Internal brace

内部撑杆
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI)的情况下,比较单纯使用后交叉韧带(PCL)重建或修复与单纯使用内支撑(IB)重建或修复的PCL患者的患者报告结果。
    对2006年至2020年期间在两个机构接受MLKI手术治疗的所有患者进行回顾性鉴定,并参与研究。通过三种仪器测量患者报告的结果:Lysholm膝关节评分,多元化的生活质量(ML-QOL),和患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)计算机自适应测试(CAT)。比较内支撑组和非内支撑组的术后结局和再手术率。
    分析了52例患者;IB组包括34例患者(女性占17.6%;年龄33.1±1.60岁),非IB组包括18例(11.1%为女性;年龄34.1±3.72岁)。整个队列的平均随访时间为1.44±0.22年(IB:1.21±0.18;非IB:2.1±0.65)。PROMISCAT之间没有显着差异[PROMIS疼痛(54.4±1.78vs51.7±1.70,p=0.319),身体功能(44.3±2.27vs47.9±1.52,p=0.294),流动性(44.0±1.71vs46.1±2.10,p=0.463)],ML-QOL[ML-QOL身体损害(40.7±4.21vs41.7±5.10,p=0.884),情绪障碍(49.2±4.88vs44.7±5.87,p=0.579),活动限制(43.5±4.56vs31.5±3.62,p=0.087),与非IB组相比,术后社会参与(44.9±4.96vs37.5±5.30,p=0.345)]和Lysholm膝关节评分(61.8±4.55vs61.0±4.95,p=0.916)。
    在这组患者中,无内支管的PCL重建和修复治疗患者与额外的内支管增强治疗患者的功能和患者报告的结局无显著差异.在MLKI损伤的情况下,有必要进行包括更大患者样本的进一步研究,以研究内部支架对PCL损伤的功效。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the patient-reported outcomes between patients with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction or repair alone versus PCL reconstruction or repair with internal bracing (IB) in the context of multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI).
    UNASSIGNED: All patients who underwent surgical management of MLKI at two institutions between 2006 and 2020 were retrospectively identified and offered participation in the study. Patient reported outcomes were measured via three instruments: Lysholm Knee score, Multiligament Quality of Life (ML-QOL), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing (CAT). The postoperative outcomes and reoperation rates were compared between the internal bracing and non-internal bracing groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-two patients were analyzed; 34 were included in the IB group (17.6% female; age 33.1 ±1.60 years), and 18 were included in the non-IB group (11.1% female; age 34.1 ±3.72 years). Mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 1.44 ± 0.22 years (IB: 1.21 ± 0.18; non-IB: 2.1 ±0.65). There were no significant differences between PROMIS CAT [PROMIS Pain (54.4 ±1.78 vs 51.7 ±1.70, p=0.319), Physical Function (44.3 ±2.27 vs 47.9 ±1.52, p=0.294), Mobility (44.0 ±1.71 vs 46.1 ±2.10, p=0.463)], ML-QOL [ML-QOL Physical Impairment (40.7 ±4.21 vs 41.7±5.10, p=0.884), Emotional Impairment (49.2 ±4.88 vs 44.7±5.87, p=0.579), Activity Limitation (43.5 ±4.56 vs 31.5±3.62, p=0.087), Societal Involvement (44.9 ±4.96 vs 37.5 ±5.30, p=0.345)] and Lysholm knee score (61.8 ±4.55 vs 61.0 ±4.95, p=0.916) postoperatively compared to the non-IB group.
    UNASSIGNED: In this group of patients, function and patient-reported outcomes between patients treated with PCL reconstruction and repair without internal brace versus those with additional internal brace augmentation were not significantly different. Further research encompassing a larger patient sample is necessary to investigate the efficacy of the internal brace for PCL injury in the context of MLKI injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在前交叉韧带(ACL)手术后康复的初始阶段,在确保有效康复和避免并发症方面发挥了关键作用。在此期间,解决ACL松弛问题的一种常用策略涉及结合合成材料进行增强。这项研究的目的是比较常规缝合带和多种高强度缝合线作为ACL修复增强技术的有效性。
    将使用Thiel方法进行防腐的十个保存的尸体膝盖分为两组,每个包含五个膝盖。在一组中,传统的缝合带被用于增强,而另一组则使用了多条高强度缝线。每个膝盖承受1000个正弦波周期的循环载荷,通过轴向牵引载荷成功,直到随后发生故障。评估了破坏时产生的位移和极限载荷,以对比两种增强技术的功效。
    与缝合带组(987.6N)相比,使用多个高强度缝合线的组在时间零点(1690.7N)表现出明显更高的失效负荷(P=.003)。此外,与缝合带组(16.3mm)相比,多次高强度缝线组1000次循环负荷(6.6mm)后的位移显著减少(P<.001).
