exoscope

出镜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于前颅窝(ACF)的前内侧部分的微创治疗方法,ACF后外侧部分的小切口和开颅术是优选的。
    方法:我们描述了超锁眼入路(SPKA)的概念和技术,使用外镜和内窥镜治疗ACF病变。
    结论:SPKA可以从横向方向观察ACF;内窥镜的扩展视角可以观察ACF的前内侧部分,包括双侧嗅沟。避免了面部皮肤和大的头皮切口,使这种方法对ACF病变有效。
    BACKGROUND: For a minimally invasive treatment approach to the anteromedial part of the anterior cranial fossa (ACF), a small incision and craniotomy of the posterolateral part of the ACF are preferable.
    METHODS: We described the concept and technique of suprapterional keyhole approach (SPKA), which uses an exoscope and endoscope to treat ACF lesions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SPKA enables ACF observation from the lateral direction; the endoscope\'s extended viewing angles enable the observation of the anteromedial part of the ACF, including the bilateral olfactory groove. Facial skin and large scalp incisions are avoided, making this approach efficient for ACF lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估进行中耳手术的各种方式的人体工程学差异。
    观察性研究。
    两个学术三级护理中心。
    进行中耳手术的主治医师和住院医师在术中拍照。使用经过验证的快速上肢评估(RULA)工具分析术中照片,以测量肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)风险。描述性统计和显著性测试用于表征和比较手术方式之间的人体工程学差异。进行多变量有序回归以评估与MSD风险增加相关的因素,由最终RULA得分决定。
    我们的110张手术照片中,大多数患者(82.7%)进行了中耳手术和乳突切除术(60.0%)。身体角度和最终RULA得分在不同模式之间差异很大。关于子集分析,显微手术表现出明显更差的手腕,树干,和颈部角度相比,内窥镜和腹腔镜手术。内镜手术的最终RULA评分明显低于内镜手术和显微镜手术,表明MSD风险显著降低。显微镜和内窥镜手术的最终评分没有显着变化。在与RULA评分增加相关因素的多变量有序回归中,与显微手术相比,腹腔镜手术的人体工程学风险显著降低(比值比=0.12,95%置信区间=[0.03-0.43]).
    异形,内窥镜,和显微手术都具有低人体工程学风险,尽管在所研究的手术方式中,腹腔镜中耳手术的风险最低。这证明了将每种方式与其他人体工程学干预措施结合使用以提供有意义的肌肉骨骼益处的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Evaluate ergonomic differences of various modalities for performing middle ear surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Observational study.
    UNASSIGNED: Two academic tertiary care centers.
    UNASSIGNED: Attending physicians and residents performing middle ear surgery were photographed intraoperatively. Intraoperative photographs were analyzed using the validated Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool to measure musculoskeletal disease (MSD) risk. Descriptive statistics and significance testing were used to characterize and compare ergonomic differences between surgical modalities. Multivariable ordinal regression was performed to assess factors associated with increased MSD risk, as determined by the final RULA score.
    UNASSIGNED: Most of our 110 intraoperative photos featured attendings (82.7%) performing combined middle ear surgery and mastoidectomy (60.0%). Body angles and the final RULA score varied significantly among modalities. On subset analysis, microscopic surgery exhibited significantly worse wrist, trunk, and neck angles compared to endoscopic and exoscopic surgery. Exoscopic surgery had significantly lower final RULA scores than both endoscopic and microscopic surgery, indicating significantly lower MSD risk. Microscopic and endoscopic surgery final scores did not vary significantly. In a multivariable ordinal regression of factors associated with increased RULA score, exoscopic surgery had statistically significantly less ergonomic risk relative to microscopic surgery (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = [0.03-0.43]).
