Limb Salvage

保肢
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:保肢手术是治疗儿童涉及主要关节相邻部位的骨恶性肿瘤的重要方法。这项技术可以保护肢体功能,尤其是下肢.然而,以合理的尺度切除肿瘤块后重建胫骨近端以保留膝关节总数并减少肢体长度差异是一项挑战。
    方法:我们介绍一例胫骨近端骨肉瘤。在接受了扩大的肿瘤切除术后,儿童的胫骨近端使用保留骨phy的假体置换进行了重组。该程序保留了受影响肢体的膝关节的整个关节表面和生长板,并为保留受影响肢体的功能和生长潜力提供了可行的替代方案。自初次手术以来,在3.5年的随访中,患者保持无病状态,并且观察到正常的肢体运动功能。
    结论:保留骨phy使我们的患者在保肢手术后表现出更好的肢体功能,因为他的膝关节没有受损,并且减少了肢体长度差异。我们认为,保留骨phy的假体置换可以为长骨局灶性恶性肿瘤切除后的重建提供最佳策略。
    BACKGROUND: Limb salvage surgery is an important method for treating malignant tumors of the bone involving the adjacent parts of the major joints in children. This technique allows for preservation of limb function, especially in the lower limb. However, the reconstruction of the proximal end of the tibia after removing the tumor mass with a rational scale to preserve the total knee joint and reduce limb length discrepancy presents a challenge.
    METHODS: We present a case of osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia. After being treated with an extended tumor resection, the proximal tibia of the child was restructured using endoprosthetic replacement with epiphyseal preservation. This procedure preserves the entire articular surface and growth plate of the knee joint of the affected limb and provides a feasible alternative protocol for retaining the function and growth potential of the affected limb. The patient remained disease-free and normal limb motor function was observed during the 3.5 year follow-up since the initial surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the epiphysis enabled our patient to perform better limb function after limb-saving surgery as a result of his undamaged knee joint and minimized limb-length discrepancy. We believe that endoprosthetic replacement with preservation of the epiphysis can provide the best strategy for reconstruction after resection of focal malignant tumors in long bones without epiphytic involvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:由于挤压机制引起的高能创伤后腕部或前臂远端截肢与复杂的组织缺损有关,正在修理,重建具有挑战性。鉴于这种打捞的难度,不幸的是,患者的翻修截肢率高。然而,据报道,重建成功的患者的生活质量更高.在这里,我们描述了使用股前外侧皮瓣(ALT)从粉碎机制进行创伤性截肢后的功能性手抢救的血运重建和重建方法。
    方法:2016年10月至2023年10月对所有接受单阶段紧急清创的患者进行了回顾性研究,血运重建,在高能量挤压伤继发的腕部或前臂远端截肢后,使用ALT覆盖软组织。检查术前复杂肢体挽救评分的图表,术中细节,包括哪些结构受伤和重建方法,和术后数据,如随访时间,结果,和并发症。
    结果:11例患者符合纳入标准,平均年龄为35.5(21-49)岁。皮肤软组织缺损的平均大小为17.3×8cm(范围,长度:13-25厘米,宽度:6-13厘米),所有病例都对下面的骨骼有相关的损伤,神经,和血管。用于重建的ALT皮瓣的平均大小为19.2×9.8cm(范围,长度:14-27厘米,宽度:7-15厘米)。所有患者都有再植肢体的存活。一名患者出现部分皮瓣坏死,需要二次清创和皮肤移植。9例患者愈合,无需任何额外的清创程序。患者平均随访24.6(12-38)个月。所有患者均达到满意的功能恢复,符合陈氏标准的II至III级。
    结论:对于外伤性腕部挤压截肢伴周围软组织损伤的患者,彻底清创,血运重建,截肢的重建可以使用ALT在一个阶段进行。提出了来自两个机构的协议化方法,证明创伤肢体的生存率提高,并发症减少,患者的长期预后得到改善。
    BACKGROUND: Amputation of the wrist or distal forearm after high-energy trauma due to a crushing mechanism is associated with complex tissue defects, making repair, and reconstruction challenging. Given the difficulty of this type of salvage, patients unfortunately experience a high revision amputation rate. However, a higher quality of life has been reported in patients with successful reconstructions. Herein, we described a protocolized approach for revascularization and reconstruction for functional hand salvage after traumatic amputation from a crushing mechanism using an anterolateral thigh flap (ALT).
