H00

H00
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是一种侵袭性的乳腺癌亚型,可影响患者的就业和劳动力参与。这项研究估计了TNBC的就业效应如何影响瑞士的政府税收和公共福利支出。代表疾病的财政负担(FBoD),以及引入新治疗方案的可能后果。
    使用四州队列模型来计算两种治疗的财政效果:新辅助派姆单抗加化疗,然后辅助派姆单抗单药治疗(PC→P)和单独的新辅助化疗(C)。税收收入的终身现值,我们计算了平均人群和接受治疗人群的社会福利支付和医疗保健费用,以评估FBoD.
    接受C和P+C→P治疗的普通TNBC患者预计产生的税收比普通人群少128,999和97,008CHF0。分别,并要求增加社会福利支付。与C相比,据估计,P+C→P增加的医疗保健成本的75%将通过税收收益来抵消。
    该分析表明,新的TNBC治疗方案的75%的额外成本可以通过税收收益来抵消。财政分析可以成为补充评估新疗法的现有方法的有用工具。
    UNASSIGNED: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that can impact patients\' employment and workforce participation. This study estimates how the employment effects of TNBC impact government tax revenue and public benefits expenditure in Switzerland, representing the fiscal burden of disease (FBoD), and likely consequences of introducing new treatment options.
    UNASSIGNED: A four-state cohort model was used to calculate fiscal effects for two treatments: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy (P + C→P) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (C). Lifetime present values of tax revenue, social benefit payments, and healthcare costs were calculated for the average population and those undergoing treatment to assess the FBoD.
    UNASSIGNED: An average TNBC patient treated with C and P + C→P is expected to generate CHF128,999 and CHF97,008 less tax than the average population, respectively, and require increased social benefit payments. Compared to C, 75% of the incremental healthcare costs of P + C→P are estimated to be offset through tax revenue gains.
    UNASSIGNED: This analysis demonstrates that 75% of the additional costs of a new TNBC treatment option can be offset by gains in tax revenue. Fiscal analysis can be a useful tool to complement existing methods for evaluating new treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究比较了准备时间,错误,满意,在一项随机研究中,与两种需要重建的RSV疫苗(VRR1和VRR2)相比,单盲时间和运动研究。方法:药剂师,护士,和药学技术人员被随机分配到三种疫苗的制备顺序。参与者阅读说明,然后连续制备三种疫苗,其间有3至5分钟的洗脱期。由训练有素的药剂师对准备时间和错误进行视频记录和审查,使用预定义,疫苗特异性检查表。参与者的人口统计,对疫苗制备的满意度,并记录疫苗偏好。受试者内方差分析用于比较准备时间。混合效应泊松和有序逻辑回归模型用于比较准备错误的数量和满意度得分,分别。结果:63名药师(60%),护士(35%)和药学技术人员(5%)参加了美国四个地点的活动。PFS的每个剂量的最小二乘平均准备时间比VRR1快141.8秒(95%CI:156.8,126.7;p<0.0001),比VRR2快103.6秒(118.7,88.5;p<0.0001),比合并的VRR快122.7秒(95%CI:134.2,111.2;p<0.0001)。PFS的总体满意度(“非常”和“非常”)为87.3%,VRR1为28.6%,VRR2为47.6%。大多数参与者(81.0%)更喜欢PFS疫苗。局限性:这项研究由于无法完全失明的观察者而受到限制。为了尽量减少秩序的影响,我们使用了3序列块设计,然而,疫苗的制备顺序可能影响结局.参与者被评估一次,而如果进行重复制备,则每种疫苗的训练效率可能会提高。结论:PFS疫苗可以大大简化疫苗制备过程,允许管理员每小时准备的剂量几乎是小瓶和注射器系统的四倍。
    UNASSIGNED: The current study compared preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference for a prefilled syringe (PFS) versus two RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution (VRR1 and VRR2) in a randomized, single-blinded time and motion study.
