Community-Acquired Infections

社区获得性感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在西方,与广泛的肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)不同,国家早期预警评分2(NEWS2)通常仅使用床旁变量来预测疾病的严重程度。这项研究的目的是比较这些得分作为社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的死亡率预测因子。这项横断面研究是在Jinnah研究生医学中心进行的,卡拉奇,巴基斯坦,2020年对116例CAP患者进行了6个月的随访。吸入性肺炎病例,医院获得性肺炎,肺结核,肺栓塞,排除肺水肿。院内死亡率作为这项研究的结果。参与者的平均年龄为46.9±20.5岁。住院死亡率为45例(38.8%)。NEWS2在预测结果方面的敏感性为97.8%,但特异性仅为15.5%。而PSI较不敏感(68.9%)但更具体(50.7%),这表明与PSI相比,NEWS2是住院CAP患者中更敏感的死亡率预测评分。
    In the West, National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is commonly applied to predict the severity of illness using only bedside variables unlike the extensive Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). The objective of this study was to compare these scores as mortality predictors in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). This cross-sectional study was conducted in Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan, for six months in 2020 on 116 patients presenting with CAP. Cases of aspiration pneumonia, hospital acquired pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary oedema were excluded. In-hospital mortality was taken as the outcome of this study. The mean age of the participants was 46.9±20.5 years. The in-hospital mortalities were 45(38.8%). NEWS2 was 97.8% sensitive but only 15.5% specific in predicting the outcome, whereas PSI was less sensitive (68.9%) but more specific (50.7%), which showed that in comparison with PSI, NEWS2 is a more sensitive mortality predicting score among hospitalised CAP patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:COVID-19在全球范围内导致了显著的发病率和死亡率。COVID后后遗症可持续超过急性和亚急性感染阶段,通常被称为后COVID综合征(PCS)。关于PCS患者的适当康复的证据有限。这项研究的目的是评估对运动能力的影响,症状,认知,焦虑,抑郁症,健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),和疲劳,4周,对于有持续呼吸道症状的PCS患者,与常规医疗相比,每周两次有监督的肺远程康复计划。
    方法:该研究将是一项多站点随机对照试验(RCT),评估者致盲。确诊之前有COVID-19感染和持续呼吸道症状的参与者,参加COVID后呼吸道诊所,将被1:1随机分为4周的干预组(IG),每周两次的肺部远程康复治疗或常规医疗的对照组(CG)。在第4周评估后,CG的参与者将被邀请跨入IG。主要结果:通过1分钟的坐立测试测量的运动能力。次要结果:5次重复坐姿测试;蒙特利尔认知评估;COVID-19约克郡康复量表;COPD评估测试;36项短期健康调查;医院焦虑和抑郁量表;疲劳严重程度量表;和凯斯勒心理困扰量表。结果将在基线时收集,经过4周的干预或控制期,在交叉组干预后,在12个月的随访中。
    鉴于与PCS相关的大量发病率以及缺乏COVID-19恢复的长期数据,研究有效的康复计划至关重要。短期肺远程康复计划,如果与常规护理相比有效,可以为实践指南提供信息,并指导未来的临床试验,以使患有COVID后持续呼吸道症状的个体受益。
    OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has led to significant morbidity and mortality globally. Post-COVID sequelae can persist beyond the acute and subacute phases of infection, often termed Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS). There is limited evidence on the appropriate rehabilitation for people with PCS. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect on exercise capacity, symptoms, cognition, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and fatigue, of a 4-week, twice-weekly supervised pulmonary telerehabilitation program compared to usual medical care for people with PCS with persistent respiratory symptoms.