    METHODS: A retrospective review was performed between October 2016 and October 2023 for all patients who underwent single-stage emergent debridement, revascularization, and soft tissue coverage using the ALT after amputation at the level of the wrist or distal forearm secondary to high-energy crush injury. Charts were reviewed for the preoperative Mangled Extremity Salvage Score, intraoperative details including what structures were injured and the reconstructive method performed, and postoperative data such as follow-up duration, outcomes, and complications.
    RESULTS: Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria with an average age of 35.5 (21-49) years old. The average size of the skin soft tissue defects was 17.3 × 8 cm (range, length: 13-25 cm, width: 6-13 cm), and all cases had associated injury to the underlying bone, nerves, and blood vessels. The average size of the ALT flap used for reconstruction was 19.2 × 9.8 cm (range, length: 14-27 cm, width: 7-15 cm). All patients had survival of the replanted limb. One patient experienced partial flap necrosis that required secondary debridement and skin graft. Nine patients healed without requiring any additional debridement procedures. Patient follow-up averaged 24.6 (12-38) months. All patients achieved satisfactory functional recovery with Grade II to III of Chen\'s criteria.
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients with traumatic crush amputation to the wrist with surrounding soft tissue injury, thorough debridement, revascularization, and reconstruction of amputated limbs can be performed in a single stage using the ALT. A protocolized approach from two institutions is presented, demonstrating improved survival and reduced complications of the traumatized limb with improved long-term patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:痛风是一种慢性疾病,其特征是尿酸单钠晶体沉积。Tophi在一些未经治疗或不受控制的痛风患者中发展,导致溃疡,化妆品问题,关节运动的机械障碍,关节损伤和肌肉骨骼残疾。目前,痛风托比的治疗是有争议和具有挑战性的。手术和内科治疗都有局限性,需要在临床实践中进一步探索。
    方法:在病例1中,我们治疗了1例糖尿病足溃疡合并多发性痛风托喜的严重感染患者。制定了系统的管理策略,以闭合伤口并挽救肢体。溃疡半年后成功愈合。在病例2中,通过手术治疗和装载万古霉素的骨水泥植入,切除了位于左足第一meta趾关节中的巨大痛风石。在案例3中,我们提出了一例痛风tophi的案例,该案例已通过标准化的系统医疗管理解决。
    方法:3例患者均诊断为痛风伴痛风沉积,尽管还有其他不同的合并症。
    方法:在病例1中,我们使用清创逐渐去除痛风托喜。在病例2中,通过外科手术切除了巨大的痛风石。在病例3中,痛风石经过药物标准化治疗后消失,饮食和生活方式管理。
    结果:3名患者根据其具体情况接受了不同的治疗疗法以去除痛风痛风石。
    结论:我们探索了通过手术或其他干预措施结合药物治疗对痛风痛风的有效干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Gout is a chronic disease characterized by deposition of monosodium urate crystals. Tophi develop in some individuals with untreated or uncontrolled gout, which leads to ulcerations, cosmetic problems, mechanical obstruction of joint movement, joint damage and musculoskeletal disability. Currently, the treatment of gouty tophi is controversial and challenging. Both surgical and internal medical treatments have limitations and require further exploration in clinical practice.
    METHODS: In Case 1, we treated a patient with severe infection of diabetic foot ulcers with concomitant multiple gouty tophi in the same limb. A systematic management strategy was formulated to close the wound and save the limb. The ulcers healed successfully after half a year. In Case 2, a giant gouty tophi located in the first metatarsophalangeal joint of the left foot was removed by surgical treatment and vancomycin-loaded bone cement implantation. In Case 3, we present a case of gouty tophi that was resolved by standardized systemic medical management.
    METHODS: Three patients were all diagnosed with gout accompanied by gouty deposition, although there were other different comorbidities.
