PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Nasolabial folds are a common sign of aging, accompanied by various manifestations such as skin and tissue loosening, wrinkles, lip corner drooping, mandibular angle loss, platysmal bands, and skin pigmentation changes. Limited research has explored Nanofat injection methods. this study was done with the aim of comparing the effect of fat injection by two methods, conventional and Nanofat, in nasolabial folds.
UNASSIGNED: The study conducted in 2020-2021 at the skin clinic in Ilam, western Iran was a case-control study. Participants were divided into two groups, and lipofilling procedures were performed using conventional and nanofat methods with autologous fat. Data collection utilized a researcher-made questionnaire and radiographic results. Follow-up visits occurred on the 30th, 90th, and 180th days to assess complications and recovery rates. After 6 months, participant\'s photographs were taken and compared with pre-intervention photographs using the GIAS criteria. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS22 version software.
UNASSIGNED: The average age of the participants was 37.80±8.30 yr. The treatment response in the conventional fat injection group was significantly better than the nanofat group (P<0.05). Both groups were satisfied with the treatment methods, but high satisfaction was reported in the conventional group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: Both methods of improving wrinkles were effective, but the improvement and response to treatment in the conventional method was better than the Nanofat method, and its effect was felt by the participants for an average period of 3 months.
UNASSIGNED: The study conducted in 2020-2021 at the skin clinic in Ilam, western Iran was a case-control study. Participants were divided into two groups, and lipofilling procedures were performed using conventional and nanofat methods with autologous fat. Data collection utilized a researcher-made questionnaire and radiographic results. Follow-up visits occurred on the 30th, 90th, and 180th days to assess complications and recovery rates. After 6 months, participant\'s photographs were taken and compared with pre-intervention photographs using the GIAS criteria. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS22 version software.
UNASSIGNED: The average age of the participants was 37.80±8.30 yr. The treatment response in the conventional fat injection group was significantly better than the nanofat group (P<0.05). Both groups were satisfied with the treatment methods, but high satisfaction was reported in the conventional group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: Both methods of improving wrinkles were effective, but the improvement and response to treatment in the conventional method was better than the Nanofat method, and its effect was felt by the participants for an average period of 3 months.
摘要：
■鼻唇沟是衰老的常见标志，伴随着各种表现，如皮肤和组织松动，皱纹,唇角下垂，下颌角损失，桔梗带,和皮肤色素沉着的变化。有限的研究探索了Nanofat注射方法。这项研究的目的是比较两种方法注射脂肪的效果，常规和Nanofat，在鼻唇沟。
■这项研究于2020-2021年在伊兰的皮肤诊所进行，伊朗西部是一项病例对照研究。参与者分为两组，和脂肪填充程序使用常规和纳米脂肪方法与自体脂肪进行。数据收集利用了研究人员制作的问卷和射线照相结果。回访发生在30日,第90,第180天评估并发症和恢复率。六个月后,采用GIAS标准拍摄参与者的照片并与干预前照片进行比较.采用SPSS22版本软件进行数据分析。
■参与者的平均年龄为37.80±8.30岁。常规脂肪注射组治疗反应明显优于纳米脂肪组(P<0.05)。两组均对治疗方法满意。但是常规组的满意度很高，但两组间差异无统计学意义。
■两种改善皱纹的方法都是有效的，但是常规方法对治疗的改善和反应优于Nanofat方法，参与者平均感觉到3个月的效果。
■这项研究于2020-2021年在伊兰的皮肤诊所进行，伊朗西部是一项病例对照研究。参与者分为两组，和脂肪填充程序使用常规和纳米脂肪方法与自体脂肪进行。数据收集利用了研究人员制作的问卷和射线照相结果。回访发生在30日,第90,第180天评估并发症和恢复率。六个月后,采用GIAS标准拍摄参与者的照片并与干预前照片进行比较.采用SPSS22版本软件进行数据分析。
■参与者的平均年龄为37.80±8.30岁。常规脂肪注射组治疗反应明显优于纳米脂肪组(P<0.05)。两组均对治疗方法满意。但是常规组的满意度很高，但两组间差异无统计学意义。
■两种改善皱纹的方法都是有效的，但是常规方法对治疗的改善和反应优于Nanofat方法，参与者平均感觉到3个月的效果。
