OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the demographic profile, prevalence, pattern, and risk factors for retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in patients over 40 years of age presenting to the Liberia Eye Centre, John F Kennedy Memorial Medical Centre, Monrovia, Liberia.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients presenting to Liberia Eye Centre from July 2017 to February 2021. A total of 17506 new patients were examined during this period out of which 10813 patients were over 40 years of age. Data were collected from the electronic medical record system database. The variables in the collected data included age, gender, location, laterality of eye affected, uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, ocular diagnosis, systemic risk factors, and associated complications.
RESULTS: Of the 10813 patients, RVO was found in 111 patients with an overall prevalence rate of 1.03% (95% confidence interval 0.80-1.2). Central RVO (CRVO) was more common than branch RVO (BRVO) in the defined population with similar proportions of both genders. The mean age for any RVO was 64.45 ± 12.27 standard deviation (SD) years (P = 0.734). Majority of the cases of RVO were from Lofa (n = 20; 18%). Fifty-five (61.1%) patients had hypertension, 5 (5.6%) had diabetes mellitus, and 6 (6.7%) had dyslipidemia. More than one systemic risk factor was present in 24 (26.7%) patients. However, none of the systemic risk factors were statistically significant. Visual acuity was most affected in patients with CRVO, with a visual acuity of <3/60 in 45 (63.4%) patients compared to 12 (30.0%) in BRVO patients. Glaucoma was present in 34 (30.6%) patients. The most common ocular complication was macular edema (n = 62, 55.8%) followed by vitreous hemorrhage (n = 8, 7.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: RVO was detected in 1.03% of the study population over the age of 40 years in Liberia, CRVO being more common than BRVO. The clinical presentation of RVO in the Liberian population for the first time provides insight into the burden of the disease and opportunity for further research.

Previous studies found seasonal variations in the incidence of retinal vascular occlusion (RVO), with more occurrence in winter. There is increasing evidence linking vitamin D deficiency and RVO. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between vitamin D levels and RVO. From inception to February 2024, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were comprehensively searched. Observational studies comparing 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels between adult patients with RVO and non-RVO controls were included. We calculated pooled mean difference (MD) and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of our data using a random-effects model and generic inverse variance method. Five studies involving 528 patients (228 patients with RVO and 300 controls were included in the meta-analysis. 25(OH)D was significantly lower in patients with RVO (pooled MD of -9.65 (95%CI -13.72 to -5.59, I2 = 92.2%). Vitamin D deficiency (serum 25(OH)D < 20) was significantly associated with RVO with the pooled OR of 14.52 (95%CI 1.72 to 122.59, I2 = 90.5). There was no difference in 25(OH)D levels between patients with central RVO and branched RVO (pooled MD of -0.94 (95%CI -3.91 to 2.03, I2 = 59.1%). In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrates that serum vitamin D levels were lower in patients with RVO than non-RVO controls. Clinicians could consider screening for vitamin D deficiency in patients with RVO. Further studies are warranted to determine the correlation between vitamin D levels and disease severity and the role of vitamin D supplements in these populations.

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) refers to the occlusion of the central retinal vein or primary and secondary branches caused by multiple factors. Clinical treatments for it include intravitreal or systemic vasodilator application, local usage of steroids and NSAID (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), thrombolysis, hemodilution, retinal laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy with vascular sheath incision, chorioretinal venous anastomosis (CRVA), and so on. At present, most treatments are aimed at RVO complications, while chorioretinal vein anastomosis can fundamentally reflux retinal vein blood through the choroid by venous vascular remodeling. Reports on the treatment of retinal vein occlusion by chorioretinal anastomosis are numerous in various countries. As a treatment means, CRVA can drain the venous blood, skipping the thrombosis spot, thus partially relieving anatomical vascular occlusion to achieve a therapeutic purpose. In this study, CRVA is evaluated from the aspects of indications, implementation process, postoperative effect evaluation, complications, and combination with anti-VEGF treatment. Based on the development of laser technology and vitrectomy, we hope to further review this treatment and provide a new reference for the clinical treatment of RVO.

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cerebrovascular disease share common risk factors and may be independently associated; however, the strength and nature of this association remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, informed by studies from PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until January 6, 2024, aimed to clarify this relationship. Eligible studies included cohorts observing stroke incidence in RVO patients for over a year. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses evaluating associations between RVO types (central and branch) and stroke subtypes (ischemic and hemorrhagic). Ten cohort studies with a total of 428,650 participants (86,299 RVO patients) were included. Compared to controls, RVO patients exhibited a significantly increased risk of stroke (pooled risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI)=1.34-1.41). Subgroup analyses indicated elevated risk for both ischemic (RR=1.37, 95 %CI=1.32-1.42) and hemorrhagic (RR=1.55, 95 %CI=1.08-2.22) strokes in RVO patients. Additionally, both central (RR=1.50, 95 %CI=1.27-1.78) and branch (RR=1.41, 95 %CI=1.32-1.50) RVO were associated with stroke risk. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent results across various criteria, and funnel plots indicated no publication bias. RVO significantly increases the risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, regardless of RVO type, suggesting a strong independent association between these conditions.

