Functional abdominal pain is a disorder in which central and peripheral sensitization processes converge, leading to hypersensitivity and allodynia. Differential diagnosis is made with organic digestive, renal, gynecological, endocrine, or neurological diseases. Treatment should be individualized for each patient. In cases of debilitating pain, therapy combining drugs with different mechanisms of action can be initiated, while in less severe cases, therapy with a progressive introduction of drugs based on clinical response is advised. The first line includes general lifestyle advice and antispasmodic substances, like peppermint oil, anticholinergic/antimuscarinic, and calcium channels antagonists. In the second line of treatment, neuromodulating agents are added. Finally, when these measures fail, third-line treatments such as gabapentine and atypical antipsychotics are considered. Psychological interventions should be considered if specialized therapists are available to manage these disorders.

A fast, simple, accurate, precise, and cheap fluorimetric protocol has been proposed for analysis of a phosphodiesterase-IV inhibitor, namely drotaverine hydrochloride. Fluorimetric protocol is based on estimating the decrease in the eosin Y fluorescence intensity by quantitative addition of drotaverine at pH 3.1 (acetate buffer). An ion pair complex is formed, which leads to quenching in the fluorescence intensity of the dye without need of prior extraction at 534 nm (λex. 339 nm). Different reaction perimeters which influence the production of complex (ion pair between drotaverine and eosin) were deeply investigated and optimized. The developed fluorimetric protocol is capable for quantitative estimation of drotaverine in linear range of 0.4 to 2.5 µg mL-1. After method validation in respect to ICH guidelines, it was applied to determine drotaverine in its commercial preparation. By comparing with other reported method, the developed and validated fluorimetric protocol is capable for estimation of drotaverine in commercial preparation with good accuracy and excellent precision.

UNASSIGNED: This review highlights adverse effects of baclofen and tizanidine in older community-dwelling adults.
UNASSIGNED: A literature search was conducted, including search terms of \"adverse effect,\" \"baclofen,\" \"elderly,\" \"falls,\" \"fractures,\" and \"tizanidine.\" Studies were included if they described community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and older who received oral baclofen or tizanidine. The Federal Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data were compiled for adverse effect incidence.
UNASSIGNED: The literature search was completed in July 2019 and updated in June 2023. Reviews performed by 2 independent reviewers yielded 15 records. FAERS identified 486 (baclofen) and 305 (tizanidine) adverse effects of interest.
UNASSIGNED: Two retrospective cohort studies evaluating baclofen use in older adults showed increased hospitalizations for encephalopathy in chronic kidney disease (7.2% vs 0.1%) and end-stage renal disease (daily dose 20 mg or more; relative risk [RR] 19.8, 95% CI = [14.0-28.0]). Other articles were case reports; 10 articles reported dyskinesias, encephalopathy or disorientation, and drowsiness associated with baclofen, and 5 articles reported bradycardia and/or hypotension with tizanidine. The FAERS Public Dashboard revealed 12.1% and 28.7% overall incidence of adverse effects of interest, with a 27.8% and 29.2% incidence of falls for baclofen and tizanidine, respectively. Baclofen and tizanidine are associated with concerning adverse effects in older adults. Alternative agents should be considered, but, if necessary, providers should start at lower doses and increase slowly.
UNASSIGNED: This review highlights the importance of using baclofen and tizanidine with caution in older adults.

Treatment of gastrointestinal pain remains a significant challenge in the management of many disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Pharmacologic agents and various behavioral therapies are among the potential therapeutic options for pain-predominant DGBI such as irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, functional heartburn, and centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome. In the retrospective study published in this journal, Luo et al. examine the use of prescription pain medications from a global perspective among patients with DGBI using the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study. This review article provides an overview of usage patterns of various pharmacologic pain management agents (opioids, central neuromodulators, antispasmodics, and other peripherally acting agents) and non-pharmacologic therapies in the context of clinical practice recommendations on the management of DGBI pain.

