Background/Objectives: One of the rare causes of cholestasis may be hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 88 medical records of HDFN newborns with cholestasis and 186 records of children with HDFN without cholestasis and conducted an observational, case-control, retrospective study. Results: Factors influencing the risk of cholestasis were lower gestational age at birth (36.83 ± 1.9 vs. 37.57 ± 1.8, p = 0.002), Rh or Kidd HDFN (80.7% vs. 53.2%), and the need for intrauterine transfusion (27.3 vs. 11.8%). The subjects had lower hemoglobin concentrations at birth (14.01 ± 3.8 vs. 16.39 ± 2.8 g/dL) and during whole hospital stay, higher cord blood total bilirubin concentration (4.26 ± 1.8 vs. 2.39 ± 1.4 mg/dL), higher maximum bilirubin concentration (15.27 ± 5.8 vs. 10.24 ± 3.4 mg/dL), and more frequent liver ultrasound abnormalities (19.9 vs. 6.3%). They also required more extended hospitalization due to higher rates of postnatal blood transfusion (33 vs. 3.8%), more frequent need for exchange transfusion (8.8% vs. 2.2%), more extended time and higher risk of phototherapy (94.3 vs. 59.1%), and higher usage of immunoglobulins (55.7 vs. 8.1%), parenteral nutrition (45.5 vs. 12.9%), and antibiotics (14.8 vs. 4.8%). Conclusions: The risk factors for cholestasis in children with HDFN are lower gestational age at delivery, Rh and Kidd serological type of HDFN, and the need for intrauterine transfusions.

This review paper provides an overview of the risk factors and laboratory testing for red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization in pregnancy. RBC alloimmunization is a significant medical issue that can cause haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), leading to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Current HDFN prophylaxis targets only Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunization, with no effective measures to prevent alloimmunization to other RBC antigen groups. Several factors can increase the risk of developing RBC alloimmunization during pregnancy, including fetomaternal haemorrhage, RBC and maternal genetic status, and previous transfusions. Identifying these risk factors is essential to execute the appropriate management strategies to minimize the risk of HDFN. The review also discusses the laboratory methods and overview of pregnancy management. The paper highlights the importance of identifying and managing the risk factors for RBC alloimmunization in pregnancy to minimize the risk of HDFN and improve neonatal outcomes.

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for treatment of hemorrhagic shock sometimes necessitates transfusion of RhD-positive units due to short supply of RhD-negative LTOWB. Practitioners must choose between using RhD-positive LTOWB when RhD-negative is unavailable against the risk to a female of childbearing potential of becoming RhD-alloimmunized, risking hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in future children, or using component therapy with RhD-negative red cells. This survey asked females with a history of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization about their risk tolerance of RhD alloimmunization compared to the potential for improved survival following transfusion of RhD-positive blood for an injured RhD negative female child.
METHODS: A survey was administered to RBC alloimmunized mothers. Respondents were eligible if they were living in the United States with at least one red cell antibody known to cause HDFN and if they had at least one RBC alloimmunized pregnancy.
RESULTS: Responses from 107 RBC alloimmmunized females were analyzed. There were 32/107 (30%) with a history of severe HDFN; 12/107 (11%) had a history of fetal or neonatal loss due to HDFN. The median (interquartile range) absolute improvement in survival at which the respondents would accept RhD-positive transfusions for a female child was 4% (1%-14%). This was not different between females with and without a history of severe or fatal HDFN (p = .08 and 0.38, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Alloimmunized mothers would accept the risk of D-alloimmunization in a RhD-negative female child for improved survival in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

