Internal brace

内部撑杆
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:SC关节的不稳定性是一种罕见的损伤,仅占肩带所有损伤的3%。虽然急性后脱位是紧急情况,需要立即手术干预,前不稳定性(根据Allman的第一和第二度)大多可以保守治疗。慢性和高度不稳定的急性前不稳定性通常会对受影响患者的生活造成重大限制。目前,没有既定的治疗算法。
    方法:这个前瞻性收集数据的回顾性病例系列是在I级创伤中心进行的。包括在2013年1月至2019年12月期间手术治疗前SC关节不稳定性的患者,并进行了至少24个月的随访。损伤包括6例急性前脱位,采用“8字形”配置的胶带环扎术治疗;12例慢性前SC不稳定患者接受自体肌腱移植治疗。对于一种高度不稳定的慢性前部不稳定,除了肌腱移植外,还应用了合成缝线材料。临床评估包括体格检查和标准化问卷,其中包括主观和客观的肩膀得分。
    结果:在24名患者中,有19名(79%)的平均年龄为32岁±15岁。63%的患者为男性。经过57个月的平均随访,急性前脱位的年龄和性别适应的平均Murley肩评分(CS)为90分±20,诺丁汉锁骨评分(NCS)为81分±22,DASH评分为11分±18。慢性前不稳定性的平均CS为90分±12,NCS为83分±17,DASH评分为4分±5。该研究显示并发症发生率为10%。两名患者接受了翻修手术。
    结论:为了融合,以“8字形”方式固定单皮质SCJ,并发症风险低,翻修率低,与其他已发表的技术相比,在治疗高度不稳定的急性和慢性前SCJ不稳定性后,可获得同样良好的功能结局.我们的方法对纵隔神经血管结构的风险比其他已发表的需要双皮质钻孔的技术要小。因此,使该技术更容易被没有心胸外科背景的医院使用。
    BACKGROUND: Instabilities of the SC joint are a rare injury, accounting for only 3% of all injuries of the shoulder-girdle. While acute posterior dislocations are an emergency and require immediate surgical intervention, anterior instabilities (first and second degree according to Allman) can mostly be treated conservatively. Chronic and highly instable acute anterior instabilities often imposes a significant limitation on the lives of affected patients. Currently, there is no established therapeutic algorithm in place.
    METHODS: This retrospective case series with prospective collection of data was performed at a level-I trauma centre. Patients treated surgically for anterior SC joint instabilities between January 2013 and December 2019 and with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. The injuries comprised of six acute anterior dislocations treated with tape-cerclage in a \"figure-of-8\" configuration; twelve patients with chronic anterior SC instabilities were treated with autologous tendon grafts. For one highly unstable chronic anterior instability in addition to the tendon graft synthetic suture material was applied. The clinical evaluation consisted of a physical examination and a standardized questionnaire, which included subjective and objective shoulder scores.
    RESULTS: Out of 24, 19 patients (79%) with an average age of 32 years ± 15 were available for follow-up. 63% of the patients were male. After a mean follow-up of 57 months, the mean age- and sex-adapted Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (CS) of acute anterior luxations amounted to 90 points ± 20, Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS) to 81 points ± 22 and DASH Score to 11 points ± 18. Chronic anterior instabilities had a mean CS of 90 points ± 12, NCS of 83 points ± 17 and DASH Score of 4 points ± 5. The study shows a complication rate of 10%. Two patients underwent revision surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: To conlude, monocortical SCJ fixation in a \"figure-of-8\" fashion presents a low risk for complication and a low revision rate and can achieve equally good functional outcome after the treatment of highly unstable acute and chronic anterior SCJ instabilities than other published techniques. Our approach presents less risk to the neurovascular structures of the mediastinum than other published techniques requiring bicortical drilling, therefore making the technique more accessible to hospitals without a cardiothoracic surgical background.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肩胛骨(SL)骨间韧带(SLIL)的损伤是腕骨不稳定的常见原因。内部支具增强已用于各种韧带修复程序;然而,需要进一步研究其在手外科中的结局.这项研究旨在检查接受SLIL修复并内部支架增强的患者的预后。
    联系了使用内部支撑技术进行SLIL修复且随访至少1年的患者。可用的患者返回以进行新的X射线照片和体格检查。如果无法联系患者,但在手术后1年以上进行了X射线和身体检查,这些数据是从他们的医疗记录中收集的。参与的患者完成了QuickDASH和患者额定腕部评估调查,并评估了他们对手术的满意度。评估的结果包括手腕的活动范围,握力,舟骨移位试验,SL间隙,SL角度,和桡骨关节炎的影像学证据。
    我们收集了13例患者(12例男性)的14例SLIL修复结果。平均随访时间为41个月(n=14,17-64)。平均QuickDASH和患者额定腕部评估得分分别为6.1(0-43.2)和9.6(0-65),分别。从即时到最新的随访,射线照相测量保持稳定,并且没有注意到放射性腕骨关节炎的变化。然而,SL间隙从术前的平均5.33mm(3.4-6.7)减少到最新随访的3.34mm(2-4.6),SL角从手术前的平均79.5°(67°-97°)下降到最新随访的67.3°(51°-85°)。所有舟骨移位测试均稳定。
    因此,SL内部支架增强具有良好的短期效果,改善疼痛,函数,满意,术后大于1年的腕部对齐。这种技术可以是在短期内管理SL不稳定性的有效选择。
    治疗IV。
