Limb Salvage

保肢
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)对血管外科医师提出了重大的治疗挑战。干预主义者,足病医生,和相关的医学专家。适当护理的证据正在迅速发展,新的治疗方案正在不断发展。这篇综述审查了CLTI护理的现行指南,以及该患者人群中多种护理策略的报告结果,包括血运重建和医疗优化。我们对PubMed数据库进行了文献综述,回顾了报道2000年至2023年CLTI治疗结局的文章,并描述了这些结局与CLTI治疗的现状相关.关于CLTI护理的重要数据仍在公布,但是广泛采用适当的CLTI护理对于治疗这一弱势群体至关重要.
    Chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) poses a significant treatment challenge for vascular surgeons, interventionalists, podiatrists, and associated medical specialists. The evidence for what constitutes appropriate care is rapidly evolving and new treatment options are in constant development. This review examines the current guidelines for CLTI care, as well as reported outcomes for multiple care strategies in this patient population, including revascularization and medical optimization. We performed a literature review of the PubMed database, reviewing articles that reported outcomes for CLTI care between 2000 and 2023, and described these outcomes as they relate to the current state of CLTI treatment. Significant data are still forthcoming regarding CLTI care, but widespread adoption of appropriate CLTI care is essential for the treatment of this vulnerable population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:反向大隐静脉(GSV)移植广泛用于保留肢体手术中的血管重建,以治疗侵袭大血管的肉瘤。然而,反向移植物和动脉切割端之间的口径不匹配会威胁移植物的通畅。最近,我们介绍了使用静脉瓣膜刀进行非逆转GSV移植.这项研究的目的是评估该技术的安全性和多功能性。
    方法:我们回顾性比较了未逆转GSV和逆转GSV在接受保肢手术的肉瘤患者中的长期通畅率和保肢率。
    方法:纳入37例患者,未逆转GSV组21例,逆转GSV组16例。患者特征,手术细节,和并发症从医院记录中回顾。使用对比增强CT或MRI评估重建血管的通畅性。统计分析,包括Kaplan-Meier生存分析,被用来进行比较。
    结果:中位随访时间为38个月。非逆转GSV组的总体移植物通畅率为90.4%(21例患者中的19例),逆转GSV(RGSV)组为81.2%(16例患者中的13例)。在非逆转GSV组中,急性和慢性阶段各有1例移植物闭塞,但肢体循环保持完整,所有肢体都幸免。
    结论:在保留肢体肉瘤手术中,非逆转GSV移植与瓣膜切开术相比,提供了一种安全和通用的替代方法。它消除了静脉逆转的需要,最大限度地减少直径不匹配,可能将自体血运重建的指征扩大到以前不合格的病例。
    OBJECTIVE: Reversed great saphenous vein (GSV) graft is widely used for revascularization in limb-sparing surgery for sarcoma invading great vessels. However, a mismatch in caliber between the reverse graft and cut end of the artery can threaten graft patency. Recently, we introduced the use of a venous valvulotome to allow nonreversed GSV graft. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and versatility of this technique.
    METHODS: We retrospectively compared long-term patency and limb salvage rates between nonreversed GSV and reversed GSV in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for sarcoma.
    METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were included, with 21 in the nonreversed GSV group and 16 in the reversed GSV group. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and complications were reviewed from the hospital records. The patency of the reconstructed vessels was assessed using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Statistical analyses, including Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were employed for comparisons.