    METHODS: The study will be a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) with assessor blinding. Participants with confirmed previous COVID-19 infection and persistent respiratory symptoms who attend a post-COVID respiratory clinic will be randomized 1:1 to either an intervention group (IG) of 4 weeks, twice-weekly pulmonary telerehabilitation or a control group (CG) of usual medical care. Participants in the CG will be invited to cross-over into the IG after the week 4 assessment. Primary outcome: exercise capacity measured by the 1-minute sit-to-stand test. Secondary outcomes: 5 repetition sit-to-stand test; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale; COPD Assessment Test; 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Fatigue Severity Scale; and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Outcomes will be collected at baseline, after 4-weeks intervention or control period, after intervention in the cross-over group, and at 12-month follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: Research into effective rehabilitation programs is crucial given the substantial morbidity associated with PCS and the lack of long-term data for COVID-19 recovery. A short duration pulmonary telerehabilitation program, if effective compared to usual care, could inform practice guidelines and direct future clinical trials for the benefit of individuals with persistent respiratory symptoms post-COVID.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于疑似败血症导致医院广谱抗生素使用的程度知之甚少,回顾过去,抗生素疗程的比例不必要地广泛,以及这些模式是否随着时间的推移而改变。
    描述疑似社区型败血症的经验性广谱抗生素使用趋势。
    这项横断面研究使用了PINCAI医疗保健数据库中241家美国医院收治的成年人的临床数据。符合条件的参与者年龄在18岁或以上,在2017年至2021年期间因怀疑社区发作性败血症而入院。由血液培养物抽取定义,乳酸测量,入院时静脉注射抗生素。
    经验性抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和/或抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺剂的使用。
    经验性抗MRSA和/或抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺药物的使用年率以及根据从医院第4天获得的临床培养物中不存在β-内酰胺抗性革兰氏阳性或头孢曲松抗性革兰氏阴性病原体的情况,回想起来可能不必要的比例。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型计算年度趋势,适应病人和医院的特点。
    在6272538例住院患者中(中位[IQR]年龄,66[53-78]岁;443465名男性[49.6%];106095名黑人[11.9%],65763西班牙裔[7.4%],653907白色[73.1%]),894724(14.3%)疑似社区型败血症,其中582585例(65.1%)接受经验性抗MRSA(379987[42.5%])或抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺治疗(513811[57.4%]);311213例(34.8%)同时接受.疑似社区发作的败血症患者占住院抗MRSA抗生素总天数的1573673,占3141300(50.1%),占5211745的2569518(49.3%)。在2017年至2021年之间,可疑脓毒症患者接受抗MRSA或抗伪粒子治疗的比例从63.0%(131275例患者中的82731例)增加到66.7%(151435例患者中的101003例)(调整后的OR[aOR]每年,1.03;95%CI,1.03-1.04)。然而,只有65434例(7.3%)(30617例革兰阳性[3.4%],38844革兰氏阴性[4.3%]),并且具有任何耐药菌的患者比例从9.6%下降到7.3%(每年的aOR,0.87;95%CI,0.87-0.88)。大多数接受经验性抗MRSA和/或抗假单胞菌治疗的疑似脓毒症患者没有耐药菌(582585例患者中的527356例[90.5%]);这一比例从2017年的88.0%增加到2021年的91.6%(每年aOR,1.12;95%CI,1.11-1.13)。
    在这项针对美国241家医院收治的成年人的横断面研究中,对于疑似社区发作的脓毒症,经验性广谱抗生素的使用占所有抗MRSA或抗假单胞菌治疗的一半;尽管在接受广谱药物治疗的患者中,只有不到10%分离出耐药菌,但在2017年至2021年间,这些类型抗生素的使用有所增加.
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known about the degree to which suspected sepsis drives broad-spectrum antibiotic use in hospitals, what proportion of antibiotic courses are unnecessarily broad in retrospect, and whether these patterns are changing over time.
    UNASSIGNED: To describe trends in empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic use for suspected community-onset sepsis.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study used clinical data from adults admitted to 241 US hospitals in the PINC AI Healthcare Database. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or more and were admitted between 2017 and 2021 with suspected community-onset sepsis, defined by a blood culture draw, lactate measurement, and intravenous antibiotic administration on admission.
    UNASSIGNED: Empiric anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and/or antipseudomonal β-lactam agent use.