    UNASSIGNED: Injury to the scapholunate (SL) interosseous ligament (SLIL) is a common cause of carpal instability. Internal brace augmentation has been used in various ligament repair procedures; however, further investigation of its outcomes in hand surgery is needed. This study aimed to examine outcomes for patients who underwent SLIL repair with internal brace augmentation.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent SLIL repair with the internal brace technique and had at least 1 year of follow-up were contacted. Available patients returned for an in-person evaluation with new radiographs and physical examination. If patients could not be contacted but had x-rays and physical examinations performed at greater than 1 year after surgery, these data were collected from their medical records. Participating patients completed the QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation surveys and rated their satisfaction with the surgery. Outcomes assessed included wrist range of motion, grip strength, scaphoid shift test, SL gap, SL angle, and radiographic evidence of radiocarpal arthritis.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected outcomes for 14 SLIL repairs among 13 patients (12 male). Mean length of the follow-up was 41 months (n = 14, 17-64). Mean QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores were 6.1 (0-43.2) and 9.6 (0-65), respectively. Radiographic measurements remained stable from immediate to latest follow-up, and no radiocarpal arthritic changes were noted. However, SL gap decreased from a mean of 5.33 mm (3.4-6.7) before surgery to 3.34 mm (2-4.6) at the latest follow-up, and SL angle decreased from a mean of 79.5° (67°-97°) before surgery to 67.3° (51°-85°) at the latest follow-up. All scaphoid shift tests were stable.
    UNASSIGNED: Therefore, SL internal brace augmentation has favorable short-term results with improvements in pain, function, satisfaction, and carpal alignment at greater than 1 year postoperatively. This technique can be an effective option for the management of SL instability in the short term.
    UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是比较使用Broström手术在有和没有内部支架的情况下修复前腓骨韧带的中期(>24个月)临床结果。19例患者使用关节镜传统Broström修复和内部支撑技术(IB)进行了手术,18例患者使用关节镜传统Broström修复而没有内部支撑技术(TB)进行了手术。所有患者均使用足踝预后评分(FAOS)和足踝能力测量(FAAM)进行临床评估。根据FAAM,最终随访时,TB和IB组的运动活动得分分别为83.33±5.66和90.63±6.21(p=0.02)。两组术前和术后应激X线片差异无统计学意义。总医疗费用高于IB组(P<0.001)。在体育活动中的FAAM得分方面也具有显着优势。然而,在日常生活中没有差异。
    The aim of the study was to compare the intermediate-term (>24 months) clinical outcomes between anterior talofibular ligament repair using Broström operation with and without an internal brace. Nineteen patients underwent surgery using an arthroscopic traditional Broström repair with an internal brace technique (IB) and Eighteen patients underwent surgery using an arthroscopic traditional Broström repair without an internal brace technique (TB) . All patients were evaluated clinically using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). According to FAAM, sports activity scores of TB and IB groups were 83.33 ± 5.66 and 90.63 ± 6.21 at the final follow-up (p = .02). There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative stress radiographs between the two groups. Total medical expense was more in the IB group (p < .001). It also has a significant superiority in the terms of FAAM scores at sports activity. However, there was no difference during daily life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文的目的是分析拇指腕掌(CMC)关节镜下半叶切除术并使用克氏针(K-wire)临时悬吊术获得的临床结果。
    在我们的中心进行了70例拇指CMC关节镜下半叶肌切除术,平均年龄为59岁,随访18个月。他们都遵循相同的协议。描述了手术技术。
    所有患者均被关节镜分类为BadiaIII期。没有使用肌腱插入术,暂时植入K线5.1周。术后平均视觉模拟评分为1.6,Kapandji反对评分为8.1,握力为42.2磅,横向捏合9.5磅,测得的尖端到尖端的夹点为4.2磅,三脚架的夹点为7.8磅。所有以前的现役工人都恢复了以前的工作。
    我们得出的结论是,拇指CMC关节镜下半叶切除术与K线临时悬吊在减轻疼痛方面取得了良好的效果,力量,和功能,不需要增加第二掌骨骨折风险的内部支具。
    UNASSIGNED: This article\'s purpose was to analyze clinical results obtained with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy with temporary suspension with a Kirschner wire (K-wire).