    UNASSIGNED: Exoscopic, endoscopic, and microscopic surgery all featured low ergonomic risk, although exoscopic middle ear surgery demonstrated the lowest risk profile among studied surgical modalities. This demonstrates the importance of using each modality in combination with other ergonomic interventions to provide meaningful musculoskeletal benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去的20年里,胶质瘤手术得到了显著的加强,具有提高的安全性和有限但改善的生活期望。在这个意义上,荧光引导切除高级别胶质瘤(HGG)起着核心作用,允许更大程度的切除(EOR)。在传统显微镜上实施荧光技术时,可以考虑引入腹腔镜引导手术。我们介绍了在5-ALA荧光引导下HGG患者的肿瘤切除术中,与显微手术相比,腹腔镜引导手术的应用和优势。方法:连续10例患者接受HGG切除术。手术通过腹腔镜引导程序(OlympusORBEYE)进行,并在手术前5小时口服Gliolan后进行。手术期间,程序转向使用微观(Kinevo900,蔡司)视图。在手术期间以1至5(从最小到最大)的标度在不同的图片样品中主观地测量两种不同程序下的荧光强度。还比较分析了手术视野的亮度和解剖结构的细节。结果:10例患者中,所有病例的组织病理学诊断均为高级别胶质瘤.在九个案例中,有可能实现大体全切除.没有围手术期死亡。中值荧光强度,在1-5的范围内,出镜组为4.5,显微镜组为3.5(p<0.01)。结论:在5-氨基乙酰丙酸的荧光引导下,腹腔镜引导手术增加了传统的优势。除了低成本和进行协作手术的可能性的重要优势之外,与显微镜引导的手术相比,它增加了肿瘤的平面和连续可视化,并在荧光引导的神经胶质瘤手术领域提供了优势。
    Background: Glioma surgery has been remarkably enhanced in the past 2 decades, with improved safety and limited but improved life expectations. The fluorescence-guided resection of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) plays a central role in this sense, allowing a greater extent of resection (EOR). The introduction of exoscopic-guided surgery may be considered in implementing fluorescence techniques over traditional microscopes. We present the application and the advantages of exoscopic-guided surgery compared to microscopic surgery in tumor resection guided by 5-ALA fluorescence in patients with HGGs. Methods: Ten consecutive patients underwent surgery for HGG resection. The surgery was performed via an exoscopic-guided procedure (Olympus ORBEYE) and after the oral administration of Gliolan 5 h before the procedure. During surgery, the procedure shifted to using a microscopic (Kinevo 900, Zeiss) view. The intensity of the fluorescence under the two different procedures was subjectively measured in different picture samples during the surgery on a 1 to 5 (from minimum to maximum) scale. The brightness of the surgical field and the detailing of the anatomy were also analyzed comparatively. Results: Among the ten patients, the histopathological diagnosis was an high-grade glioma in all cases. In nine cases, it was possible to achieve gross total resection. There was no perioperative mortality. The median fluorescence intensity, on a scale of 1-5, was 4.5 in the exoscope group and 3.5 in the microscope group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The exoscopic-guided surgery adds advantages to traditional fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid. Beyond the important advantage of low cost and the possibility to perform collaborative surgeries, it adds a plain and continuous visualization of the tumor and offers advantages in the surgical field of fluorescence-guided glioma surgery compared to the microscopic-guided one.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:颞浅动脉至大脑中动脉(STA-MCA)直接搭桥手术是治疗烟雾病(MMD)最常见的手术方法。这里,我们的目的是比较3D外镜在旁路手术中的性能与金标准手术显微镜。
    方法:考虑纳入2015年至2023年在一家大学医院进行的所有直接STA-MCA旁路手术。数据是从患者档案和手术视频材料中回顾性收集的。从2020年起,旁路手术仅使用数字三维外镜作为可视化设备进行.结果与显微外科搭桥对照组(2015-2019)进行比较。主要终点定义为手术的总持续时间,完成血管吻合的持续时间(缺血时间),旁路通畅,进行吻合的缝线数量,在最后一次随访时,在吻合口渗漏试验和格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)后增加了一些指标作为次要结局参数.
    结果:共有16名连续烟雾患者接受了21个STA-MCA旁路手术。其中,6例患者使用显微镜进行手术,10例患者使用外镜进行手术(ORBEYE®n=1;AEOS®n=9).手术的总持续时间在设备之间相当(显微镜:313分钟。±116vs.外镜:279分钟。±42;p=0.647)。缺血时间也证明组间相似(显微镜:43分钟。±19vs.外镜:41分钟。±7;p=0.701)。旁路通畅率没有差异。在可视化设备之间,每次吻合的针数相似(显微镜:17±4vs.外镜:17±2;p=0.887)。相比之下,在旁路泄漏测试后,在显微吻合中需要更多额外的缝合(p=0.035).
