar projection. The nasolabial fold improved by at least 1 grade in 61.43% of the patients and by at least 2 grades in 37.14%. A total of 87.65% of the patients expressed high satisfaction or satisfaction with the outcomes of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: By specifically targeting the mid-face ptosis fat compartments, the technique demonstrated significant enhancements of both the nasolabial fold and the malar projection. The results indicate that this novel technique holds promise as an efficient approach for satisfactorily addressing facial aging concerns.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the relationship of facial artery with nasolabial fold by color Doppler sonography and to determine facial artery variations and their relationship with age, gender, or hemifaces.
METHODS: The study included 188 patients (94 women, 94 men) aged 18-60 years. Overall, 376 facial arteries in both hemifaces were evaluated for the course within nasolabial fold, symmetry, and relationship with gender.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 39.29 ± 12.81 years. Type A (55.7%) was the most common type in both hemifaces. There was no significant relationship between the course of facial artery and age (P > .05). Asymmetrical course of facial artery was more common in females (54.3%). In both genders, type A was the type with highest symmetry detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Nasolabial fold is one of the important facial regions for filler injection. To prevent vascular injection, course of facial artery should be identified within the nasolabial fold. Type A was the most common type in both hemifaces and genders. Although the rates were close to each other, asymmetry in the course of the facial artery was observed in most of the patients. Ultrasonographic examination which is non-invasive and non-ionizing imaging method can be performed carefully before filler injection to determine vascular tissues.