Abstract：
The aim of the study was to compare the intermediate-term (>24 months) clinical outcomes between anterior talofibular ligament repair using Broström operation with and without an internal brace. Nineteen patients underwent surgery using an arthroscopic traditional Broström repair with an internal brace technique (IB) and Eighteen patients underwent surgery using an arthroscopic traditional Broström repair without an internal brace technique (TB) . All patients were evaluated clinically using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). According to FAAM, sports activity scores of TB and IB groups were 83.33 ± 5.66 and 90.63 ± 6.21 at the final follow-up (p = .02). There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative stress radiographs between the two groups. Total medical expense was more in the IB group (p < .001). It also has a significant superiority in the terms of FAAM scores at sports activity. However, there was no difference during daily life.
摘要：
该研究的目的是比较使用Broström手术在有和没有内部支架的情况下修复前腓骨韧带的中期（>24个月）临床结果。19例患者使用关节镜传统Broström修复和内部支撑技术（IB）进行了手术，18例患者使用关节镜传统Broström修复而没有内部支撑技术（TB）进行了手术。所有患者均使用足踝预后评分（FAOS）和足踝能力测量（FAAM）进行临床评估。根据FAAM,最终随访时，TB和IB组的运动活动得分分别为83.33±5.66和90.63±6.21（p=0.02）。两组术前和术后应激X线片差异无统计学意义。总医疗费用高于IB组(P<0.001)。在体育活动中的FAAM得分方面也具有显着优势。然而,在日常生活中没有差异。