    RESULTS: The median follow-up was 38 months. Overall graft patency was 90.4% (19 of 21 patients) in the nonreversed GSV group and 81.2% (13 of 16) in the reverse GSV (RGSV) group. In the nonreversed GSV group, there was 1 case of graft occlusion each in the acute and chronic phases, but limb circulation remained intact and all limbs were spared.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nonreversed GSV grafting with valvulotome offers a safe and versatile alternative to reversed GSV grafts in limb-sparing sarcoma surgery. It eliminates the need for vein reversal and minimizes diameter mismatch, potentially expanding the indication for autologous revascularization to previously ineligible cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在一些患者中,血运重建是不可能的或无效的。对于这些,经皮深静脉动脉化(p-DVA)可被视为替代治疗.这项研究的目的是评估仅具有一个经皮通道的血管内超声(IVUS)引导技术的长期结果。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性单中心研究,研究对象为18条非选择性CLTI肢体,采用IVUS引导的p-DVA治疗。主要结局指标是:无重大不良事件(MAE)和30天的生存率;30天的保肢和无截肢生存率(AFS)。6个月,12个月和24个月。次要结果指标是:程序成功,生存,通畅和伤口愈合。
    结果:我们用无选择的CLTI治疗了14例患者,进行18p-DVA。中位年龄为74,4岁(60-87岁)。所有这些患者先前的胫骨和足动脉血管成形术失败。程序性成功率,定义为建立进入脚静脉系统的动脉血流,是100%。30天时无死亡和MAE记录。存活率是100%,83.4%和77.8%;保肢率88.9%,77.8%和77.8%;AFS为88.9%,6、12和24个月分别为61.1%和55.6%。6个月时伤口完全愈合为18.7%,12个月时为80.0%,24个月时为100%。
    结论:基于这些结果,IVUS引导的p-DVA对于无选择的CLTI患者似乎是安全有效的,没有与干预相关的死亡率,可接受的保肢率和无截肢生存率。
    OBJECTIVE: In some patients, revascularization is not possible or is not effective. For these, percutaneous deep vein arterialization (p-DVA) could be considered an alternative treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided technique that has only one percutaneous access.
    METHODS: This is a prospective monocentric study on 18 no-option CLTI limbs treated with an IVUS-guided p-DVA. The primary outcome measures are: the freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) and survival at 30 days; limb salvage and amputation free survival (AFS) at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. The secondary outcome measures are: procedural success, survival, patency and wound healing.
    RESULTS: We treated 14 patients with no-option CLTI, carrying out 18 p-DVA. Median age was 74,4 years (60-87). All these patients had a previous failed angioplasty of the tibial and foot arteries. Procedural success rate, defined as the establishment of arterial flow into the venous system of the foot, was 100%. No deaths and MAEs recorded at 30 days. Survival was 100%, 83.4% and 77.8%; limb salvage was 88.9%, 77.8% and 77.8%; AFS was 88.9%, 61.1% and 55.6% at 6, 12 and 24 months. Complete wound healing was 18.7% at 6 months, 80.0% at 12 months and 100% at 24 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, the IVUS-guided p-DVA seems to be safe and effective for no-option CLTI patients, with no mortality related to the intervention, an acceptable limb salvage rate and amputation free survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了评估演示文稿,病因学,干预措施,和急性肢体缺血(ALI)患者的结局。
    方法:观察性研究。研究的地点和持续时间:外科,阿加汗大学医院,卡拉奇,巴基斯坦,从2000年1月到2020年12月。
    方法:回顾性评估104例接受手术治疗的ALI患者的记录。影像学(超声/CTA/常规血管造影)证实了诊断。人口特征,合并症,病因学,结果采用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析。
    结果:该队列的平均年龄为58.89±12.6岁,与(54.8%,n=57)女性和(45.2%,n=47)男性。高血压(54.8%,n=57),糖尿病(46.2%,n=48),和心房颤动(34.6%,n=36)是常见的合并症。血栓栓塞(67.3%,n=70)和血栓闭塞(32.7%,n=34)是主要病因,主要影响下肢(66.3%,n=58)和股动脉(51.9%,n=54)。大多数病例被归类为卢瑟福分类2A(53.8%;56例)和2B(44.2%;46例);58(55.8%)患者被归类为ASAIII级,36例(34.6%)患者被归类为ASAIV级。栓塞切除术(80.8%,n=84)是普遍的干预,截肢率(17.3%,n=18)和死亡率(5.8%,n=6)。
    结论:大多数ALI患者表现为RutherfordII级,并有血栓栓塞的病因。栓塞切除术是最常见的手术,截肢率和死亡率很高。
    背景:急性肢体缺血,栓塞切除术,截肢,血栓栓塞.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate presentations, aetiologies, interventions, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute limb ischaemia (ALI).
    METHODS: An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from January 2000 to December 2020.
    METHODS: Record of 104 patients who underwent surgical interventions for ALI was retrospectively evaluated. The diagnosis was confirmed on imaging (ultrasound / CTA / conventional angiography). Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, aetiologies, and outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
    RESULTS: The cohort\'s mean age was 58.89 ± 12.6 years, with (54.8%, n = 57) females and (45.2%, n = 47) males. Hypertension (54.8%, n = 57), diabetes (46.2%, n = 48), and atrial fibrillation (34.6%, n = 36) were common comorbidities. Thromboembolism (67.3%, n = 70) and thrombotic occlusion (32.7%, n = 34) were primary aetiologies, predominantly affecting the lower limb (66.3%, n = 58) and femoral artery (51.9%, n = 54). The majority of cases were classified as Rutherford classification 2A (53.8%; 56 cases) and 2B (44.2%; 46 cases); 58 (55.8%) patients were classified as ASA Class III, while 36 (34.6%) patients were categorised as ASA Class IV. Embolectomy (80.8%, n = 84) was the prevailing intervention, with an amputation rate (17.3%, n = 18) and a mortality rate (5.8%, n = 6).
    CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with ALI presented with Rutherford Class II and had thromboembolism aetiology. Embolectomy was the most commonly performed procedure with a high amputation rate and mortality.
    BACKGROUND: Acute limb ischaemia, Embolectomy, Amputation, Thromboembolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:外周动脉疾病的患病率正在上升,全球数百万人遭受其最后阶段的表现,慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)。下肢搭桥等血运重建手术在保肢中起着至关重要的作用,但最佳的药物治疗对于最大化这些手术的益处和降低心血管和肢体相关事件的长期风险至关重要。
    结果:接受下肢搭桥手术的PAD患者需要采取全面的方法来改变危险因素,以进行心血管和肢体相关并发症的一级和二级预防。这包括适当使用高强度他汀类药物,戒烟,以及高血压和糖尿病的管理。此外,抗血小板治疗适用于所有CLTI患者,低剂量抗凝治疗也可能有益.
    结论:最佳药物治疗对于优化下肢旁路手术患者的预后至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of peripheral artery disease is growing, with millions of people globally suffering its end-stage manifestation, chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Revascularization procedures like lower extremity bypass play a vital role in limb salvage but optimal medical therapy is essential for maximizing the benefit of these procedures and reducing long-term risks of cardiovascular and limb-related events.
    RESULTS: Patients with PAD who undergo lower extremity bypass warrant a comprehensive approach to risk factor modification for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and limb-related complications. This includes appropriate use of high-intensity statins, smoking cessation, and management of hypertension and diabetes. Additionally, antiplatelet therapy is indicated for all patients with CLTI and additional treatment with low-dose anticoagulation may also be beneficial.
    CONCLUSIONS: Optimal medical therapy is essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing lower extremity bypass.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述一种新颖的救助技术,以接近踝下(BTA)慢性完全闭塞或足弓严重疾病,其中球囊/导管无法跟随交叉导丝,并且没有其他描述的再通方法是可行的。
    当面对复杂的BTA血运重建时,如果导丝穿过,但由于缺乏可推动性,球囊无法前进,对导丝尖端所在的膝下血管进行顺行穿刺。然后将导丝小心地导航通过该远端BTA血管进入针中以实现其会合和外化。低轮廓的球囊通过股骨通路插入并前进直到BTA血管的不可交叉点。然后将扭矩装置连接到球囊的近端毂,然后将穿通导丝从新的远端通道中拉出,允许气球与电线一起拖过病变。
    对于高度复杂的BTA血运重建手术,可以考虑使用踝关节下顺行远距(BAT)技术,其中导线穿过病变,但没有其他设备可以跟踪它。
    结论:本文的临床影响在于描述了导丝交叉的BTA血运重建的救助技术,但没有设备可以先进。这种技术在未能取得成功可能导致肢体丧失的情况下可能是有帮助的。BAT技术在极具挑战性的情况下提供了解决方案,增强技术成功,改善预后并可能保留否则将面临截肢的患者的四肢,如果不是血运重建的话.该视频显示了在透视下使用支持导管进行的BAT技术:对DP进行的前置式穿刺,支撑导管在导线上的推进,导管中导丝的会合和随后的线的外部化。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe a novel bailout technique to approach below-the-ankle (BTA) chronic total occlusions or plantar-arch severe disease where the balloon/catheter is unable to follow the crossing guidewire and no other described recanalization approach is feasible.
    UNASSIGNED: When facing a complex BTA revascularization, if the guidewire crosses but the balloon cannot progress due to a lack of pushability, an antegrade puncture of the infrapopliteal vessel where the tip of the guidewire lays is performed. The guidewire is then carefully navigated through this distal BTA vessel into the needle to achieve its rendezvous and externalization. A low-profile balloon is inserted through the femoral access and advanced till the non-crossable point of the BTA vessels. A torque device is then attached to the proximal hub of the balloon, and the through-and-through guidewire is subsequently pulled from the new distal access, allowing the balloon to be dragged across the lesion together with the wire.