    METHODS: In case 1, we used debridement to gradually remove gouty tophi. In case 2, the giant gouty tophi was removed by surgical operation. In case 3, the gouty tophi disappeared after standardized treatment with medicine, diet and lifestyle management.
    RESULTS: Three patients underwent different treatment therapies to remove gouty tophi based on their specific conditions.
    CONCLUSIONS: We explored effective interventions for tophi in gout by surgical or other interventions in combination with pharmacotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)由于其相关的截肢率而面临重大挑战,死亡率,治疗的复杂性和过高的成本。我们早期的工作引入了DFU的伤口外科综合治疗(WSIT),产生有希望的结果。这项研究的重点是在第一阶段采用抗生素负载骨水泥(ALBC)的特定WSIT方案,第二阶段,游离股外侧肌保留肌(VLMS)皮瓣和厚皮移植(STSGs),以修复非负重DFU。从2021年7月到2023年7月,7名DFU患者(年龄47-71岁)接受了这种治疗。人口统计数据,收集住院时间和修复手术时间。组织学和免疫组织化学分析评估血管生成,胶原蛋白沉积和炎症。SF-36问卷测量术前和术后生活质量。术前超声多普勒显示所有患者受区动脉血流速度峰值均显著>30cm/s(38.6±6.8cm/s)。肌瓣大小从8×3.5×1到18×6×2厘米不等。修复手术的手术时间为156.9±15.08分钟,住院时间为18.9±3.3天。组织学分析证明,用ALBC覆盖DFU可诱导膜形成并增加胶原蛋白,新生血管形成和M2巨噬细胞分数,同时减少M1巨噬细胞。在7至24个月的随访中,所有移植物均未截肢,在此期间,SF-36得分显着提高。ALBC与自由VLMS襟翼和STSGs的组合被证明对于重建非负重DFU是安全有效的。它迅速控制了感染,提高生活质量和足部功能,减少住院时间。我们主张将这一战略纳入DFU治疗计划。
    Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present significant challenges due to their associated amputation rates, mortality, treatment complexity and excessive costs. Our earlier work introduced a wound surgical integrated treatment (WSIT) for DFUs, yielding promising outcomes. This study focuses on a specific WSIT protocol employing antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in the first Stage, and free vastus lateralis muscle-sparing (VLMS) flaps and split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) in the second stage to repair non-weight-bearing DFUs. From July 2021 to July 2023, seven DFU patients (aged 47-71 years) underwent this treatment. Demographic data, hospital stay and repair surgery times were collected. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses assessed angiogenesis, collagen deposition and inflammation. SF-36 questionnaire measured pre- and postoperative quality of life. Preoperative ultrasound Doppler showed that the peak blood flow velocity of the recipient area artery was significantly >30 cm/s (38.6 ± 6.8 cm/s) in all patients. Muscle flap sizes varied from 8 × 3.5 × 1 to 18 × 6 × 2 cm. The operation time of the repair surgery was 156.9 ± 15.08 minutes, and the hospital stay was 18.9 ± 3.3 days. Histological analysis proved that covering DFUs with ALBC induced membrane formation and increased collagen, neovascularization and M2 macrophages fraction while reducing M1 macrophages one. All grafts survived without amputation during a 7- to 24-month follow-up, during which SF-36 scores significantly improved. A combination of ALBC with free VLMS flaps and STSGs proved to be safe and effective for reconstructing non-weight-bearing DFUs. It rapidly controlled infection, enhanced life quality and foot function, and reduced hospitalization time. We advocate integrating this strategy into DFU treatment plans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于髋臼肿瘤切除术后最佳骨盆带重建的争论仍然存在,外科医生在模块化和3D打印的半骨盆假体之间挣扎。我们假设3D打印版本的结果更好,然而,缺乏比较研究。这项研究填补了这一空白,回顾性检查生物力学和临床结果。
    方法:从2017年2月至2021年6月,我们回顾性评估了32例因髋臼周围恶性肿瘤而接受整块切除术的患者。
    方法:肢体功能。
    结果:植入物精度,髋关节旋转中心恢复,假体-骨整合,和并发症。通过有限元分析对骨盆缺损模型进行生物力学特性评估。
