UNASSIGNED: There are increasing demands on Emergency Medical Services. More efficient treatment pathways are required to support conveyance decision making and patient referral in prehospital care. Point of Care testing is increasingly available and utilised across the NHS to support optimal ways of working. We aimed to design and conduct a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis to prioritise in vitro point of care tests and use cases for inclusion in a platform trial of in vitro point of care testing in UK Emergency Medical Services.
UNASSIGNED: We designed a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis that included systematic scoping reviews stakeholder recruitment, two stakeholder surveys and two stakeholder workshops to scope the use cases, explore criteria and map use cases, evaluate the criteria and measure the use cases against the criteria.
UNASSIGNED: We recruited 32 stakeholders. We developed a scoring matrix with 4 criteria for scoring the use cases and 8 criteria for scoring the point of care tests and applied weighting determined from survey results. Use cases were scored by the stakeholders against 4 criteria. The 3 highest scoring use cases were point of care troponin testing in: possible Acute Myocardial Infarction, lactate testing in suspected sepsis and in trauma. We developed the process for scoring the point of care tests to be completed close to a proposed trial to allow for a changes in technology.
UNASSIGNED: We successfully designed a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis to identify use cases and candidate tests for inclusion in a future platform trial of in vitro point of care testing in UK Emergency Medical Services. We identified 3 use cases for evaluation in a platform trial of in vitro point of care testing: troponin testing in possible acute myocardial infarction, lactate testing in suspected sepsis and lactate testing to identify occult haemorrhage in trauma.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital management of severely burned patients is extremely challenging. It should include adequate analgesia, decision-making on the necessity of prehospital endotracheal intubation and the administration of crystalloid fluids. Guidelines recommend immediate transport to specialised burn centres when certain criteria are met. To date, there is still insufficient knowledge on the characteristics of prehospital emergency treatment. We sought to investigate the current practice and its potential effects on patient outcome.
METHODS: We conducted a single centre, retrospective cohort analysis of severely burned patients (total burned surface area > 20%), admitted to the Berlin burn centre between 2014 and 2019. The relevant data was extracted from Emergency Medical Service reports and digital patient charts for exploratory data analysis. Primary outcome was 28-day-mortality.
RESULTS: Ninety patients (male/female 60/30, with a median age of 52 years [interquartile range, IQR 37-63], median total burned surface area 36% [IQR 25-51] and median body mass index 26.56 kg/m2 [IQR 22.86-30.86] were included. The median time from trauma to ED arrival was 1 h 45 min; within this time, on average 1961 ml of crystalloid fluid (0.48 ml/kg/%TBSA, IQR 0.32-0.86) was administered. Most patients received opioid-based analgesia. Times from trauma to ED arrival were longer for patients who were intubated. Neither excessive fluid treatment (> 1000 ml/h) nor transport times > 2 h was associated with higher mortality. A total of 31 patients (34,4%) died within the hospital stay. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that non-survival was linked to age > 65 years (odds ratio (OR) 3.5, 95% CI: 1.27-9.66), inhalation injury (OR 3.57, 95% CI: 1.36-9.36), burned surface area > 60% (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.57-16.84) and prehospital intubation (5.38, 95% CI: 1.92-15.92).
CONCLUSIONS: We showed that severely burned patients frequently received excessive fluid administration prehospitally and that this was not associated with more hemodynamic stability or outcome. In our cohort, patients were frequently intubated prehospitally, which was associated with increased mortality rates. Further research and emergency medical staff training should focus on adequate fluid application and cautious decision-making on the risks and benefits of prehospital intubation.
BACKGROUND: German Clinical Trial Registry (ID: DRKS00033516).