    UNASSIGNED: The below-the-ankle antegrade teleferic (BAT) technique may be considered for highly complex BTA revascularization procedures where the wire crosses the lesion, but no other device can be tracked over it.
    CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of this article lies in the description of a bailout technique for BTA revascularization where the guidewire crosses, but no device can be advanced. This technique can be helpful in scenarios where failure to achieve success could result in limb loss. The BAT technique provides a solution in extremely challenging cases, enhancing technical success, improving outcomes and potentially preserving the limbs of patients who would otherwise face amputation, if not revascularized.The video shows the BAT technique performed with a support catheter under fluoroscopy: antegrate puncture of the DP, advancement of the support catheter over the wire, rendezvous of the guidewire in the catheter and subsequent externalization of the wire.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨辐射诱导的肉瘤(B-RIS)是继发性肿瘤,据报道总生存期比从头骨肉瘤差。这些肿瘤的治疗策略仍不确定。我们的系统评价试图根据组织学和手术干预评估总生存率。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价,并在PROSPERO(438415)中注册。包括描述阑尾和中轴骨骼B-RIS患者的肿瘤学结果的研究。《加强流行病学观察研究报告清单》用于质量评估。根据组织学亚型和手术类型对来自11篇具有个性化数据的234例患者的子集进行了生存分析。共纳入20篇文章,共566例患者。最常见的位置是骨盆(27.7%),主要组织学类型为骨肉瘤(69.4%),未分化多形性肉瘤(14.1%),和纤维肉瘤(9.2%)。分别在68.5%和31.5%的病例中进行了保肢和截肢手术,分别。
    结果:局部复发率为13%,保肢手术和截肢手术之间没有差异(p=0.51)。转移率为42.3%。五年OS为43.7%(95%置信区间[CI],33.3%-53.5%)用于骨肉瘤,UPS的31.5%(95%CI,11.3%-54.2%),纤维肉瘤占28.1%(95%CI,10.6%-48.8%)。保肢的五年OS为49.2%(95%CI,35.3%-61.6%),截肢的五年OS为46.9%(95%CI,29.1%-62.9%)。组织学亚型(p=0.18)和治疗类型(p=0.86)之间的5年OS没有差异。
    结论:无论组织学如何,B-RIS在初次治疗后5年表现出不良的OS。与截肢手术相比,保肢手术与5年OS较低无关。未来的研究应该比较两组,同时控制混杂因素。
    方法:三级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅作者说明。
    BACKGROUND: Bone radiation-induced sarcomas (B-RIS) are secondary neoplasms with reportedly worse overall survival than de novo bone sarcoma. Treatment strategy for these neoplasms remains uncertain. Our systematic review sought to assess overall survival based on histology and surgical intervention.
    METHODS: A systemic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (438415). Studies describing oncologic outcomes of patients with B-RIS in the appendicular and axial skeleton were included. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist was used for quality assessment. Survival analysis by histologic subtype and surgery type was performed in a subset of 234 patients from 11 articles with individualized data. A total of 20 articles with a total of 566 patients were included. The most frequent location was the pelvis (27.7%), and the main histological types were osteosarcoma (69.4%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (14.1%), and fibrosarcoma (9.2%). Limb-salvage and amputation were performed in 68.5% and 31.5% of cases, respectively.
    RESULTS: Local recurrence was 13%, without difference between limb-salvage surgery and amputation (p = 0.51). The metastasis rate was 42.3%. Five-year OS was 43.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.3%-53.5%) for osteosarcoma, 31.5% (95% CI, 11.3%-54.2%) for UPS, and 28.1% (95% CI, 10.6%-48.8%) for fibrosarcoma. Five-year OS was 49.2% (95% CI, 35.3%-61.6%) for limb-salvage and 46.9% (95% CI, 29.1%-62.9%) for amputation. There was no difference in 5-year OS between histologic subtypes (p = 0.18) or treatment type (p = 0.86).
    CONCLUSIONS: B-RIS demonstrated poor OS at 5 years after initial management regardless of histology. Limb-salvage surgery was not associated with lower 5-year OS compared with amputation. Future studies should compare both groups while controlling for confounders.