Globally, the prevalence of self-medication among young people has increased exponentially. Due to the basic knowledge and easy access to medicines, undergraduate students at health science colleges are likely to self-medicate. This research was undertaken to assess self-medication prevalence and its contributing factors among female undergraduate students in health science colleges at Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia.
A descriptive, cross-sectional study involving 214 female students from the Majmaah University in Saudi Arabia\'s health science colleges-Medical: (82, 38.31%) and Applied Medical Science College (132, 61.68%)-was conducted. A self-administered questionnaire with sociodemographic information, drugs used, and reasons for self-medication was used for the survey. Non-probability sampling techniques were used to recruit participants.
Of the 214 female participants, 173, 80.84 % (medical: 82, 38.31% and applied medical science: 132, 61.68%) confirmed that they were on self-medication. The majority of participants (42.1%) were between the ages of 20 and 21.5 years (mean ± SD: 20.81 ± 1.4). The main reasons for self-medication were quick relief from the illness (77.5%) followed by saving time (76.3%), minor illnesses (71.1%), self-confidence (56.7%), and laziness (56.7%). The use of leftover drugs at home was common among applied medical science students (39.9%). The main indication for self-medication included menstrual problems (82.7 %), headache (79.8%), fever (72.8%), pain (71.1%), and stress (35.3%). The most common drugs used included antipyretic and analgesics (84.4%), antispasmodics (78.9%), antibiotics (76.9%), antacids (68.2%), multivitamins, and dietary supplements (66.5%). On the contrary, the least used drugs were antidepressants, anxiolytics, and sedatives (3.5, 5.8, and 7.5 %, respectively). Family members were the main source of information for self-medication (67.1%), followed by self-acquired knowledge (64.7%), social media (55.5%), and least were friends (31.2%). For adverse effects of the medication, the majority of them consulted the physician (85%) followed by consulting the pharmacist (56.7%) and switched to other drugs or decreased drug dosage. Quick relief, saving time, and minor illness were the main reasons for self-medication among health science college students. It is recommended to conduct awareness programs, workshops, and seminars to educate on the benefits and adverse effects of self-medication.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastroenterological disorder with complex pathogenesis and multifaceted therapy approaches, aimed at alleviating clinical symptoms and improving the life quality of patients. Its treatment includes dietary changes and drugs from various pharmacological groups such as antidiarrheals, anticholinergics, serotonin receptor antagonists, targeting chloride ion channels, etc. The present article is focused on the synthesis and biological evaluation of some mebeverine precursors as potential antispasmodics.
METHODS: In silico analysis aimed at predicting the pharmacodynamic profile of the compounds was performed. Based on these predictions, ex vivo bioelectrical activity (BEA) and immunohistochemical effects of the compounds were established. A thorough biological evaluation of the compounds was conducted assessing their in vitro antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity.
RESULTS: All the newly synthesized compounds exerted drug-like properties, whereby 3-methyl-1-phenylbutan-2-amine 3 showed a significant change in BEA due to Ca2+ channel regulation, Ca2+ influx modulation, and a subsequent change in smooth muscle cell response. The immunohistochemical studies showed a good correlation with the obtained data on the BEA, defining amine 3 as a leader structure. No cytotoxicity to human malignant leukemic cell lines (LAMA-84, K-562) was observed for all tested compounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the experimental results, we outlined 3-methyl-1-phenylbutan-2-amine 3 as a potential effective choice for orally active long-term therapy of IBS.

UNASSIGNED: Whether administration of antispasmodics as a component of premedication contributes to detection of lesions by screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) remains unclear. Our primary aim was to investigate this possibility.
UNASSIGNED: The cohort in this retrospective study comprised consecutive asymptomatic individuals who had undergone screening EGDS as part of a health check-up at the Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center from October 2015 to September 2020. The investigated lesions comprised esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, gastric adenoma or adenocarcinoma, and duodenal adenoma or adenocarcinoma.
UNASSIGNED: Targeted lesions were detected in 72 of 31 484 participants (0.23%), 18 260 and 13 224 of whom had received and not received pre-procedure antispasmodics, respectively. The rates of detection of lesions in these groups were 0.21% (38/18260) and 0.26% (34/13224), respectively (P = 0.40). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no association between administration of antispasmodics and rates of detection of targeted lesions [P = 0.24, Odds ratio (95% CI): 1.46 (0.78-2.75)].
UNASSIGNED: Antispasmodics, which were administered to more than half of the study cohort, did not improve the rate of detection of targeted lesions.

