DNA polymerase ζ (Pol ζ) plays an essential role in replicating damaged DNA templates but contributes to mutagenesis due to its low fidelity. Therefore, ensuring tight control of Pol ζ\'s activity is critical for continuous and accurate DNA replication, yet the specific mechanisms remain unclear. This study reveals a regulation mechanism of Pol ζ activity in human cells. Under normal conditions, an autoinhibition mechanism keeps the catalytic subunit, REV3L, inactive. Upon encountering replication stress, however, ATR-mediated phosphorylation of REV3L\'s S279 cluster activates REV3L and triggers its degradation via a caspase-mediated pathway. This regulation confines the activity of Pol ζ, balancing its essential role against its mutations causing potential during replication stress. Overall, our findings elucidate a control scheme that fine tunes the low-fidelity polymerase activity of Pol ζ under challenging replication scenarios.

PARP inhibitors (PARPi), known for their ability to induce replication gaps and accelerate replication forks, have become potent agents in anticancer therapy. However, the molecular mechanism underlying PARPi-induced fork acceleration has remained elusive. Here, we show that the first PARPi-induced effect on DNA replication is an increased replication fork rate, followed by a secondary reduction in origin activity. Through the systematic knockdown of human DNA polymerases, we identify POLA1 as mediator of PARPi-induced fork acceleration. This acceleration depends on both DNA polymerase α and primase activities. Additionally, the depletion of POLA1 increases the accumulation of replication gaps induced by PARP inhibition, sensitizing cells to PARPi. BRCA1-depleted cells are especially susceptible to the formation of replication gaps under POLA1 inhibition. Accordingly, BRCA1 deficiency sensitizes cells to POLA1 inhibition. Thus, our findings establish the POLA complex as important player in PARPi-induced fork acceleration and provide evidence that lagging strand synthesis represents a targetable vulnerability in BRCA1-deficient cells.

BACKGROUND: Viruses with double-stranded (ds) DNA genomes in the realm Duplodnaviria share a conserved structural gene module but show a broad range of variation in their repertoires of DNA replication proteins. Some of the duplodnaviruses encode (nearly) complete replication systems whereas others lack (almost) all genes required for replication, relying on the host replication machinery. DNA polymerases (DNAPs) comprise the centerpiece of the DNA replication apparatus. The replicative DNAPs are classified into 4 unrelated or distantly related families (A-D), with the protein structures and sequences within each family being, generally, highly conserved. More than half of the duplodnaviruses encode a DNAP of family A, B or C. We showed previously that multiple pairs of closely related viruses in the order Crassvirales encode DNAPs of different families.
METHODS: Groups of phages in which DNAP swapping likely occurred were identified as subtrees of a defined depth in a comprehensive evolutionary tree of tailed bacteriophages that included phages with DNAPs of different families. The DNAP swaps were validated by constrained tree analysis that was performed on phylogenetic tree of large terminase subunits, and the phage genomes encoding swapped DNAPs were aligned using Mauve. The structures of the discovered unusual DNAPs were predicted using AlphaFold2.
RESULTS: We identified four additional groups of tailed phages in the class Caudoviricetes in which the DNAPs apparently were swapped on multiple occasions, with replacements occurring both between families A and B, or A and C, or between distinct subfamilies within the same family. The DNAP swapping always occurs \"in situ\", without changes in the organization of the surrounding genes. In several cases, the DNAP gene is the only region of substantial divergence between closely related phage genomes, whereas in others, the swap apparently involved neighboring genes encoding other proteins involved in phage genome replication. In addition, we identified two previously undetected, highly divergent groups of family A DNAPs that are encoded in some phage genomes along with the main DNAP implicated in genome replication.
CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the DNAP gene by one encoding a DNAP of a different family occurred on many independent occasions during the evolution of different families of tailed phages, in some cases, resulting in very closely related phages encoding unrelated DNAPs. DNAP swapping was likely driven by selection for avoidance of host antiphage mechanisms targeting the phage DNAP that remain to be identified, and/or by selection against replicon incompatibility.