The D antigen of the Rh blood group is considered clinically significant due to its ability to cause hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn. This systematic review discusses the prevalence of RhD variants among pregnant women and the importance of including RhD genotyping for prenatal testing to detect RhD variants and prevent anti-D alloimmunization. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using scientific search engines, including PubMed and MEDLINE databases, with the keywords \'anti-D alloimmunization\', \'RhD variant\', and \'pregnant women.\' The review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc version 20. A significance level of p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant for all two-tailed tests. The meta-analysis included four articles that met the inclusion criteria. The total prevalence of RhD positivity (RhD+) was 61% (95% CI:34%-85%). The prevalence ranged from 22% to 82%, indicating a high degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2=98.71%, p<0.0001). The overall prevalence of D variants was 15% (95% CI, 9%-23%) with a prevalence of 0.05% to 100%, showing a high degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2=99.89%, p<0.0001). Anti-D alloimmunization could occur in pregnant women with some types of RhD variants. All four studies focused on molecular testing of samples showing inconsistent or weak results with at least two anti-D antibodies using serological methods.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is characterized by destruction of fetal/neonatal red blood cells (RBCs) secondary to maternally derived antibodies, which are typically thought to be passively acquired via placental transfer. Few cases have examined the possibility of HDFN mediated by maternal antibodies passively transferred via breast milk.
We describe two cases of persistent HDFN in infants potentially mediated by passively acquired antibodies via maternal breast milk. We discuss supporting and refuting evidence that may account for this possibility and describe testing methodology illustrating how maternal alloantibodies can be detected in breast milk.
In both cases, anti-D antibodies were detected in maternal breast milk. One patient experienced a significant decrease in anti-D plasma titer from 64 to 4 dilutions following 2 weeks of breastfeeding cessation. The other patient experienced a resolution of anemia without breastfeeding cessation.
There is a paucity of data regarding the lifespan of passively acquired RBC antibodies in neonatal circulation, with significant variation noted between passively acquired IgG based on studies utilizing intravenous immunoglobulin compared to studies of maternally-acquired antiviral IgG antibodies. While our data do not definitively implicate passive transfer of alloantibodies in breast milk as a mediator of HDFN, they do illustrate the need for further investigation into the mechanisms and kinetics of passively acquired antibodies in neonatal circulation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the development of an accurate and quantitative pyrosequence (PSQ) method for paternal RHD zygosity detection to help risk management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).
METHODS: Blood samples from 96 individuals were genotyped for RHD zygosity using pyrosequencing assay. To validate the accuracy of pyrosequencing results, all the samples were then detected by the mismatch polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) method and Sanger DNA sequencing. Serological tests were performed to assess RhD phenotypes.
RESULTS: Serological results revealed that 36 cases were RhD-positive and 60 cases were RhD-negative. The concordance rate between pyrosequencing assay and mismatch PCR-SSP assay was 94.8% (91/96). There were 5 discordant results between pyrosequencing and the mismatch PCR-SSP assay. Sanger sequencing confirmed that the pyrosequencing assay correctly assigned zygosity for the 5 samples.
CONCLUSIONS: This DNA pyrosequencing method accurately detect RHD zygosity and will help risk management of pregnancies that are at risk of HDFN.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-D was severe and fatal before the development of RhD immune prophylaxis. Proper screening and universal administration of Rh immune globulin has decreased the incidence of HDFN to a great extent. Pregnancy, transfusion, and transplantation still increase the chances of other alloantibody formation and the potential for HDFN. Advanced methods for immunohematology investigation allow for the identification of alloantibodies causative for HDFN other than anti-D. Many antibodies have been reported to cause HDFN, but there is scant literature where isolated anti-C is responsible for HDFN. We present here a case of severe HDFN caused by anti-C leading to severe hydrops and death of the neonate despite three intrauterine transfusions and other measures.

Several cases of the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-M antibodies have been reported, in which almost all the HDFN-associated anti-M were warmly reacting. Here we report two cases of severe HDFN associated with cold-reacting IgG anti-M. In both cases, pregnancy was terminated, in weeks 33 and 23 respectively, due to a diagnosis of fetal growth retardation (FGR). To our knowledge, these are the most severe HDFN cases caused by cold-reacting IgG anti-M.

The clinical significance of serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity (SRUS) in pregnancy is not clear based on available literature. The aim of this study is to determine if SRUS is associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).
Retrospective data were collected from eight institutions over an 11-year study period (2010-2020), when available (5/8 sites). The outcome of the pregnancies with SRUS-no, mild, moderate, or severe HDFN-was determined.
SRUS was demonstrated in 589 pregnancies. After excluding those with incomplete data, a total of 284 pregnancies were included in the primary HDFN outcome analysis. SRUS was detected in 124 (44%) pregnancies in isolation, and none were affected by HDFN. Of 41 pregnancies with SRUS and ABO incompatibility, 37 (90%) were unaffected, and 4 (10%) were associated with mild HDFN. Of 98 pregnancies with SRUS and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), 80 (81%) were unaffected, and 19 (19%) were associated with mild to severe HDFN. There was 1 case of mild HDFN and 1 case of severe HDFN in the 21 pregnancies with SRUS, ABO incompatibility, and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), and 19 (90%) were unaffected by HDFN. Among all patients with repeat testing, newly identified alloantibodies or other antibodies were identified in 63 of 212 (30%) patients. Although most were not clinically significant, on occasion SRUS preceded clinically significant antibody(s) associated with HDFN (3%, 5/188).
The antenatal serologic finding of SRUS in isolation is not associated with HDFN but may precede clinically significant antibodies.