    多根高强度缝合线显示出更好的生物力学特性,可在时间零点增强ACL修复。缝合胶带和多根高强度缝合线的极限失效载荷值均高于自然ACL载荷。因此,这些物质可能作为增强选项,以防止ACL的逐渐延长,特别是在康复的初始阶段。
    UNASSIGNED: During the initial stages of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, a pivotal role is played in ensuring effective recuperation and averting complications. An often-employed strategy to tackle ACL laxity during this period involves the incorporation of synthetic materials for reinforcement. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of conventional suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures as augmentation techniques for ACL repair.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten preserved cadaveric knees embalmed using the Thiel method were segregated into two groups, each containing five knees. In one group, traditional suture tape was employed for augmentation, while the other group utilized multiple high-strength sutures. Each knee underwent a cyclic load of 1000 sine wave cycles, succeeded by an axial distraction load until failure ensued. The resultant displacement and ultimate load at failure were assessed to contrast the efficacy of the two augmentation techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: The group utilizing multiple high-strength sutures exhibited a significantly higher load to failure at time-zero (1690.7 N) compared to the suture tape group (987.6 N) (P = .003). Furthermore, the multiple high-strength sutures group demonstrated significantly reduced displacement after 1000 cyclic loads (6.6 mm) in comparison to the suture tape group (16.3 mm) (P < .001).
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple high-strength sutures show better biomechanical properties for the augmentation of ACL repair at time-zero. Both suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures had ultimate load-to-failure values higher than the natural ACL loads. Therefore, these substances might serve as augmentation options to prevent the ACL\'s gradual elongation, a critical concern particularly in the initial stages of rehabilitation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前交叉韧带损伤的金标准治疗是重建(ACL-R)。移植失败是值得关注的问题,确保持久的初始移植与快速整合至关重要。使用可植入装置(内部支架加固)的移植物增强是一种旨在降低破裂风险并加速恢复的技术。很少有研究研究这些技术,特别是与非增强移植物相比。本研究使用增强和非增强的绳肌腱自体移植物评估ACL-R的短期结果。
    这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了增强和非增强ACL-R。所有程序均使用相同的技术在单个中心进行。膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分[KOOS]用于评估患者报告的结果。
    增强组70例,对照组111例。增强组的平均移植物直径为8.82mm,而非增强组的平均移植物直径为8.44mm。在73.5%的增强组中可实现六股移植,而在非增强组中则为33%。在非增强组中报告了两次移植物失败,在增强组中没有。增强组的患者满意率较高。与未增强组相比,增强组的术后KOOS有统计学上无意义的改善(p0.6)。无论增强状态如何,在功能评分和年龄之间没有发现相关性,或股骨隧道宽度。
    在使用增强或非增强腿筋移植物的ACL重建的短期功能结果中,没有统计学上的显着差异。增强的ACL-R可以实现优越的移植物直径,与非增强ACL相比,失败率和患者报告的结果。需要前瞻性试验来进一步检查这一点。
    UNASSIGNED: The gold standard treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury is reconstruction (ACL-R). Graft failure is the concern and ensuring a durable initial graft with rapid integration is crucial. Graft augmentation with implantable devices (internal brace reinforcement) is a technique purported to reduce the risk of rupture and hasten recovery. Few studies have examined these techniques, in particular when compared to non-augmented grafts. This study assesses the short-term outcome of ACL-R using augmented and non-augmented hamstring tendon autografts.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing augmented and non-augmented ACL-R. All procedures were performed in a single centre using the same technique. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] was used to assess patient-reported outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 70 patients in the augmented and 111 patients in the control group. Mean graft diameter in the augmented group was 8.82 mm versus 8.44 mm in the non-augmented. Six strand graft was achievable in 73.5% of the augmented group compared to 33% in the non-augmented group. Two graft failures were reported in the non-augmented group and none in the augmented group. Patient satisfaction rates were higher in the augmented group. There was a statistically insignificant improvement in the postoperative KOOS in the augmented group compared to the non-augmented group (p 0.6). Irrespective of augmentation status, no correlation was found between the functional score and age, or femoral tunnel width.
