DNA polymerase theta (Polθ) is a DNA helicase-polymerase protein that facilitates DNA repair and is synthetic lethal with homology-directed repair (HDR) factors. Thus, Polθ is a promising precision oncology drug-target in HDR-deficient cancers. Here, we characterize the binding and mechanism of action of a Polθ helicase (Polθ-hel) small-molecule inhibitor (AB25583) using cryo-EM. AB25583 exhibits 6 nM IC50 against Polθ-hel, selectively kills BRCA1/2-deficient cells, and acts synergistically with olaparib in cancer cells harboring pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations. Cryo-EM uncovers predominantly dimeric Polθ-hel:AB25583 complex structures at 3.0-3.2 Å. The structures reveal a binding-pocket deep inside the helicase central-channel, which underscores the high specificity and potency of AB25583. The cryo-EM structures in conjunction with biochemical data indicate that AB25583 inhibits the ATPase activity of Polθ-hel helicase via an allosteric mechanism. These detailed structural data and insights about AB25583 inhibition pave the way for accelerating drug development targeting Polθ-hel in HDR-deficient cancers.

During lagging strand chromatin replication, multiple Okazaki fragments (OFs) require processing and nucleosome assembly, but the mechanisms linking these processes remain unclear. Here, using transmission electron microscopy and rapid degradation of DNA ligase Cdc9, we observed flap structures accumulated on lagging strands, controlled by both Pol δ\'s strand displacement activity and Fen1\'s nuclease digestion. The distance between neighboring flap structures exhibits a regular pattern, indicative of matured OF length. While fen1Δ or enhanced strand displacement activities by polymerase δ (Pol δ; pol3exo-) minimally affect inter-flap distance, mutants affecting replication-coupled nucleosome assembly, such as cac1Δ and mcm2-3A, do significantly alter it. Deletion of Pol32, a subunit of DNA Pol δ, significantly increases this distance. Mechanistically, Pol32 binds to histone H3-H4 and is critical for nucleosome assembly on the lagging strand. Together, we propose that Pol32 establishes a connection between nucleosome assembly and the processing of OFs on lagging strands.

BACKGROUND: Adaptive mutagenesis observed in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells upon exposure to EGFR inhibitors contributes to the development of resistance and recurrence. Multiple investigations have indicated a parallel between cancer cells and bacteria in terms of exhibiting adaptive mutagenesis. This phenomenon entails a transient and coordinated escalation of error-prone translesion synthesis polymerases (TLS polymerases), resulting in mutagenesis of a magnitude sufficient to drive the selection of resistant phenotypes.
METHODS: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive pan-transcriptome analysis of the regulatory framework within CRC cells, with the objective of identifying potential transcriptome modules encompassing certain translesion polymerases and the associated transcription factors (TFs) that govern them. Our sampling strategy involved the collection of transcriptomic data from tumors treated with cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, untreated CRC tumors, and colorectal-derived cell lines, resulting in a diverse dataset. Subsequently, we identified co-regulated modules using weighted correlation network analysis with a minKMEtostay threshold set at 0.5 to minimize false-positive module identifications and mapped the modules to STRING annotations. Furthermore, we explored the putative TFs influencing these modules using KBoost, a kernel PCA regression model.
RESULTS: Our analysis did not reveal a distinct transcriptional profile specific to cetuximab treatment. Moreover, we elucidated co-expression modules housing genes, for example, POLK, POLI, POLQ, REV1, POLN, and POLM. Specifically, POLK, POLI, and POLQ were assigned to the \"blue\" module, which also encompassed critical DNA damage response enzymes, for example. BRCA1, BRCA2, MSH6, and MSH2. To delineate the transcriptional control of this module, we investigated associated TFs, highlighting the roles of prominent cancer-associated TFs, such as CENPA, HNF1A, and E2F7.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that translesion polymerases are co-regulated with DNA mismatch repair and cell cycle-associated factors. We did not, however, identified any networks specific to cetuximab treatment indicating that the response to EGFR inhibitors relates to a general stress response mechanism.