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy thumb CMC arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomies with a mean age of 59 and 18 months of follow-up were performed in our center during a 13-year period. All of them followed the same protocol. Surgical technique is described.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients were arthroscopically classified as Badia\'s III stage. No tendon interposition was used, and a K-wire was temporarily implanted for 5.1 weeks. Mean postsurgical Visual Analogue Scale of 1.6, Kapandji Opposition Score of 8.1, grip strength of 42.2 lbs, lateral pinch of 9.5 lbs, tip-to-tip pinch of 4.2 lbs and tripod pinch of 7.8 lbs were measured. All previous active workers resumed their previous job.
    UNASSIGNED: We conclude that thumb CMC arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy with temporary suspension with K-wire reaches good results in terms of pain reduction, strength, and functionality, without the necessity of an internal brace which increases risks of a second metacarpal fracture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI)的情况下,比较单纯使用后交叉韧带(PCL)重建或修复与单纯使用内支撑(IB)重建或修复的PCL患者的患者报告结果。
    对2006年至2020年期间在两个机构接受MLKI手术治疗的所有患者进行回顾性鉴定,并参与研究。通过三种仪器测量患者报告的结果:Lysholm膝关节评分,多元化的生活质量(ML-QOL),和患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)计算机自适应测试(CAT)。比较内支撑组和非内支撑组的术后结局和再手术率。
    分析了52例患者;IB组包括34例患者(女性占17.6%;年龄33.1±1.60岁),非IB组包括18例(11.1%为女性;年龄34.1±3.72岁)。整个队列的平均随访时间为1.44±0.22年(IB:1.21±0.18;非IB:2.1±0.65)。PROMISCAT之间没有显着差异[PROMIS疼痛(54.4±1.78vs51.7±1.70,p=0.319),身体功能(44.3±2.27vs47.9±1.52,p=0.294),流动性(44.0±1.71vs46.1±2.10,p=0.463)],ML-QOL[ML-QOL身体损害(40.7±4.21vs41.7±5.10,p=0.884),情绪障碍(49.2±4.88vs44.7±5.87,p=0.579),活动限制(43.5±4.56vs31.5±3.62,p=0.087),与非IB组相比,术后社会参与(44.9±4.96vs37.5±5.30,p=0.345)]和Lysholm膝关节评分(61.8±4.55vs61.0±4.95,p=0.916)。
    在这组患者中,无内支管的PCL重建和修复治疗患者与额外的内支管增强治疗患者的功能和患者报告的结局无显著差异.在MLKI损伤的情况下,有必要进行包括更大患者样本的进一步研究,以研究内部支架对PCL损伤的功效。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the patient-reported outcomes between patients with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction or repair alone versus PCL reconstruction or repair with internal bracing (IB) in the context of multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI).