    UNASSIGNED: Annual rates of empiric anti-MRSA and/or antipseudomonal β-lactam agent use and the proportion that were likely unnecessary in retrospect based on the absence of β-lactam resistant gram-positive or ceftriaxone-resistant gram-negative pathogens from clinical cultures obtained through hospital day 4. Annual trends were calculated using mixed-effects logistic regression models, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 6 272 538 hospitalizations (median [IQR] age, 66 [53-78] years; 443 465 male [49.6%]; 106 095 Black [11.9%], 65 763 Hispanic [7.4%], 653 907 White [73.1%]), 894 724 (14.3%) had suspected community-onset sepsis, of whom 582 585 (65.1%) received either empiric anti-MRSA (379 987 [42.5%]) or antipseudomonal β-lactam therapy (513 811 [57.4%]); 311 213 (34.8%) received both. Patients with suspected community-onset sepsis accounted for 1 573 673 of 3 141 300 (50.1%) of total inpatient anti-MRSA antibiotic days and 2 569 518 of 5 211 745 (49.3%) of total antipseudomonal β-lactam days. Between 2017 and 2021, the proportion of patients with suspected sepsis administered anti-MRSA or antipseudomonal therapy increased from 63.0% (82 731 of 131 275 patients) to 66.7% (101 003 of 151 435 patients) (adjusted OR [aOR] per year, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03-1.04). However, resistant organisms were isolated in only 65 434 cases (7.3%) (30 617 gram-positive [3.4%], 38 844 gram-negative [4.3%]) and the proportion of patients who had any resistant organism decreased from 9.6% to 7.3% (aOR per year, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.87-0.88). Most patients with suspected sepsis treated with empiric anti-MRSA and/or antipseudomonal therapy had no resistant organisms (527 356 of 582 585 patients [90.5%]); this proportion increased from 88.0% in 2017 to 91.6% in 2021 (aOR per year, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.11-1.13).
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study of adults admitted to 241 US hospitals, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic use for suspected community-onset sepsis accounted for half of all anti-MRSA or antipseudomonal therapy; the use of these types of antibiotics increased between 2017 and 2021 despite resistant organisms being isolated in less than 10% of patients treated with broad-spectrum agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)的出现可能为早期和全面识别社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的病原体提供了有希望的工具。在这项研究中,我们旨在进一步评估mNGS在疑似CAP中的病因诊断价值.
    方法:从541例疑似CAP患者中收集555份支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)样本,用于mNGS病原体检测。根据感染诊断和治疗指导评估临床价值。比较了mNGS和痰培养对病原体鉴定的诊断性能以及mNGS和X-pertMTB/RIF对结核病(TB)的诊断性能。为了评估治疗指导的潜力,我们分析了疑似CAP患者的治疗方案,包括经验性抗菌治疗后肺部影像学改变,强化治疗方案,抗真菌治疗,对诊断未确诊且在抗感染治疗后影像学检查未改善的患者以及高度怀疑TB或NTM感染的患者转至武汉肺科医院进行进一步诊断甚至抗分枝杆菌治疗的患者进行1年随访。
    结果:在通过mNGS和痰培养分析的516个BALF样本中,mNGS阳性率明显高于痰培养(79.1%vs.11.4%,P=0.001)。通过mNGS和X-pertMTB/RIF分析了来自确诊结核病患者的48个样本,mNGS诊断活动性TB的敏感性明显低于X-pertMTB/RIF(64.6%vs.85.4%,P=0.031)。在106例病原体阴性病例中,48人最终被认为是非传染性疾病,阴性预测值为45.3%。在381例病原体阳性病例中,311最终被诊断为CAP,阳性预测值为81.6%。共纳入487例患者的治疗效果评价,和67.1%的改善与最初的经验性抗生素治疗。在检测到细菌的163名患者中,77.9%通过抗菌治疗得到改善;在检测到真菌的85例患者中,12.9%抗真菌治疗后缓解。
    结论:总体而言,mNGS在可疑CAP病原体的检测中具有独特的优势。然而,mNGS在诊断TB方面并不优于X-pertMTB/RIF。此外,对于所有疑似CAP患者,不需要将mNGS作为常规检查。此外,当真菌被MNGS检测到时,抗真菌治疗应谨慎。
    BACKGROUND: The emergence of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) may provide a promising tool for early and comprehensive identification of the causative pathogen in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In this study, we aim to further evaluate the etiological diagnostic value of mNGS in suspected CAP.