    结果:在3D打印组中,应力分布反映了正常的骨盆,与整体压力升高的模块化组形成对比,不稳定的过渡,和更高的应力峰值。3D打印组表现出优异的功能评分(MSTS:24.3±1.8vs.21.8±2.0,p<0.05;HHS:79.8±5.2vs.75.3±3.5,p<0.05)。假体-骨界面骨整合,用T-SMART测量,受青睐的3D打印假体,但手术时间(426.2±67.0vs.301.7±48.6min,p<0.05)和失血量(2121.1±686.8vs.1600.0±505.0ml,p<0.05)更高。
    结论:3D打印的半骨盆内假体提供了精确的骨盆环缺损匹配,优越的应力传递,和功能相比,模块化内置假体。然而,复杂性,制造专业知识,具有挑战性的手术植入导致手术时间延长和失血增加。对功能结果的细微差别考虑,复杂性,和病人的情况是至关重要的明智的治疗决定。
    方法:三级,治疗性研究(回顾性比较研究)。
    BACKGROUND: Debates persist over optimal pelvic girdle reconstruction after acetabular tumor resection, with surgeons grappling between modular and 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprostheses. We hypothesize superior outcomes with 3D-printed versions, yet scarce comparative research exists. This study fills the gap, examining biomechanics and clinical results retrospectively.
    METHODS: From February 2017 to June 2021, we retrospectively assessed 32 patients undergoing en bloc resection for malignant periacetabular tumors at a single institution.
    METHODS: limb function.
    RESULTS: implant precision, hip joint rotation center restoration, prosthesis-bone osteointegration, and complications. Biomechanical characteristics were evaluated through finite element analysis on pelvic defect models.
    RESULTS: In the 3D-printed group, stress distribution mirrored a normal pelvis, contrasting the modular group with elevated overall stress, unstable transitions, and higher stress peaks. The 3D-printed group exhibited superior functional scores (MSTS: 24.3 ± 1.8 vs. 21.8 ± 2.0, p < 0.05; HHS: 79.8 ± 5.2 vs. 75.3 ± 3.5, p < 0.05). Prosthetic-bone interface osteointegration, measured by T-SMART, favored 3D-printed prostheses, but surgery time (426.2 ± 67.0 vs. 301.7 ± 48.6 min, p < 0.05) and blood loss (2121.1 ± 686.8 vs. 1600.0 ± 505.0 ml, p < 0.05) were higher.
    CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprosthesis offers precise pelvic ring defect matching, superior stress transmission, and function compared to modular endoprostheses. However, complexity, fabrication expertise, and challenging surgical implantation result in prolonged operation times and increased blood loss. A nuanced consideration of functional outcomes, complexity, and patient conditions is crucial for informed treatment decisions.
    METHODS: Level III, therapeutic study (Retrospective comparative study).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:血管内深静脉动脉化(DVA)是一种新的技术,旨在挽救传统外科手术无法挽救的外周动脉疾病。本研究旨在回顾当代关于功效的文献,安全,DVA对无选择的危重肢体缺血患者的耐久性。
    方法:本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行,使用PubMed中的“经皮深静脉动脉化”或“经皮深静脉动脉化”的预定义搜索词,WebofSciences,OvidSP,和EMBASE。仅纳入5名或更多患者的研究,而涉及开放或混合DVA的研究被排除.主要结果包括技术成功率和初级截肢率。次要结果包括伤口愈合率,并发症,重新干预,和全因死亡率。
    结果:共纳入了包括233名患者的10项研究。患者主要是那些被认为没有选择的严重肢体缺血的患者。中位随访期为12个月(1-63个月)。技术成功率为97%(95%CI96.2%-97.9%),主要截肢率为21.8%(95%21.1%-22.4%)。伤口愈合率为69.5%(95%CI67.9-71.0%),并发症发生率为13.8%(95%CI11.7%-15.9%),再干预率为37.4%(95%CI34.9%-39.9%),全因死亡率为15.7%(95%CI14.1%-17.2%)。
    结论:我们的研究表明,血管内DVA对于无选择的严重肢体缺血患者是安全的。尽管如此,研究规模较小,随访时间少于1年.目前缺乏1级证据来推荐无选择危重肢体缺血患者的常规使用。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular deep vein arteriaization (DVA) is a novel technique aimed at salvaging peripheral arterial disease unamenable to conventional surgical intervention. This study aims to review contemporary literature on the efficacy, safety, and durability of DVA on patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI).