Enzymatic DNA writing technologies based on the template-independent DNA polymerase terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) have the potential to advance DNA information storage. TdT is unique in its ability to synthesize single-stranded DNA de novo but has limitations, including catalytic inhibition by ribonucleotide presence and slower incorporation rates compared to replicative polymerases. We anticipate that protein engineering can improve, modulate, and tailor the enzyme\'s properties, but there is limited information on TdT sequence-structure-function relationships to facilitate rational approaches. Therefore, we developed an easily modifiable screening assay that can measure the TdT activity in high-throughput to evaluate large TdT mutant libraries. We demonstrated the assay\'s capabilities by engineering TdT mutants that exhibit both improved catalytic efficiency and improved activity in the presence of an inhibitor. We screened for and identified TdT variants with greater catalytic efficiency in both selectively incorporating deoxyribonucleotides and in the presence of deoxyribonucleotide/ribonucleotide mixes. Using this information from the screening assay, we rationally engineered other TdT homologues with the same properties. The emulsion-based assay we developed is, to the best of our knowledge, the first high-throughput screening assay that can measure TdT activity quantitatively and without the need for protein purification.

When replication forks encounter damaged DNA, cells utilize damage tolerance mechanisms to allow replication to proceed. These include translesion synthesis at the fork, postreplication gap filling, and template switching via fork reversal or homologous recombination. The extent to which these different damage tolerance mechanisms are utilized depends on cell, tissue, and developmental context-specific cues, the last two of which are poorly understood. To address this gap, we have investigated damage tolerance responses in Drosophila melanogaster. We report that tolerance of DNA alkylation damage in rapidly dividing larval tissues depends heavily on translesion synthesis. Furthermore, we show that the REV1 protein plays a multi-faceted role in damage tolerance in Drosophila. Larvae lacking REV1 are hypersensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and have highly elevated levels of γ-H2Av (Drosophila γ-H2AX) foci and chromosome aberrations in MMS-treated tissues. Loss of the REV1 C-terminal domain (CTD), which recruits multiple translesion polymerases to damage sites, sensitizes flies to MMS. In the absence of the REV1 CTD, DNA polymerases eta and zeta become critical for MMS tolerance. In addition, flies lacking REV3, the catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta, require the deoxycytidyl transferase activity of REV1 to tolerate MMS. Together, our results demonstrate that Drosophila prioritize the use of multiple translesion polymerases to tolerate alkylation damage and highlight the critical role of REV1 in the coordination of this response to prevent genome instability.

Translesion synthesis (TLS) is a mechanism of DNA damage tolerance utilized by eukaryotic cells to replicate DNA across lesions that impede the high-fidelity replication machinery. In TLS, a series of specialized DNA polymerases are employed, which recognize specific DNA lesions, insert nucleotides across the damage, and extend the distorted primer-template. This allows cells to preserve genetic integrity at the cost of mutations. In humans, TLS enzymes include the Y-family, inserter polymerases, Polη, Polι, Polκ, Rev1, and the B-family extender polymerase Polζ, while in S. cerevisiae only Polη, Rev1, and Polζ are present. To bypass DNA lesions, TLS polymerases cooperate, assembling into a complex on the eukaryotic sliding clamp, PCNA, termed the TLS mutasome. The mutasome assembly is contingent on protein-protein interactions (PPIs) between the modular domains and subunits of TLS enzymes, and their interactions with PCNA and DNA. While the structural mechanisms of DNA lesion bypass by the TLS polymerases and PPIs of their individual modules are well understood, the mechanisms by which they cooperate in the context of TLS complexes have remained elusive. This review focuses on structural studies of TLS polymerases and describes the case of TLS holoenzyme assemblies in action emerging from recent high-resolution Cryo-EM studies.

Replication stress compromises genomic integrity. Fork blocking lesions such as those induced by cisplatin and other chemotherapeutic agents arrest replication forks. Repriming downstream of these lesions represents an important mechanism of replication restart, however the single stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps left behind, unless efficiently filled, can serve as entry point for nucleases. Nascent strand gaps can be repaired by BRCA-mediated homology repair. Alternatively, gaps can also be filled by translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases. How these events are regulated is still not clear. Here, we show that PARP10, a poorly-characterized mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase, is recruited to nascent strand gaps to promote their repair. PARP10 interacts with the ubiquitin ligase RAD18 and recruits it to these structures, resulting in the ubiquitination of the replication factor PCNA. PCNA ubiquitination, in turn, recruits the TLS polymerase REV1 for gap filling. We show that PARP10 recruitment to gaps and the subsequent REV1-mediated gap filling requires both the catalytic activity of PARP10, and its ability to interact with PCNA. We moreover show that PARP10 is hyperactive in BRCA-deficient cells, and its inactivation potentiates gap accumulations and cytotoxicity in these cells. Our work uncovers PARP10 as a regulator of ssDNA gap filling, which promotes genomic stability in BRCA-deficient cells.