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of births worldwide result in life-threatening complications during pregnancy, delivery, or postpartum. Comprehensive Emergency Management of Obstetric and Newborn Care (CEmONC) is intended as one of the measures for maternal healthcare services to reduce the high burden with regard to childbirth complications. However, its state of implementation fidelity has not been well investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the implementation fidelity of CEmONC services at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.
METHODS: A case-study design with an embedded mixed method was employed. Adherence, quality of delivery, and participant responsiveness dimensions from Carroll\'s conceptual framework were used in this evaluation. Four hundred four exit interviews, 423 retrospective document reviews and 10 key informants were conducted. Moreover, a binary logistic regression model was fitted. The qualitative data were transcribed, translated, coded, and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. The overall implementation fidelity of the CEmONC was judged based on the pre-seated judgmental criteria.
RESULTS: Overall the implementation fidelity of the CEmONC service was 75.5%. Quality of delivery, participant responsiveness and adherence were 72.7%, 76.6% and 77.2% respectively. Signal functions like parenteral antibiotics and removal of retained products were insufficiently performed against the recommended protocols which was also evidenced by the key informant interviews. Healthcare providers\' respect for the clients was less. Age ≥ 35 years (AOR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24,0.98), educational status of college and above (AOR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.46,4.66), being government employed (AOR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.08,3.18), having ANC follow-up (AOR = 5.50, 95% CI: 1.83, 16.47) and grand multigravida (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.08, 4.38) were factors significantly associated with participant responsiveness towards the services.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall implementation fidelity of the CEmONC services was implemented in good fidelity. Moreover, the quality of delivery was judged as implemented in fair fidelity. Parenteral antibiotics and removal of retained products were not found to be sufficiently performed. Respect for the clients was insufficiently delivered. Therefore, it is recommended that parenteral antibiotics drugs be adequately provided and training for healthcare providers regarding compassionate and respectful care shall be facilitated. Moreover, healthcare providers are strongly recommended to adhere to the recommended guidelines.

UNASSIGNED: Defibrillation in the critical first minutes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) can significantly improve survival. However, timely access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) remains a barrier.
UNASSIGNED: The authors estimated the impact of a statewide program for drone-delivered AEDs in North Carolina integrated into emergency medical service and first responder (FR) response for OHCA.
UNASSIGNED: Using Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival registry data, we included 28,292 OHCA patients ≥18 years of age between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 in 48 North Carolina counties. We estimated the improvement in response times (time from 9-1-1 call to AED arrival) achieved by 2 sequential interventions: 1) AEDs for all FRs; and 2) optimized placement of drones to maximize 5-minute AED arrival within each county. Interventions were evaluated with logistic regression models to estimate changes in initial shockable rhythm and survival.
UNASSIGNED: Historical county-level median response times were 8.0 minutes (IQR: 7.0-9.0 minutes) with 16.5% of OHCAs having AED arrival times of <5 minutes (IQR: 11.2%-24.3%). Providing all FRs with AEDs improved median response to 7.0 minutes (IQR: 6.2-7.8 minutes) and increased OHCAs with <5-minute AED arrival to 22.3% (IQR: 16.4%-30.9%). Further incorporating optimized drone networks (326 drones across all 48 counties) improved median response to 4.8 minutes (IQR: 4.3-5.2 minutes) and OHCAs with <5-minute AED arrival to 56.3% (IQR: 46.9%-64.2%). Survival rates were estimated to increase by 34% for witnessed OHCAs with estimated drone arrival <5 minutes and ahead of FR and emergency medical service.
UNASSIGNED: Deployment of AEDs by FRs and optimized drone delivery can improve AED arrival times which may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Implementation studies are needed.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to explore social isolation and loneliness in those who frequently contacted the ambulance service, what factors contributed to this and how unmet needs could be addressed.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with staff from the ambulance service and service users who were identified as frequently contacting the ambulance service. Service users also completed the UCLA loneliness scale and personal community maps. Data were analysed thematically before triangulation with the UCLA loneliness scale and personal community maps.
RESULTS: The final analysis was drawn from 15 staff and seven service user participants. The relationship between social isolation and loneliness and contacting the ambulance service was a contributing, but not the driving, factor in contacting the ambulance service. For service users, we identified three key themes: (1) impact on activities of daily living and loneliness and/or isolation as a result of a health condition; (2) accessing appropriate health and social care services to meet needs; (3) the link between social isolation and/or loneliness and contact with the ambulance service. The analysis of staff data also highlighted three key themes: (1) social isolation and/or loneliness in their role; (2) access to other appropriate health and social care services; (3) the impact of austerity and Covid-19 on social isolation and/or loneliness.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research emphasises the complex nature of social isolation and loneliness, including the cyclic nature of poor health and social isolation and loneliness, and how this contributes to contact with the ambulance service.
UNASSIGNED: The advisory group for the study was supported by a public and patient representative who contributed to the design of the study documentation, data analysis and authorship.

