BACKGROUND: Salivary gland cystadenoma (SGCA) is a rare benign tumor that predominantly occurs in the parotid gland. SGCAs affecting the minor salivary glands are uncommon and often resemble, clinically and histopathologically, other salivary gland lesions.
METHODS: This study aimed to describe a series of four cases of SGCA affecting intraoral sites and performed a literature review of well-reported SGCA published in the English-language literature.
RESULTS: SGCA cases included in this series were diagnosed in the buccal mucosa, lip, and hard palate of female patients aged between 19 and 78 years. All cases underwent excisional biopsy and were histologically characterized by a multicystic growth with variable degrees of capsule formation and were lined by several types of epithelium, including some cell types that are infrequently reported in SGCA. In some cases, a small collection of lymphocytes was observed adjacent to cystic formations. All SGCA were positive for periodic acid-Schiff, and immunohistochemical reactions were positive for CK7 and p63. The follow-up time ranged widely from 3 to 53 months, and to date, no recurrence has been observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The literature review revealed a total of 33 published studies accounting for 55 SGCA cases.

Primary mucinous tumors of the renal pelvis are extremely rare and pose challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. This study reviewed the clinical and pathological characteristics of mucinous tumors of the renal pelvis, including mucinous cystadenocarcinomas and mucinous cystadenomas. Immunohistochemical analysis was conducted in three cases, along with KRAS gene detection using the Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) method. The results revealed mucinous epithelium with acellular mucinous pools in all cases, and acellular mucinous pools were observed in the renal parenchyma and perirenal fat capsules. All tumors expressed CK20 and CDX2, and one case showed KRAS gene mutation. The study suggests that mucinous cystadenomas of the renal pelvis may exhibit borderline biological behaviors. This study is the first to report a KRAS gene mutation in a mucinous cystadenoma of the renal pelvis, offering valuable insights into the diagnosis and treatment of this rare condition.

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas rarely occur in the uterus and the ovary. Benign mesonephric-like (ML) proliferations and hyperplasia have been described solely within the ovary. Pathogenetic data are very limited. We report a case with microscopic focus of benign ML-proliferation in association with mucinous cystadenoma in the ovary. The immunophenotype was distinct (mucinous tumor: focal weak nuclear positivity for PAX-8, CK 7, patchy cytoplasmic positivity for p16 and negativity for estrogen receptor, CD 10, TTF-1, p53 wildtype; mesonephric component: diffusely positive for PAX-8, CK 7, luminal CD 10, TTF-1, focal staining for estrogen receptor, patchy cytoplasmic for p16, p53 wildtype). On NGS-analysis there was clonal mutation of KRAS p.G12C. The data provide additional evidence for the concept of transdifferentiation (Müllerian tissue representing Wolffian/mesonephric features on histology and immunostaining) within the pathogenesis of mesonephric proliferation of the female genital tract and demonstrate the clonal relationship between these distinct morphologic components.

BACKGROUND: Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Several case reports describe MCN increasing in size during gestation. The aim of this study is to assess if pregnancy is a risk factor for malignant degeneration of MCN.
METHODS: All female patients who underwent pancreatic resection of a MCN between 2011 and 2021 were included. MCN resected or diagnosed within 12 months of gestation were defined perigestational. MCN with high grade dysplasia or an invasive component were classified in the high grade (HG) group. The primary outcome was defined as the correlation between exposure to gestation and peri-gestational MCN to development of HG-MCN.
RESULTS: The study includes 176 patients, 25 (14 %) forming the HG group, and 151 (86 %) forming the low grade (LG) group. LG and HG groups had a similar distribution of systemic contraceptives use (26 % vs. 16 %, p = 0.262), and perigestational MCN (7 % vs 16 %, p = 0.108). At univariate analysis cyst size ≥10 cm (OR 5.3, p < 0.001) was associated to HG degeneration. Peri gestational MCN positively correlated with cyst size (R = 0.18, p = 0.020). In the subgroup of 14 perigestational MCN patients 29 % had HG-MCN and 71 % experienced cyst growth during gestation with an average growth of 55.1 ± 18 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Perigestational MCN are associated to increased cyst diameter, and in the subset of patients affected by MCN during gestation a high rate of growth was observed. Patients with a MCN and pregnancy desire should undergo multidisciplinary counselling.

This case report presents a unique and unprecedented occurrence of mucinous cystadenoma of the ovary accompanied by xanthogranulomatous oophoritis, a rare inflammatory condition. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of its kind in the medical literature. The patient, a 25-year-old woman, presented with abdominal pain, fever, and discomfort, prompting further investigation that led to the unexpected discovery of these coexisting pathologies.