    结论:考虑到样本量小,使用脚踏开关式3D外镜对烟雾病进行端侧搭桥手术与更多并发症无关,并导致与显微搭桥手术相当的临床和放射学结果.
    OBJECTIVE: Superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) direct bypass surgery is the most common surgical procedure to treat moyamoya disease (MMD). Here, we aim to compare the performance of the 3D exoscope in bypass surgery with the gold standard operative microscope.
    METHODS: All direct STA-MCA bypass procedures performed at a single university hospital for MMD between 2015 and 2023 were considered for inclusion. Data were retrospectively collected from patient files and surgical video material. From 2020 onwards, bypass procedures were exclusively performed using a digital three-dimensional exoscope as visualization device. Results were compared with a microsurgical bypass control group (2015-2019). The primary endpoint was defined as total duration of surgery, duration of completing the vascular anastomosis (ischemia time), bypass patency, number of stiches to perform the anastomosis, added stiches after leakage testing of the anastomosis and the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at last follow-up as secondary outcome parameter.
    RESULTS: A total of 16 consecutive moyamoya patients underwent 21 STA-MCA bypass procedures. Thereof, six patients were operated using a microscope and ten patients using an exoscope (ORBEYE® n = 1; AEOS® n = 9). Total duration of surgery was comparable between devices (microscope: 313 min. ± 116 vs. exoscope: 279 min. ± 42; p = 0.647). Ischemia time also proved similar between groups (microscope: 43 min. ± 19 vs. exoscope: 41 min. ± 7; p = 0.701). No differences were noted in bypass patency rates. The number of stiches per anastomosis was similar between visualization devices (microscope: 17 ± 4 vs. exoscope: 17 ± 2; p = 0.887). In contrast, more additional stiches were needed in microscopic anastomoses after leakage testing the bypass (p = 0.035).
    CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the small sample size, end-to-side bypass surgery for moyamoya disease using a foot switch-operated 3D exoscope was not associated with more complications and led to comparable clinical and radiological results as microscopic bypass surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了评估经口激光手术(TOLES)在单中心系列受良恶性声门和声门上病变影响的患者中的疗效,并将结果与经口激光显微手术(TOLMS)的结果进行比较。
    为了证明TOLES在手术时间方面的非劣效性,切缘状态和并发症发生率,我们比较了2021年7月至2023年7月间接受TOLES治疗的93例患者的结局与接受TOLMS治疗的107例历史患者的配对组的结局.要对TOLES和TOLMS进行多参数人体工程学评估,我们使用观察性方法进行生物力学超负荷风险评估,并使用可穿戴技术比较了15例TOLES手术与同一位外科医生使用TOLMS进行的13例手术的配对匹配.
    在手术时间方面没有发现显着差异,正利润率,或TOLES和TOLMS之间的并发症。通过惯性测量单元和肌电图表面电极进行的人体工程学评估表明,与TOLMS相比,TOLES的生物力学过载降低。
    TOLES的许多优点,例如其优越的教学价值,更好的数字控制的光,即使通过小无聊的喉镜,改善双目视觉,通过3或4手技术提高手术性能,很难量化。相比之下,与TOLMS相比,在肿瘤学结果和人体工程学方面具有非劣效性。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the efficacy of transoral laser exoscopic surgery (TOLES) in a unicentric series of patients affected by benign and malignant glottic and supraglottic lesions, and compare outcomes with those of transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS).
    UNASSIGNED: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of TOLES in terms of operative time, margin status and complication rates, we compared outcomes of 93 patients treated by TOLES between July 2021 and July 2023 with those of a match-paired group of 107 historical patients treated by TOLMS. To perform a multiparametric ergonomic evaluation of TOLES vs TOLMS, we used observational methods for biomechanical overload risk assessment and wearable technologies comparing 15 procedures with TOLES vs a paired match of 13 surgeries performed with TOLMS by the same surgeon.
    UNASSIGNED: No significant differences were found in terms of surgical duration, positive margins, or complications between TOLES and TOLMS. Ergonomics assessment by inertial measurement units and electromyographic surface electrodes demonstrated a reduced biomechanical overload with TOLES compared to TOLMS.