    UNASSIGNED: Pharmacists, nurses, and pharmacy technicians were randomized to a preparation sequence of the three vaccines. Participants read instructions, then consecutively prepared the three vaccines with a 3-5-min washout period in between. Preparations were video recorded and reviewed by a trained pharmacist for preparation time and errors using predefined, vaccine-specific checklists. Participant demographics, satisfaction with vaccine preparation, and vaccine preference were recorded. Within-subjects analysis of variance was used to compare preparation time. Mixed-effects Poisson and ordered logistic regression models were used to compare the number of preparation errors and satisfaction scores, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty-three pharmacists (60%), nurses (35%), and pharmacy technicians (5%) participated at four sites in the United States. The least squares mean preparation time per dose for PFS was 141.8 s (95% CI = 156.8-126.7; p <.0001) faster than for VRR1, 103.6 s (95% CI = 118.7-88.5; p <.0001) faster than for VRR2, and 122.7 s (95% CI = 134.2-111.2; p <.0001) faster than the pooled VRRs. Overall satisfaction (combined \"Very\" and \"Extremely\") was 87.3% for PFS, 28.6% for VRR1, and 47.6% for VRR2. Most participants (81.0%) preferred the PFS vaccine.
    UNASSIGNED: The study is limited by the inability to completely blind observers. To minimize the effects of order, we utilized a 3-sequence block design; however, the order in which the vaccines were prepared may have affected outcomes. Participants were assessed once, whereas if repeated preparations were performed there may have been trained efficiencies gained for each vaccine.
    UNASSIGNED: PFS vaccines can greatly simplify the vaccine preparation process, allowing administrators to prepare almost four times more doses per hour than with vial and syringe systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    俄勒冈州健康保险实验的一个标题结果是急诊室(ER)利用率增加。马萨诸塞州医疗改革的一个看似矛盾的结果是ER利用率下降。我通过在俄勒冈实验中确定治疗效果的异质性并将其推断到马萨诸塞州来调和这两个结果。即使俄勒冈州的同事增加了他们的ER利用率,相对于俄勒冈州从未接受过的人,谁会降低他们的ER利用率。马萨诸塞州将覆盖范围从更高的水平扩大到更健康的人。因此,马萨诸塞州的追随者与俄勒冈州的一部分从不接受者相当,可以调和结果。
    A headline result from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment is that emergency room (ER) utilization increased. A seemingly contradictory result from the Massachusetts health reform is that ER utilization decreased. I reconcile both results by identifying treatment effect heterogeneity within the Oregon experiment and extrapolating it to Massachusetts. Even though Oregon compliers increased their ER utilization, they were adversely selected relative to Oregon never takers, who would have decreased their ER utilization. Massachusetts expanded coverage from a higher level to healthier compliers. Therefore, Massachusetts compliers are comparable to a subset of Oregon never takers, which can reconcile the results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于心脏骤停(SCA)一级预防(PP)的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)在发展中国家未得到充分利用。改善SCA研究已经确定了1.5个一级预防(1.5PP)患者的子集,这些患者具有较高的SCA风险和ICD治疗的显着死亡率益处。从中国医疗体系的角度来看,我们评估了ICD治疗的成本效益与不对1.5PP患者进行ICD治疗,以告知临床和政策决定.
    对已发布的马尔可夫模型进行了调整和验证,以模拟疾病的病程并描述1.5PP患者的不同健康状况。病人的特点,死亡率,效用和并发症的估计来自改善SCA研究和其他文献.成本投入来自政府投标价格,中国9家公立医院的医疗服务价格和临床专家调查。对于ICD和无ICD治疗,对整个生命周期内的总医疗费用和质量调整生命年(QALYs)进行建模,并计算增量成本-效果比(ICER).进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析以评估模型参数的不确定性。我们使用中国药物经济学评价指南推荐的支付意愿(WTP)阈值,2022年是中国人均GDP的一到三倍(85,698-257,094元人民币)。
    与没有ICD治疗相比,ICD治疗的增量成本效益比(ICER)为139,652CNY/QALY,这大约是中国人均GDP的1-2倍。ICD治疗具有成本效益的概率为92.1%。敏感性分析的结果支持基本案例的发现。
    ICD治疗与没有ICD治疗相比,对于中国的1.5PP患者来说是具有成本效益的。
    UNASSIGNED: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs) for primary prevention (PP) of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is underutilized in developing countries. The Improve SCA study has identified a subset of 1.5 primary prevention (1.5PP) patients with a higher risk of SCA and a significant mortality benefit from ICD therapy. From the perspective of China\'s healthcare system, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy vs. no ICD therapy among 1.5PP patients with a view to informing clinical and policy decisions.