    METHODS: The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, using predefined search terms of \"percutaneous deep vein arterialization\" or \"percutaneous deep venous arterialization\" in PubMed, Web of Sciences, OvidSP, and Embase. Only studies with 5 or more patients were included, and studies involving open or hybrid DVA were excluded. The primary outcomes included technical success and primary amputation rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of wound healing, complication, reintervention, and all-cause mortality.
    RESULTS: Ten studies encompassing a total of 233 patients were included. Patients were primarily those deemed to have NO-CLI. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range 1-63 months). The technical success rate was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.2%-97.9%) and the major amputation rate was 21.8% (95% 21.1%-22.4%). The wound healing rate was 69.5% (95% CI 67.9-71.0%), complication rate was 13.8% (95% CI 11.7%-15.9%), reintervention rate was 37.4% (95% CI 34.9%-39.9%), and all-cause mortality rate was 15.7% (95% CI 14.1%-17.2%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that endovascular DVA is safe for patients with NO-CLI. Nonetheless, studies were small with follow-up period of less than 1 year. There is currently lack of level 1 evidence to recommend routine use in patients with NO-CLI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管断肢再植的情况越来越多,术后伤口感染会增加患者的经济和心理负担。这里,本研究旨在探讨术后伤口感染的病原菌分布及危险因素,以帮助早期识别和管理高危患者.
    方法:将2014年11月9日至2022年9月6日在苏州瑞兴医疗集团接受再植的外伤性大肢切断的成年住院患者纳入回顾性研究。人口统计,和临床特征,治疗,并收集结果。数据用于分析术后切口感染的危险因素。
    结果:在249名患者中,185(74.3%)为男性,中位年龄为47.0岁.术后伤口感染74例(29.7%),其中51人(20.5%)感染了多重耐药细菌。缺血时间(OR1.31,95%CI1.13-1.53,P=0.001),伤口污染(OR6.01,95%CI2.38-15.19,P<0.001),应激性高血糖(OR23.37,95%CI2.30~236.93,P=0.008)是独立危险因素,而术后白蛋白水平(OR0.94,95%CI0.89-0.99,P=0.031)与术后伤口感染的减少显着相关。缺血时间(OR1.21,95%CI1.05-1.40,P=0.010),伤口污染(OR8.63,95%CI2.91-25.57,P<0.001),MESS(OR1.32,95%CI1.02~1.71,P=0.037是多重耐药菌感染的独立危险因素。
    结论:严重外伤性大肢残割患者再植后伤口感染较为常见,大多数是多重耐药细菌。缺血时间和伤口污染与术后伤口感染的增加有关,包括多重耐药引起的。积极纠正低蛋白血症和控制应激性高血糖可能是有益的。
    OBJECTIVE: Even though replantation of limb mutilation is increasing, postoperative wound infection can result in increasing the financial and psychological burden of patients. Here, we sought to explore the distribution of pathogens and identify risk factors for postoperative wound infection to help early identification and managements of high-risk patients.
    METHODS: Adult inpatients with severed traumatic major limb mutilation who underwent replantation from Suzhou Ruixing Medical Group between November 09, 2014, and September 6, 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Demographic, and clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Data were used to analyze risk factors for postoperative wound infection.