    UNASSIGNED: The many advantages of TOLES, such as its superior didactic value, better digital control of light even through small-bored laryngoscopes, improved binocular vision, and increase in surgical performance by 3 or 4-hand techniques, are difficult to be quantified. In contrast, its non-inferiority in terms of oncological results and better ergonomics compared to TOLMS are demonstrated herein.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:展开式开门式椎管成形术对脊髓型颈椎病具有良好的临床疗效。然而,一些与手术侵袭相关的术后并发症,如轴性颈部疼痛和后凸,尚未解决。使用外镜,这是最近推出的一种新颖的放大工具,允许传统的开门椎板成形术与最小的侵入性。因此,我们建议使用外腹腔镜微创椎管成形术(exLAP),并介绍其在术后急性期的临床结果.方法:回顾性分析28例C3-C6椎板开放成形术患者的临床资料。在这些病人中,17例接受exLAP(M组),11例接受常规平林开门椎板成形术(H组)。从术后第1天到第7天,使用颈部疼痛和口服镇痛药使用频率的数字评定量表(NRS)评分评估结果。结果:M组患者颈部疼痛的NRS评分明显低于H组。结论:ExLAP是一种新的,实用,和微创手术技术可以减轻脊髓型颈椎病患者的术后轴性疼痛。
    Background/Objectives: Expansive open-door laminoplasty results in favorable clinical outcomes for cervical myelopathy. However, some postoperative complications associated with surgical invasiveness, such as axial neck pain and kyphosis, have not been resolved. The use of an exoscope, which is a recently introduced novel magnification tool, allows for traditional open-door laminoplasty with minimal invasiveness. Therefore, we propose the use of exoscopic minimally invasive open-door laminoplasty (exLAP) and present its clinical outcomes during the acute postoperative period. Methods: A total of 28 patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty at C3-C6 were reviewed. Of these patients, 17 underwent exLAP (group M) and 11 underwent conventional Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty (group H). Outcomes were evaluated using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for neck pain and the frequency of oral analgesic use from postoperative day 1 to 7. Results: The NRS score for neck pain was significantly lower for patients in group M than for those in group H. Conclusions: ExLAP is a novel, practical, and minimally invasive surgical technique that may alleviate the postoperative axial pain of patients with cervical myelopathy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    3D外镜是一种新兴技术,在神经外科手术中取得了成功,现在越来越多地用于耳科和神经手术。目前对其安全性尚无共识,效率,和效用,与传统显微镜相比,这些程序。本系统综述旨在评估3维(3D)外镜在耳科和神经手术中的使用。
    MEDLINE/PubMed,WebofScience,Scopus,和EMBASE。
    使用3D外镜对耳科和神经外科的数据库进行系统搜索。考虑了对发表日期没有限制的英文论文。纳入标准:使用外镜研究耳科或神经/颅底手术的完整文章。排除标准:非耳科手术和非神经/颅底手术,独家使用传统的显微镜,社论,视频报告,和信件。两位作者独立审查了论文的收录情况;差异以协商一致方式解决。提取的变量包括:患者人数,外科手术的类型,手术和术后并发症,设置和操作时间,和可视化和人体工程学评级。
    分析了6篇包含128例手术病例(103例,25例显微镜)的文章。在手术切除的病例中,21%是慢性耳部疾病的手术,5%是人工耳蜗植入,74%是侧颅底手术,包括各种各样的方法。
    根据初步研究,出镜在安全性上似乎相当,可视化,与手术显微镜相比,效率,具有增加舒适度和易用性的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: The 3D exoscope is an emerging technology that has been met with success in neurosurgery and is now increasingly used in otologic and neurotologic surgery. There is currently no consensus on its safety, efficiency, and utility, compared to the traditional microscope for these procedures. This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of the 3-dimensional (3D) exoscope for otologic and neurotologic surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search of the databases was conducted for otologic and neurotologic surgery using the 3D exoscope. English language papers with no limit on the date of publication were considered. Inclusion criteria: full articles studying otologic or neurotologic/skull base surgery using exoscopes. Exclusion criteria: non-otologic surgery and non-neurotologic/skull base surgery, exclusive use of the traditional microscope, editorials, video reports, and letters. Two authors independently reviewed papers for inclusion; discrepancies were settled by consensus. Extracted variables included: number of patients, types of surgical procedures, operative and postoperative complications, setup and operative time, and visualization and ergonomic rating.
