UNASSIGNED: This study aims to identify the rate of occult nodal metastasis (ONM), risk factors associated with ONM, and compare regional recurrence (RR), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) in patients treated with elective neck dissection (END) versus expectant management (OBS) for primary T1-T2 gingival squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC) of the maxilla and mandible.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was conducted and included patients from 2014 to 2021 who were treated at a tertiary referral center.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty patients underwent END and 36 were managed expectantly, with a mean follow-up period of 28 months. ONM was observed in 26% of the study cohort with 16.7% occurring in the maxilla and 36.4% in the mandible. No specific histopathologic features were predictive for ONM. No regional recurrence occurred. Local recurrence occurred in 5% and 2.8% of END and OBS groups, respectively. Two-year DFS were comparable between the END (93.8%) versus OBS (83.9%) as well as maxilla (90.9%) versus mandible (83.4%), P > 0.05.
UNASSIGNED: ONM remains variable in cT1-T2N0 GSCC with a greater incidence occurring in the mandible when compared to the maxilla, respectively. An END should be strongly considered for mandibular GSCC. Overall, END for the N0 neck has been shown to provide significant overall and disease-free survival benefits. However, further prospective randomized studies are needed to verify risk factors for ONM and validate the disease-related survival benefit of an elective neck dissection in this patient population.

BACKGROUND: Occult nodal disease (OND) during clinically-N0 salvage total laryngectomy (TL) can be detected with the Neck-Imaging-Reporting-and-Data-Systems (NI-RADS). However, some patients will still have OND revealed on final pathology.
METHODS: A retrospective study on all patients who had OND during salvage TL with elective neck dissection (END) between 2009 and 2021 was performed. Repeat CT and PET scan interpretation was performed to evaluate their preoperative imaging for suspicious features.
RESULTS: Among 81 salvage TL patients undergoing END, 12 (16%) had OND and a total of 26 occult nodes were identified. On pathology, the average node length [SD] was 0.6 cm [0.3]. On CT, 31% (8 of 26) had rounded morphology. On PET, most had SUVmax below blood pool. One patient scored NI-RADS 2; the rest scored 1.
CONCLUSIONS: On re-review of preoperative imaging, occult nodes were subtle and challenging to identify. Despite no clear impact on survival, performing an END may provide prognostic information.

Our objective was to examine the impact of elective neck dissection (END) on the prognosis of patients with cT2N0 maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MS-SCC) and to determine factors that predict the occurrence of occult metastasis in this patient population. A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the SEER database. Patients with cT2N0 MS-SCC were included in the study and divided into two groups: those who received END and those who did not. The impact of END on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using propensity score matching. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors for occult metastasis. A total of 180 patients were included in the study, with 40 cases receiving END. Following propensity score matching, patients treated with END and those without showed similar DSS and OS rates. Occult metastasis was observed in 9 patients, corresponding to a rate of 22.5%. High-grade tumors were independently associated with a higher risk of occult metastasis compared to low-grade tumors (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.00). cT2 MS-SCC carries an occult metastasis rate of 22.5%, with histologic grade being the primary determinant of occult metastasis. END does not confer a significant survival benefit in this patient population.

Objective In this study, we sought to identify the predictors for occult nodal disease (OND) and compare oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing elective neck dissection (END) at the time of salvage laryngectomy (SLE) versus the observation group. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted involving all patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) necks who underwent SLE at a tertiary academic center over 12 years. A total of 58 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: END (n=39) and observation (n=19). Primary endpoints were OND, regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Univariate analysis was performed to establish the association between variables with Fisher\'s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. Survival analysis was performed with the log-rank test. Results The cohort comprised 46 (79.3%) males and 12 (20.7%) females, with a mean age of 60 years. Pathological nodal disease was identified in five of 71 (7%) examined neck dissection specimens, with positive nodes found in levels II through IV. The only statistically significant predictor of OND was the rT3/rT4 stage (p=0.017). There were no differences in perioperative complications, RRFS (p=0.216), or DSS (p=0.298) between the END and observation groups. Conclusions In cN0 necks, the advanced recurrent T-stage (rT3-rT4) is a predictor for OND. As OND was found involving levels II, III, and IV in this study\'s specimens, formal lateral neck dissection should be the procedure of choice if END is to be performed alongside SLE. While END did not show a significantly higher morbidity profile versus conservative management in this cohort, the procedure did not improve loco-regional control or survival, even when stratifying by tumor stage.