    RESULTS: Among the 249 patients, 185 (74.3%) were males, the median age was 47.0 years old. Postoperative wound infection in 74 (29.7%) patients, of whom 51 (20.5%) had infection with multi-drug resistant bacteria. Ischemia time (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.53, P = 0.001), wound contamination (OR 6.01, 95% CI 2.38-15.19, P <0.001), and stress hyperglycemia (OR 23.37, 95% CI 2.30-236.93, P = 0.008) were independent risk factors, while the albumin level after surgery (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99, P = 0.031) was significant associated with the decrease of postoperative wound infection. Ischemia time (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40, P = 0.010), wound contamination (OR 8.63, 95% CI 2.91-25.57, P <0.001), and MESS (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.02-1.71, P = 0.037 were independent risk factors for multi-drug resistant bacteria infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Post-replantation wound infection was common in patients with severe traumatic major limb mutilation, and most were multi-drug resistant bacteria. Ischemia time and wound contamination were associated with the increase of postoperative wound infection, including caused by multi-drug resistant. Positive correction of hypoproteinemia and control of stress hyperglycemia may be beneficial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在动脉动脉粥样硬化病变的治疗是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在探讨准分子激光消融(ELA)联合药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗这些病变的疗效和安全性。
    方法:回顾性分析2019年6月至2021年12月,行髂动脉联合DCB的患者资料。人口统计,病变特征,分析围手术期并发症和随访信息。主要终点是原发性通畅。次要终点包括无截肢生存率(MAFS),技术上的成功,救助支架,临床驱动的靶病变再干预(CD-TLR),踝臂指数(ABI)和卢瑟福类的改善。
    结果:共纳入61例患者。平均年龄为73.4±11.7岁。20例(32.8%)患者有狭窄病变,而41例(67.2%)患者有慢性完全闭塞(CTO)。这些病变的平均长度为7.3±2.8cm。手术技术成功率为95.1%。3例(4.9%)患者进行了支架治疗。术中远端栓塞3例(4.9%),而3例(4.9%)患者发生流量限制夹层。平均ABI从基线时的0.45±0.13显著改善至ELA后的0.90±0.12,6个月时为0.88±0.11,12个月时为0.85±0.12。在随访期间。中位随访时间为28.2±6.1个月。5例(8.2%)患者进行了再干预。2年原发性通畅率为83.5%。
    结论:ELA联合DCB是治疗the动脉粥样硬化病变的一种安全有效的策略,支架置入率低,原发性通畅性高。
    BACKGROUND: The treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the popliteal artery is challenging. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of excimer laser ablation (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for these lesions.
    METHODS: From June 2019 to December 2021, data of patients who underwent ELA combined with DCB in the popliteal artery were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, lesion characteristics, periprocedural complications, and follow-up information were analyzed. The primary endpoint was primary patency. Secondary endpoints included major amputation-free survival rate, technical success, bailout stenting, clinically-driven target lesion reintervention, improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI), and Rutherford class.
    RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 73.4 ± 11.7 years. 20 (32.8%) patients had stenotic lesions, while 41 (67.2%) patients had chronic total occlusions. The mean length of these lesions was 7.3 ± 2.8 cm. Procedure technical success rate was 95.1%. Bailout stent was performed in 3 (4.9%) patients. Intraprocedural distal embolization occurred in 3 (4.9%) patients, while flow limiting dissections occurred in 3 (4.9%) patients. The mean ABI was significantly improved from 0.45 ± 0.13 at baseline to 0.90 ± 0.12 after ELA, 0.88 ± 0.11 at 6 months and 0.85 ± 0.12 at 12 months during the follow-up period. The median follow-up time was 28.2 ± 6.1 months. Reintervention was performed in 5 (8.2%) patients. The 2-year primary patency was 83.5%.