    UNASSIGNED: A published Markov model was adjusted and verified to simulate the course of the disease and describe different health states of 1.5PP patients. The patient characteristics, mortality, utility and complication estimates were obtained from the Improve SCA study and other literature. Cost inputs were sourced from government tender prices, medical service prices and clinical experts\' surveys in 9 Chinese public hospitals. For both ICD and no ICD therapy, the total medical costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were modelled over a lifetime horizon and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model parameters. We used the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold recommended by China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations, one to three times China\'s GDP per capita (CNY85,698-CNY257,094) in 2022 Chinese Yuan.
    UNASSIGNED: The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is 139,652 CNY/QALY, which is about 1-2 times China\'s GDP per capita. The probability that ICD therapy is cost effective was 92.1%. Results from sensitivity analysis supported the findings of the base case.
    UNASSIGNED: ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is cost-effective for the 1.5PP patients in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:评估2023年秋季更新的冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)mRNA疫苗在1年分析时间范围内(2023年9月至2024年8月)对德国≥60岁的成年人和30-59岁的高危人群的潜在临床影响和成本效益。方法:更新了隔室易感暴露感染恢复模型,并使其适应德国市场。有症状的感染数量,与COVID-19相关的住院治疗和死亡人数,成本,并使用决策树模型计算获得的质量调整寿命年(QALYs)。将2023年秋季Moderna更新的COVID-19(mRNA-1273.815)疫苗的增量成本效益比与没有额外接种疫苗进行比较。mRNA-1273.815与辉瑞-BioNTech秋季更新的COVID-19(XBB.1.5BNT162b2)疫苗之间的潜在差异,以及mRNA-1273.815疫苗相对于没有接种疫苗的社会投资回报,也被检查过。结果:与没有秋季疫苗接种相比,mRNA-1273.815运动预计可预防约1,697,900例有症状的感染,85,400例住院治疗,4100人死亡。与XBB.1.5BNT162b2活动相比,mRNA-1273.815运动还预计可预防约90,100例有症状的感染,3,500例住院治疗,160人死亡。在两项分析中,我们发现mRNA-1273.815活动占主导地位。结论:相对于XBB.1.5BNT162b2疫苗,mRNA-1273.815疫苗可以被认为具有成本效益,并且与德国没有疫苗相比,极有可能提供更多的好处并节省成本。并提供高社会投资回报。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines updated for Autumn 2023 in adults aged ≥60 years and high-risk persons aged 30-59 years in Germany over a 1-year analytic time horizon (September 2023-August 2024).
    UNASSIGNED: A compartmental Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered model was updated and adapted to the German market. Numbers of symptomatic infections, a number of COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were calculated using a decision tree model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of an Autumn 2023 Moderna updated COVID-19 (mRNA-1273.815) vaccine was compared to no additional vaccination. Potential differences between the mRNA-1273.815 and the Autumn Pfizer-BioNTech updated COVID-19 (XBB.1.5 BNT162b2) vaccines, as well as societal return on investment for the mRNA-1273.815 vaccine relative to no vaccination, were also examined.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to no autumn vaccination, the mRNA-1273.815 campaign is predicted to prevent approximately 1,697,900 symptomatic infections, 85,400 hospitalizations, and 4,100 deaths. Compared to an XBB.1.5 BNT162b2 campaign, the mRNA-1273.815 campaign is also predicted to prevent approximately 90,100 symptomatic infections, 3,500 hospitalizations, and 160 deaths. Across both analyses we found the mRNA-1273.815 campaign to be dominant.