BACKGROUND: Macular edema (ME) is a common complication following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and is also the main reason for visual impairment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or dexamethasone implant (IDI) monotherapy, as well as the combination of IVR and IDI injections, in patients with ME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, and comparative study included 292 patients with unilateral ME involvement (total of 292 eyes) secondary to BRVO. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups and followed up for 12 months. Patients in group 1 (n = 96) were treated with 3-dose loading IVR injections followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Patients in group 2 (n = 98) received IVR combined with IDI injection, followed by IVR PRN regimen. Patients in group 3 (n = 98) were treated with IDI injection, followed by repeated IDI injection based on clinical necessity. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), complications, and frequency of injections were recorded and compared between the three groups.
RESULTS: At baseline, the three groups did not differ in age, gender, duration of ME, BCVA, IOP, and CRT (P > 0.05). Mean number of total injections per eye within 12 months were 7.1 ± 2.3 (range 4-9) in group 1, 3.7 ± 1.5 (range 2-6) in group 2, and 1.8 ± 0.4 (range 1-3) in group 3. There was a statistical difference in the number of injections between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.037). Eyes in group 3 received fewer injections than those in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). BCVA improvement and CRT reduction were achieved in all groups and there was no significant difference between the three groups at the end of the 12th month. However, IOP elevation and cataract progression were more frequent in group 3, especially in those patients who received repeated IDI injections.
CONCLUSIONS: Three therapeutic regimens had comparable efficacy in treating ME secondary to BRVO. Combination therapy had an advantage in maintaining good effect with fewer re-injections and complications.
UNASSIGNED: The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Xi\'an Aier Ancient City Eye Hospital, Xi\'an Aier Eye Hospital, and Xianyang Aier Eye Hospital ethics committees (2022SF-367).

To use Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) to measure scleral thickness (ST) and subfoveal choroid thickness (SFCT) in patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO) and to conduct a correlation analysis. A cross-sectional study was conducted. From May 2022 to December 2022, a total of 34 cases (68 eyes) of untreated unilateral Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO) patients were recruited at the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University. Among these cases, 31 were temporal branch vein occlusions, 2 were nasal branch occlusions, and 1 was a superior branch occlusion. Additionally, 39 cases (39 eyes) of gender- and age-matched control eyes were included in the study. Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) was used to measure ST at 6 mm superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal to the limbus, while Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography (EDI-OCT) was used to measure SFCT. The differences in ST and SFCT between the affected eye, contralateral eye, and control eye of BRVO patients were compared and analyzed for correlation. The axial lengths of the BRVO-affected eye, contralateral eye, and control group were (22.92 ± 0.30) mm, (22.89 ± 0.32) mm and (22.90 ± 0.28) mm respectively, with no significant difference in axial length between the affected eye and contralateral eye (P > 0.05). The SFCT and ST measurements in different areas showed significant differences between the BRVO-affected eye, contralateral eye in BRVO patients (P < 0.05). The CRT of BRVO-affected eyes was significantly higher than that of the contralateral eyes and the control eyes (P < 0.001). In comparison between BRVO-affected eyes and control eyes, there were no statistically significant differences in age and axial length between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed in SFCT and temporal, nasal, superior, and inferior ST between the two groups (P < 0.05). The difference in temporal ST between the contralateral eyes and the control eyes was not statistically significant (t = - 0.35, P = 0.73). However, the contralateral group showed statistically significant increases in SFCT, nasal, superior and inferior ST compared to control eyes (t = - 3.153, 3.27, 4.21, 4.79, P = 0.002, 0.002, < 0.001, < 0.001). However, the difference between the CRT of the contralateral and control eyes was not statistically significant (P = 0.421). When comparing SFCT and ST between BRVO-affected eyes with and without macular edema, no statistically significant differences were found (t = - 1.10, 0.45, - 1.30, - 0.30, 1.00; P = 0.28, 0.66, 0.21, 0.77, 0.33). The thickness of SFCT and temporal ST in major BRVO group is higher than the macular BRVO group and the difference was statistically significant (t = 6.39, 7.17, P < 0.001 for all). Pearson correlation analysis revealed that in BRVO patients, there was a significant positive correlation between SFCT/CRT and temporal ST (r = 0.288, 0.355, P = 0.049, 0.04). However, there was no correlation between SFCT/CRT and nasal ST, superior ST, and inferior ST (P > 0.05). In BRVO patients, both SFCT/CRT and ST increase, and there is a significant correlation between SFCT/CRT and the ST at the site of vascular occlusion.