    UNASSIGNED: All patients who underwent surgical management of MLKI at two institutions between 2006 and 2020 were retrospectively identified and offered participation in the study. Patient reported outcomes were measured via three instruments: Lysholm Knee score, Multiligament Quality of Life (ML-QOL), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing (CAT). The postoperative outcomes and reoperation rates were compared between the internal bracing and non-internal bracing groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-two patients were analyzed; 34 were included in the IB group (17.6% female; age 33.1 ±1.60 years), and 18 were included in the non-IB group (11.1% female; age 34.1 ±3.72 years). Mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 1.44 ± 0.22 years (IB: 1.21 ± 0.18; non-IB: 2.1 ±0.65). There were no significant differences between PROMIS CAT [PROMIS Pain (54.4 ±1.78 vs 51.7 ±1.70, p=0.319), Physical Function (44.3 ±2.27 vs 47.9 ±1.52, p=0.294), Mobility (44.0 ±1.71 vs 46.1 ±2.10, p=0.463)], ML-QOL [ML-QOL Physical Impairment (40.7 ±4.21 vs 41.7±5.10, p=0.884), Emotional Impairment (49.2 ±4.88 vs 44.7±5.87, p=0.579), Activity Limitation (43.5 ±4.56 vs 31.5±3.62, p=0.087), Societal Involvement (44.9 ±4.96 vs 37.5 ±5.30, p=0.345)] and Lysholm knee score (61.8 ±4.55 vs 61.0 ±4.95, p=0.916) postoperatively compared to the non-IB group.
    UNASSIGNED: In this group of patients, function and patient-reported outcomes between patients treated with PCL reconstruction and repair without internal brace versus those with additional internal brace augmentation were not significantly different. Further research encompassing a larger patient sample is necessary to investigate the efficacy of the internal brace for PCL injury in the context of MLKI injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    正在开发新技术,以降低前交叉韧带(ACL)移植物的故障率并防止翻修手术。一种这样的技术涉及高强度缝合带(ST),也称为内部支撑。最近的文献强调了使用ST重建ACL,但没有研究比较不同类型的移植物的ST增强。
    根据所使用的移植物类型,比较使用ST增强进行ACL重建的情况(即,骨-髌腱-骨[BPTB],股四头肌,腿筋)。
    系统评价;证据水平,5.
    根据PRISMA(系统审查和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南对多个数据库进行在线搜索,并于2022年4月完成,以确定与ACL移植物ST段增强相关的研究。
    在确定的926项研究中,10符合纳入标准。五项研究(50%)使用了腿筋肌腱(HT),3(30%)使用股四头肌腱(QT),1(10%)使用BPTB,1例(10%)同时使用HT和QT移植物。ST增强的HT自体移植物的动态和峰值伸长率降低(15%-56%),增加故障负荷,与对照相比,初始和最终动态刚度增加。术后体格检查结果无显着差异(活动范围,拉赫曼,枢轴移位),除了与单纯HT相比,ST增强的移植物在手术后的松弛度明显减少(0.8vs1.9mm;P<.05)。ST增强的QT同种异体移植物显示移植物强度增加。与对照组相比,人QT自体移植研究显示更高的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分。与未增强组相比,具有ST增强的BPTB同种异体移植物的循环位移减少了31%(P=.015),载荷增加(758±128N;P<.001)和刚度增加(156±23N/mm;P=.003)。与对照组相比,ST增强组的并发症发生率较低或没有增加。
    HT,QT,和ST增强的BPTB移植物证明了ACL重建的有效方法。所有ST段增大的移植物类型均未显示临床不利的证据,一些研究表明,与传统ACL重建相比,具有显着的生物力学或临床优势。
    UNASSIGNED: New techniques are being developed to decrease the failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts and prevent revision surgery. One such technique involves high-strength suture tape (ST), also referred to as internal bracing. Recent literature has highlighted the use of ST for ACL reconstruction, but no study has compared ST augmentation between graft types.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the use of ST augmentation for ACL reconstruction based on the type of graft used (ie, bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], quadriceps, hamstring).
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.
    UNASSIGNED: An online search of multiple databases was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was completed April 2022 to identify studies related to ST augmentation of ACL grafts.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 926 studies identified, 10 met inclusion criteria. Five studies (50%) used hamstring tendon (HT), 3 (30%) used quadriceps tendon (QT), 1 (10%) used BPTB, and 1 (10%) used both HT and QT grafts. HT autografts augmented with ST had decreased dynamic and peak elongation (15%-56%), increased load to failure, and increased initial and final dynamic stiffness compared with controls. There was no significant difference in postoperative physical examination findings (range of motion, Lachman, pivot shift), except that ST-augmented grafts had significantly less laxity after surgery compared with HT alone (0.8 vs 1.9 mm; P < .05). QT allografts with ST augmentation showed increased graft strength. Human QT autograft studies showed higher Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores compared with controls. BPTB allografts with ST augmentation had decreased cyclic displacement by 31% (P = .015) and increased load (758 ± 128 N; P < .001) and stiffness (156 ± 23 N/mm; P = .003) compared with nonaugmented groups. The complication rate was low or showed no increase in the ST augmentation groups compared with control groups.