    UNASSIGNED: The mRNA-1273.815 vaccine can be considered cost-effective relative to the XBB.1.5 BNT162b2 vaccine and highly likely to provide more benefits and save costs compared to no vaccine in Germany, and to offer high societal return on investment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估2023年秋季更新的COVID-19mRNA疫苗在1年分析时间范围内(2023年9月至2024年8月)对≥18岁的成年人的潜在临床影响和成本效益。
    更新了隔室易感暴露感染恢复模型,以反映2023年夏季的COVID-19病例。有症状的感染数量,与COVID-19相关的住院和死亡,使用决策树模型计算获得的成本和质量调整寿命年(QALY)。将Moderna更新的mRNA秋季2023疫苗(ModernaFallCampaign)的增量成本效益比(ICER)与没有额外疫苗接种进行了比较。还研究了Moderna和辉瑞-BioNTech2023秋季疫苗之间的潜在差异。
    基本案例结果表明,ModernaFall运动将使预期的6420万有症状的感染减少720万(11%)至5700万。与COVID-19相关的住院人数和死亡人数预计将减少343,000人(-29%)和50,500人(-33%),分别。与没有疫苗相比,ModernaFall运动将使QALY增加740,880,医疗保健费用增加57亿美元,每QALY收益为7700美元。从社会成本的角度来看,ICER是2100美元。敏感性分析表明,疫苗的有效性,COVID-19发病率,住院率,和成本推动成本效益。与Pfizer-BioNTech疫苗相比,Moderna疫苗对感染的相对疫苗效力为5.1%,住院治疗的相对疫苗效力为9.8%,与Pfizer-BioNTech疫苗相比,使用Moderna疫苗预计可预防24,000例住院病例和3300例死亡病例。
    随着COVID-19成为地方病,未来发病率,包括感染模式,是高度不确定的。2023年秋季疫苗的有效性尚不清楚,目前尚不清楚何时会出现逃避自然或疫苗免疫的新变体。尽管有这些限制,我们的模型预测,在所有敏感性分析中,ModernaFallCampaign疫苗的成本效益都很高.
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines updated for fall 2023 in adults aged ≥18 years over a 1-year analytic time horizon (September 2023-August 2024).
    UNASSIGNED: A compartmental Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered model was updated to reflect COVID-19 cases in summer 2023. The numbers of symptomatic infections, COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths, and costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were calculated using a decision tree model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of a Moderna updated mRNA fall 2023 vaccine (Moderna Fall Campaign) was compared to no additional vaccination. Potential differences between the Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNTech fall 2023 vaccines were also examined.
    UNASSIGNED: Base case results suggest that the Moderna Fall Campaign would decrease the expected 64.2 million symptomatic infections by 7.2 million (11%) to 57.0 million. COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths are expected to decline by 343,000 (-29%) and 50,500 (-33%), respectively. The Moderna Fall Campaign would increase QALYs by 740,880 and healthcare costs by $5.7 billion relative to no vaccine, yielding an ICER of $7700 per QALY gained. Using a societal cost perspective, the ICER is $2100. Sensitivity analyses suggest that vaccine effectiveness, COVID-19 incidence, hospitalization rates, and costs drive cost-effectiveness. With a relative vaccine effectiveness of 5.1% for infection and 9.8% for hospitalization for the Moderna vaccine versus the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, use of the Moderna vaccine is expected to prevent 24,000 more hospitalizations and 3300 more deaths than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