Abasic sites are DNA lesions repaired by base excision repair. Cleavage of unrepaired abasic sites in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) can lead to chromosomal breakage during DNA replication. How rupture of abasic DNA is prevented remains poorly understood. Here, using cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), Xenopus laevis egg extracts, and human cells, we show that RAD51 nucleofilaments specifically recognize and protect abasic sites, which increase RAD51 association rate to DNA. In the absence of BRCA2 or RAD51, abasic sites accumulate as a result of DNA base methylation, oxidation, and deamination, inducing abasic ssDNA gaps that make replicating DNA fibers sensitive to APE1. RAD51 assembled on abasic DNA prevents abasic site cleavage by the MRE11-RAD50 complex, suppressing replication fork breakage triggered by an excess of abasic sites or POLθ polymerase inhibition. Our study highlights the critical role of BRCA2 and RAD51 in safeguarding against unrepaired abasic sites in DNA templates stemming from base alterations, ensuring genomic stability.

Chimeric DNA polymerase with notable performance has been generated for wide applications including DNA amplification and molecular diagnostics. This rational design method aims to improve specific enzymatic characteristics or introduce novel functions by fusing amino acid sequences from different proteins with a single DNA polymerase to create a chimeric DNA polymerase. Several strategies prove to be efficient, including swapping homologous domains between polymerases to combine benefits from different species, incorporating additional domains for exonuclease activity or enhanced binding ability to DNA, and integrating functional protein along with specific protein structural pattern to improve thermal stability and tolerance to inhibitors, as many cases in the past decade shown. The conventional protocol to develop a chimeric DNA polymerase with desired traits involves a Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle. This procedure initiates with the selection of a parent polymerase, followed by the identification of relevant domains and devising a strategy for fusion. After recombinant expression and purification of chimeric polymerase, its performance is evaluated. The outcomes of these evaluations are analyzed for further enhancing and optimizing the functionality of the polymerase. This review, centered on microorganisms, briefly outlines typical instances of chimeric DNA polymerases categorized, and presents a general methodology for their creation. KEY POINTS: • Chimeric DNA polymerase is generated by rational design method. • Strategies include domain exchange and addition of proteins, domains, and motifs. • Chimeric DNA polymerase exhibits improved enzymatic properties or novel functions.

DNA polymerase theta (Polθ) is a DNA helicase-polymerase protein that facilitates DNA repair and is synthetic lethal with homology-directed repair (HDR) factors. Thus, Polθ is a promising precision oncology drug-target in HDR-deficient cancers. Here, we characterize the binding and mechanism of action of a Polθ helicase (Polθ-hel) small-molecule inhibitor (AB25583) using cryo-EM. AB25583 exhibits 6 nM IC50 against Polθ-hel, selectively kills BRCA1/2-deficient cells, and acts synergistically with olaparib in cancer cells harboring pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations. Cryo-EM uncovers predominantly dimeric Polθ-hel:AB25583 complex structures at 3.0-3.2 Å. The structures reveal a binding-pocket deep inside the helicase central-channel, which underscores the high specificity and potency of AB25583. The cryo-EM structures in conjunction with biochemical data indicate that AB25583 inhibits the ATPase activity of Polθ-hel helicase via an allosteric mechanism. These detailed structural data and insights about AB25583 inhibition pave the way for accelerating drug development targeting Polθ-hel in HDR-deficient cancers.

G-quadruplexes (G4s) form throughout the genome and influence important cellular processes. Their deregulation can challenge DNA replication fork progression and threaten genome stability. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected role for the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) translocase helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF) in responding to G4s. We show that HLTF, which is enriched at G4s in the human genome, can directly unfold G4s in vitro and uses this ATP-dependent translocase function to suppress G4 accumulation throughout the cell cycle. Additionally, MSH2 (a component of MutS heterodimers that bind G4s) and HLTF act synergistically to suppress G4 accumulation, restrict alternative lengthening of telomeres, and promote resistance to G4-stabilizing drugs. In a discrete but complementary role, HLTF restrains DNA synthesis when G4s are stabilized by suppressing primase-polymerase (PrimPol)-dependent repriming. Together, the distinct roles of HLTF in the G4 response prevent DNA damage and potentially mutagenic replication to safeguard genome stability.

