{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation: Can You Overtighten?
{Author}: Shahien AA;Beason DP;Slowik JS;Fleisig GS;Dugas JR;Cain EL;
{Journal}: Am J Sports Med
{Volume}: 52
{Issue}: 2
{Year}: 2024 02 22
{Factor}: 7.01
{DOI}: 10.1177/03635465231220382
{Abstract}: There has been a renewed interest and, recently, wider implementation of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair in throwing athletes because of improvement in ligament repair technology and corresponding outcome data.<BR>To compare the biomechanical parameters and failure mode between 2 brace-tightening techniques for UCL repair.<BR>Controlled laboratory study.<BR>Eleven matched pairs of cadaveric arms were procured. One limb from each pair underwent UCL repair with suture tape augmentation with either (1) attempted restoration of physiologic ligament tension or (2) maximal tension. Each specimen was subjected to 10 cycles of subfailure valgus torque at 90º of flexion in the intact state after UCL avulsion and then after UCL repair. Specimens were then torqued to failure. Articular contact mechanics, linear gap distance, angular displacement, failure torque, failure stiffness, and suture tape pull-through length were recorded. Two-way analysis of variance and paired t tests were used to test for statistical differences.<BR>There was a significant effect (P = .01) of tightening on joint contact area. There was a significant decrease in gap distance (P = .03) and angular displacement (P = .004) from the torn condition to the repaired condition for the maximum tension group, without a significant difference in gap distance from the intact condition. Failure torque and stiffness were not significantly different between groups, although there was a significant difference (P = .001) in the overall suture tape pull-through length.<BR>Although there are potential physiologic changes at time zero-including significant decreases in contact area, normalized gap distance, and normalized angular displacement with maximal tension repair-examination of failure biomechanics suggests that these effects may be mitigated over time within the construct by suture tape pull-through at the tape-anchor interface. Neither method of UCL repair with suture tape augmentation resulted in overconstraint of the elbow joint compared with the native ligament biomechanics.<BR>As more long-term outcome data from UCL repair with suture tape augmentation emerge, there will be wider implementation with various techniques to tension the suture tape. Examining the potential biomechanical sequelae of the UCL repair construct applied under maximal tension will help further refine recommendations for surgeons who utilize this technique for UCL repair.