Curriculum development

课程开发
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有人呼吁护理计划转向基于能力的教育(CBE)。基于能力的教育在护理教育中具有许多好处。包括概念和能力的课程可以帮助学生和利益相关者了解新的护士毕业生将能够利用他们在整个计划中构建的知识做什么。能力本位教育是以学生为中心,灵活,并依赖于学生积极参与他们的学习。一个小型的教师团队开发了一个新的直接进入MSN程序,基于CBE的基本组成部分。本文介绍了将CBE纳入程序开发的过程,以及在课程中全面实施CBE的挑战和障碍。
    There has been a call for nursing programs to shift to Competency-based education (CBE). Competency-based education has numerous benefits in nursing education. A curriculum that includes both concepts and competencies helps students and stakeholders understand what new nurse graduates will be able to do with the knowledge they construct throughout the program. Competency-based education is student-centered, flexible, and dependent on students actively engaging in their learning. A small faculty team developed a new direct-entry MSN program, based on essential components of CBE. This article describes the process of incorporating CBE into the development of the program, as well as challenges and barriers to fully implementing CBE into the curriculum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:整形外科在职检查(PSITE)的驻地表现被用作美国整形外科书面检查委员会成功的预测指标,以及居民升学和奖学金申请。然而,与普通外科相比,整形外科文献中缺乏专门针对最佳PSITE准备策略的信息。出于这个原因,我们的目标是了解该主题是否经过充分研究,并在这两个领域中表示有效的学习策略和课程干预措施,可以帮助居民和计划优化PSITE表现。
    方法:根据PubMed和EMBASE的PRISMA指南进行了文献检索,包括2012年至2022年的研究,以确定有关提高普通外科和整形外科在职考试成绩的策略的文章。只有在原始分数中报告可测量结果的研究,百分位分数,或正确的百分比被包括在内。
    结果:对30篇文章的定性分析揭示了2类干预措施:个人学习习惯和机构课程干预措施。在普通外科文献中,27篇文章研究了干预措施对居民ABSITE得分的积极影响,21项研究被归类为机构课程干预措施,6篇文章涉及个人学习习惯。与提高ABSITE性能相关的主题包括强制性补救计划,专门的学习时间,和基于问题的学习干预。相比之下,整形外科文献中只有3篇文章讨论了与改善PSITE评分相关的干预措施,所有这些都属于课程干预。
    结论:不幸的是,整形外科文献缺乏关于居民如何提高表现的具体证据。整形外科的未来研究应复制普通外科的成功策略,并进一步研究PSITE的最佳准备策略。这些努力可以有助于提高居民的表现,推进整形外科教育和病人护理。
    BACKGROUND: Resident performance on the Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination (PSITE) is used as a predictor of success on the American Board of Plastic Surgery Written Examination, as well as resident progression and fellowship applications. However, information specifically addressing strategies on optimal PSITE preparation is lacking in the plastic surgery literature when compared to general surgery. For this reason, we aim to understand if the topic is well-studied and denote effective study strategies and curricular interventions in both fields that can help residents and programs optimize PSITE performance.
    METHODS: A literature search including studies from 2012 to 2022 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in PubMed and EMBASE to identify articles on strategies to improve in-service exam scores for general surgery and plastic surgery. Only studies that reported measurable outcomes in raw score, percentile score, or percent correct were included.
    RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of 30 articles revealed 2 categories of interventions: individual study habits and institutional curricular interventions. In general surgery literature, 27 articles examined interventions positively impacting resident ABSITE scores, with 21 studies classified as institutional curricular interventions and 6 articles addressing individual study habits. Themes associated with improved ABSITE performance included mandatory remediation programs, dedicated study time, and problem-based learning interventions. In contrast, only 3 articles in plastic surgery literature discussed interventions associated with improved PSITE scores, all falling under curricular interventions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Unfortunately, the plastic surgery literature lacks concrete evidence on how residents can improve performance. Future research in plastic surgery should replicate successful strategies from general surgery and further investigate optimal preparation strategies for the PSITE. Such endeavors can contribute to improving resident performance and advancing plastic surgery education and patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虚拟患者(VP)在卫生专业教育中被广泛使用。当它们很好地融入课程时,它们被认为比松散耦合的附加组件更有效。然而,目前还不清楚什么是他们成功的整合。这项研究的目的是确定和综合文献中发现的主题,利益相关者认为这对于在课程中成功实施VPs很重要。
    方法:我们检索了2000年至2023年9月25日的五个数据库。我们包括定性,定量,混合方法和描述性案例研究定义了,已识别,探索,或评估了一组因素,在学生的感知中,教师,课程主任和研究人员,对副总裁的实施至关重要。我们排除了不考虑实施特征的有效性研究,以及专注于VP设计因素的研究。我们包括英语全文报告和排除会议摘要,简短的意见文件和社论。以Kern的六步模型为初始框架,使用框架合成方法进行结果合成。我们使用QuADS工具评估了研究的质量。
    结果:我们的搜索共产生4808个项目,其中21项研究符合纳入标准.我们确定了14个主题,形成了一个整合框架。主题是:课程目标;实施副总裁的课程阶段;有效利用资源;副总裁与课程学习目标保持一致;使用的优先次序;与其他学习方式的关系;围绕副总裁的学习活动;时间分配;小组设置;存在模式;为学生和教师提供副总裁的方向;技术基础设施;质量保证,维护,和可持续性;评估副总裁学习成果和学习分析。我们调查了研究中主题的发生,以证明框架的相关性。研究的质量并不影响主题的覆盖面。
    结论:由此产生的框架可用于围绕课程中的VPs实施构建计划和讨论。它已经被用来组织欧洲项目的课程实施指南。我们希望它将指导进一步的研究,以加深我们对个人整合主题的了解。
    BACKGROUND: Virtual patients (VPs) are widely used in health professions education. When they are well integrated into curricula, they are considered to be more effective than loosely coupled add-ons. However, it is unclear what constitutes their successful integration. The aim of this study was to identify and synthesise the themes found in the literature that stakeholders perceive as important for successful implementation of VPs in curricula.
    METHODS: We searched five databases from 2000 to September 25, 2023. We included qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods and descriptive case studies that defined, identified, explored, or evaluated a set of factors that, in the perception of students, teachers, course directors and researchers, were crucial for VP implementation. We excluded effectiveness studies that did not consider implementation characteristics, and studies that focused on VP design factors. We included English-language full-text reports and excluded conference abstracts, short opinion papers and editorials. Synthesis of results was performed using the framework synthesis method with Kern\'s six-step model as the initial framework. We appraised the quality of the studies using the QuADS tool.
    RESULTS: Our search yielded a total of 4808 items, from which 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. We identified 14 themes that formed an integration framework. The themes were: goal in the curriculum; phase of the curriculum when to implement VPs; effective use of resources; VP alignment with curricular learning objectives; prioritisation of use; relation to other learning modalities; learning activities around VPs; time allocation; group setting; presence mode; VPs orientation for students and faculty; technical infrastructure; quality assurance, maintenance, and sustainability; assessment of VP learning outcomes and learning analytics. We investigated the occurrence of themes across studies to demonstrate the relevance of the framework. The quality of the studies did not influence the coverage of the themes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The resulting framework can be used to structure plans and discussions around implementation of VPs in curricula. It has already been used to organise the curriculum implementation guidelines of a European project. We expect it will direct further research to deepen our knowledge on individual integration themes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议进行系统思考,但不是必需的,在营养和营养学教育中教授食品和水系统的可持续性。