    UNASSIGNED: No statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the short-term functional outcome of ACL reconstruction using an augmented or non-augmented hamstring graft. Augmented ACL-R may achieve superior graft diameters, failure rates and patient reported outcomes when compared to nonaugmented ACL-R. Prospective trials are needed to examine this further.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To mitigate the risk of poor wound healing and of infection associated with the open repair of Achilles tendon midsubstance ruptures, minimally invasive techniques have been developed. We report our preliminary results after reviewing our \"jigless knotless internal brace technique.\"
    METHODS: Patients were placed in prone position and a transverse 3-cm incision was made proximal to the palpable ruptured end. The proximal ruptured end was pulled out, gently debrided, and sutured using Krackow locking loops. Percutaneous sutures were crisscrossed through the distal tendon stump and looped around the Krackow sutures over the proximal stump. The ipsilateral Krackow sutures and the contralateral crisscrossed sutures were subcutaneously passed through two mini-incisions over the posterior calcaneus tuberosity and seated at the tuberosity with two 4.5-mm knotless suture anchors. All patients underwent the same post-operative rehabilitation protocol and regular follow-ups for at least 1 year.
    RESULTS: We recruited 10 patients (mean age, 37.3 years) who scored 100 points on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, and who returned to their preoperative exercise levels 1-year post-operatively with no complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our method is simple, effective, and requires no special tools. It might be a reliable option for Achilles tendon repair.
    METHODS: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    治疗关节内韧带损伤的选择是有限的,韧带重建不足会导致疼痛的关节不稳定,功能丧失,和退行性关节炎的进行性发展。这项研究旨在评估用于韧带重建的生物增强基质材料的能力,以承受关节内的拉力并增强恢复关节功能所需的韧带再生。
    共有18只新西兰兔通过自体移植进行了双侧前交叉韧带重建,FiberTape,或FiberTape增强的自体移植。主要结果是生物力学评估(n=17),microCT(μCT)评估(n=12),组织学评估(n=12),和定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)分析(n=6)。
    八周时,单独的FiberTape或FiberTape增强的自体移植物与自体移植物相比,在最终失效负荷方面表现出增加的生物力学稳定性(p=0.035)。伸长率(p=0.006),和能量吸收(p=0.022)。FiberTape移植的样品还显示骨隧道中的骨矿物质密度增加(p=0.039)。组织学评估显示所有移植物通过新骨形成整合在骨隧道中,和有限的炎症迹象。通过炎症生物标志物的定量证实了在所有样品中缺乏延长的炎症。然而,沿缝合胶带材料未观察到韧带样组织的再生。除了一次自体移植失败,未发现不良事件.
    我们的结果表明,FiberTape在经过验证的8周兔模型中增加了关节内韧带重建的生物力学性能。在此期间,FiberTape不会对骨骼隧道的愈合产生不利影响,也不会引起炎症的长期升高。引用这篇文章:骨关节J2019;101-B:1238-1247。
    Options for the treatment of intra-articular ligament injuries are limited, and insufficient ligament reconstruction can cause painful joint instability, loss of function, and progressive development of degenerative arthritis. This study aimed to assess the capability of a biologically enhanced matrix material for ligament reconstruction to withstand tensile forces within the joint and enhance ligament regeneration needed to regain joint function.
    A total of 18 New Zealand rabbits underwent bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by autograft, FiberTape, or FiberTape-augmented autograft. Primary outcomes were biomechanical assessment (n = 17), microCT (µCT) assessment (n = 12), histological evaluation (n = 12), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis (n = 6).
    At eight weeks, FiberTape alone or FiberTape-augmented autograft demonstrated increased biomechanical stability compared with autograft regarding ultimate load to failure (p = 0.035), elongation (p = 0.006), and energy absorption (p = 0.022). FiberTape-grafted samples also demonstrated increased bone mineral density in the bone tunnel (p = 0.039). Histological evaluation showed integration of all grafts in the bone tunnels by new bone formation, and limited signs of inflammation overall. A lack of prolonged inflammation in all samples was confirmed by quantification of inflammation biomarkers. However, no regeneration of ligament-like tissue was observed along the suture tape materials. Except for one autograft failure, no adverse events were detected.