    CONCLUSIONS: ELA combined with DCB is a safe and effective strategy in the treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerotic lesions with low rates of bail-out stenting and high primary patency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于骨骼不成熟,治疗儿童长骨骨肉瘤具有挑战性,这限制了来自成年患者的见解的普遍性。结果是否存在差异?应如何为不同年龄的儿童量身定制手术方案?具体的术后并发症是什么?自2000年以来,我们部门对345名14岁以下下肢骨肉瘤患者进行了一项大型单中心回顾性队列研究,以解决这些问题。
    方法:对我科2000年至2019年收治的345例下肢骨肉瘤患儿进行回顾性分析。根据年龄组比较临床和功能结果,手术方法,假体类型,和原发肿瘤的位置。患者分为低年龄组(≤10岁)和高年龄组(>10岁)。总生存率(OS),无进展生存率(PFS),使用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估假体生存率,使用非参数生存分析(对数秩检验)和单变量cox回归进行比较。并发症的发生率,局部复发率(LRR),转移率,最终保肢和截肢率,采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验对不同独立组的肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会(MSTS)评分进行进一步评价,采用t检验对测量数据进行评价。
    结果:患者的平均年龄为11.10±2.32岁(4至14岁),平均随访时间48.17个月。5年、10年和15年的OS率为50.3%,43.8%,和37.9%,分别。5年无进展生存率为44.8%,10年无进展生存率为41.1%。最终保肢率为61.45%,而最终截肢率为38.55%。与高年龄组相比,低年龄组的截肢率更高(48.00%vs.33.18%,P=0.009)。整体LRR为9.28%,转移发生率为28.99%。保肢组的LRR高于截肢组(P=0.004)。低年龄组比高年龄组经历更多的假体相关并发症(P=0.001)。低年龄组中最常见的假体相关并发症是软组织衰竭,而假体周围感染在高年龄组中最常见。与低年龄组相比,高年龄组的累积假体存活率更高(P=0.0097)。在儿科患者中,模块化假体的MSTS评分较好,假体的累积存活率高于可扩张假体(P<0.05)。
    结论:随着年龄的增长,儿科患者的肢体保护变得越来越有效,虽然年轻患者需要考虑截肢。与假体相关的常见术后并发症包括软组织衰竭和假体周围感染。诊断为下肢骨肉瘤的年轻患者截肢率升高,假体相关并发症的发生率更高。
    OBJECTIVE: Treating pediatric osteosarcoma in long bones is challenging due to skeletal immaturity, which restricts the generalizability of insights derived from adult patients. Are there disparities in outcomes? How should surgical protocols be tailored for children of varying ages? What are the specific postoperative complications? A large single-center retrospective cohort study of 345 patients under 14 years old with lower-limb osteosarcoma treated in our department since 2000 was conducted to address these inquiries.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 345 pediatric patients with lower-limb osteosarcoma admitted to our department between 2000 and 2019 was conducted. Clinical and functional outcomes were compared based on age groups, surgical methods, type of prosthesis, and primary tumor location. Patients were divided into the low-age group (≤10 y old) and the high-age group (>10 y old). Overall survival rate (OS), progressionfree survival rate (PFS), and prosthesis survival rate were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, nonparametric survival analysis (log-rank test), and Univariate cox regression were used for comparison. The incidence of complications, local relapse rate (LRR), metastasis rate, final limb-salvage, and amputation rate, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of different independent groups were further evaluated using χ2 test or Fisher\'s exact test, and t -test was employed to evaluate the measurement data.
    RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 11.10±2.32 years ranging from 4 to 14 y, with an average follow-up duration of 48.17 months. The 5, 10, and 15-year OS rates were 50.3%, 43.8%, and 37.9%, respectively. The progression-free survival rate was 44.8% at 5 years and 41.1% at 10 years. The final limb salvage rate was 61.45%, while the final amputation rate was 38.55%. The low-age group had a higher amputation rate compared with the high-age group (48.00% vs. 33.18%, P =0.009). The overall LRR was 9.28%, and the incidence of metastasis was 28.99%. The LRR of the limb-salvage group was higher than the amputation group ( P =0.004). The low-age group experienced more prosthesis-related complications than the high-age group ( P =0.001). The most common prosthesis-related complication in the low-age group was soft-tissue failure, while the periprosthetic infection was most frequent in the high-age group. The high-age group had a higher cumulative prosthesis survival compared with the low-age group ( P =0.0097). Modular prosthesis showed better MSTS scores and higher cumulative prosthetic survival than expandable prosthesis in pediatric patients ( P <0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Limb preservation in pediatric patients becomes increasingly efficacious with advancing age, while consideration of amputation is warranted for younger patients. The prevailing postoperative complications associated with prosthesis encompass soft tissue failure and periprosthetic infection. Younger patients diagnosed with lower limb osteosarcoma exhibit a heightened amputation rate and a greater incidence of prosthesis-related complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨外周动脉疾病(PAD)合并衰弱的主要肢体不良事件(MAE)的危险因素,建立并验证MAE的风险预测模型。