    目的:本研究调查了系统思维和可持续发展,弹性,以及营养和营养学计划中的健康食品和水系统(SRHFWS)。它检查了项目主管的做法,值,态度,信心水平,以及系统思维之间的关系,教授SRHFWS主题,信心水平,以及多年的营养师和项目总监经验。
    方法:于2022年9月进行,该研究使用了具有经过验证的20项系统思维量表(STS)的描述性设计和具有1-5个李克特型量表的研究人员设计的调查。
    方法:在线调查已分发给611名营养和饮食教育认证委员会(ACEND)计划负责人,27%(n=163)的反应。
    方法:描述性统计(频率,意思是,标准偏差)使用Excel计算。使用R.使用ANOVA将作为RDN的经验和作为项目主管的经验与教学每个SRHFWS主题的信心水平进行比较。使用线性回归确定STS总分与人口统计学和程序变量之间的关系。
    结果:77%的项目主管在STS上得分较高(平均得分为65.2,0-80分,SD8.4),超过85%的董事同意在营养学中纳入系统思维很重要。然而,只有32.1%的人报告了教学系统的思维。不到一半的项目主管同意在ACEND标准中充分解决了系统思维,近80%的项目主管认为系统思维内容还有加强空间。董事们既不同意也不同意有足够的ACEND标准来解决SRHFWS,并且报告的SRHFWS主题教授不一致。教授经济和环境主题的信心水平最低。对营养与饮食学会基金会开发的资源的认识和利用程度很低。
    结论:在营养和营养学教育中整合系统思维为解决该领域的复杂性提供了有希望的机会。应用系统思维来教授SRHFWS可能会缩小教育者的重要性和计划覆盖范围之间的差距。提高项目主管对基金会资源的认识和利用,提高实践标准和认证标准之间的一致性,可以使项目主管能够利用系统思维来教授营养和营养学方面与可持续性相关的挑战。
    BACKGROUND: Systems thinking is recommended, but not required, for teaching food and water system sustainability in nutrition and dietetics education.
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated systems thinking and sustainable, resilient, and healthy food and water systems (SRHFWS) in nutrition and dietetics programs. It examined program directors\' practices, values, attitudes, confidence levels, and the relationships between systems thinking, teaching SRHFWS topics, confidence levels, and years of experience as a dietitian and program director.
    METHODS: Conducted in September 2022, the study used a descriptive design with a validated 20-item Systems Thinking Scale (STS) and a researcher-designed survey with 1-5 Likert-type scales.
    METHODS: The online survey was distributed to 611 Accreditation Council for Education in Nutrition and Dietetics (ACEND) program directors, with a 27% (n=163) response.
    METHODS: Descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, standard deviation) were calculated using Excel. Inferential statistics were examined using R. ANOVA was used to compare experience as RDN and experience as a program director to confidence levels in teaching each SRHFWS topic. Linear regression was used determine the relationship between total STS score and demographic and programmatic variables.
    RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of program directors scored high on the STS (mean score 65.2, on a 0-80 scale, SD 8.4), and more than 85% of directors agreed including systems thinking in dietetics was important. However, only 32.1% reported teaching systems thinking. Less than half of program directors agreed systems thinking was adequately addressed in ACEND standards, and nearly 80% of program directors agreed there was room to strengthen systems thinking content. Directors neither agreed nor disagreed there are adequate ACEND standards addressing SRHFWS and reported SRHFWS topics were inconsistently taught. Confidence levels were lowest for teaching economic and environmental topics. Awareness and use of resources developed by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation was low.
    CONCLUSIONS: Integration of systems thinking in nutrition and dietetics education presents promising opportunities to address complexity in the field. Applying systems thinking to teach SRHFWS may narrow the disparity between educators\' perceived importance and program coverage. Enhancing program directors\' awareness and utilization of Foundation resources and improved alignment between practice standards and accreditation standards may empower program directors to use systems thinking to teach sustainability-related challenges in nutrition and dietetics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:健康素养有限的照顾者的儿童面临较差健康状况的风险。因此,健康素养的沟通工具对于实现更公平的卫生系统至关重要。然而,对于儿科居民应达到的健康素养技能没有达成一致。我们使用Delphi方法就健康素养目标达成共识,以指导儿科住院医师课程的开发。
    方法:我们的Delphi小组参加了3轮匿名调查,以对健康素养目标在儿科住院医师教育中的重要性进行排名。共识被定义为≥70%的小组成员将目标确定为基本目标或100%同意建议或基本目标。
    结果:13位儿科健康素养专家包括种族,地理上,和专业多样化的小组。经过3轮调查,最初65项目标中有27项达成共识。所有最终目标都与研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的核心能力保持一致。
    结论:一组儿科健康素养专家就儿科住院医师培训特有的健康素养目标达成了共识。这些优先目标与ACGME核心能力保持一致,以及基于证据的策略,如回教,以及诸如解决组织健康素养之类的新考虑。他们应该在儿科住院医师计划中告知未来的健康素养课程和评估。
    OBJECTIVE: Children of caregivers with limited health literacy are at risk of poorer health outcomes. Thus, health literacy-informed communication tools are critical to achieving a more equitable health system. However, there is no agreement on the health literacy skills pediatric residents should attain. We used Delphi methodology to establish consensus on health literacy objectives to inform development of a pediatric resident curriculum.