    UNASSIGNED: As COVID-19 becomes endemic, future incidence, including patterns of infection, are highly uncertain. The effectiveness of fall 2023 vaccines is unknown, and it is unclear when a new variant that evades natural or vaccine immunity will emerge. Despite these limitations, our model predicts the Moderna Fall Campaign vaccine is highly cost-effective across all sensitivity analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:这项真实世界的回顾性数据库研究量化了美国肺癌或甲状腺癌患者中生物标志物检测的成本。
    UNASSIGNED:商业声称IBMMarketscan数据库,一个去识别的现实世界数据集,用于识别2015年1月至2019年12月之间诊断为肺癌或甲状腺癌的患者。符合条件的患者为18岁或以上,具有两个或更多个肺或甲状腺诊断代码。排除具有先前癌症诊断证据的患者。亚组分析评估了合格的转移性疾病患者。描述性统计数据用于评估商业保险计划付款人和患者自付费用,以进行总体诊断测试以及测试程序代码和付款人类型。成本调整为2020美元。
    UNASSIGNED:共有23,633名肺癌患者符合条件,其中13,320人患有转移性疾病。有36,867名甲状腺癌患者,其中2,241人患有转移性疾病。在68.4%/75.8%(肺/转移性肺)和18.2%/42.3%(甲状腺/转移性甲状腺)中观察到生物标志物代码。很少有患者具有综合生物标志物测试的代码(5.2%/6.7%肺/转移性肺,0.3%/2.2%甲状腺/转移性甲状腺)在进行生物标志物检测的人群中,所有生物标志物检测的每位患者的总费用中位数分别为$394/$462(肺/转移性肺)和$148/$232(甲状腺/转移性甲状腺).付款人的终生生物标志物总费用从128美元(消费者驱动的健康计划)到477美元(首选提供者组织)不等。除消费者驱动的健康计划外,肿瘤类型和所有付款人类型的患者终生自付费用中位数为0.00美元(甲状腺12美元,转移性肺10美元)。
    未经评估:虽然全面测试增加了生物标志物测试的成本,这些数据表明,对于支付者和患者而言,生物标志物检测的终生成本相对较低.在美国,生物标志物测试的成本不应限制这些人群获得商业保险计划。
    UNASSIGNED: This real-world retrospective database study quantified the costs of biomarker testing in a US population of patients with lung or thyroid cancers.
    UNASSIGNED: The commercial claims IBM Marketscan database, a de-identified real-world dataset, was used to identify patients diagnosed with lung or thyroid cancer between 1/2015 and 12/2019. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with two or more lung or thyroid diagnosis codes. Patients were excluded who had evidence of prior cancer diagnoses. Subgroup analyses evaluated eligible patients with metastatic disease. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate commercial insurance plan payer and patient out-of-pocket costs for diagnostic testing overall as well as by test procedure code and payer type. Costs were adjusted to 2020 US dollars.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 23,633 patients with lung cancer were eligible, 13,320 of whom had metastatic disease. There were 36,867 patients with thyroid cancer, 2,241 of whom had metastatic disease. Biomarker codes were observed among 68.4/75.8% (lung/metastatic lung) and 18.2/42.3% (thyroid/metastatic thyroid). Few patients had codes for comprehensive biomarker tests (5.2/6.7% lung/metastatic lung, 0.3/2.2% thyroid/metastatic thyroid) Among those with biomarker tests, the median per-patient total payer lifetime costs of all biomarker testing were $394/$462 (lung/metastatic lung) and $148/$232 (thyroid/metastatic thyroid). Total lifetime biomarker costs for payers ranged from a median of $128 (consumer-driven health plans) to $477 (preferred provider organizations). Median lifetime patient out-of-pocket costs were $0.00 for both tumor types and all payer types except for consumer-driven health plans ($12 for thyroid and $10 for metastatic lung).
    UNASSIGNED: While comprehensive testing adds to the cost of biomarker testing, these data suggest the relatively low lifetime cost of biomarker testing for both payers and patients. Costs for biomarker testing should not be a limitation to access among these populations with commercial insurance plans in the US.
