Patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia are not candidates for conventional revascularization options and will inevitably require major amputation. Deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a potential option for these patients. A complete endovascular system to perform DVA has recently received great acclaim and US Foor and Drug Administration approval. However, patients with severe tibial medial calcinosis such as those with diabetes or renal failure may not be candidates for this because most endovascular needles cannot penetrate severe calcium. Here we describe a novel hybrid approach to DVA that provided technical success in three patients with end-stage renal disease and severe medial calcinosis.

UNASSIGNED: This study was aimed to determine the various factors which could serve as predictor of saving of lower limb from amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).
UNASSIGNED: This three-year retrospective study was conducted in the Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit of Hayatabad Medical complex Peshawar, Pakistan. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological information of the diabetic patients with DFU admitted between January 2020 to December 2022 was retrieved from the hospital files. Information regarding initial and final decision regarding amputation and the outcome of the ulcer was also recorded.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 502 patients of diabetes mellitus (DM) with DFU were included in the study, of whom there were 279 (55.6%) males and 223 (44.4%) females. The mean age of the study population, mean duration of DM and mean HbA1c were 55.2 ± 9.8 years, 13.7 ± 6.7 years and 11.2 ± 2.4 %, respectively. Patients who had an amputation of their lower limbs had an increased age (p= 0.034), raised total leucocyte count (TLC) (p= <0.001), higher HbA1c (p= 0.025), had osteomyelitis (p= <0.001), and had a higher-grade ulcer (p= <0.001). On binary logistic regression analysis, ulcer grade (OR=7.4, p= <0.001), osteomyelitis (OR=11.8, p= <0.001), and initial decision of no amputation at the time of admission (OR=33.6, p=<0.001) were independently associated with the lower limb salvage.
UNASSIGNED: DFU which were of grade I to II, had no evidence of osteomyelitis and for which an initial decision was of no amputation were more likely to be salvaged.

A 57-year-old man presented after a fall, which resulted in acetabular and pelvic fractures. He underwent fracture fixation, which was complicated by iliac vein occlusion, leading to phlegmasia cerulea dolens. He underwent lower extremity surgical venous thrombectomy, contralateral iliac vein stent placement, and modified Palma procedure with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene venous crossover bypass and arteriovenous fistula creation. His postoperative course was unremarkable and he regained full function of the extremity without significant stasis complications. The bypass and stent remain patent 3 years postoperatively. Although iliac vein injury during acetabular fracture repair is rare, prompt recognition and intervention prevent limb loss.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage surgery is an important method for treating malignant tumors of the bone involving the adjacent parts of the major joints in children. This technique allows for preservation of limb function, especially in the lower limb. However, the reconstruction of the proximal end of the tibia after removing the tumor mass with a rational scale to preserve the total knee joint and reduce limb length discrepancy presents a challenge.
METHODS: We present a case of osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia. After being treated with an extended tumor resection, the proximal tibia of the child was restructured using endoprosthetic replacement with epiphyseal preservation. This procedure preserves the entire articular surface and growth plate of the knee joint of the affected limb and provides a feasible alternative protocol for retaining the function and growth potential of the affected limb. The patient remained disease-free and normal limb motor function was observed during the 3.5 year follow-up since the initial surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the epiphysis enabled our patient to perform better limb function after limb-saving surgery as a result of his undamaged knee joint and minimized limb-length discrepancy. We believe that endoprosthetic replacement with preservation of the epiphysis can provide the best strategy for reconstruction after resection of focal malignant tumors in long bones without epiphytic involvement.

BACKGROUND: Total femur replacement (TFR) has become increasingly significant as a salvage procedure for both oncologic reconstruction and complex nononcologic conditions such as revision arthroplasty. Despite its effectiveness in limb salvage, TFR is associated with high complication and failure rates, which vary depending on the underlying indication.
METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was conducted, focusing on studies that reported outcomes of TFR in oncologic and nononcologic cases. Primary outcomes included failure mode and rates according to the Henderson classification, functional outcomes scores, and mobility status. Data were analyzed using random-effects models and generalized linear mixed models.
RESULTS: A total of 35 studies involving 1,002 patients were included. The majority of TFRs were performed for oncologic reasons (63.7%). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 66%, with a limb salvage rate of 89%. The meta-analysis revealed a combined failure rate of 34%. For type 4 failures (infection), nononcologic patients exhibited a significantly higher rate at 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-26%, I2 = 46%, p < 0.01) compared with 8% in oncologic patients (95% CI, 6%-12%, I2 = 0%). Regarding combined types 1 to 4 failures, oncologic patients had a rate of 20% (95% CI, 25%-52%, I2 = 60%), whereas nononcologic patients faced a higher rate of 37% (95% CI, 12%-26%, I2 = 63%) (p < 0.05), indicating a significant difference. There were no significant differences in the MSTS score. In addition, there were no notable differences when comparing failure modes 1, 2, and 3 independently. Mobility analysis showed that approximately 70% of patients required walking aids after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: TFR offers a valuable limb salvage option in both oncologic and nononcologic scenarios, despite its high failure rates. Although functional outcomes were similar between groups, the higher failure rate in nononcologic cases and the poor overall quality of evidence warrant further comprehensive assessments into predictors of outcomes to optimize results.
METHODS: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Decision-making regarding limb amputation represents a significant clinical challenge, especially when the initial evaluation does not coincide with the criteria established in scales used worldwide, as is the case of the MESS scale. This article presents the case of a 24-year-old female patient who was transferred to a university hospital after a road traffic accident with severe and large lesions in the left lower limb. Despite a poor initial prognosis and in-hospital complications, including multiple surgical procedures and foot drop, a favorable recovery was achieved with complete anatomical salvage of the limb at risk. The multidisciplinary approach and intensive rehabilitation were instrumental in achieving a satisfactory functional recovery. This case highlights the importance of considering factors beyond amputation scale scores, as well as the need for comprehensive care to improve outcomes in patients with complex extremity injuries.