    METHODS: Our Delphi panel participated in 3 rounds of anonymous surveys to rank the importance of health literacy objectives in pediatric resident education. Consensus was defined as ≥70% of panelists identifying an objective as essential or 100% agreeing an objective was recommended or essential.
    RESULTS: Thirteen pediatric health literacy experts comprised a racially, geographically, and professionally-diverse panel. After 3 survey rounds, 27 of the initial 65 objectives met consensus. All final objectives aligned with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies.
    CONCLUSIONS: A panel of pediatric health literacy experts established consensus on health literacy objectives specific to pediatric resident training. These prioritized objectives align with ACGME core competencies, as well as evidence-based strategies like teach-back, and newer considerations like addressing organizational health literacy. They should inform future health literacy curricula and assessment within pediatric residency programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:随着临床医师教育家的追踪在研究生医学教育中不断普及,本报告旨在填补文献中的空白,通过提供14年的最新情况,了解精神病学住院医师学术管理员参与者的专业成果,临床医师教育者(AACE)跟踪并将这些结果与非跟踪参与者进行比较。
    方法:从2009年到2022年,向所有精神病学住院医师培训计划的毕业生分发了一项基于网络的匿名调查,以查询专业成就。比较了AACE跟踪参与者和非跟踪参与者的结果。
    结果:在联系的228名校友中,61%的回答(n=140)。87%的赛道参与者做出了回应(n=74),而41%的非赛道参与者做出了回应(n=45)。跟踪参与者,63%的人在学术环境中执业,57%的人担任过行政领导角色,49%的教育领导角色,39%的国家或地区领导角色。跟踪毕业生在学术上参与了70%的报告至少一个出版物,89%至少有一个演示文稿,93%参加至少一次全国会议。相比之下,31%的非轨道参与者在学术环境中执业,44%的人持有行政管理,29%的教育,20%的国家或地区领导角色。39%的人至少有一份出版物,75%至少有一次演讲,90%参加了至少一次全国会议。与非赛道参与者相比,跟踪参与者更有可能拥有学术背景和更多的出版物,并且更有可能担任国家或地区领导角色。
    结论:Track参与者比非Track参与者表现出作为临床教育者和学术管理者的纵向职业成功。
    OBJECTIVE: As clinician educator tracks continue to gain popularity in graduate medical education, this report aims to fill a gap in the literature by providing a 14-year update on professional outcomes of participants in a psychiatry residency academic administrator, clinician educator (AACE) track and to compare these outcomes to non-track participants.
    METHODS: An anonymous web-based survey querying professional achievements was distributed to all graduates of a psychiatry residency training program from 2009 to 2022. Outcomes of AACE track participants and non-track participants were compared.
    RESULTS: Of 228 alumni contacted, 61% responded (n = 140). Eighty-seven percent of track participants responded (n = 74) while 41% of non-track participants responded (n = 45). Of track participants, 63% practice in academic settings with 57% having held administrative leadership roles, 49% educational leadership roles, and 39% national or regional leadership roles. Track graduates were academically engaged with 70% reporting at least one publication, 89% at least one presentation, and 93% attending at least one national meeting. In comparison, 31% of non-track participants practice in academic settings with 44% having held administrative, 29% educational, and 20% national or regional leadership roles. Thirty-nine percent have at least one publication, 75% at least one presentation, and 90% attended at least one national meeting. When compared to non-track participants, track participants were significantly more likely to have an academic affiliation and a higher number of publications and were more likely to hold national or regional leadership roles.