In the Japanese official detection method for unauthorized genetically modified (GM) papayas, one of two types of real-time PCR reagents with DNA polymerase (TaqMan Gene Master Mix [TaqMan Gene] or FastGene QPCR Probe Mastermix w/ROX [FastGene]) is primarily used for measurement. In 2022, we conducted a laboratory performance study on the unauthorized GM papaya line PRSV-YK, and the results revealed that high threshold cycle (Cq) values for the PRSV-YK detection test were obtained using TaqMan Gene with the 7500 Fast & 7500 Real-Time PCR System (ABI7500) and QuantStudio 12K Flex (QS12K), indicating the possibility of false negatives. The possibility of similar problems with all unauthorized GM papaya lines detection tests needs to be evaluated. In this study, we performed detection tests on unauthorized GM papaya lines (PRSV-YK, PRSV-SC, and PRSV-HN), the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promotor (CaM), and a papaya positive control (Chy), and examined how the limits of detection (LOD) for each test are affected by two types of DNA polymerases (TaqMan Gene and FastGene) and three types of real-time PCR instruments (ABI7500, QS12K, and LightCycler 480 Instrument II [LC480]). In the PRSV-YK and PRSV-SC detection tests using ABI7500 and QS12K, measurement with TaqMan Gene showed a higher LOD than FastGene. In this case, an exponential amplification curve was confirmed on the amplification plot; however, the amplification curve did not cross the ΔRn threshold line and the correct Cq value was not obtained with a threshold line=0.2. The other tests (PRSV-HN, CaM, and Chy with ABI7500 and QS12K, and all detection tests with LC480) showed no important differences in the LOD for each test using either DNA polymerase. Therefore, when performing PRSV-YK and PRSV-SC detection tests with the ABI7500 or QS12K, FastGene should be used to avoid false negatives for foods containing GM papaya lines PRSV-YK and PRSV-SC at low mixing levels.

In Escherichia coli, it is debated whether the two replisomes move independently along the two chromosome arms during replication or if they remain spatially confined. Here, we use high-throughput fluorescence microscopy to simultaneously determine the location and short-time-scale (1 s) movement of the replisome and a chromosomal locus throughout the cell cycle. The assay is performed for several loci. We find that (i) the two replisomes are confined to a region of ~250 nm and ~120 nm along the cell\'s long and short axis, respectively, (ii) the chromosomal loci move to and through this region sequentially based on their distance from the origin of replication, and (iii) when a locus is being replicated, its short time-scale movement slows down. This behavior is the same at different growth rates. In conclusion, our data supports a model with DNA moving towards spatially confined replisomes at replication.

DNA polymerase theta (Polθ)-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) repairs DNA double-strand breaks and confers resistance to genotoxic agents. How Polθ is regulated at the molecular level to exert TMEJ remains poorly characterized. We find that Polθ interacts with and is PARylated by PARP1 in a HPF1-independent manner. PARP1 recruits Polθ to the vicinity of DNA damage via PARylation dependent liquid demixing, however, PARylated Polθ cannot perform TMEJ due to its inability to bind DNA. PARG-mediated de-PARylation of Polθ reactivates its DNA binding and end-joining activities. Consistent with this, PARG is essential for TMEJ and the temporal recruitment of PARG to DNA damage corresponds with TMEJ activation and dissipation of PARP1 and PAR. In conclusion, we show a two-step spatiotemporal mechanism of TMEJ regulation. First, PARP1 PARylates Polθ and facilitates its recruitment to DNA damage sites in an inactivated state. PARG subsequently activates TMEJ by removing repressive PAR marks on Polθ.