Background/Objectives: To investigate changes in visual acuity and retinal sensitivity and thickness after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) for macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) patients. Methods: This study evaluated 34 patients with treatment-naïve BRVO and at least 6 months\' follow-up after pro re nata IRI. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was determined as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). In nine retinal regions, retinal sensitivity was calculated by MP-3 microperimetry; and in nine macular subfields, retinal thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT); evaluations were performed before IRI and then monthly for 6 months. Results: IRI significantly improved visual acuity and retinal sensitivity and thickness. In patients with good improvement in BCVA (change in logMAR > 0.2), IRI significantly improved retinal sensitivity in eight of nine regions, i.e., in all except the outer non-occluded region, and in patients with poor improvement in BCVA (change in logMAR < 0.2), in six of nine regions, i.e., not in the inner, outer non-occluded, and outer temporal regions. We found significant differences in the trend profile in the foveal, outer occluded, and inner nasal regions between patients with good and poor improvement in BCVA. Conclusions: The findings suggest that IRI improves visual acuity and retinal sensitivity and thickness and that retinal effects may vary between patients with good and poor visual improvement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 3-year outcomes of VEGF inhibitors in the treatment of cystoid macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in an international multicenter cohort of eyes.
METHODS: Multicenter, international, BRVO database study.
METHODS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients (760 eyes) undergoing intravitreal therapy for BRVO for 3 years in a multicenter international setting.
METHODS: Demographics, visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters, central subfield thickness (CST), treatments, number of injections, and visits data was collected using a validated web-based tool.
METHODS: Visual acuity gain at 3 years in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters. Secondary outcome measures included anatomical results, treatment pattern, and percentage of completers. A subgroup analysis by study drug was conducted for clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Mean adjusted VA change was +11 letters (95% confidence interval 9-13), mean adjusted change in CST was -176 μm (-193, -159). Median number of injections/visits was 16 of 24 at 3 years of follow-up. Most eyes received VEGF inhibitors exclusively (89%, n = 677) and as a monotherapy in 71% (n = 538). Few eyes were switched to steroids (11%, n = 83). Suspensions in treatment >180 days occurred in 26% of study eyes. Aflibercept showed greater CST reductions (-147 vs. -128 vs. -114 μm; P < 0.001) and significantly lower switching rates (14% vs. 38% vs. 33%; P < 0.001) compared with ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This international study of 3-year BRVO outcomes after starting treatment with VEGF inhibitors found adequate visual and anatomical results in routine clinical care. Visual outcomes were similar among the different initiating VEGF inhibitors, although eyes starting with aflibercept had better anatomical outcomes and a lower switching rate.
BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated evidence base for clinical decision-making by comparing the efficacy and safety of aflibercept 2 mg and ranibizumab in treating retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using eight databases up to December 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWSs) comparing aflibercept and ranibizumab in patients with RVO were evaluated. The primary outcomes assessed were efficacy, number of injections administered, and adverse events.
RESULTS: Three RCTs (424 patients) and 11 RWSs (1415 patients) were included. For central RVO (CRVO), RCTs demonstrated a comparable efficacy, whereas RWSs showed that mean changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were significantly greater with aflibercept compared to ranibizumab; the number of injections of aflibercept was fewer than that of ranibizumab in RCTs, but similar in RWSs. For branch RVO (BRVO), no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two drugs in RCTs/RWSs was observed, with fewer injections of aflibercept at 12 months in RWSs. The safety profiles of both drugs were similar for both CRVO and BRVO.
CONCLUSIONS: For CRVO, aflibercept had similar efficacy and safety profile but with fewer injections versus ranibizumab in RCTs; RWSs showed greater BCVA improvement and CRT reduction with aflibercept than ranibizumab. For BRVO, RCTs showed similar in efficacy, safety, and injection numbers for both drugs, while RWSs demonstrated that aflibercept required fewer injections at 12 months of follow-up. Overall, this study provides updated evidence for clinical decision-making in the treatment of RVO.

BACKGROUND: Frosted branch angiitis is a retinal vascular condition that is associated with a viral infection or autoimmune disorders like Crohn\'s disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Behcet\'s disease. Frosted branch angiitis presents with vascular inflammation, retinal edema, and severe retinal vascular sheathing. We present a case of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, an autoinflammatory disease, presenting with frosted branch angiitis.
METHODS: A 14-year-old female with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and a history of bilateral anterior uveitis developed acute unilateral vision loss and was found to have frosted branch angiitis complicated by branch retinal vein occlusion. She underwent an extensive serology workup and aqueous viral PCR to rule out other possible autoimmune and viral etiologies for forested branch angiitis. She received systemic and intravitreal antiviral treatment due to positive CMV IgM initially. However, the clinical picture improved following the use of a higher dose of oral steroids and the switch of the immunosuppressive agent to a TNF-a inhibitor.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this would be the first case in the literature demonstrating a systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patient presenting with frosted branch angiitis. Infectious causes still must be ruled out, especially CMV, as it is the most common cause of secondary frosted branch angiitis.