    CONCLUSIONS: Track participants demonstrate longitudinal career success as clinician educators and academic administrators more so than non-track participants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:超声(US)已成为妇产科(Ob/Gyn)不可或缺的一部分,在住院医师期间需要熟练的培训。尽管其临床重要性,在德国,研究生超声教育的质量和结构存在明显差距。
    方法:于2023年10月至2024年3月对德国的Ob/Gyn居民进行了横断面调查,使用LimeSurvey平台。调查,通过电子邮件分发,社交媒体,和物理传单,吸引了211名参与者,115完成所有部分。问卷涵盖了人口统计细节,美国培训经验,以及美国在临床实践中的重要性。
    结果:尽管美国受到受访者的高度评价,他们平均有26.1%的临床活动投入其中,对培训质量有明显的不满。关键问题包括监管不力,自我训练的必要性,和低参与认证课程。尽管93.0%的美国专业组织,如德国医学超声学会(DEGUM),对结构化培训计划的参与很少。
    结论:该研究强调了在德国Ob/Gyn住院医师中对美国标准化培训方案和课程改革的迫切需要。美国公认的重要性与培训质量之间的差异表明迫切需要改进。通过全面、结构化的教育改革可以大大提高未来Ob/Gyn专家的熟练程度和信心,最终改善患者护理。
    BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) has become integral to obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn), necessitating proficient training during residency. Despite its clinical importance, there is a perceived gap in the quality and structure of postgraduate ultrasound education in Germany.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Ob/Gyn residents in Germany from October 2023 to March 2024, using the LimeSurvey platform. The survey, distributed via email, social media, and physical flyers, garnered 211 participants, with 115 completing all sections. The questionnaire covered demographic details, US training experiences, and the perceived importance of US in clinical practice.
    RESULTS: Although US was highly valued by respondents, with an average of 26.1% of their clinical activity devoted to it, there was significant dissatisfaction with the training quality. Key issues included inadequate supervision, the necessity of self-training, and low participation in certification courses. Despite 93.0% awareness of professional US organizations like the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM), engagement with structured training programs was minimal.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights a critical need for standardized US training protocols and curricular reform in Ob/Gyn residencies in Germany. The discrepancy between the recognized importance of US and the quality of training indicates a pressing need for improvements. Addressing these gaps through comprehensive, structured educational reforms could significantly enhance the proficiency and confidence of future Ob/Gyn specialists, ultimately improving patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究评估了亚洲睡眠医学认证和培训的现状,在亚洲睡眠医学学会(ASSM)的推动下,对29个亚洲国家和地区进行了全面调查,以确定存在的差距并为未来的改进提供建议。
    方法:ASSM教育工作组委员会设计了一项调查,以收集有关认证的数据,教育,和睡眠医学的训练标准,包括有关加强该领域教育的挑战的信息。
    结果:响应率为86%(25个国家/地区),调查显示,睡眠医学仅在9个国家/地区被认为是独立的专业(占接受调查的国家/地区的36%)。十个国家/地区建立了睡眠医学培训计划,日本和沙特阿拉伯提供它作为一个独特的专业。确定了培训和认证标准方面的重大差异,许多国家/地区缺乏正式的培训和实践指南。调查还显示,亚洲大多数地方睡眠协会都支持由ASSM领导的亚洲睡眠医学培训课程的开发。然而,几个障碍严重阻碍了睡眠医学培训计划的建立和发展,包括缺乏训练有素的专家和技术人员,以及缺乏国家睡眠医学认证。
    结论:该调查强调了整个亚洲对标准化睡眠医学培训和认证的需求。制定亚洲睡眠医学培训课程和推广ASSM认证指南是关键建议。实施这些策略对于推动睡眠医学成为整个亚洲广泛认可的学科至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the current state of sleep medicine accreditation and training in Asia by conducting a comprehensive survey across 29 Asian countries and regions facilitated by the Asian Society of Sleep Medicine (ASSM) to identify existing gaps and provide recommendations for future enhancements.