    METHODS: A total of 555 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected for pathogen detection by mNGS from 541 patients with suspected CAP. The clinical value was assessed based on infection diagnosis and treatment guidance. The diagnostic performance for pathogen identification by mNGS and sputum culture and for tuberculosis (TB) by mNGS and X-pert MTB/RIF were compared. To evaluate the potential for treatment guidance, we analyzed the treatment regimen of patients with suspected CAP, including imaging changes of lung after empirical antibacterial therapy, intensified regimen, antifungal treatment, and a 1-year follow up for patients with unconfirmed diagnosis and non-improvement imaging after anti-infective treatment and patients with high suspicion of TB or NTM infection who were transferred to the Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital for further diagnosis and even anti-mycobacterium therapy.
    RESULTS: Of the 516 BALF samples that were analyzed by both mNGS and sputum culture, the positivity rate of mNGS was significantly higher than that of sputum culture (79.1% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.001). A total of 48 samples from patients with confirmed TB were analyzed by both mNGS and X-pert MTB/RIF, and the sensitivity of mNGS for the diagnosis of active TB was significantly lower than that of X-pert MTB/RIF (64.6% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.031). Of the 106 pathogen-negative cases, 48 were ultimately considered non-infectious diseases, with a negative predictive value of 45.3%. Of the 381 pathogen-positive cases, 311 were eventually diagnosed as CAP, with a positive predictive value of 81.6%. A total of 487 patients were included in the evaluation of the therapeutic effect, and 67.1% improved with initial empirical antibiotic treatment. Of the 163 patients in which bacteria were detected, 77.9% improved with antibacterial therapy; of the 85 patients in which fungi were detected, 12.9% achieved remission after antifungal therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, mNGS had unique advantages in the detection of suspected CAP pathogens. However, mNGS was not superior to X-pert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of TB. In addition, mNGS was not necessary as a routine test for all patients admitted with suspected CAP. Furthermore, when fungi are detected by mNGS, antifungal therapy should be cautious.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:坏死性筋膜炎(NF)是一种罕见但可能危及生命的软组织感染。这项研究的目的是评估在6小时内及时手术和住院死亡率之间的关系,并描述NF患者的趋势,手术时间和标准化死亡率(SMR)超过11年。
    方法:这是一个多中心,2008年4月1日至2019年3月31日在香港对所有因肢体NF在住院后24小时内接受急诊手术的重症监护病房患者进行回顾性队列研究.及时手术被定义为首次住院6小时内的首次手术治疗。如果在培养结果之前或当天给予患者针对所有记录的病原体的抗生素,则获得适当的抗生素。主要结果是医院死亡率。
    结果:有495名患者(中位年龄62岁,349(70.5%)男性)在11年内住院24小时内接受手术治疗的肢体NF。392例(79.2%)患者使用了适当的抗生素。有181人(36.5%)死亡。及时手术与住院死亡率无关(相对危险度0.89,95%CI:0.73-1.07),高龄,疾病的严重程度更高,合并症,肾脏替代疗法,血管加压药的使用,和手术类型是多变量模型中的重要预测因素。NF诊断呈上升趋势(1.9例/年,95%CI:0.7至3.1;P<0.01;R2=0.60),但中位手术时间没有下降趋势(-0.2h/年,95%CI:-0.4至0.1;P=0.16)或SMR(-0.02/年,95%CI:-0.06至0.01;P=0.22;R2=0.16)。
    结论:在24小时内手术的患者中,在6-12小时内进行非常早期的手术与生存率无关.每年报告的肢体NF病例有所增加,但尽管适当使用抗生素和及时进行手术干预的比率很高,但死亡率仍然很高。
    BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but potentially life-threatening soft tissue infection. The objective of this study was to assess the association between timely surgery within 6 h and hospital mortality in patients with limb NF, and to describe the trends in patients with NF, time to surgery and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) over 11 years.
    METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of all intensive care unit patients who had emergency surgery within 24 h of hospitalization for limb NF between April 1, 2008 and March 31, 2019 in Hong Kong. Timely surgery was defined as the first surgical treatment within 6 h of initial hospitalization. Appropriate antibiotics were achieved if the patient was given antibiotic(s) for all documented pathogens prior to or on day of culture results. The primary outcome was hospital mortality.
    RESULTS: There were 495 patients (median age 62 years, 349 (70.5%) males) with limb NF treated by surgery within 24 h of hospitalization over the 11 years. Appropriate antibiotic(s) were used in 392 (79.2%) patients. There were 181 (36.5%) deaths. Timely surgery was not associated with hospital mortality (Relative Risk 0.89, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.07) but admission year, advanced age, higher severity of illness, comorbidities, renal replacement therapy, vasopressor use, and type of surgery were significant predictors in the multivariable model. There was an upward trend in NF diagnosis (1.9 cases/year, 95% CI: 0.7 to 3.1; P < 0.01; R2 = 0.60) but there was no downward trend in median time to surgery (-0.2 h/year, 95% CI: -0.4 to 0.1; P = 0.16) or SMR (-0.02/year, 95% CI: -0.06 to 0.01; P = 0.22; R2 = 0.16).
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients operated within 24 h, very early surgery within 6-12 h was not associated with survival. Increasing limb NF cases were reported each year but mortality remained high despite a high rate of appropriate antibiotic use and timely surgical intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19的临床过程变化很大,继发感染导致COVID-19的复杂性。继发感染的早期检测在临床上与患者预后相关。降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)是最常用的感染生物标志物。Pentraxin3(PTX3)是一种急性期蛋白,具有作为感染早期生物标志物的良好性能。在COVID-19患者中,入院时的PTX3血浆浓度是预后不良的独立预测因素。在这项研究中,我们评估了PTX3是否有助于COVID-19过程中共同感染的早期识别。
    方法:我们分析了患有(n=101)或不患有(n=179)社区或医院获得性真菌或细菌继发感染(CAI或HAI)的COVID-19患者的PTX3水平。
    结果:诊断为CAI或HAI时的PTX3血浆浓度明显高于无继发感染的患者。与PCT和CRP相比,PTX3血浆水平的升高与CAI和HAI的最高风险比相关(aHR11.68和24.90).在多变量Cox回归分析中,PTX3也是潜在合并感染患者28天死亡率或重症监护病房住院的最重要预测因素。比CRP和PCT更明显。
    结论:PTX3是一种有前景的预测生物标志物,可用于COVID-19和合并感染患者的早期识别和风险分层。
    背景:Dolce&Gabbana时装屋捐赠;为COVID-19致敬部长;欧盟在MURPNRR关于新兴传染病的扩展伙伴关系倡议中提供的资金(项目编号:PE00000007,INF-ACT)和MURPNRR意大利卓越网络,用于高级诊断(项目编号PNC-E3-2022-23683266PNC-HLS-DA);欧盟MSCA(项目CORVOS860044)。
    BACKGROUND: COVID-19 clinical course is highly variable and secondary infections contribute to COVID-19 complexity. Early detection of secondary infections is clinically relevant for patient outcome. Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are the most used biomarkers of infections. Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is an acute phase protein with promising performance as early biomarker in infections. In patients with COVID-19, PTX3 plasma concentrations at hospital admission are independent predictor of poor outcome. In this study, we assessed whether PTX3 contributes to early identification of co-infections during the course of COVID-19.
    METHODS: We analyzed PTX3 levels in patients affected by COVID-19 with (n = 101) or without (n = 179) community or hospital-acquired fungal or bacterial secondary infections (CAIs or HAIs).
