OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the development of an accurate and quantitative pyrosequence (PSQ) method for paternal RHD zygosity detection to help risk management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).
METHODS: Blood samples from 96 individuals were genotyped for RHD zygosity using pyrosequencing assay. To validate the accuracy of pyrosequencing results, all the samples were then detected by the mismatch polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) method and Sanger DNA sequencing. Serological tests were performed to assess RhD phenotypes.
RESULTS: Serological results revealed that 36 cases were RhD-positive and 60 cases were RhD-negative. The concordance rate between pyrosequencing assay and mismatch PCR-SSP assay was 94.8% (91/96). There were 5 discordant results between pyrosequencing and the mismatch PCR-SSP assay. Sanger sequencing confirmed that the pyrosequencing assay correctly assigned zygosity for the 5 samples.
CONCLUSIONS: This DNA pyrosequencing method accurately detect RHD zygosity and will help risk management of pregnancies that are at risk of HDFN.

Several cases of the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-M antibodies have been reported, in which almost all the HDFN-associated anti-M were warmly reacting. Here we report two cases of severe HDFN associated with cold-reacting IgG anti-M. In both cases, pregnancy was terminated, in weeks 33 and 23 respectively, due to a diagnosis of fetal growth retardation (FGR). To our knowledge, these are the most severe HDFN cases caused by cold-reacting IgG anti-M.

OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations.
METHODS: We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors.
RESULTS: In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

The anti-M antibody can lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and adverse fetal outcomes, especially in the Asian population. However, fetal erythropoiesis resulting from M alloimmunization needs further investigation.
We analyzed erythropoiesis in eight fetuses with M alloimmunization and compared them with the fetuses affected by anti-D. They were matched as pairs according to the gestational age of diagnosis and the hematocrit before treatment. Paired t-tests or paired Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were conducted to compare the difference in the cord blood indexes. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlativity between hematocrit and the reticulocyte percentage in the two groups.
The fetuses in the MN group had lower reticulocyte count and percentage than those in the RhD group (p < .05). All of the fetal reticulocyte production indexes (RPIs) in the MN group were less than 2, indicating an inadequate hemopoietic response to anemia, while the majority of the RPIs in the RhD group (85.7%) were significantly higher (p = .003), with 6 cases greater than 2.5. Hematocrit was negatively correlated with reticulocyte percentage (y = 54.7-171.7x, r2  = 0.825, p = .005) in the RhD group, while no significant correlation was found in the MN group. No difference in the number of IUT, interval, or the fetal outcome was found between the two groups.
Fetal reticulocytopenia provided direct evidence of an inadequate hemopoietic response in HDFN due to anti-M, leading to hyporegenerative anemia. Once the IgG component of anti-M is detected, close monitoring should be considered.

A group O RhD-negative pregnant patient with anti-D antibody at titer 1:2048 delivered a baby boy by cesarean section at 38 + 6 weeks gestational age. The neonate typed as group O, but D antigen was at first uncertain. DAT and antibody screen of newborn were both positive. Various assays were used for D antigen determination. Ultimately, D antigen blocked by high-titer maternal anti-D antibody was confirmed. Total bilirubin of the newborn was 52.7 umol/L, and hemoglobin was 1.46 mg/dL. O RhD-negative red cells were used for an exchange transfusion.