OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the demographic profile, prevalence, pattern, and risk factors for retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in patients over 40 years of age presenting to the Liberia Eye Centre, John F Kennedy Memorial Medical Centre, Monrovia, Liberia.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients presenting to Liberia Eye Centre from July 2017 to February 2021. A total of 17506 new patients were examined during this period out of which 10813 patients were over 40 years of age. Data were collected from the electronic medical record system database. The variables in the collected data included age, gender, location, laterality of eye affected, uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, ocular diagnosis, systemic risk factors, and associated complications.
RESULTS: Of the 10813 patients, RVO was found in 111 patients with an overall prevalence rate of 1.03% (95% confidence interval 0.80-1.2). Central RVO (CRVO) was more common than branch RVO (BRVO) in the defined population with similar proportions of both genders. The mean age for any RVO was 64.45 ± 12.27 standard deviation (SD) years (P = 0.734). Majority of the cases of RVO were from Lofa (n = 20; 18%). Fifty-five (61.1%) patients had hypertension, 5 (5.6%) had diabetes mellitus, and 6 (6.7%) had dyslipidemia. More than one systemic risk factor was present in 24 (26.7%) patients. However, none of the systemic risk factors were statistically significant. Visual acuity was most affected in patients with CRVO, with a visual acuity of <3/60 in 45 (63.4%) patients compared to 12 (30.0%) in BRVO patients. Glaucoma was present in 34 (30.6%) patients. The most common ocular complication was macular edema (n = 62, 55.8%) followed by vitreous hemorrhage (n = 8, 7.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: RVO was detected in 1.03% of the study population over the age of 40 years in Liberia, CRVO being more common than BRVO. The clinical presentation of RVO in the Liberian population for the first time provides insight into the burden of the disease and opportunity for further research.

BACKGROUND: Macular edema (ME) is a common complication following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and is also the main reason for visual impairment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or dexamethasone implant (IDI) monotherapy, as well as the combination of IVR and IDI injections, in patients with ME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, and comparative study included 292 patients with unilateral ME involvement (total of 292 eyes) secondary to BRVO. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups and followed up for 12 months. Patients in group 1 (n = 96) were treated with 3-dose loading IVR injections followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Patients in group 2 (n = 98) received IVR combined with IDI injection, followed by IVR PRN regimen. Patients in group 3 (n = 98) were treated with IDI injection, followed by repeated IDI injection based on clinical necessity. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), complications, and frequency of injections were recorded and compared between the three groups.
RESULTS: At baseline, the three groups did not differ in age, gender, duration of ME, BCVA, IOP, and CRT (P > 0.05). Mean number of total injections per eye within 12 months were 7.1 ± 2.3 (range 4-9) in group 1, 3.7 ± 1.5 (range 2-6) in group 2, and 1.8 ± 0.4 (range 1-3) in group 3. There was a statistical difference in the number of injections between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.037). Eyes in group 3 received fewer injections than those in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). BCVA improvement and CRT reduction were achieved in all groups and there was no significant difference between the three groups at the end of the 12th month. However, IOP elevation and cataract progression were more frequent in group 3, especially in those patients who received repeated IDI injections.
CONCLUSIONS: Three therapeutic regimens had comparable efficacy in treating ME secondary to BRVO. Combination therapy had an advantage in maintaining good effect with fewer re-injections and complications.
UNASSIGNED: The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Xi\'an Aier Ancient City Eye Hospital, Xi\'an Aier Eye Hospital, and Xianyang Aier Eye Hospital ethics committees (2022SF-367).

BACKGROUND: Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common retinal vascular disease leading to severe vision loss and blindness. This study aimed to investigate and reveal the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying macular edema (ME) recurrence in patients with BRVO through a proteomic approach.
METHODS: We detected proteins in the aqueous humor of 14 untreated, four refractory, and four post-operative patients with BRVO-ME and 12 age-matched cataract controls using four-dimensional label-free proteomic and bioinformatics analyses.