    UNASSIGNED: Six articles containing 128 surgical cases (103 exoscopic and 25 microscopic) were analyzed. Of the exoscopic cases, 21% were surgeries for chronic ear disease, 5% were cochlear implants, and 74% were lateral skull base procedures encompassing a wide variety of approaches.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on preliminary studies, the exoscope appears to be comparable in safety, visualization, and efficiency compared to the operating microscope, with the potential for increased comfort and ease of use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近引入了手术3D外镜作为显微神经外科手术中手术显微镜的替代品。由于exoscope的可用性仍然有限,重要的是要知道即使是短期的手术外镜训练也能发展执行手术所需的技能。
    方法:10名参与者(6名顾问,四名居民)使用3D外显镜(AesculapAeos®)执行了两项实验室旁路测试任务。在人工模型之间(间隔2-5周)进行了6次训练(6小时)。参与者被分为两组:测试组(n=6)接受外镜训练,对照组(n=4)接受手术显微镜训练。试验任务是人工端侧显微外科吻合模型,使用12个中断的9-0缝合线并记录在视频上。我们根据缝合时间比较了测试对象之间的个人和小组表现,吻合质量,和手动灵巧。
    结果:总之,进行了20次旁路任务(基线n=10,随访n=10)。在外镜训练组中,中位持续时间减少了28分钟和44%。下降幅度更大(29分钟,45%)在少于6年微神经外科手术经验的参与者中,与更有经验的参与者相比(13分钟,24%)。培训后,至少有1年使用外验镜经验的参与者没有改善任务持续时间.与使用显微镜的训练相比,使用外镜的训练导致更大的时间减少(44%对17%)。
    结论:即使使用外镜进行短期训练,在新手微神经外科医生中,外镜辅助旁路缝合也有显著改善。对于更有经验的参与者,很快就达到了初始学习曲线的平台期。可能需要更长期的努力来见证此用户组的进一步改进。
    BACKGROUND: The surgical 3D exoscopes have recently been introduced as an alternative to the surgical microscopes in microneurosurgery. Since the exoscope availability is still limited, it is relevant to know whether even a short-term exoscope training develops the skills needed for performing exoscope-assisted surgeries.
    METHODS: Ten participants (six consultants, four residents) performed two laboratory bypass test tasks with a 3D exoscope (Aesculap Aeos®). Six training sessions (6 h) were performed in between (interval of 2-5 weeks) on artificial models. The participants were divided into two groups: test group (n = 6) trained with the exoscope and control group (n = 4) with a surgical microscope. The test task was an artificial end-to-side microsurgical anastomosis model, using 12 interrupted 9-0 sutures and recorded on video. We compared the individual as well as group performance among the test subjects based on suturing time, anastomosis quality, and manual dexterity.
    RESULTS: Altogether, 20 bypass tasks were performed (baseline n = 10, follow-up n = 10). The median duration decreased by 28 min and 44% in the exoscope training group. The decrease was steeper (29 min, 45%) among the participants with less than 6 years of microneurosurgery experience compared to the more experienced participants (13 min, 24%). After training, the participants with at least 1-year experience of using the exoscope did not improve their task duration. The training with the exoscope led to a greater time reduction than the training with the microscope (44% vs 17%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Even short-term training with the exoscope led to marked improvements in exoscope-assisted bypass suturing among novice microneurosurgeons. For the more experienced participants, a plateau in the initial learning curve was reached quickly. A much longer-term effort might be needed to witness further improvement in this user group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    “哑铃”肿瘤被描述为表现为脊柱内和脊柱外延伸的良性肿瘤,通过椎间孔连接(麦考密克,1996)[1]。大约90%的此类肿瘤在组织学上被分类为神经鞘瘤,最常见于胸部区域(Takamura等人。,1997年)[2]。通常,一旦肛门内部分的尺寸增加导致神经或脊髓压迫,就可以进行诊断(Ishikawa等。,2002)[3]。如何通过微创方法对具有大的或位于腹侧的椎间孔外组件的肿瘤进行完整的手术切除仍存在争议(Payer等。,2006年)[4]。单阶段后部切除肿瘤是表现出小的椎间孔外成分的病变的最有效方法(Payer和etal。,2006年)[4]。然而,由于手术视野减少和周围结构的控制不佳,可以通过手术显微镜(OM)视图获得,这种方法的应用似乎仍然仅限于脊柱外成分较大的病变。另一种手术方法是经胸膜侧入路,which,然而,具有更大的并发症风险,并且通常需要胸外科医生的帮助。在过去的十年里,外镜是作为混合光学仪器开发的,站在OM和内窥镜之间,融合了两种可视化技术的优缺点,提供宽视角,高分辨率图像,和非单轴视图。在这项工作中,我们介绍了一名60岁的男性患者,该患者有6个月的背痛病史和轻度的左肢体感觉异常,对保守治疗具有抵抗力,这是首次采用单阶段镜检查辅助(OlympusORBEYE4K-3D出镜)后入路完全切除了胸椎哑铃型神经鞘瘤,并有较大的脊柱外受累。
