Internal brace

内部撑杆
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    正在开发新技术,以降低前交叉韧带(ACL)移植物的故障率并防止翻修手术。一种这样的技术涉及高强度缝合带(ST),也称为内部支撑。最近的文献强调了使用ST重建ACL,但没有研究比较不同类型的移植物的ST增强。
    根据所使用的移植物类型,比较使用ST增强进行ACL重建的情况(即,骨-髌腱-骨[BPTB],股四头肌,腿筋)。
    系统评价;证据水平,5.
    根据PRISMA(系统审查和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南对多个数据库进行在线搜索,并于2022年4月完成,以确定与ACL移植物ST段增强相关的研究。
    在确定的926项研究中,10符合纳入标准。五项研究(50%)使用了腿筋肌腱(HT),3(30%)使用股四头肌腱(QT),1(10%)使用BPTB,1例(10%)同时使用HT和QT移植物。ST增强的HT自体移植物的动态和峰值伸长率降低(15%-56%),增加故障负荷,与对照相比,初始和最终动态刚度增加。术后体格检查结果无显着差异(活动范围,拉赫曼,枢轴移位),除了与单纯HT相比,ST增强的移植物在手术后的松弛度明显减少(0.8vs1.9mm;P<.05)。ST增强的QT同种异体移植物显示移植物强度增加。与对照组相比,人QT自体移植研究显示更高的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分。与未增强组相比,具有ST增强的BPTB同种异体移植物的循环位移减少了31%(P=.015),载荷增加(758±128N;P<.001)和刚度增加(156±23N/mm;P=.003)。与对照组相比,ST增强组的并发症发生率较低或没有增加。
    HT,QT,和ST增强的BPTB移植物证明了ACL重建的有效方法。所有ST段增大的移植物类型均未显示临床不利的证据,一些研究表明,与传统ACL重建相比,具有显着的生物力学或临床优势。
    UNASSIGNED: New techniques are being developed to decrease the failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts and prevent revision surgery. One such technique involves high-strength suture tape (ST), also referred to as internal bracing. Recent literature has highlighted the use of ST for ACL reconstruction, but no study has compared ST augmentation between graft types.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the use of ST augmentation for ACL reconstruction based on the type of graft used (ie, bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], quadriceps, hamstring).
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.
    UNASSIGNED: An online search of multiple databases was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was completed April 2022 to identify studies related to ST augmentation of ACL grafts.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 926 studies identified, 10 met inclusion criteria. Five studies (50%) used hamstring tendon (HT), 3 (30%) used quadriceps tendon (QT), 1 (10%) used BPTB, and 1 (10%) used both HT and QT grafts. HT autografts augmented with ST had decreased dynamic and peak elongation (15%-56%), increased load to failure, and increased initial and final dynamic stiffness compared with controls. There was no significant difference in postoperative physical examination findings (range of motion, Lachman, pivot shift), except that ST-augmented grafts had significantly less laxity after surgery compared with HT alone (0.8 vs 1.9 mm; P < .05). QT allografts with ST augmentation showed increased graft strength. Human QT autograft studies showed higher Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores compared with controls. BPTB allografts with ST augmentation had decreased cyclic displacement by 31% (P = .015) and increased load (758 ± 128 N; P < .001) and stiffness (156 ± 23 N/mm; P = .003) compared with nonaugmented groups. The complication rate was low or showed no increase in the ST augmentation groups compared with control groups.