RESULTS: In total, 84 proteins exhibited significant differential expression between the BRVO and control samples (fold change [FC] ≥ 1.2 and adjusted p-value < 0.05). Compared to the control group, 43 and 41 proteins were upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in the BRVO group. These proteins were involved in cell adhesion, visual perception, retina homeostasis, and platelet activation. Several significantly enriched signaling pathways included complement and coagulation cascades and platelet activation. In the protein-protein interaction networks generated using the search tool for retrieval of interacting genes (STRING), the fibrinogen alpha chain and fibrinogen beta chain constituted a tightly connected cluster. Many common protein expression trends, such as the fibrinogen alpha chain and fibrinogen beta chain, were observed in both the recurrent and refractory groups. Differentially expressed proteins in the two groups were involved in complement activation, acute-phase response, platelet activation, and platelet aggregation. Important signaling pathways include the complement and coagulation cascades, and platelet activation. Protein-protein interaction analysis suggested that the fibrinogen alpha chain and fibrinogen beta chain constituted a tightly connected cluster. The expression of some differentially expressed proteins shared by the BRVO and the recurrent and refractory groups was reversed in the post-operative group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to analyze the proteomics of recurrent, refractory, and post-operative groups treated for BRVO-ME, and may potentially provide novel therapeutic interventions for the recurrence of ME.

BACKGROUND: AURIGA is the largest real-world study to date to evaluate intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment of diabetic macular edema or macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical practice. Here, we report the 24-month outcomes in the RVO cohort from France, Germany, Italy, and Taiwan.
METHODS: AURIGA (NCT03161912) was a prospective observational study. Eligible patients with RVO were enrolled for whom the decision to treat with IVT-AFL had already been made by the attending physician. Patients were treated with IVT-AFL for up to 24 months at physician discretion according to local practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) from baseline to month (M) 12. All statistical analyses were descriptive.
RESULTS: In 554 treatment-naïve and 65 previously treated patients with RVO, the respective mean (95% confidence interval) change in VA from baseline was + 12.5 (10.8, 14.3) and + 7.9 (3.3, 12.6) letters by M12 and + 11.4 (9.4, 13.3) and + 4.4 (- 0.6, 9.5) letters by M24 (baseline mean ± standard deviation: 51.0 ± 21.9 and 51.9 ± 20.4 letters); 44.0% of treatment-naïve and 27.9% of previously treated patients reported ≥ 15-letter gains by M24. By M24, the mean change in central retinal thickness from baseline was - 247 (- 267, - 227) µm in treatment-naïve patients and - 147 (- 192, - 102) µm in previously treated patients. From baseline to M6, M12, and M24, treatment-naïve patients received a total of 4.0 ± 1.3, 5.5 ± 2.5, and 6.9 ± 4.2 injections, respectively, and previously treated patients received 3.8 ± 1.5, 5.0 ± 2.2, and 6.3 ± 3.7 injections, respectively. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with that of previous studies.
CONCLUSIONS: In AURIGA, patients with RVO experienced clinically relevant functional and anatomic improvements following IVT-AFL treatment in routine clinical practice. These improvements were largely maintained in treatment-naïve patients over the 24-month study despite the decreasing treatment frequency, suggesting long-term durability of IVT-AFL treatment outcomes. Infographic available for this article.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03161912 (May 19, 2017). INFOGRAPHIC.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and evidence of previous, unnoticed inner nuclear layer (INL) infarction in the fellow eye.
METHODS: This prospective case-control study compared the prevalence of INL lesions in the fellow eye of consecutive people with hypertension (PwHTN) with unilateral RVO versus a randomly chosen eye of an age-matched control group of PwHTN without RVO. En face slabs above the outer plexiform layer (OPL) were generated from 6 × 6 fovea-centered optical coherence tomography scans. Cross-sectional scans and en face slabs were surveyed for evidence of active/resolved ischemic INL lesions.
