Community-acquired pneumonia continues to be one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality due to infectious disease. The aetiologies, clinical presentations, diagnostic modalities and therapeutic options are changing and outpacing the creation of management guidelines. This educational article summarizes a roundtable activity sponsored by an unrestricted educational grant by Paratek that included US experts discussing these changes and identifying gaps in the current guidelines.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains one of the leading causes of admission to the intensive care unit, thus consuming a large share of resources and is associated with high mortality rates worldwide. The evidence generated by clinical studies in the last decade was translated into recommendations according to the first published guidelines focusing on severe community-acquired pneumonia. Despite the advances proposed by the present guidelines, several challenges preclude the prompt implementation of these diagnostic and therapeutic measures. The present article discusses the challenges for the broad implementation of the sCAP guidelines and proposes solutions when applicable.

In 2023, the new European guidelines on severe community-acquired pneumonia, providing clinical practice recommendations for the management of this life-threatening infection, characterized by a high burden of mortality, morbidity, and costs for the society. This review article aims to summarize the principal evidence related to eight different questions covered in the guidelines, by also highlighting the future perspectives for research activity.

Compliance with guidelines in the empirical treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is very important to increase treatment success and reduce mortality. This study aimed to determine compliance with guideline recommendations for CAP and define the role of the clinical pharmacist (CP). Patients diagnosed with CAP were evaluated retrospectively between January 2018 and January 2020 and prospectively between February 2020 and February 2021. Compliance with guidelines was evaluated according to the local, national (Turkish Thoracic Society), and international (American Thoracic Society and Infectious Disease Society of America, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) guidelines. A total of 751 patients (423 in the retrospective and 328 in the prospective period) were included. It was determined that the 30-day mortality and length of stay were higher in patients who were not treated according to the guidelines. The compliance for empirical treatments was 16.3%-59.1% and 7.8%-30.1% in retrospective and prospective periods, respectively. During the prospective period, a total of 603 recommendations were made by CP, and 578 (95.9%) were accepted and implemented. In the prospective period, treatment duration was shortened, inappropriate fluoroquinolone use was decreased, the switch to oral treatment was increased, and the number of potential drug-drug interactions was decreased (p < 0.001). Compliance with guidelines is essential to be improved to reduce mortality, shorten the length of stay, determine the appropriate antimicrobial duration, and reduce the use of fluoroquinolones and broad-spectrum antibiotics unless necessary. CP intervention contributes to the rational selection of antimicrobials, limiting drug-drug interactions, avoiding toxicities, and compliance with guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an algorithm to reduce the chart review burden of improvement efforts by automatically labeling antibiotic selection as either guideline-concordant or -discordant based on electronic health record data for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
METHODS: We developed a 3-part algorithm using structured and unstructured data to assess adherence to an institutional CAP clinical practice guideline. The algorithm was applied to retrospective data for patients seen with CAP from 2017 to 2019 at a tertiary children\'s hospital. Performance metrics included positive predictive value (precision), sensitivity (recall), and F1 score (harmonized mean), with macro-weighted averages. Two physician reviewers independently assigned \"actual\" labels based on manual chart review.
RESULTS: Of 1345 patients with CAP, 893 were included in the training cohort and 452 in the validation cohort. Overall, the model correctly labeled 435 of 452 (96%) patients. Of the 286 patients who met guideline inclusion criteria, 193 (68%) were labeled as having received guideline-concordant antibiotics, 48 (17%) were labeled as likely in a scenario in which deviation from the clinical practice guideline was appropriate, and 45 (16%) were given the final label of \"possibly discordant, needs review.\" The sensitivity was 0.96, the positive predictive value was 0.97, and the F1 was 0.96.
CONCLUSIONS: An automated algorithm that uses structured and unstructured electronic health record data can accurately assess the guideline concordance of antibiotic selection for CAP. This tool has the potential to improve the efficiency of improvement efforts by reducing the manual chart review needed for quality measurement.