    METHODS: The ASSM Education Task Force Committee designed a survey to gather data on accreditation, education, and training standards in sleep medicine, including information on challenges in enhancing education in the field.
    RESULTS: With an 86% (25 countries/regions) response rate, the survey showed that sleep medicine is recognized as an independent specialty in just nine countries/regions (36% of the countries/regions surveyed). Ten countries/regions have established sleep medicine training programs, with Japan and Saudi Arabia offering it as a distinct specialty. Significant disparities in training and accreditation standards were identified, with many countries/regions lacking formalized training and practice guidelines. The survey also revealed that most local sleep societies across Asia support the development of an Asian Sleep Medicine Training Curriculum led by the ASSM. However, several barriers significantly impede the establishment and development of sleep medicine training programs, including the scarcity of trained specialists and technologists and the absence of national accreditation for sleep medicine.
    CONCLUSIONS: The survey highlights the need for standardized sleep medicine training and accreditation across Asia. Developing an Asian Sleep Medicine Training Curriculum and promoting ASSM accreditation guidelines are key recommendations. Implementing these strategies is essential for advancing sleep medicine as a widely recognized discipline throughout Asia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    第一年的基础科学课程超出了其范围。课程的重振是由二年级和三年级医学生推动的,谁创造了新的学习目标,并编辑了深受课程主持人和学生欢迎的案例。学生在课程振兴中的作用是一种新颖的方法。
    A first-year foundational science course grew beyond its scope. Revitalization of the course was driven by second and third-year medical students, who created new learning objectives and edited cases that were well-received by course facilitators and students. The students\' role in the course revitalization is a novel approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探索医学院最后一年医学生对睡眠教育的看法,以指导睡眠课程的发展。
    方法:邀请6年级医学生在2020年进行最后的全科医学实习,以完成一项在线调查,其中包括在医疗计划期间召回的有关睡眠教育的问题。
    结果:收到来自51/71(72%)学生的答复。参与者回忆的主要学习主题是睡眠呼吸暂停(83%),睡眠生理学(71%),打鼾(69%)。<65%的学生报告了其他主题的教育。学生的优先主题是治疗常见的睡眠障碍,记录睡眠史,和导航轮班工作。
    结论:虽然大多数学生回顾了有关特定主题的教育,许多人对睡眠评估的教育知之甚少,失眠,或轮班工作。鉴于睡眠在健康和发病率的许多领域的相关性,课程中的睡眠教育需要更多的强调和加强。我们建议需要一个可识别的睡眠课程,以确保医学生对患者和他们自己的睡眠和睡眠障碍有必要的核心教育。Further,我们认为,在现有课程的限制下,这可以在短时间内实现,并提出一些创造性的解决方案。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore final-year medical students\' perceptions of sleep education during medical school to inform the development of a sleep curriculum.
    METHODS: Year 6 medical students on their final general practice placement in 2020 were invited to complete an online survey including questions regarding sleep education recalled during the medical programme.
    RESULTS: Responses were received from 51/71 (72 %) students. Main learning topics recalled by participants were sleep apnoea (83 %), sleep physiology (71 %), and snoring (69 %). Education in other topics was reported by <65 % of students. Priority topics for students were treating common sleep disorders, taking a sleep history, and navigating shift work.
    CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the majority of students recalled education on specific topics, many had little awareness of education relating to sleep assessment, insomnia, or shift work. Sleep education in the curriculum needs more emphasis and reinforcement given sleep\'s relevance across many domains of health and morbidity. We propose that an identifiable sleep curriculum is required to ensure medical students have the necessary core education regarding sleep and sleep disorders both for patients and themselves. Further, we believe this is possible to achieve in a short timeframe within the constraints of an existing curriculum and propose some creative solutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号