RESULTS: 69 PwHTN were included and assigned to two groups, i.e., the RVO group (n = 37; 22 BRVO and 15 CRVO) and the control group (n = 32). There was no inter-group difference regarding age, gender distribution, and background diseases. Resolved INL lesions were more frequent in the RVO group (n = 26) than in the control group (n = 4) (70.3% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001). BRVO and CRVO cases had similar prevalence of INL lesions in their fellow eyes. Unlike diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and gender, INL lesions were associated with RVO (in the fellow eye) with an odds ratio of 15.7 (95%CI: 4.17-76.73, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We identified a substantially higher prevalence of INL lesions in PwHTN with RVO compared to PwHTN without RVO. The atrophic appearance of lesions suggests they may serve as early markers of increased RVO risk in individuals with systemic or cardiovascular predisposing factors.

OBJECTIVE: The pathology of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), a retinal circulatory disease, is related to monocular metamorphopsia-related vision impairment of the affected eyes, but the association of binocular metamorphopsia in such patients is unclear. This study aimed to examine the frequency of binocular metamorphopsia and its association with the clinical characteristics of patients with BRVO.
METHODS: A total of 87 patients who were treated for BRVO-associated macular edema (ME) were included in this study. At baseline and 1 and 3 months after the initiation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, we quantified metamorphopsia in the affected eyes and binocular metamorphopsia using the M-CHARTS® diagnostic tool.
RESULTS: At baseline, 53 and 7 patients had metamorphopsia in the affected eyes and binocular metamorphopsia, respectively. Although the visual acuity improved significantly after the initiation of anti-VEGF treatment, the mean M-CHARTS score in the affected eyes did not change from the baseline score. At 3 months, 9 patients showed binocular metamorphopsia; it was significantly associated with metamorphopsia in the affected eyes with a 95% confidence interval of 0.021-0.122 (β = 0.306, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Metamorphopsia in the affected eyes can cause binocular metamorphopsia in patients with BRVO-ME.

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of selective retina therapy (SRT) combined with the intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). This trial was a 12-month single-center, randomized, single-masked prospective study. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to IVR and SRT (IVR + SRT group), or IVR and sham SRT (IVR + sham group). After the initial IVR, all participants received ME resolution criteria-driven pro re nata treatment. SRT or sham SRT was always applied one day after IVR. The primary outcome measure of this study was the mean change in central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline, and the secondary outcome measures were the mean change in visual acuity from baseline and the number of IVR treatments at a 52-week follow-up. Thirteen patients were in the IVR + SRT group, and 11 were in the IVR + sham group. Compared to the baseline, mean CMT and BCVA improved significantly after 52 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups. The mean number of IVR was 2.85 ± 1.52 in the IVR + SRT group and 4.73 ± 2.33 in the IVR + sham group at the 52-week follow-up, with a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). IVR combined with SRT may significantly decrease the number of IVR treatments while maintaining the visual and anatomical improvement effect of IVR monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Information about real-world ranibizumab use is needed to optimize treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). The BOREAL-RVO study assessed treatment use, effectiveness, and safety of 24-month treatment with ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to RVO in a real-world setting.
METHODS: This was a multicenter, post-authorization, observational study in France, including patients starting ranibizumab for RVO. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 6. Secondary endpoints were mean changes from baseline in BCVA at month 24 and central retinal thickness (CRT) at months 6 and 24, and treatment use in real-world setting.