    This real-world retrospective database study found that there is a relatively low lifetime total cost of biomarker testing for the care of patients with lung or thyroid cancers. While comprehensive testing adds to the cost of biomarker testing, these data suggest the relatively low lifetime cost of biomarker testing for both payers and patients. Payer costs for biomarker testing do not appear to be limitation to access among populations with commercial insurance plans in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:随着公共卫生当局计划秋季疫苗接种,新兴的SARS-COV-2变种正在刺激适应性疫苗的开发。这项研究估计了美国成年人(≥18岁)的三种潜在加强策略所预防的感染和住院次数:使用Moderna的(1)许可的第一代单价疫苗mRNA-1273(祖先株)或(2)候选二价疫苗mRNA-1273.214(祖先BA.1关注变体[VOC])从2022年9月开始,或(3)Moderna的BA.1的候选疫苗开发时间更新为VO7222/5。
    未经评估:年龄分层,传输动态,易感暴露感染恢复(SEIR)模型,改编自以前的文献,用于估计随时间的感染;该模型包含由SEIR和疫苗接种状态定义的区室。决策树用于估计感染的临床后果。进行了校准,因此该模型跟踪大流行的实际过程到当前时间。
    未经批准:用mRNA-1273接种疫苗(9月),mRNA-1273.214(9月),mRNA-1273.222(11月)预计将减少34%的感染,40%,18%,分别,住院率下降了42%,48%,25%,分别,超过6个月相比,没有助推器。围绕传播性的敏感性分析,疫苗覆盖率,掩蔽,并且逐渐减少表明,与其他疫苗相比,9月份mRNA-1273.214的增强可以预防更多的感染和住院病例。
    UNASSIGNED:随着新变体的出现,影响传播估计和临床影响的病毒的关键特征也在演变,使参数估计变得困难。我们的分析表明,与定制的疫苗相比,用mRNA-1273.214加强在预防感染和住院方面比使用BA4/5亚变体在6个月内更有效。仅仅因为它可以提前2个月部署。我们得出的结论是,在获得更有效的BA4/5疫苗之前延迟加强是没有优势的;早期使用mRNA-1273.214的加强将防止大多数感染和住院。
    UNASSIGNED: Emerging SARS-COV-2 variants are spurring the development of adapted vaccines as public health authorities plan for fall vaccinations. This study estimated the number of infections and hospitalizations prevented by three potential booster strategies for adults (≥18 years) in the United States: boosting with either Moderna\'s (1) licensed first generation monovalent vaccine mRNA-1273 (ancestral strain) or (2) candidate bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.214 (ancestral + BA.1 variant of concern [VOC]) starting in September 2022, or (3) Moderna\'s updated candidate bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.222 (ancestral + BA.4/5 VOC) starting November 2022 due to longer development time.
    UNASSIGNED: An age-stratified, transmission dynamic, Susceptible-Exposed-Infection-Recovered (SEIR) model, adapted from previous literature, was used to estimate infections over time; the model contains compartments defined by SEIR and vaccination status. A decision tree was used to estimate clinical consequences of infections. Calibration was performed so the model tracks the actual course of the pandemic to present time.
    UNASSIGNED: Vaccinating with mRNA-1273(Sept), mRNA-1273.214(Sept), and mRNA-1273.222(Nov) is predicted to reduce infections by 34%, 40%, and 18%, respectively, and hospitalizations by 42%, 48%, and 25%, respectively, over 6 months compared to no booster. Sensitivity analyses around transmissibility, vaccine coverage, masking, and waning illustrate that boosting with mRNA-1273.214 in September prevented more cases of infection and hospitalization than the other vaccines.