    方法:本前瞻性研究在中国西南地区6家医院的血管外科患者中进行。从2021年2月1日至12月20日前瞻性收集PAD合并虚弱的患者,以男性为主要结局,并跟踪了一年。该队列分为发展队列和验证队列。在发展队列中,使用随机森林进行变量选择和多变量Cox回归分析,建立了多变量风险预测模型来预测MAE.该模型由可视化列线图和基于Web的计算器表示。用验证队列测试模型性能,并使用C统计量和校准图进行评估。
    结果:从2021年2月1日至12月20日,共有1179名患者被前瞻性纳入。在816名PAD患者中,这项研究的中位随访期为9±4.07个月,和平均[SD]年龄,74.64[74.64±9.43]年,249[30.5%]妇女。一年之内,222例(27.2%)患者发展为男性。靶病变血运重建99例(12.1%)患者,截肢者为131例(16.1%)。整个队列中的死亡率为108例(13.2%)患者。在控制了竞争性风险事件(死亡)后,发展为男性的累积风险无统计学差异.前白蛋白(PA)(HR0.6,95%CI0.41-0.89,P=.010),经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(HR2.31,95%CI1.26-4.21,P=.006),卢瑟福分类(HR1.77,95%CI1.36-2.31,P<.001),白细胞(WBC)(HR1.85,95%CI1.20-2.87,P=0.005),高海拔地区(HR3.1,95%CI1.43-6.75,P=.004),血管内治疗(EVT)(HR10.2,95%CI1.44-72.5,P=.020)和住院时间(LOS)(HR1.01,95%CI1.00-1.03,P=.012)是男性的危险因素.C统计量为0.76(95%CI,0.70-0.79)的男性预测模型。对于MAE预测模型,内部验证的C统计量为0.68,外部验证的C统计量为0.66。PAD的MALE预测模型提出了交互式列线图和基于Web的网络计算器。
    结论:在这项研究中,在虚弱的PAD患者中,MALE预测模型具有预测MALE的判别能力。MALE模型可以优化患有虚弱PAD的患者的临床决策。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors for major limb adverse events (MALE) in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) combined with frailty and to develop and validate a risk prediction model of MALE.
    METHODS: This prospective study was performed in the vascular surgery department of patients in six hospitals in southwest China. Prospective collection of patients with PAD combined with frailty from February 1 to December 20, 2021, with MALE as the primary outcome, and followed for 1 year. The cohort was divided into a development cohort and a validation cohort. In the development cohort, a multivariate risk prediction model was developed to predict MALE using random forests for variable selection and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The model is represented by a visualized nomogram and a web-based calculator. The model performance was tested with the validation cohort and assessed using the C-statistic and calibration plots.
    RESULTS: A total of 1179 patients were prospectively enrolled from February 1 to December 20, 2021. Among 816 patients with PAD who were included in the analysis, the median follow-up period for this study was 9 ± 4.07 months, the mean age was 74.64 ± 9.43 years, and 249 (30.5%) were women. Within 1 year, 222 patients (27.2%) developed MALE. Target lesion revascularizations were performed in 99 patients (12.1%), and amputations were performed in 131 patients (16.1%). The mortality rate within the whole cohort was 108 patients (13.2%). After controlling for competing risk events (death), the cumulative risk of developing MALE was not statistically different. Prealbumin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.89; P = .010), percutaneous coronary intervention (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26-4.21; P = .006), Rutherford classification (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.36-2.31; P < .001), white blood cell (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.20-2.87; P = .005), high altitude area (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.43-6.75; P = .004), endovascular treatment (HR, 10.2; 95% CI, 1.44-72.50; P = .020), and length of stay (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .012) were risk factors for MALE. The MALE prediction model had a C-statistic of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.79). The C-statistic was 0.68 for internal validation and 0.66 for external validation for the MALE prediction model. The MALE prediction model for PAD presented an interactive nomogram and a web-based network calculator.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the MALE prediction model has a discriminative ability to predict MALE among patients with PAD in frailty. The MALE model can optimize clinical decision-making for patients with PAD in frailty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号