Giant abdominopelvic tumors continue to present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for all surgeons despite all the advances in the world of imaging. Particularly, one of the most important challenges is to determine its probable origin for adequate surgical planning. Even though mostly all of these tumors are benign ovarian tumors, extraordinarily, malignant mural nodules may develop from the wall of these benign tumors, carrying an invariable unfavorable prognosis for the patient. This case highlights the importance of a correct diagnostic approach using ultrasound and abdominal computed tomography scans and confirming the diagnosis through a histopathologic examination. The treatment for these cases is surgical resection and posterior oncological treatment if needed. This case shows how timely treatment is one of the principal determinators of morbidity and mortality.

Biliary cystadenoma, a rare potentially malignant hepatic cystic lesion, is characterized by multiloculations and septations. It is common in middle-aged females (about 5% of nonparasitic liver cysts); only 12 cases are described in children. We report a rare case of hepatic biliary cystadenoma in a 3-year-old girl, with a gradually increasing lump in the right upper abdomen. Complete excision with a healthy liver margin was done.

Giant ovarian cysts (>10 cm) are rare due to the widespread use of routine imaging. However, in the absence of compressive symptoms, giant cysts remain a diagnostic challenge, especially in patients with larger body habitus. Complications of benign ovarian cysts are infrequent but can include torsion of the adnexa. Bilateral torsion is a rare emergency that can threaten a patient\'s future fertility. In this case, we report on a 24-year-old female with bilateral torsion due to a triad of adnexal masses including a 30 cm mucinous cystadenoma, a 10 cm mature teratoma, and an 8 cm paratubal cyst. Controlled fluid aspiration was performed prior to en bloc resection of the cystadenoma due to the emergent nature of the case and lack of malignant features.

BACKGROUND: Intussusception is a rare condition in adults, accounting for 5% of intestinal intussusception and being responsible for approximately 1% of all adult bowel obstructions. Neoplastic origin is the most common etiology of intestinal intussusception in adults, unlike pediatric intussusception, which is usually idiopathic. Intussusception due to the appendiceal mucocele is exceptional, and only a few cases have been reported in the medical literature.
METHODS: We report the case of a 25-year-old black African male patient with no medical history. He presented to the emergency department for abdominal pain, nausea, and bilious vomiting. The abdominal examination revealed typical signs of acute bowel obstruction. Enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography showed an invagination of the last ileal loop, cecum, and ascending colon into the lumen of the transverse colon, with a rounded image with hypodense content and some calcifications compatible with an appendiceal mucocele. An emergency exploratory laparoscopy was performed and confirmed the ileocecocolic intussusception. Right hemicolectomy and ileocolic anastomosis were performed. The patient recovery postoperatively was uneventful, and he was discharged 4 days later. Histological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed the diagnosis of mucinous cystadenoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms of bowel intussusception with the appendiceal mucocele as the lead point in adults are similar to any other bowel intussusception. Differential diagnosis is often carried out thanks to the injected abdominal computed tomography scan.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound features help to differentiate benign from malignant masses, and some of them are included in the ultrasound (US) scores. The main aim of this work is to describe the ultrasound features of certain adnexal masses of difficult classification and to analyse them according to the most frequently used US scores.
METHODS: Retrospective studies of adnexal lesions are difficult to classify by US scores in women undergoing surgery. Ultrasound characteristics were analysed, and masses were classified according to the Subjective Assessment of the ultrasonographer (SA) and other US scores (IOTA Simple Rules Risk Assessment-SRRA, ADNEX model with and without CA125 and O-RADS).
RESULTS: A total of 133 adnexal masses were studied (benign: 66.2%, n:88; malignant: 33.8%, n:45) in a sample of women with mean age 56.5 ± 7.8 years. Malignant lesions were identified by SA in all cases. Borderline ovarian tumors (n:13) were not always detected by some US scores (SRRA: 76.9%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 76.9% and 84.6%) nor were serous carcinoma (n:19) (SRRA: 89.5%), clear cell carcinoma (n:9) (SRRA: 66.7%) or endometrioid carcinoma (n:4) (ADNEX model without CA125: 75.0%). While most teratomas and serous cystadenomas have been correctly differentiated, other benign lesions were misclassified because of the presence of solid areas or papillae. Fibromas (n:13) were better identified by SA (23.1% malignancy), but worse with the other US scores (SRRA: 69.2%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 84.6% and 69.2%, O-RADS: 53.8%). Cystoadenofibromas (n:10) were difficult to distinguish from malignant masses via all scores except SRRA (SA: 70.0%, SRRA: 20.0%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 60.0% and 50.0%, O-RADS: 90.0%). Mucinous cystadenomas (n:12) were misdiagnosed as malignant in more than 15% of the cases in all US scores (SA: 33.3%, SRRA: 16.7%, ADNEX model without and with CA125: 16.7% and 16.7%, O-RADS:41.7%). Brenner tumors are also difficult to classify using all scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Some malignant masses (borderline ovarian tumors, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, endometrioid carcinomas) are not always detected by US scores. Fibromas, cystoadenofibromas, some mucinous cystadenomas and Brenner tumors may present solid components/papillae that may induce confusion with malignant lesions. Most teratomas and serous cystadenomas are usually correctly classified.