    METHODS: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    无选择的慢性威胁肢体缺血的患者不是常规血运重建的候选人,并且不可避免地需要大截肢。深静脉动脉化(DVA)是这些患者的潜在选择。一个完整的血管内系统进行DVA最近获得了广泛的赞誉和美国食品和药物管理局的批准。然而,严重的胫骨内侧钙质沉着症患者,如糖尿病或肾功能衰竭患者,可能不适合这种情况,因为大多数血管内针无法穿透严重的钙质.在这里,我们描述了一种新型的DVA混合方法,该方法在三名患有终末期肾病和严重内侧钙质沉着症的患者中取得了技术成功。
    Patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia are not candidates for conventional revascularization options and will inevitably require major amputation. Deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a potential option for these patients. A complete endovascular system to perform DVA has recently received great acclaim and US Foor and Drug Administration approval. However, patients with severe tibial medial calcinosis such as those with diabetes or renal failure may not be candidates for this because most endovascular needles cannot penetrate severe calcium. Here we describe a novel hybrid approach to DVA that provided technical success in three patients with end-stage renal disease and severe medial calcinosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在确定可作为糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者下肢免于截肢的预测因素。
    这项为期三年的回顾性研究是在Hayatabad医疗中心白沙瓦的糖尿病和内分泌科进行的,巴基斯坦。人口统计,临床,从医院档案中检索了2020年1月至2022年12月期间收治的DFU糖尿病患者的实验室和放射学信息.还记录了有关截肢和溃疡结局的初步和最终决定的信息。
    共有502名患有DFU的糖尿病(DM)患者被纳入研究,其中男性279人(55.6%),女性223人(44.4%)。研究人群的平均年龄,平均DM持续时间和平均HbA1c为55.2±9.8年,13.7±6.7年和11.2±2.4%,分别。下肢截肢患者的年龄增加(p=0.034),总白细胞计数(TLC)升高(p=<0.001),较高的HbA1c(p=0.025),患有骨髓炎(p=<0.001),并且患有较高级别的溃疡(p=<0.001)。在二元逻辑回归分析中,溃疡等级(OR=7.4,p=<0.001),骨髓炎(OR=11.8,p=<0.001),入院时不截肢的初始决定(OR=33.6,p=<0.001)与下肢抢救独立相关。
    DFU为I至II级,没有骨髓炎的证据,并且最初决定不截肢更有可能被挽救。
    UNASSIGNED: This study was aimed to determine the various factors which could serve as predictor of saving of lower limb from amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).
    UNASSIGNED: This three-year retrospective study was conducted in the Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit of Hayatabad Medical complex Peshawar, Pakistan. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological information of the diabetic patients with DFU admitted between January 2020 to December 2022 was retrieved from the hospital files. Information regarding initial and final decision regarding amputation and the outcome of the ulcer was also recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 502 patients of diabetes mellitus (DM) with DFU were included in the study, of whom there were 279 (55.6%) males and 223 (44.4%) females. The mean age of the study population, mean duration of DM and mean HbA1c were 55.2 ± 9.8 years, 13.7 ± 6.7 years and 11.2 ± 2.4 %, respectively. Patients who had an amputation of their lower limbs had an increased age (p= 0.034), raised total leucocyte count (TLC) (p= <0.001), higher HbA1c (p= 0.025), had osteomyelitis (p= <0.001), and had a higher-grade ulcer (p= <0.001). On binary logistic regression analysis, ulcer grade (OR=7.4, p= <0.001), osteomyelitis (OR=11.8, p= <0.001), and initial decision of no amputation at the time of admission (OR=33.6, p=<0.001) were independently associated with the lower limb salvage.
    UNASSIGNED: DFU which were of grade I to II, had no evidence of osteomyelitis and for which an initial decision was of no amputation were more likely to be salvaged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性威胁肢体缺血定义为缺血性静息疼痛或组织丢失(例如,溃疡/坏疽)存在超过2周。整理包括一个仔细的历史,体检的重点是评估脉搏和伤口,下肢无创血管研究(如,踝臂指数,脚趾压力),大隐静脉标测,和下肢动脉解剖成像(例如,计算机断层扫描,磁共振,或减影血管造影),如果计划进行血运重建干预。
    Chronic limb-threatening ischemia is defined as ischemic rest pain or tissue loss (eg, ulceration/gangrene) that has been present for greater than 2 weeks. Workup includes a careful history, physical examination focused on evaluation of pulses and wounds, lower extremity noninvasive vascular studies (eg, ankle-brachial indices, toe pressures), saphenous vein mapping, and imaging of the lower extremity arterial anatomy (eg, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or subtraction angiography) if a revascularization intervention is planned.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号