BACKGROUND: Paramedicine is a dynamic profession which has evolved from a \"treat and transport\" service into a complex network of health professionals working in a diverse range of clinical roles. Research is challenging in the paramedicine context, and internationally, research capacity and culture has developed slowly. International examples of research agendas and strategies in paramedicine exist, however, research priorities have not previously been identified in Ireland.
METHODS: This study was a three round electronic modified Delphi design which aimed to establish the key aspects of the research priorities via end-user consensus. Participants included interested stakeholders involved in prehospital care or research in Ireland. The first round questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions with results coded and developed into themes for the closed-ended questions used in the second and third round questionnaires. A consensus level of 70% was set a priori for second and third rounds.
RESULTS: Research Priorities that reached consensus included Staff Wellbeing, Education and Professionalism and Acute Medical Conditions. Respondents indicated that these three areas should be a priority in the next 2 years. Education, Staffing and Leadership were imperative Key Resources that required change. Education was a Key Processes change deemed imperative to allow the future research to occur. Outcomes that should be included in the future research strategy were Patient Outcomes, Practitioner Development, Practitioner Wellbeing, Alternate Pathways, Evidence-based Practice and Staff Satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are similar to previously published international studies, with some key differences. There was a greater emphasis on Education and Practitioner Wellbeing with the latter possibly attributed to the timing of the research in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. The disseminated findings of this study should inform sustainable funding models to aid the development of paramedicine research in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to address the challenges faced by rural emergency medical services in Europe, due to an increasing number of missions and limited human resources. The primary objective was to determine the necessity of having an on-site emergency physician (EP), while the secondary objectives included analyzing the characteristics of rural EP missions.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, examining rural EP missions carried out between January 1st, 2017, and December 2nd, 2021 in Burgenland, Austria. The need for physical presence of an EP was classified based on the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score into three categories; category A: no need for an EP (NACA 1-3); category B: need for an EP (NACA 1-3 along with additional medical interventions beyond the capabilities of emergency medical technicians); and category C: definite need for an EP (NACA 4-7). Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
RESULTS: Out of 16,971 recorded missions, 15,591 were included in the study. Approximately 32.3% of missions fell into category A, indicating that an EP\'s physical presence was unnecessary. The diagnoses made by telecommunicators matched those of the EPs in only 52.8% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that about a third of EP missions carried out in rural areas might not have a solid medical rationale. This underscores the importance of developing an alternative care approach for these missions. Failing to address this could put additional pressure on already stretched EMS systems, risking their collapse.

OBJECTIVE: To codesign safety-netting strategies for primary and emergency care settings by integrating the experiences and ideas of patients, carers and clinicians.
METHODS: A codesign process involving two focus group discussions, eight individual interviews and five workshops. All sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and reported using the Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines.
METHODS: Primary and emergency care in Sweden, focusing on the Stockholm region.
METHODS: 7 (5 women) individuals with patient expertise, 1 (man) individual with carer expertise, 18 (12 women) individuals with clinical expertise.
RESULTS: Three main categories reflecting strategies for applying safety-netting were developed: first, conveying safety-netting advice, which involves understanding patient concerns, tailoring communication and using appropriate modalities for communicating; second, ensuring common understanding, which involves summarising information, asking a teach-back question and anticipating questions post consultation; and third, supporting safety-netting behaviour, which involves facilitating reconsultation, helping patients and carers to navigate the health system and explaining the care context and its purpose.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the collaborative nature of safety-netting, engaging both the clinician and patient, sometimes supported by carers, in an iterative process. Adding to previous research, our study also emphasises the importance of anticipating postconsultation inquiries and facilitating reconsultation.

Hurricanes, as one of the most devastating natural disasters, significantly impact the public\'s health, causing both physical injuries and long-lasting mental health issues. Although substantial research has focused on hurricane-related injuries, this study aims to synthesize findings from recent literature, specifically evaluating the 10 most recent hurricanes, to identify research gaps and inform future studies. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA-Scr guidelines, assessed studies from PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane databases, and Medline as of February 2024. Eligibility criteria focused on studies examining physical and mental health impacts, COVID-19 effects, and emergency medical services (EMS) interventions related to Hurricanes Ian, Nicholas, Ida, Zeta, Delta, Sally, Laura, Isaias, Hanna, and Dorian. Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were categorized into four themes: physical injuries and fatalities, mental health impacts, hurricane-COVID-19 interplay, and EMS interventions. Findings revealed varied mechanisms of injuries and deaths, significant mental health challenges, compounded crises due to COVID-19, and diverse EMS strategies, including AI utilization and strategic planning for medical care delivery. Addressing the social determinants of health and evaluating hurricane readiness initiatives were two gaps in the literature identified. Future research should focus on the mental health impacts and concurrent crisis challenges to develop comprehensive disaster management practices that enhance community resilience against future hurricanes and public health crises.

暂无摘要。