RESULTS: 226 branch RVO (BRVO) and 196 central RVO (CRVO) patients were enrolled; 71.7% and 70.9% completed the 24-month follow-up, respectively. In BRVO, mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 55.2 (18.7) letters, with gains of 14.3 (13.7), 14.1 (16.5), 13.0 (17.5), and 11.4 (20.1) letters at months 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. In CRVO, mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 40.4 (25.6) letters, with gains of 16.0 (21.2), 9.5 (25.4), 9.2 (27.7), and 8.3 (23.8) letters at months 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. At month 24, 52% of BRVO and 41% of CRVO patients had gains of 15 or more letters. In BRVO, mean (SD) CRT values at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 550 (175), 315 (104), 343 (122), 335 (137), and 340 (105) μm. In CRVO, mean (SD) CRT values at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 643 (217), 327 (152), 400 (203), 379 (175), and 348 (161) μm. On average, BRVO patients had 3.8 injections for 6.9 visits by month 6, and 7.2 injections for 19.7 visits by month 24. CRVO patients had 2.7 injections for 4.2 visits by month 6 and 7.1 injections for 21.1 visits by month 24. Factors predictive of better BCVA gain at month 6 were age under 60 at baseline, lower baseline BCVA and BCVA gain at month 3. There were no new safety findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Major improvements in BCVA and CRT were observed at month 3 after the induction phase and then were sustained up to month 24, with a slight decrease, probably due to under-treatment. This study demonstrated ranibizumab to be a safe and effective treatment for BRVO and CRVO in the real-world setting, although more regular or proactive treatment could further improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Macular edema is found in more than half of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) cases, leading to visual loss in most of these cases. Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is currently the standard treatment for macular edema due to BRVO (BRVO-ME). The difference in the effects of aflibercept and ranibizumab on the choroid in BRVO-ME is unknown. Therefore, we analyzed the effects of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and aflibercept on BRVO-ME.
METHODS: We retrospectively observed changes in choroidal thickness in the subfoveal region in 36 patients with BRVO-ME who visited the Department of Ophthalmology at the Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital. The patients were treated with intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab and followed up for 12 months or more.
RESULTS: The observed point bifurcated into the affected and non-affected sides 500 μm from the fovea. The central macular thickness (CMT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were 564.2 ± 268.5 μm and 228.8 ± 50.1 μm, respectively, in the ranibizumab group (16 patients, 16 eyes) and 542.4 ± 172.5 μm and 246.1 ± 59.1 μm, respectively, in the aflibercept group (20 patients, 20 eyes). The changes in CMT at 12 months were 324.0 ± 262.6 μm and 326.55 ± 187.2 μm in the ranibizumab and aflibercept groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.97). Similarly, the changes in SFCT over 12 months were not significant between the groups (ranibizumab, 41.9 ± 33.0 μm; aflibercept, 43.8 ± 43.8 μm, p = 0.89).
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of ranibizumab and aflibercept on choroidal thickness in BRVO-ME were the same regardless of the site. Although BRVO is a retinal disease, we hope that we can further explore the mechanism of BRVO-ME by observing changes in the choroid in the future.

BACKGROUND: To compare three monthly injections versus one initial injection of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing to treat macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: Seventy-four patients were randomized (1:1) to the 3 + PRN or 1 + PRN groups. Patients underwent monthly evaluations and additional IVR injections were administered if the retreatment criteria were met. The functional and anatomical outcomes were recorded. The factors associated with the improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (93.2%) completed the study. At 12 months, the mean gain in BCVA was 12.9 letters in the 3 + PRN group and 14.3 letters in the 1 + PRN group, which was not significant (P = 0.59). The mean reduction in central macular thickness was 297.8 μm in the 3 + PRN group and 300.2 μm in the 1 + PRN group (P = 0.96). The macular vascular density changes of the superficial and deep capillary plexuses were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.99 and 0.70, respectively). The mean number of IVR injections was 5.0 in the 3 + PRN group and 4.2 in the 1 + PRN group (P = 0.17). The incidence of retinal neovascularization was similar in both groups (P = 0.67). The baseline BCVA, but not the treatment regimen, was significantly associated with the change in BCVA (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant gains in BCVA and maintenance of macular perfusion were achieved in BRVO eyes treated with the 3 + PRN or 1 + PRN regimens. Baseline BCVA was a prognostic factor for the visual improvement.
BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the 1 + PRN and 3 + PRN regimen in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (ChiCTR2000038086).