During lagging strand chromatin replication, multiple Okazaki fragments (OFs) require processing and nucleosome assembly, but the mechanisms linking these processes remain unclear. Here, using transmission electron microscopy and rapid degradation of DNA ligase Cdc9, we observed flap structures accumulated on lagging strands, controlled by both Pol δ\'s strand displacement activity and Fen1\'s nuclease digestion. The distance between neighboring flap structures exhibits a regular pattern, indicative of matured OF length. While fen1Δ or enhanced strand displacement activities by polymerase δ (Pol δ; pol3exo-) minimally affect inter-flap distance, mutants affecting replication-coupled nucleosome assembly, such as cac1Δ and mcm2-3A, do significantly alter it. Deletion of Pol32, a subunit of DNA Pol δ, significantly increases this distance. Mechanistically, Pol32 binds to histone H3-H4 and is critical for nucleosome assembly on the lagging strand. Together, we propose that Pol32 establishes a connection between nucleosome assembly and the processing of OFs on lagging strands.

BACKGROUND: Adaptive mutagenesis observed in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells upon exposure to EGFR inhibitors contributes to the development of resistance and recurrence. Multiple investigations have indicated a parallel between cancer cells and bacteria in terms of exhibiting adaptive mutagenesis. This phenomenon entails a transient and coordinated escalation of error-prone translesion synthesis polymerases (TLS polymerases), resulting in mutagenesis of a magnitude sufficient to drive the selection of resistant phenotypes.
METHODS: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive pan-transcriptome analysis of the regulatory framework within CRC cells, with the objective of identifying potential transcriptome modules encompassing certain translesion polymerases and the associated transcription factors (TFs) that govern them. Our sampling strategy involved the collection of transcriptomic data from tumors treated with cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, untreated CRC tumors, and colorectal-derived cell lines, resulting in a diverse dataset. Subsequently, we identified co-regulated modules using weighted correlation network analysis with a minKMEtostay threshold set at 0.5 to minimize false-positive module identifications and mapped the modules to STRING annotations. Furthermore, we explored the putative TFs influencing these modules using KBoost, a kernel PCA regression model.
RESULTS: Our analysis did not reveal a distinct transcriptional profile specific to cetuximab treatment. Moreover, we elucidated co-expression modules housing genes, for example, POLK, POLI, POLQ, REV1, POLN, and POLM. Specifically, POLK, POLI, and POLQ were assigned to the \"blue\" module, which also encompassed critical DNA damage response enzymes, for example. BRCA1, BRCA2, MSH6, and MSH2. To delineate the transcriptional control of this module, we investigated associated TFs, highlighting the roles of prominent cancer-associated TFs, such as CENPA, HNF1A, and E2F7.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that translesion polymerases are co-regulated with DNA mismatch repair and cell cycle-associated factors. We did not, however, identified any networks specific to cetuximab treatment indicating that the response to EGFR inhibitors relates to a general stress response mechanism.

An organism\'s genomic DNA must be accurately duplicated during each cell cycle. DNA synthesis is catalysed by DNA polymerase enzymes, which extend nucleotide polymers in a 5\' to 3\' direction. This inherent directionality necessitates that one strand is synthesised forwards (leading), while the other is synthesised backwards discontinuously (lagging) to couple synthesis to the unwinding of duplex DNA. Eukaryotic cells possess many diverse polymerases that coordinate to replicate DNA, with the three main replicative polymerases being Pol α, Pol δ and Pol ε. Studies conducted in yeasts and human cells utilising mutant polymerases that incorporate molecular signatures into nascent DNA implicate Pol ε in leading strand synthesis and Pol α and Pol δ in lagging strand replication. Recent structural insights have revealed how the spatial organization of these enzymes around the core helicase facilitates their strand-specific roles. However, various challenging situations during replication require flexibility in the usage of these enzymes, such as during replication initiation or encounters with replication-blocking adducts. This review summarises the roles of the replicative polymerases in bulk DNA replication and explores their flexible and dynamic deployment to complete genome replication. We also examine how polymerase usage patterns can inform our understanding of global replication dynamics by revealing replication fork directionality to identify regions of replication initiation and termination.