    UNASSIGNED: With the emergence of new variants, key characteristics of the virus that affect estimates of spread and clinical impact also evolve, making parameter estimation difficult. Our analysis demonstrated that boosting with mRNA-1273.214 was more effective over 6 months in preventing infections and hospitalizations with a BA.4/5 subvariant than the tailored vaccine, simply because it could be deployed 2 months earlier. We conclude that there is no advantage to delay boosting until a more effective BA.4/5 vaccine is available; earlier boosting with mRNA-1273.214 will prevent the most infections and hospitalizations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管视网膜母细胞瘤(Rb)被认为具有良好的预后,经济压力对于患者家庭来说仍然是一个巨大的问题。此外,医生,政府,和社会基金会工作人员并不确切地知道完整的Rb治疗真正需要多少,特别是非医疗费用和间接成本。本研究旨在评估Rb患者的经济负担。
    这是一项回顾性研究。50名Rb患者最终被纳入研究。问卷调查是对幸存的Rb患者的主要家庭护理人员进行的,目的是通过电话收集患病期间的费用信息。成本包括直接成本和间接成本;直接成本包括医疗和非医疗成本。医疗费用包括药费,手术费用,治疗费,实验室测试,非实验室测试费用,和医疗消耗性用品费用(包括住院费和门诊费)。
    总直接费用为$27,814.62±15,137.73,平均医疗费用为$15,034.48±8,224.19($3,963.99-36,826.53)。非医疗总费用平均为$12,252.93±9,872.64($728.86-48,104.95)。平均减少工作时间为11.50±8.06个月,平均损失收入为13,512.23±11,545.83美元。在非医疗费用中,北京及周边地区儿童平均非医疗费用为6,557.68±6,385.42美元,其他省份儿童平均非医疗费用为14,502.29±10,484.86美元,t检验p值=0.011。北京及周边地区儿童平均交通费用(河北,天津)为1,871.09±1,428.91元,其他省份为4,909.62±3,697.02元。北京及周边地区儿童的平均住宿费为2,788.42±3,065.00美元,其他省份为6,599.27±3,065.00美元。
    患有Rb的儿童有沉重的经济负担。直接非医疗费用较高。就近就医有助于减轻疾病的经济负担。此外,与工作有关的问题对于有Rb的家庭来说也是一个主要的经济问题,政府应该适当提供经济补贴。简化国民健康保险流程和购买商业补充医疗保险将增加家庭负担癌症治疗费用的能力。
    UNASSIGNED: Although retinoblastoma (Rb) is considered to have a good prognosis, economical stress is still a huge problem for patients\' families. Besides, doctors, the government, and social foundation staff do not precisely know how much is truly required for complete Rb therapy, especially the non-medical costs and indirect costs. This study was conducted to estimate the economic burden of Rb patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study. Fifty Rb patients were finally enrolled in the study. The questionnaire survey was conducted with surviving Rb patient\' main family caregivers to collect the information on costs during illness through the phone. Costs included direct and indirect cost; direct costs included medical and non-medical costs. Medical costs include drug costs, surgery costs, treatment fees, lab tests, non-lab tests costs, and medical consumptive stuff costs (including hospital expenses and outpatient fees).
    UNASSIGNED: The total direct cost was $27,814.62 ± 15,137.73, and the average medical cost was $15,034.48 ± 8,224.19 ($3,963.99-36,826.53). The total non-medical expenses averaged $12,252.93 ± 9,872.64 ($728.86-48,104.95). The average reduced working time was 11.50 ± 8.06 months, and the average lost income was $13,512.23 ± 11,545.83. Among the non-medical expenses, the average non-medical expenses for children in Beijing and surrounding areas was $6,557.68 ± 6,385.42, and the average non-medical expenses for children in other provinces and was $14,502.29 ± 10,484.86, t-test p-value = 0.011. The average transportation cost for children in Beijing and surrounding areas (Hebei, Tianjin) was $1,871.09 ± 1,428.91, other provinces was $4,909.62 ± 3,697.02. Of children in Beijing and surrounding areas the average accommodation fee was $2,788.42 ± 3,065.00, in other provinces it was $6,599.27 ± 3,065.00.
    UNASSIGNED: Children with Rb have a heavy economic burden. Direct non-medical expenses are higher. Getting medical treatment nearby can help reduce the economic burden of the disease. Besides, work-related issues are also a major financial problem for families with Rb, and the government should properly provide economic subsidies. Simplifying the national health insurance process and purchasing commercial supplementary medical insurance will increase the family\'s ability to afford the cost of cancer treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    How important is the relaxation of contact restrictions for the recovery of the German economy and what conclusions can be drawn for the appropriate level of contact restrictions in the coming months? In considering these issues, an attempt will be made to assess what significance the contact restriction measures introduced by the federal and state governments since mid-March 2020 will actually have for the current slump in economic activity in Germany. In addition, the various plausible scenarios for the spread and containment of infection are presented with different options for easing contact restrictions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号