BACKGROUND: It is well documented that inappropriate use of antimicrobials is the major driver of antimicrobial resistance. To combat this, antibiotic stewardship has been demonstrated to reduce antibiotic usage, decrease the prevalence of resistance, lead to significant economic gains and better patients\' outcomes. In Nigeria, antimicrobial guidelines for critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs), with infections are scarce. We set out to develop antimicrobial guidelines for this category of patients.
METHODS: A committee of 12 experts, consisting of Clinical Microbiologists, Intensivists, Infectious Disease Physicians, Surgeons, and Anesthesiologists, collaborated to develop guidelines for managing infections in critically ill patients in Nigerian ICUs. The guidelines were based on evidence from published data and local prospective antibiograms from three ICUs in Lagos, Nigeria. The committee considered the availability of appropriate antimicrobial drugs in hospital formularies. Proposed recommendations were approved by consensus agreement among committee members.
RESULTS: Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common microorganisms isolated from the 3 ICUs, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Escherichia coli. Targeted therapy is recognized as the best approach in patient management. Based on various antibiograms and publications from different hospitals across the country, amikacin is recommended as the most effective empiric antibiotic against Enterobacterales and A. baumannii, while colistin and polymixin B showed high efficacy against all bacteria. Amoxicillin-clavulanate or ceftriaxone was recommended as the first-choice drug for community-acquired (CA) CA-pneumonia while piperacillin-tazobactam + amikacin was recommended as first choice for the treatment of healthcare-associated (HA) HA-pneumonia. For ventilatorassociated pneumonia (VAP), the consensus for the drug of first choice was agreed as meropenem. Amoxycillin-clavulanate +clindamycin was the consensus choice for CAskin and soft tissue infection (SSIS) and piperacillin-tazobactam + metronidazole ±vancomycin for HA-SSIS. Ceftriaxone-tazobactam or piperacillin-tazobactam + gentamicin was consensus for CA-blood stream infections (BSI) with first choice+regimen for HA-BSI being meropenem/piperacillin-tazobactam +amikacin +fluconazole. For community-acquired urinary tract infection (UTI), first choice antibiotic was ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone with a catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) regimen of first choice being meropenem + fluconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Data from a multicenter three ICU surveillance and antibiograms and publications from different hospitals in the country was used to produce this evidence-based Nigerian-specific antimicrobial treatment guidelines of critically ill patients in ICUs by a group of experts from different specialties in Nigeria. The implementation of this guideline will facilitate learning, continuous improvement of stewardship activities and provide a baseline for updating of guidelines to reflect evolving antibiotic needs.
BACKGROUND: Il est bien établi que l’utilisation inappropriée des antimicrobiens est le principal moteur de la résistance aux antimicrobiens. Pour lutter contre ce phénomène, il a été démontré que la bonne gestion des antibiotiques permettait de réduire l’utilisation des antibiotiques, de diminuer la prévalence de la résistance, de réaliser des gains économiques significatifs et d’améliorer les résultats pour les patients. Au Nigéria, les directives antimicrobiennes pour les patients gravement malades dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI), souffrant d’infections, sont rares. Nous avons entrepris d’élaborer des lignes directrices sur les antimicrobiens pour cette catégorie de patients.
UNASSIGNED: Un comité de 12 experts, composé de microbiologistes cliniques, d’intensivistes, de médecins spécialistes des maladies infectieuses, de chirurgiens et d’anesthésistes, a collaboré à l’élaboration de lignes directrices pour la prise en charge des infections chez les patients gravement malades dans les unités de soins intensifs nigérianes. Les lignes directrices sont basées sur des données publiées et des antibiogrammes prospectifs locaux provenant de trois unités de soins intensifs de Lagos, au Nigeria. Le comité a pris en compte la disponibilité des médicaments antimicrobiens appropriés dans les formulaires des hôpitaux. Les recommandations proposées ont été approuvées par consensus entre les membres du comité.
UNASSIGNED: Candida albicans et Pseudomonas aeruginosa étaient les microorganismes les plus fréquemment isolés dans les trois unités de soins intensifs, suivis par Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii et Escherichia coli. La thérapie ciblée est reconnue comme la meilleure approche pour la prise en charge des patients. Sur la base de divers antibiogrammes et publications provenant de différents hôpitaux du pays, l\'amikacine est recommandée comme l\'antibiotique empirique le plus efficace contre les entérobactéries et A. baumannii, tandis que la colistine et la polymixine B se sont révélées très efficaces contre toutes les bactéries. L\'amoxicilline-clavulanate ou la ceftriaxone ont été recommandées comme médicaments de premier choix pour les pneumonies communautaires, tandis que la pipéracilline-tazobactam + amikacine ont été recommandées comme médicaments de premier choix pour le traitement des pneumonies associées aux soins. Pour les pneumonies acquises sous ventilation mécanique (PAV), le consensus sur le médicament de premier choix est le méropénem. L\'amoxycilline-clavulanate +clindamycine était le choix consensuel pour les infections de la peau et des tissus mous et la pipéracilline-tazobactam + métronidazole ±vancomycine pour les infections de la peau et des tissus mous. HA-SSIS. Ceftriaxone-tazobactam ou pipéracilline-tazobactam + gentamicine a fait l\'objet d\'un consensus pour les infections de la circulation sanguine de l\'AC (BSI), le premier choix de régime pour les HA-BSI étant le méropénem/pipéracilline-tazobactam +amikacine +fluconazole. Pour les infections urinaires communautaires, l\'antibiotique de premier choix était la ciprofloxacine ou la ceftriaxone, le régime de premier choix pour les infections urinaires associées à un cathéter étant le meropenem +fluconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Les données issues d’une surveillance multicentrique de trois unités de soins intensifs, d’antibiogrammes et de publications de différents hôpitaux du pays ont été utilisées par un groupe d’experts de différentes spécialités nigérianes pour élaborer ces lignes directrices sur le traitement antimicrobien des patients gravement malades dans les unités de soins intensifs, fondées sur des données probantes et spécifiques au Nigeria. La mise en œuvre de ces lignes directrices facilitera l’apprentissage, l’amélioration continue des activités de gestion et fournira une base de référence pour la mise à jour des lignes directrices afin de refléter l’évolution des besoins en antibiotiques.
UNASSIGNED: Antimicrobiens, Résistance aux antimicrobiens, Gestion des antibiotiques, Lignes directrices, Soins intensifs, Unité de soins intensifs, Infections associées aux soins de santé.