Background: Acupuncture has been extensively applied to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in clinical practice in China. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated their efficacy, but it has rarely been compared with first-line antispasmodics to verify their effectiveness. Therefore, we compare acupuncture with antispasmodics in the treatment of IBS by using an adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis. Methods: Embase, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to 14 March 2022, with no language restrictions. RCTs comparing antispasmodics or acupuncture with placebo or one of the antispasmodics were enrolled. The primary outcome of interest was the improvement of abdominal pain. And the secondary outcomes of interest were the relief of global IBS symptoms and adverse events. The random-effects model was utilized to pool data. The effect size was measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative ratio, and the effectiveness of acupuncture and different antispasmodics were ranked by P-scores. Results: Thirty-five RCTs (n = 5,190) were included. The analysis showed that cimetropium, drotaverine, acupuncture, and pinarverium were superior over placebo in relieving abdominal pain; cimetropium (SMD, -3.00 [95%CI, -4.47 to -1.53], P-score = 0.99) ranked the most effective. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture had a greater improvement than most antispasmodics except cimetropium and drotaverine in relieving abdominal pain, although the between-group difference was statistically insignificant. In the analysis of continuous outcome in the relief of global IBS symptoms, the result showed that pinaverium was more effective (SMD, 1.72 [95%CI, 0.53 to 2.92], P-score = 0.90) than placebo. Trimebutine and acupuncture had greater improvements than placebo, but no significant difference was shown between groups. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture was more effective than pinaverium (SMD, -1.11 [95%CI, -1.94 to -0.28]) in relieving global IBS symptoms. In the analysis of adverse events, acupuncture had a lower adverse event rate than most of the other antispasmodics. Conclusion: Cimetropium, drotaverine, and acupuncture were all better than placebo in improving abdominal pain. Acupuncture was preferred over pinaverium in relieving global IBS symptoms, and acupuncture had lower adverse events than most antispasmodics.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder associated with significant disease burden. This American Gastroenterological Association Guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of medications for the pharmacological management of IBS with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) and is an update of a prior technical review and guideline.
The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The technical review panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and conducted an evidence review of the following agents: eluxadoline, rifaximin, alosetron, loperamide, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and antispasmodics. The guideline panel reviewed the evidence and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations.
The panel agreed on 8 recommendations for the management of patients with IBS-D. The panel made conditional recommendations for eluxadoline, rifaximin, alosetron, (moderate certainty), loperamide (very low certainty), tricyclic antidepressants, and anstispasmodics (low certainty). The panel made a conditional recommendation against the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (low certainty).

In Poland, drotaverine is the most frequently purchased antispasmodic, yet there is a paucity of real-world data on its use. We evaluated the profiles of patients who used drotaverine, and we investigated prescription patterns among general practitioners (GPs). In this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, we asked patients who purchased drotaverine about their reasons for using it, its perceived efficacy, satisfaction with treatment, and physician consultation. We also asked GPs about the status of drotaverine in their practice. Among 650 recruited patients, 74% used drotaverine for pain, 67% for cramps, and 19% for abdominal discomfort. Approximately 83% of patients purchased drotaverine without a physician\'s advice. Patients who used it after a physician\'s advice were more frequently female, older, and less educated. For all symptoms, mean severity scores decreased by ~5 points (0-10 scale) after the first dose. Ninety-eight percent of patients were satisfied with drotaverine. Among 210 GPs, the percentages prescribing drotaverine were: 42% for irritable bowel syndrome, 89% for cholelithiasis, 60% as supportive therapy for urinary infections, 89% for nephrolithiasis, and 75% for menstruation pain. The GPs perceived drotaverine as more useful, effective, and tolerable than other drugs for abdominal pain or cramps. Drotaverine significantly reduced the severity of all symptoms for which it was taken, and it was perceived as effective and tolerable.