    UNASSIGNED: HT, QT, and BPTB grafts augmented with ST demonstrate an effective method for ACL reconstruction. All graft types with ST augmentation showed no evidence of clinical disadvantage, with some studies indicating significant biomechanical or clinical advantages compared with conventional ACL reconstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有了新的兴趣,最近,由于韧带修复技术和相应结果数据的改进,在投掷运动员中更广泛地实施尺侧副韧带(UCL)修复。
    比较用于UCL修复的2种支具-收紧技术之间的生物力学参数和失效模式。
    对照实验室研究。
    采购了11对匹配的尸体臂。每对中的一条肢体都进行了UCL修复,并通过(1)尝试恢复生理韧带张力或(2)最大张力来增强缝合胶带。在UCL撕脱后,然后在UCL修复后,在完整状态下,每个标本在屈曲90º下经受10个周期的亚失效外翻扭矩。然后将标本扭转为失败。关节接触力学,线性间隙距离,角位移,失效扭矩,破坏刚度,并记录缝合胶带拉穿长度。采用双向方差分析和配对t检验进行统计学差异检验。
    拧紧对关节接触面积有显着影响(P=.01)。最大张力组从撕裂状态到修复状态的间隙距离(P=.03)和角位移(P=.004)显着减少,与完整状态的间隙距离没有显着差异。两组之间的失效扭矩和刚度没有显着差异,尽管在整体缝合带拉通长度上存在显著差异(P=.001)。
    尽管在时间零点存在潜在的生理变化-包括接触面积的显着减少,归一化间隙距离,以及具有最大张力修复的标准化角位移-对失效生物力学的检查表明,随着时间的推移,这些影响可以通过在胶带-锚接口处的缝线胶带拉拔来减轻。与天然韧带生物力学相比,采用缝合胶带增强的UCL修复方法均未导致肘关节过度受约束。
    随着更多来自UCL修复和缝合带增强的长期结果数据的出现,将有更广泛的实施与各种技术来张紧缝合带。检查在最大张力下应用的UCL修复构造的潜在生物力学后遗症将有助于进一步完善对利用该技术进行UCL修复的外科医生的建议。
    There has been a renewed interest and, recently, wider implementation of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair in throwing athletes because of improvement in ligament repair technology and corresponding outcome data.
    To compare the biomechanical parameters and failure mode between 2 brace-tightening techniques for UCL repair.
    Controlled laboratory study.
    Eleven matched pairs of cadaveric arms were procured. One limb from each pair underwent UCL repair with suture tape augmentation with either (1) attempted restoration of physiologic ligament tension or (2) maximal tension. Each specimen was subjected to 10 cycles of subfailure valgus torque at 90º of flexion in the intact state after UCL avulsion and then after UCL repair. Specimens were then torqued to failure. Articular contact mechanics, linear gap distance, angular displacement, failure torque, failure stiffness, and suture tape pull-through length were recorded. Two-way analysis of variance and paired t tests were used to test for statistical differences.
    There was a significant effect (P = .01) of tightening on joint contact area. There was a significant decrease in gap distance (P = .03) and angular displacement (P = .004) from the torn condition to the repaired condition for the maximum tension group, without a significant difference in gap distance from the intact condition. Failure torque and stiffness were not significantly different between groups, although there was a significant difference (P = .001) in the overall suture tape pull-through length.
    Although there are potential physiologic changes at time zero-including significant decreases in contact area, normalized gap distance, and normalized angular displacement with maximal tension repair-examination of failure biomechanics suggests that these effects may be mitigated over time within the construct by suture tape pull-through at the tape-anchor interface. Neither method of UCL repair with suture tape augmentation resulted in overconstraint of the elbow joint compared with the native ligament biomechanics.