OBJECTIVE: Distant metastases (DM) are the primary cause of treatment failure and death of patients with salivary gland carcinomas (SGC). The purpose of present study was to evaluate factors predictive on DM development in a cohort of patients with high-grade salivary gland carcinomas.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients surgically treated with curative intention at the authors\' institution from January 1993 to December 2018. Outcomes evaluated were overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS).
RESULTS: A total of 213 patients, 117 males (55%) and 96 females (45%), were included in the study. Parotid gland malignancies accounted for 56% of all cases. Adenoid cystic carcinoma (119 cases; 56%) was the most common tumor type. Cumulative OS for the 5-and 10-year follow-up period was 80% and 58% respectively. DM occurred with 75 patients (35%). The most common locations for DM were lung (55 cases; 73%) and liver (12 cases; 16%). Pathological nodal status, particularly the number of metastatic nodes, was the independent prognostic factor for OS, DSS, RFS and DMFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Number of metastatic lymph nodes, instead of extranodal extension and largest nodal diameter, was the contributing factor related to DMFS. Since the main function of staging system is to predict outcomes, the significance of extranodal extension and nodal dimension in salivary gland cancer staging system requires further clarification. The elective neck dissection could be considered therapeutic approach for high-grade SGC since occult metastases were detected in 33% of cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oncologic safety and quality of life associated with the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as compared to elective neck dissection (END) in patients with cT1/2N0 maxillary squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS: This study constituted a retrospective analysis of consecutively treated patients who underwent SLNB or END, with data collected prospectively. We analyzed the impact of the different neck procedures on regional control and disease-specific survival via the Cox model. Patients in both groups completed the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire.
RESULTS: We included a total of 130 patients, with 47 receiving SLNB. In all cases, the sentinel lymph node could be identified, and of these, 5 had a positive result, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3 %, a specificity of 100 %, a false negative rate of 16.7 %, and a negative predictive value of 97.6 %. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, and negative predictive value of END in detecting occult metastasis were 64.3 %, 100 %, 35.7 %, and 93.2 %, respectively. In comparison to END after propensity score matching, SLNB exhibited no significant difference in its effects on regional control (p = 0.519, HR: 1.05, 95 % CI: 0.52-1.93) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.634, HR: 1.22, 95 % CI: 0.53-1.99). Patients in SLNB group showed significantly higher mean scores of shoulder and taste domains at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively compared to those in END group.
CONCLUSIONS: SLNB could act as a viable alternative to END in cT1/2N0 maxillary squamous cell carcinoma with comparable prognosis and better quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MS-SCC) is an infrequent malignancy, and determining the optimal neck management for patients with cT3/4N0 MS-SCC remains a topic of ongoing debate. The purpose of this study was to compare the prognoses and quality of life outcomes of patients who underwent either elective neck dissection (END) or elective neck irradiation (ENI) for cT3/4N0 MS-SCC.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients with surgically treated cT3/4N0 MS-SCC, and the impact of different neck management strategies on regional control and disease-specific survival was compared using propensity score matching. The effect of surgical intervention on quality of life was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Of the 120 patients included, 36 underwent END. After propensity score matching, our analysis indicated that END did not lead to superior outcomes than ENI, as demonstrated by comparable rates of regional control (p = 0.990) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.999). However, in the 70 returned questionnaires, patients who underwent END reported higher scores in the domains of appearance, chewing, and speech than did patients who underwent ENI.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that while END and ENI contribute to similar prognoses, END yields superior functional outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: Optimal neck management remains unclear in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with parotid metastasis. Our goal was to compare the impact of different cervical treatments on HNcSCC with parotid metastasis.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were retrospectively included. The primary outcome variables were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The impacts of observation, elective neck irradiation (ENI), and elective neck dissection (END) were analyzed using the Cox model and presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
UNASSIGNED: In total, 268 patients were enrolled. In the Cox model for RC, compared with ENI, observation was associated with a significantly higher risk of regional recurrence (p = 0.001, HR = 2.50, 95%CI = 1.45-4.30). However, END showed a comparable influence on regional recurrence (p = 0.246, HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.38-1.28). In the Cox model for DSS, END demonstrated a similar HR of 0.62 (95%CI = 0.30-1.26) compared to ENI (p = 0.184). However, patients who underwent observation were associated with an additional nearly twofold risk of cancer-related mortality (HR = 2.85, 95%CI = 1.55-5.23). Subgroup analysis showed that ENI predicted comparable RC (p = 0.389) and DSS (p = 0.346) in patients with one or two metastatic parotid lymph nodes, but worse RC (p = 0.007) and DSS (p = 0.024) in patients with more than three positive lymph nodes.
UNASSIGNED: In HNcSCC with parotid metastasis, elective treatment of neck lymph nodes with END or ENI should always be performed.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines began recommending the use of neck dissection during surgical management of stage I-II supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).
METHODS: Trends and factors associated with the use of neck dissection during larynx-preserving surgery for patients with cT1-2, N0, M0 supraglottic LSCC in the National Cancer Database (2004-2020) were evaluated using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 2080 patients who satisfied study eligibility criteria, 633 (30.4%) underwent neck dissection. Between 2018 and 2020, the rate of neck dissection was 39.0% (114/292). After multivariable adjustment, academic facility type, undergoing biopsy prior to surgery, and more radical surgery were significant predictors of receiving neck dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this national analysis suggest that the utilization of guideline-concordant neck dissection for management of stage I-II supraglottic LSCC remains low and highlight the need to promote the practice of neck dissection for this patient population.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the role of elective neck dissection (END) and adjuvant radiation on survival in N0 high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC).
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: National Cancer Institute\'s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
METHODS: All patients diagnosed with high-grade MEC with node-negative disease (N0) from 2004 to 2018 were included. Demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to control for confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 310 patients with high-grade MEC and N0 (clinical and pathologic) disease were identified. The parotid was the most common primary site (266, 86%). Of included patients, 133 (42.9%) were T3-T4 tumors and 212 (68%) received adjuvant radiation. END was performed on 223 (71.9%) of cases. END in T3-T4 high-grade MEC led to significant improvements in DSS (74.3% vs 34.0%, P < .01) and OS (55.2% vs 20.5%, P < .01) as compared to no END. Subanalysis shows that in patients who received neck dissections and were pathologic N0, adjuvant radiation had no impact on DSS (84.0% vs 72.1%, P = .45) and OS (52.1% vs 55.8%, P = .91). Benefits persisted when controlling for confounders using multivariate Cox proportional regression.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T3-T4 high-grade MEC who underwent END and found to be pathologically node-negative (pN0) had significantly improved 5-year DSS and 5-year OS than patients who were cN0 and did not undergo END. Importantly, although 68% of patients received adjuvant radiation, we show no benefit of this treatment modality on outcomes in pN0 high-grade MEC.