    \"Dumbbell\" tumors are described as benign neoplasms presenting both intraspinal and extraspinal extensions, connected through the intervertebral foramen (McCormick, 1996) [1]. About 90 % of such tumors are histologically classified as schwannomas that most frequently arise in the thoracic region (Takamura and et al., 1997) [2]. Diagnosis is usually achieved as soon as the dimensional increase of the intracanal portion results in nerve or spinal cord compression (Ishikawa and et al., 2002) [3]. How to obtain a complete surgical resection of tumors with large or ventrally located extraforaminal components with a minimally invasive approach is still debated (Payer and et al., 2006) [4]. The single-stage posterior removal of the tumor is the most performed approach for lesions presenting with a small extra-foraminal component (Payer and et al., 2006) [4]. However, due to the reduced visual surgical field and poor control of the surrounding structures that could be obtained with an operative microscopic (OM) view, the application of this approach still appears to be limited to lesions with a large extraspinal component. An alternative surgical approach is the lateral transthoracic transpleural approach, which, however, carries greater risks of complications and often requires assistance from a thoracic surgeon. During the last decade, the exoscope was developed as a hybrid optical instrument, standing between the OM and the endoscope, merging the pros and cons of both visualization technologies, providing a wide viewing angle, high-resolution images, and non-monoaxial view. In this work we present a case of a 60-years old male patient with a 6-month history of dorsal pain and mild left limb paresthesia resistant to conservative treatment in which for the first time a single stage exoscopic-assisted (Olympus ORBEYE 4K-3D exoscope) posterior approach was used to remove entirely a thoracic dumbbell schwannoma with large extraspinal involvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    双额骨开颅术经常涉及额窦开放和粘膜损伤。我们报告了一种使用外科钛微夹修复额窦粘膜的新技术。在2019年4月至2022年8月之间,连续6例接受额窦暴露和粘膜损伤的双额开颅手术的患者使用外科钛微夹进行了粘膜修复。在所有情况下,将额窦粘膜从额窦内壁剥离,以确保使用ORBEYE进行足够的粘膜切缘。在所有情况下,都使用微夹子完成了修复。我们还使用纤维蛋白胶密封粘膜伤口,并用骨屑充分填充额窦,在所有情况下,术后油液的发生率为零。当额窦粘膜在开颅手术中受伤时,使用ORBEYE使用外科钛微夹子修复粘膜可能是一种简单而快速的技术。
    Bifrontal craniotomy frequently involves opening the frontal sinus and mucosal injury. We report a new technique for mucosal repair in the frontal sinus using surgical titanium microclips. Six consecutive patients who underwent bifrontal craniotomy with frontal sinus exposure and mucosal injury underwent mucosal repair using surgical titanium microclips between April 2019 and August 2022. In all cases, the frontal sinus mucosa was peeled from the inner walls of the frontal sinus to ensure sufficient mucosal margin for clipping using ORBEYE. The repair was accomplished with the microclips in all cases. We also sealed the mucosal wound using fibrin glue and sufficiently filled the frontal sinus with bone debris, resulting in zero incidence of postoperative liquorrhea in all cases. Repairing the mucosa using surgical titanium microclips using ORBEYE may be a simple and quick technique when the frontal sinus mucosa is injured during craniotomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号