    RESULTS: PTX3 plasma concentrations at diagnosis of CAI or HAI were significantly higher than those in patients without secondary infections. Compared to PCT and CRP, the increase of PTX3 plasma levels was associated with the highest hazard ratio for CAIs and HAIs (aHR 11.68 and 24.90). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, PTX3 was also the most significant predictor of 28-days mortality or intensive care unit admission of patients with potential co-infections, faring more pronounced than CRP and PCT.
    CONCLUSIONS: PTX3 is a promising predictive biomarker for early identification and risk stratification of patients with COVID-19 and co-infections.
    BACKGROUND: Dolce & Gabbana fashion house donation; Ministero della Salute for COVID-19; EU funding within the MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT) and MUR PNRR Italian network of excellence for advanced diagnosis (Project no. PNC-E3-2022-23683266 PNC-HLS-DA); EU MSCA (project CORVOS 860044).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脓毒症是导致死亡和严重疾病的主要原因,需要早期识别和治疗管理以提高生存率。快速SOFA分数有助于其识别,但其诊断性能不足。制定一个分数,可以快速识别社区获得性败血症情况,有临床并发症风险的患者咨询急诊科(ED)。
    方法:我们进行了单中心,2016年3月至2018年8月在大学医院急诊科进行的前瞻性队列研究(NCT03280992)。包括所有因怀疑社区获得性感染而进入急诊科的患者。使用后向逐步多变量逻辑回归选择前90天内感染性休克或死亡进展的预测变量,以制定临床评分。构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以确定曲线下面积(AUC)的辨别能力。我们还确定了我们的评分阈值,该阈值优化了败血症恶化评分所需的性能。我们已经将我们的分数与NEWS-2和qSOFA分数进行了比较。
    结果:在收治的21,826名患者中,796名患者被怀疑患有社区获得性感染,461名患者符合脓毒症标准;因此,这些患者被纳入分析.年龄中位数为72[54-84]岁,248(54%)是男性,244人(53%)有呼吸道症状。临床评分范围从0到90,包括8个变量,ROC曲线下面积为0.85(置信区间[CI]95%0.81-0.89)。截止值26的灵敏度为88%(CI95%0.79-0.93),特异性为62%(CI95%57-67),阴性预测值为95%(CI95%91-97)。我们评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.85(95%CI,0.81-0.89),qSOFA为0.73(95%CI,0.68-0.78),NEWS-2为0.66(95%CI,0.60-0.72)。
    结论:我们的研究提供了一个准确的临床评分,用于识别早期有恶化风险的脓毒症患者。这个分数可以在入学时实施。
    BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a leading cause of death and serious illness that requires early recognition and therapeutic management to improve survival. The quick-SOFA score helps in its recognition, but its diagnostic performance is insufficient. To develop a score that can rapidly identify a community acquired septic situation at risk of clinical complications in patients consulting the emergency department (ED).
    METHODS: We conducted a monocentric, prospective cohort study in the emergency department of a university hospital between March 2016 and August 2018 (NCT03280992). All patients admitted to the emergency department for a suspicion of a community-acquired infection were included. Predictor variables of progression to septic shock or death within the first 90 days were selected using backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression to develop a clinical score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the discriminating power of the area under the curve (AUC). We also determined the threshold of our score that optimized the performance required for a sepsis-worsening score. We have compared our score with the NEWS-2 and qSOFA scores.
    RESULTS: Among the 21,826 patients admitted to the ED, 796 patients were suspected of having community-acquired infection and 461 met the sepsis criteria; therefore, these patients were included in the analysis. The median [interquartile range] age was 72 [54-84] years, 248 (54%) were males, and 244 (53%) had respiratory symptoms. The clinical score ranged from 0 to 90 and included 8 variables with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (confidence interval [CI] 95% 0.81-0.89). A cut-off of 26 yields a sensitivity of 88% (CI 95% 0.79-0.93), a specificity of 62% (CI 95% 57-67), and a negative predictive value of 95% (CI 95% 91-97). The area under the ROC curve for our score was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.89) versus 0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.78) for qSOFA and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.60-0.72) for NEWS-2.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides an accurate clinical score for identifying septic patients consulting the ED early at risk of worsening disease. This score could be implemented at admission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:迄今为止,尚无针对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)和结缔组织病(CTD)患者的重症监护病房(ICU)入院的个性化预测模型。在这项研究中,我们旨在建立一个基于机器学习的模型来预测这些患者是否需要入住ICU.