    UNASSIGNED: HT, QT, and BPTB grafts augmented with ST demonstrate an effective method for ACL reconstruction. All graft types with ST augmentation showed no evidence of clinical disadvantage, with some studies indicating significant biomechanical or clinical advantages compared with conventional ACL reconstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景慢性三角肌和弹簧韧带功能不全的联合重建并不常见。我们的研究旨在分享我们在治疗创伤后,慢性三角肌,和使用“四边形结构”技术的弹簧韧带功能不全。材料和方法本研究包括5例创伤后合并三角肌和弹簧韧带功能不全的患者。所有患者都报告了“让路”的感觉。术前,每位患者均接受踝关节和足部负重X线照片.注意到足第一跖骨角和后足对齐角。使用内部BraceTM增强的缝合锚钉修复了浅三角肌韧带(Arthrex,那不勒斯,美国)FiberTape®形成四边形结构,在解剖学上模仿三角肌-弹簧韧带复合体的各种组成部分。由于相关的过多的脚跟外翻,3例患者还接受了内侧移位跟骨截骨术。此外,一名患者需要外侧韧带修复,和另一个病人需要的联合稳定。美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分用于评估术前和术后的踝关节功能。结果5例患者均获随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均20个月。术前平均距骨第一跖骨角从8.46度改善至4.84度。术前平均后足对齐角度从术后的10.9度减小到5.76度。一名患者由于锚而感到不适,一年后需要移除。术后,没有病人重新体验到“让路”的感觉。术后AOFAS评分显示两名患者为优秀,两个一样好,一个公平。所有患者都恢复了受伤前的工作。结论我们开发了一种使用四边形结构进行三角肌和弹簧韧带联合重建的技术。这种技术有助于恢复解剖稳定性,是安全的,易于重现,并在后续行动中显示出积极的短期结果。证据水平是对研究质量和可靠性进行分类的方法之一,我们的研究属于IV级证据.
    Background A combined reconstruction of chronic deltoid and spring ligament insufficiency is uncommon. Our study aims to share our experience in treating post-traumatic, chronic deltoid, and spring ligament insufficiency using the \"quadrangular construct\" technique. Material and methods Five patients who had post-traumatic combined deltoid and spring ligament insufficiency were included in the study. All patients reported a \"giving-way\" sensation. Preoperatively, each patient underwent weight-bearing radiographs of the ankle and foot. The talo-first metatarsal angle and hindfoot alignment angle were noted. The superficial deltoid ligament was repaired using a suture anchor augmented with Internal BraceTM (Arthrex, Naples, USA) FiberTape® to form a quadrangular construct that anatomically mimics various components of the deltoid-spring ligament complex. Due to the associated excessive heel valgus, three patients also underwent medial displacement calcaneum osteotomy. Additionally, one patient required lateral ligament repair, and another patient required syndesmotic stabilization. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative ankle function. Results All five patients were followed up for a mean of 20 months (range: 12-24 months). The mean preoperative talo-first metatarsal angle improved from 8.46 degrees to 4.84 degrees. The preoperative mean hindfoot alignment angle was reduced from 10.9 to 5.76 degrees postoperatively. One patient had irritation due to the anchor, which needed removal after one year. Postoperatively, no patients re-experienced the feeling of \"giving way\". The AOFAS scores postoperatively showed two patients as excellent, two as good, and one as fair. All the patients returned to their pre-injury work. Conclusion  We have developed a technique for combined deltoid and spring ligament reconstruction using a quadrangular construct. This technique helps to restore anatomical stability, is safe, easily reproducible, and has shown positive short-term results in follow-up. The level of evidence is one of the methods used to categorize the quality and reliability of research, and our study falls under the category of level IV evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Knee ligament injuries are most common in sports injuries. In general, ligament repair or reconstruction is necessary to restore the stability of the knee joint and prevent secondary injuries. Despite advances in ligament repair and reconstruction techniques, a number of patients still experience re-rupture of the graft and suboptimal recovery of motor function. Since Dr. Mackay\'s introduction of the internal brace technique, there has been continuous research in recent years using the internal brace ligament augmentation technique for knee ligament repair or reconstruction, particularly in the repair or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. This technique focuses on increasing the strength of autologous or allograft tendon grafts through the use of braided ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene suture tapes to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation and avoid re-rupture or failure. The purpose of this review is to present detailed research progress in the internal brace ligament enhancement technique of knee ligament injury repair as well as the reconstruction from biomechanical and histological research and clinical studies and to comprehensively assess the value of the application of this technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用缝合带内部支撑进行假体重建,以增强改良的Broström修复踝关节外侧不稳定的兴趣日益增加。这项研究的目的是研究与单独使用标准改良的Broström修复相比,缝合胶带增强是否会改善临床和放射学结果。
    方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。所有临床研究发表在Medline,Embase,从成立到2020年1月,Pubmed和Cochrane图书馆数据库报告了使用缝合胶带增强到改良的Broström修复术治疗踝关节外侧不稳定。
    结果:确定了78项研究,其中10项(评估333例患者)符合纳入标准。平均随访24.8个月(6-52个月)。所有研究均显示,缝合带增强组和改良Broström组术后多项临床结果指标均有统计学上的显着改善。然而,组间差异无统计学意义.汇总结果表明,与单独的改良Broström修复相比,缝合带增强可能会减少不稳定性的复发(p<0.05)。总体证据质量中等至较差,支持使用缝合带增强的数据有限。
    结论:使用缝合带内部支撑治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的临床和影像学结果非常好,并且相当于多种临床和影像学评估措施的标准治疗。很少有证据表明功能结果更好,或复发率低于单独的改良Broström修复。
    CRD42020169876。
    方法:II.
    BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in augmentation of modified Broström repairs for lateral ankle instability with a prosthetic reconstruction using suture tape internal bracing. The aim of this study was to investigate if suture tape augmentation resulted in improved clinical and radiological outcomes compared to a standard modified Broström repair alone.
    METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. All clinical studies published in Medline, Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane Library Database from inception until January 2020 reporting on the use of suture tape augmentation to a modified Broström repair for lateral ankle instability.
    RESULTS: 78 studies were identified of which 10 (assessing 333 patients) met the criteria for inclusion. Mean follow up was 24.8 months (range 6-52 months). All studies showed a statistically significant improvement across multiple clinical outcome measures post-surgery in both suture tape augmentation and modified Broström groups, however there were no statistically significant inter-group differences. Pooled results suggested there may be a reduction in recurrence of instability with suture tape augmentation when compared to modified Broström repair alone (p < 0.05). Overall quality of evidence was moderate to poor with limited data to support use of suture tape augmentation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and radiographic outcomes using a suture tape internal bracing for lateral ankle instability are excellent, and are equivalent to standard treatment across multiple clinical and radiographic assessment measures. There is minimal evidence to suggest functional outcomes are better, or recurrence rates are lower than modified Broström repair alone.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42020169876.
    METHODS: II.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Chronic ankle instability can result from untreated or badly managed acute lateral ankle ligament injuries. Conservative management is the modality of choice for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries, and operative treatment is reserved for special cases. Failure after strict rehabilitation may be an indication for surgery. Several operative options are available, including anatomic repair, anatomic reconstruction, and tenodesis procedures. Anatomic repair can be performed when the quality of the damaged ligaments permits. Anatomic reconstruction with an autograft or allograft should be considered when the torn ligaments are not adequate. Ankle arthroscopy is a useful adjunct to ligamentous procedures, performed at the time of repair to identify and treat intra-articular conditions that may be associated with chronic ankle instability. Tenodesis techniques are not recommended because of their suboptimal long-term results related to the modification of ankle and hindfoot biomechanics.Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Recently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to assess the already-published, clinical, and pre-clinical results of those techniques. A literature review was conducted and implemented by three independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were clinical or cadaveric or animal studies about patients suffering from ACL rupture, who were treated with one of those four different arthroscopic techniques of primary ACL repair. There were 10 clinical trials dealing with the different techniques of primary ACL repair and 12 cadaveric or animal studies. The majority of the published clinical trials investigated the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), while only four studies referred to the three other surgical techniques. Most of the clinical trials suggested that primary ACL repair should be done during the first 14-21 days after a proximal ACL rupture and not later. Further clinical evidence is needed for the techniques of bridge-enhanced ACL repair, internal brace, and suture anchors ACL refixation in order to support the animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies. Till now, the existing clinical trials were not enough to establish the use of those techniques in the ACL-ruptured patients. On the contrary, the Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization with Ligamys™ device demonstrated very promising results in different types of clinical studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号