暂无摘要。

This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic prescriptions for children with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in public and private primary care clinics and in a hospital\'s pediatric emergency department (PED) in 2012-2013 (pre-guideline) and in 2014-2015 (post-guideline). Special attention was paid to guideline compliance, especially regarding macrolide prescriptions, which the guidelines discourage. Retrospective data of 1431 children with LRTI in November-December 2012-2015 were collected from electronic registers and checked manually. Three diagnostic groups were analyzed: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), wheezing bronchitis, and non-wheezing bronchitis. A comparison of the pre- and post-guideline periods revealed antibiotic prescription rates of 48.7% and 48.9% (p = 0.955) for all LRTIs, respectively, and 77.6% and 71.0% (p = 0.053) for non-wheezing bronchitis. The prescription rates for all LRTIs were 24.9% in PED and 45.9% in public (p < 0.001 vs. PED) and 75.4% in private clinics (p < 0.001 vs. PED and p < 0.001 vs. public clinics). During post-guideline periods, antibiotics were prescribed for CAP less often in private (56.3%) than in public clinics (84.6%; p = 0.037) or in PED (94.3%; p < 0.001 vs. private and p = 0.091 vs. public primary clinics). Macrolide prescriptions were highest in private clinics (42.8%), followed by public primary care clinics (28.5%; p < 0.05) and PED (0.8%; p < 0.05 vs. both public and private primary care). Amoxicillin was the predominant antibiotic in public primary care and PED and macrolides in private primary care.
CONCLUSIONS:  Antibiotic prescribing for children with LRTI differed significantly between healthcare providers. CAP was undertreated and bronchitis overtreated with antibiotics in primary care, especially in the private clinics.
BACKGROUND: • Clinical Treatment Guidelines tend to have modest effect on physicians\' antibiotic prescribing habits. • Pediatric viral LRTIs are widely treated with unnecessary antibiotics.
BACKGROUND: • Remarkable differences in antibiotic prescriptions in pediatric LRTIs between Finnish private and public providers were observed. • Overuse of macrolides was common especially in private clinics.

Incomplete uptake of guidelines can lead to nonstandardized care, increased expenditures, and adverse clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the 2011 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America (PIDS/IDSA) pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guideline that emphasized aminopenicillin use and de-emphasized the use of chest radiographs (CXRs) in certain populations.
This quasi-experimental study queried a national administrative database of children\'s hospitals to identify children aged 3 months-18 years with CAP who visited 1 of 28 participating hospitals from 2009 to 2021. PIDS/IDSA pediatric CAP guideline recommendations regarding antibiotic therapy, diagnostic testing, and imaging were evaluated. Segmented regression interrupted time series was used to measure guideline-concordant practices with interruptions for guideline publication and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Of 315 384 children with CAP, 71 804 (22.8%) were hospitalized. Among hospitalized children, there was a decrease in blood culture performance (0.5% per quarter) and increase in aminopenicillin prescribing (1.1% per quarter). Among children discharged from the emergency department (ED), there was an increase in aminopenicillin prescription (0.45% per quarter), whereas the rate of obtaining CXRs declined (0.12% per quarter). However, use of CXRs rebounded during the COVID-19 pandemic (increase of 1.56% per quarter). Hospital length of stay, ED revisit rates, and hospital readmission rates remained stable.
Guideline publication was associated with an increase of aminopenicillin prescribing. However, rates of diagnostic testing did not materially change, suggesting the need to consider implementation strategies to meaningfully change clinical practice for children with CAP.

Mobile health platforms like smartphone apps that provide clinical guidelines are ubiquitous, yet their long-term impact on guideline adherence remains unclear. In 2016, an antibiotic guidelines app, called SCRIPT, was introduced in Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand, to provide local antibiotic guidelines to clinicians on their smartphones.
We aimed to assess whether the provision of antibiotic guidelines in a smartphone app resulted in sustained changes in antibiotic guideline adherence by prescribers.
We analyzed antibiotic guideline adherence rates during the first 24 hours of hospital admission in adults diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia using an interrupted time-series study with 3 distinct periods post app implementation (ie, 3, 12, and 24 months).
Adherence increased from 23% (46/200) at baseline to 31% (73/237) at 3 months and 34% (69/200) at 12 months, reducing to 31% (62/200) at 24 months post app implementation (P=.07 vs baseline). However, increased adherence was sustained in patients with pulmonary consolidation on x-ray (9/63, 14% at baseline; 23/77, 30% after 3 months; 32/92, 35% after 12 month; and 32/102, 31% after 24 months; P=.04 vs baseline).
An antibiotic guidelines app increased overall adherence, but this was not sustained. In patients with pulmonary consolidation, the increased adherence was sustained.