    方法:这是一项对2008年11月至2021年11月间入住中国某大学医院的患者的回顾性研究。如果患者在入院和住院期间被诊断为CAP和CTD,则将其包括在内。与人口统计相关的数据,CTD类型,合并症,收集住院前24小时的生命体征和实验室检查结果。通过三种方法筛选基线变量以识别潜在的预测因子,包括单变量分析,最小绝对收缩和选择算子(Lasso)回归和Boruta算法。使用9种监督机器学习算法来构建预测模型。我们评估了差异化的表现,校准,和所有模型的临床实用性来确定最优模型。进行了Shapley加法解释(SHAP)和局部可解释模型不可知解释(LIME)技术来解释最佳模型。
    结果:将纳入的患者以70:30的比例随机分为训练组(1070名患者)和测试组(459名患者)。三种特征选择方法的交叉结果产生了16个预测因子。极限梯度增强(XGBoost)模型在各种模型中实现了接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的最高面积(0.941)和精度(0.913)。校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)均表明XGBoost模型优于其他模型。SHAP摘要图说明了最重要的前6个特征,包括较高的N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)和C反应蛋白(CRP),较低水平的CD4+T细胞,淋巴细胞和血清钠,血清(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖试验(G试验)阳性。
    结论:我们成功开发,评估并解释了基于机器学习的CAP和CTD患者ICU入院预测模型。经外部验证和改进后,XGBoost模型可用于临床参考。
    BACKGROUND: There is no individualized prediction model for intensive care unit (ICU) admission on patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and connective tissue disease (CTD) so far. In this study, we aimed to establish a machine learning-based model for predicting the need for ICU admission among those patients.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study on patients admitted into a University Hospital in China between November 2008 and November 2021. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with CAP and CTD during admission and hospitalization. Data related to demographics, CTD types, comorbidities, vital signs and laboratory results during the first 24 h of hospitalization were collected. The baseline variables were screened to identify potential predictors via three methods, including univariate analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression and Boruta algorithm. Nine supervised machine learning algorithms were used to build prediction models. We evaluated the performances of differentiation, calibration, and clinical utility of all models to determine the optimal model. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) techniques were performed to interpret the optimal model.
    RESULTS: The included patients were randomly divided into the training set (1070 patients) and the testing set (459 patients) at a ratio of 70:30. The intersection results of three feature selection approaches yielded 16 predictors. The eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.941) and accuracy (0.913) among various models. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) both suggested that the XGBoost model outperformed other models. The SHAP summary plots illustrated the top 6 features with the greatest importance, including higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP), lower level of CD4 + T cell, lymphocyte and serum sodium, and positive serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan test (G test).
    CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed, evaluated and explained a machine learning-based model for predicting ICU admission in patients with CAP and CTD. The XGBoost model could be clinical referenced after external validation and improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有许多用于评估死亡风险的预后预测模型,但目前的评分模型可能无法完全满足脓毒症患者的需求。这项研究开发并验证了一种适用于任何护理环境的脓毒症患者的新模型,并准确预测了28天的死亡率。派生数据集,2019年9月至2021年12月从20家医院收集,与验证数据集形成对比,从2022年1月至2022年12月从15家医院收集。在这项研究中,7436名患者被归类为派生数据集的成员,和2284名患者被分类为验证数据集的成员。点系统模型是预测脓毒症死亡率的测试预测模型中的最佳模型。对于社区获得性败血症,模型性能令人满意(推导数据集AUC:0.779,95%CI0.765-0.792;验证数据集AUC:0.787,95%CI0.765-0.810).同样,医院获得性败血症,它表现良好(推导数据集AUC:0.768,95%CI0.748-0.788;验证数据集AUC:0.729,95%CI0.687-0.770).计算器,可访问https://avonlea76。shinyapps.io/shiny_app_up/,是用户友好和兼容。脓毒症死亡率的新预测模型是用户友好的,并且可以令人满意地预测28天的死亡率。它的多功能性在于它适用于所有患者,包括社区获得性和医院获得性败血症。
    There are numerous prognostic predictive models for evaluating mortality risk, but current scoring models might not fully cater to sepsis patients\' needs. This study developed and validated a new model for sepsis patients that is suitable for any care setting and accurately forecasts 28-day mortality. The derivation dataset, gathered from 20 hospitals between September 2019 and December 2021, contrasted with the validation dataset, collected from 15 hospitals from January 2022 to December 2022. In this study, 7436 patients were classified as members of the derivation dataset, and 2284 patients were classified as members of the validation dataset. The point system model emerged as the optimal model among the tested predictive models for foreseeing sepsis mortality. For community-acquired sepsis, the model\'s performance was satisfactory (derivation dataset AUC: 0.779, 95% CI 0.765-0.792; validation dataset AUC: 0.787, 95% CI 0.765-0.810). Similarly, for hospital-acquired sepsis, it performed well (derivation dataset AUC: 0.768, 95% CI 0.748-0.788; validation dataset AUC: 0.729, 95% CI 0.687-0.770). The calculator, accessible at https://avonlea76.shinyapps.io/shiny_app_up/ , is user-friendly and compatible. The new predictive model of sepsis mortality is user-friendly and satisfactorily forecasts 28-day mortality. Its versatility lies in its applicability to all patients, encompassing both community-acquired and hospital-acquired sepsis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与没有COPD的患者相比,患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的疾病严重程度和死亡率更高。然而,对有或无COPD的CAP患者下呼吸道微生物组分布的深入研究尚不清楚.
    方法:因此,我们使用宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)来探索两组之间的微生物组差异。
    结果:共检索到36例无COPDCAP和11例COPDCAP病例。收集支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)并使用非靶向mNGS和生物信息学分析进行分析。mNGS显示CAP合并COPD组富含链球菌,普雷沃氏菌,属水平的博德特氏菌和痤疮杆菌,粘胶红花,基因博德特氏菌。6在物种水平。虽然无COPD的CAP组有丰富的Ralstonia,普雷沃氏菌,属水平的链球菌和皮克蒂拉尔斯托,粘胶红花,物种水平的黑色素prevotella。同时,两组之间的α和β微生物组多样性相似.线性判别分析发现,pa-raburkholderia,在无COPD的CAP组中,结核杆菌和人葡萄球菌的含量更高,而中间链球菌的含量更高,星座链球菌,milleri链球菌,CAP合并COPD组镰刀菌较高。
    结论:这些研究结果表明,合并COPD对CAP患者的下气道微生物组有轻微影响。
    BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have higher disease severity and mortality compared to those without COPD. However, deep investigation into microbiome distribution of lower respiratory tract of CAP with or without COPD was unknown.
    METHODS: So we used metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) to explore the microbiome differences between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Thirty-six CAP without COPD and 11 CAP with COPD cases were retrieved. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected and analyzed using untargeted mNGS and bioinformatic analysis. mNGS revealed that CAP with COPD group was abundant with Streptococcus, Prevotella, Bordetella at genus level and Cutibacterium acnes, Rothia mucilaginosa, Bordetella genomosp. 6 at species level. While CAP without COPD group was abundant with Ralstonia, Prevotella, Streptococcus at genus level and Ralstonia pickettii, Rothia mucilaginosa, Prevotella melaninogenica at species level. Meanwhile, both alpha and beta microbiome diversity was similar between groups. Linear discriminant analysis found that pa-raburkholderia, corynebacterium tuberculostearicum and staphylococcus hominis were more enriched in CAP without COPD group while the abundance of streptococcus intermedius, streptococcus constellatus, streptococcus milleri, fusarium was higher in CAP with COPD group.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings revealed that concomitant COPD have an mild impact on lower airway microbiome of CAP patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号