This case series describes the clinical course and reconstructive methods utilized for patients with diabetes and significant gangrene and necrosis following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. COVID-19 produces mainly respiratory symptoms but has a variety of atypical presentations and sequelae. Serious complications are increased in patients with underlying medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus. By generating a prothrombotic milieu, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) increases the risk for arterial and venous thromboses. Inflammatory damage and micro-thromboses are thought to contribute to acro-ischemia, colloquially known as \'COVID toes,\' which presents cutaneously as chilblain-like lesions. Necrosis can be severe and devastating, often resulting in major amputation. Two exemplary case reports are presented herein: first, a 57-year-old female presented for vascular evaluation with pedal gangrene to the midfoot one month after developing painful discoloration in her right toe. After angioplasty restored pedal blood flow, she received a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) with a local tissue flap. Second, a 41-year-old female presented for vascular evaluation with extensive pedal gangrene three months after hospitalization for COVID-19. After arteriotomy improved pedal blood flow, she underwent a Lisfranc amputation followed by superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap reconstruction. Sufficient evidence suggests that COVID-19 impairs microcirculatory function and can be especially detrimental in diabetic patients. Reconstructive techniques in patients with severe gangrene with COVID toes help patients regain functionality.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of PRISTINE was to evaluate the 6 and 12 months safety and efficacy of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR)™ sirolimus-coated balloon for treatment of complex lower limb occlusive lesions (TASC II C & D) in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) from Singapore.
METHODS: PRISTINE was a prospective, non-randomized, single arm, observational, multi-investigator, single-center clinical study. Complication-free survival at 30 days was the safety clinical endpoint. Immediate technical success (ability to cross and dilate the lesion and achieve residual angiographic stenosis < 30%), 6-month primary vessel patency, limb salvage, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and amputation free survival (AFS) were the efficacy endpoints of interest.
RESULTS: Seventy five patients were included. There were 50 (68.0%) males; mean age, 69.0 ± 10.7 years. CLTI severity was based on the Rutherford Scale (R5 = 51; R6 = 17). Significant co-morbidities included diabetes mellitus (n = 68; 91.0%) and end-stage renal failure (n = 28; 37.0%). 112 atherosclerotic lesions were treated (TASC II D = 58 (52%); 76 (67%) de novo). There was 100% technical success. Mean lesion length treated was 22.4 ± 13.9 cm. Primary vessel patencies at 6 and 12 months were 64/86 (74%) and 43/74 (58%) and freedom from clinically driven TLR were 72/86 (84%) and 55/74 (74%) respectively. AFS was 61/73 (84.0%; five deaths and seven major lower extremity amputation) at 6-months. Mean Rutherford score improved from 5.1 ± 0.55 at baseline to 1.1 ± 2.05 (p < 0.05) at one year and there was a wound healing rate of 38/48 (79%) at the same timepoint.
CONCLUSIONS: The Selution SLR™ drug eluting balloon is safe and efficacious in treating highly complex infra-inguinal atherosclerotic lesions in an otherwise challenging frail population of CLTI patients with a high incidence of diabetes and end-stage renal failure. It is associated with highly satisfactory acute technical and clinical success, 12-month target lesion patency and AFS.
METHODS: Level 2b, Individual Cohort Study.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Percutaneous deep venous arterialisation (DVA) is emerging as a promising alternative for limb salvage in chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) patients without any reasonable anatomical option for conventional revascularisation techniques. However, its mechanism of action remains incompletely understood. This report aimed to find some of the histological alterations occurring in the limb following DVA.
UNASSIGNED: This short report presents the case of a 53 year old female who underwent DVA for Rutherford 5 CLTI. Although the intervention was successful and showed evidence of improved blood flow to the foot, the post-operative course was notable due to worsening infection leading to a below knee amputation four weeks later. The blood vessels were harvested for histological analysis, which found features of venous arterialisation such as smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia, even in the paired posterior tibial vein that did not undergo DVA.
UNASSIGNED: This case demonstrated unexpected histological changes occurring in the paired posterior tibial vein that did not undergo DVA. This warrants further investigations to fully understand the mechanisms at play in DVA and to explore the role of the paired vein in sustaining arterialised flow to the foot.