    As more long-term outcome data from UCL repair with suture tape augmentation emerge, there will be wider implementation with various techniques to tension the suture tape. Examining the potential biomechanical sequelae of the UCL repair construct applied under maximal tension will help further refine recommendations for surgeons who utilize this technique for UCL repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景慢性三角肌和弹簧韧带功能不全的联合重建并不常见。我们的研究旨在分享我们在治疗创伤后,慢性三角肌,和使用“四边形结构”技术的弹簧韧带功能不全。材料和方法本研究包括5例创伤后合并三角肌和弹簧韧带功能不全的患者。所有患者都报告了“让路”的感觉。术前,每位患者均接受踝关节和足部负重X线照片.注意到足第一跖骨角和后足对齐角。使用内部BraceTM增强的缝合锚钉修复了浅三角肌韧带(Arthrex,那不勒斯,美国)FiberTape®形成四边形结构,在解剖学上模仿三角肌-弹簧韧带复合体的各种组成部分。由于相关的过多的脚跟外翻,3例患者还接受了内侧移位跟骨截骨术。此外,一名患者需要外侧韧带修复,和另一个病人需要的联合稳定。美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分用于评估术前和术后的踝关节功能。结果5例患者均获随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均20个月。术前平均距骨第一跖骨角从8.46度改善至4.84度。术前平均后足对齐角度从术后的10.9度减小到5.76度。一名患者由于锚而感到不适,一年后需要移除。术后,没有病人重新体验到“让路”的感觉。术后AOFAS评分显示两名患者为优秀,两个一样好,一个公平。所有患者都恢复了受伤前的工作。结论我们开发了一种使用四边形结构进行三角肌和弹簧韧带联合重建的技术。这种技术有助于恢复解剖稳定性,是安全的,易于重现,并在后续行动中显示出积极的短期结果。证据水平是对研究质量和可靠性进行分类的方法之一,我们的研究属于IV级证据.
    Background A combined reconstruction of chronic deltoid and spring ligament insufficiency is uncommon. Our study aims to share our experience in treating post-traumatic, chronic deltoid, and spring ligament insufficiency using the \"quadrangular construct\" technique. Material and methods Five patients who had post-traumatic combined deltoid and spring ligament insufficiency were included in the study. All patients reported a \"giving-way\" sensation. Preoperatively, each patient underwent weight-bearing radiographs of the ankle and foot. The talo-first metatarsal angle and hindfoot alignment angle were noted. The superficial deltoid ligament was repaired using a suture anchor augmented with Internal BraceTM (Arthrex, Naples, USA) FiberTape® to form a quadrangular construct that anatomically mimics various components of the deltoid-spring ligament complex. Due to the associated excessive heel valgus, three patients also underwent medial displacement calcaneum osteotomy. Additionally, one patient required lateral ligament repair, and another patient required syndesmotic stabilization. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative ankle function. Results All five patients were followed up for a mean of 20 months (range: 12-24 months). The mean preoperative talo-first metatarsal angle improved from 8.46 degrees to 4.84 degrees. The preoperative mean hindfoot alignment angle was reduced from 10.9 to 5.76 degrees postoperatively. One patient had irritation due to the anchor, which needed removal after one year. Postoperatively, no patients re-experienced the feeling of \"giving way\". The AOFAS scores postoperatively showed two patients as excellent, two as good, and one as fair. All the patients returned to their pre-injury work. Conclusion  We have developed a technique for combined deltoid and spring ligament reconstruction using a quadrangular construct. This technique helps to restore anatomical stability, is safe, easily reproducible, and has shown positive short-term results in follow-up. The level of evidence is one of the methods used to categorize the quality and reliability of research, and our study falls under the category of level IV evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在前交叉韧带(ACL)手术后康复的初始阶段,在确保有效康复和避免并发症方面发挥了关键作用。在此期间,解决ACL松弛问题的一种常用策略涉及结合合成材料进行增强。这项研究的目的是比较常规缝合带和多种高强度缝合线作为ACL修复增强技术的有效性。
    将使用Thiel方法进行防腐的十个保存的尸体膝盖分为两组,每个包含五个膝盖。在一组中,传统的缝合带被用于增强,而另一组则使用了多条高强度缝线。每个膝盖承受1000个正弦波周期的循环载荷,通过轴向牵引载荷成功,直到随后发生故障。评估了破坏时产生的位移和极限载荷,以对比两种增强技术的功效。
    与缝合带组(987.6N)相比,使用多个高强度缝合线的组在时间零点(1690.7N)表现出明显更高的失效负荷(P=.003)。此外,与缝合带组(16.3mm)相比,多次高强度缝线组1000次循环负荷(6.6mm)后的位移显著减少(P<.001).