    Our results indicate that FiberTape increases the biomechanical performance of intra-articular ligament reconstructions in a verified rabbit model at eight weeks. Within this period, FiberTape did not adversely affect bone tunnel healing or invoke a prolonged elevation in inflammation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1238-1247.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景十二对新鲜的冷冻尸体手腕被随机分配到360度肌腱固定术修复组或使用内部支撑(缝合带)构造的360度肌腱固定术修复。病例描述将标本预加载至5N,随后生物力学加载至失效,在允许轴向载荷的夹具上以0.1mm/s的速率。记录最大载荷和失效模式。带内部支撑的360肌腱固定术组的破坏载荷为283.47±100.25N,与仅360肌腱固定术组相比,其屈服强度为143.61±90.54N。内部支撑结构内的破坏模式是通过结滑移,移植物破裂,或从强度测试构造中分离骨。360肌腱固定术组倾向于通过移植物滑动或移植物破裂而失败。文献综述肩胛骨不稳定的处理可能是一个难以治疗的问题。传统上,许多手术重建都集中在使用克氏针(K)固定的背侧韧带重建上。这导致手腕长时间固定,结果各不相同,部分原因是由于同时发生的掌侧韧带破坏可能会持续存在的多轴不稳定性。为了解决这种不稳定,已经设计了解决掌侧和背侧韧带损伤的手术技术。临床相关性采用360度肌腱固定术和内部支架增强(SLITT程序)的肩关节重建比单独的肌腱固定术具有更好的生物力学稳定性。
    Background  Twelve paired fresh frozen cadaveric wrists were randomized to a 360-degree tenodesis repair group or the 360-degree tenodesis repair with an internal brace (suture tape) construct. Case Description  The specimens were preloaded to 5 N and subsequently biomechanically loaded to failure, at a rate of 0.1 mm/s on a jig that allowed for axial load. The maximum load and mode of failure were recorded. Load to failure in the 360 tenodesis group with internal brace was 283.47 ± 100.25 N, compared with the 360 tenodesis group only, whose yield strength was 143.61 ± 90.54 N. The mode of failure within the internal brace construct was either through knot slippage, graft disruption, or bone separation from strength testing construct. The 360 tenodesis group tended to fail via graft slippage or graft rupture. Literature Review  The management of scapholunate instability can be a difficult problem to treat. Traditionally, many of the surgical reconstructions have focused upon dorsal ligament reconstruction with Kirschner (K) wire fixation. This results in prolonged immobilization of the wrist with varied outcomes, in part due to the multiaxial instability that may persist due to concomitant volar ligament disruption. To address this instability, surgical techniques have been devised that address both the volar and dorsal ligament injuries. Clinical Relevance  Scapholunate reconstruction with a 360-degree tenodesis and internal brace augmentation (SLITT procedure) provided superior biomechanical stability than tenodesis alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Patellar tendon repair with braided polyethylene suture alone is subject to knot slippage and failure. Several techniques to augment the primary repair have been described. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate a novel patellar tendon repair technique augmented with a knotless suture anchor internal brace with suture tape (SAIB). The hypothesis was that this technique would be biomechanically superior to a nonaugmented repair and equivalent to a standard augmentation with an 18-gauge steel wire.
    Controlled laboratory study.
    Midsubstance patellar tendon tears were created in 32 human cadaveric knees. Two comparison groups were created. Group 1 compared #2 supersuture repair without augmentation to #2 supersuture repair with SAIB augmentation. Group 2 compared #2 supersuture repair with an 18-gauge stainless steel cerclage wire augmentation to #2 supersuture repair with SAIB augmentation. The specimens were potted and biomechanically loaded on a materials testing machine. Yield load, maximum load, mode of failure, plastic displacement, elastic displacement, and total displacement were calculated for each sample. Standard statistical analysis was performed.
    There was a statistically significant increase in the mean ± SD yield load and maximum load in the SAIB augmentation group compared with supersuture alone (mean yield load: 646 ± 202 N vs 229 ± 60 N; mean maximum load: 868 ± 162 N vs 365 ± 54 N; P < .001). Group 2 showed no statistically significant differences between the augmented repairs (mean yield load: 495 ± 213 N vs 566 ± 172 N; P = .476; mean maximum load: 737 ± 210 N vs 697 ± 130 N; P = .721).
    Patellar tendon repair augmented with SAIB is biomechanically superior to repair without augmentation and is equivalent to repair with augmentation with an 18-gauge stainless steel cerclage wire.
    This novel patellar tendon repair augmentation is equivalent to standard 18-gauge wire augmentation at time zero. It does not require a second surgery for removal, and it is biomechanically superior to primary repair alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号