    多根高强度缝合线显示出更好的生物力学特性,可在时间零点增强ACL修复。缝合胶带和多根高强度缝合线的极限失效载荷值均高于自然ACL载荷。因此,这些物质可能作为增强选项,以防止ACL的逐渐延长,特别是在康复的初始阶段。
    UNASSIGNED: During the initial stages of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, a pivotal role is played in ensuring effective recuperation and averting complications. An often-employed strategy to tackle ACL laxity during this period involves the incorporation of synthetic materials for reinforcement. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of conventional suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures as augmentation techniques for ACL repair.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten preserved cadaveric knees embalmed using the Thiel method were segregated into two groups, each containing five knees. In one group, traditional suture tape was employed for augmentation, while the other group utilized multiple high-strength sutures. Each knee underwent a cyclic load of 1000 sine wave cycles, succeeded by an axial distraction load until failure ensued. The resultant displacement and ultimate load at failure were assessed to contrast the efficacy of the two augmentation techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: The group utilizing multiple high-strength sutures exhibited a significantly higher load to failure at time-zero (1690.7 N) compared to the suture tape group (987.6 N) (P = .003). Furthermore, the multiple high-strength sutures group demonstrated significantly reduced displacement after 1000 cyclic loads (6.6 mm) in comparison to the suture tape group (16.3 mm) (P < .001).
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple high-strength sutures show better biomechanical properties for the augmentation of ACL repair at time-zero. Both suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures had ultimate load-to-failure values higher than the natural ACL loads. Therefore, these substances might serve as augmentation options to prevent the ACL\'s gradual elongation, a critical concern particularly in the initial stages of rehabilitation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    带肌腱重建/悬吊成形术(TRS)的梯形切除术是美国最常用的手术方法,用于治疗拇指腕掌(CMC)骨关节炎(OA)。最近,在研究机构中使用了带有缝合带悬挂成形术(STS)的梯形切除术,作为一种替代的手术治疗选择,具有更早恢复功能和减少手术时间的好处。这项研究的目的是比较TRS和STS治疗拇指CMCOA的患者结果。
    所有接受原发性,分析2014年1月1日至2020年9月1日治疗拇指CMCOA的分离TRS或STS。我们评估了人口统计学和术前和术后患者评估结果评分,包括患者报告结果测量信息系统评分以及疼痛结果。满意,和外观在手术后平均2.6年(至少6个月)。比较两组之间返回工作和活动的时间。双变量统计比较了组间的结果。
    94名患者被纳入最终研究队列,其中53例接受了TRS,41例接受了STS。术前没有差异,术后,或组间最终患者评估结果评分。两组患者在最终随访时都报告了较高的总体和外观满意度得分。STS组的平均止血带时间缩短了15分钟(26%),恢复工作平均快3周。
    STS组和TRS组术后患者评分结果评分无差异。STS组手术时间较短,术后恢复工作较快。
    治疗III.
    UNASSIGNED: Trapeziectomy with tendon reconstruction/suspensionplasty (TRS) is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the United States for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Trapeziectomy with suture tape suspensionplasty (STS) has been used recently at the study institution as an alternative surgical treatment option with perceived benefits of earlier return to function and reduced operative time. The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes following TRS versus STS for treatment of thumb CMC OA.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients who underwent primary, isolated TRS or STS for treatment of thumb CMC OA between 1/1/2014 and 9/1/2020 were analyzed. We assessed demographics and preoperative and postoperative patient-rated outcome scores including Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scores as well as pain outcomes, satisfaction, and appearance at a mean of 2.6 years after surgery (minimum 6 months). Time to return to work and activities was compared between groups. Bivariate statistics compared outcomes between groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Ninety-four patients were included in the final study cohort, of which 53 underwent TRS and 41 underwent STS. There were no differences in preoperative, postoperative, or final patient-rated outcome scores between groups. Patients reported high global and appearance satisfaction scores at final follow-up in both groups. Mean tourniquet time was 15 minutes (26%) shorter and return to work was on average 3 weeks faster for the STS group.
    UNASSIGNED: There were no differences in postoperative patient-rated outcome scores between the STS and TRS groups. The STS group had a shorter surgical time and faster return-to-work after surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号