Hurricanes, as one of the most devastating natural disasters, significantly impact the public\'s health, causing both physical injuries and long-lasting mental health issues. Although substantial research has focused on hurricane-related injuries, this study aims to synthesize findings from recent literature, specifically evaluating the 10 most recent hurricanes, to identify research gaps and inform future studies. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA-Scr guidelines, assessed studies from PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane databases, and Medline as of February 2024. Eligibility criteria focused on studies examining physical and mental health impacts, COVID-19 effects, and emergency medical services (EMS) interventions related to Hurricanes Ian, Nicholas, Ida, Zeta, Delta, Sally, Laura, Isaias, Hanna, and Dorian. Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were categorized into four themes: physical injuries and fatalities, mental health impacts, hurricane-COVID-19 interplay, and EMS interventions. Findings revealed varied mechanisms of injuries and deaths, significant mental health challenges, compounded crises due to COVID-19, and diverse EMS strategies, including AI utilization and strategic planning for medical care delivery. Addressing the social determinants of health and evaluating hurricane readiness initiatives were two gaps in the literature identified. Future research should focus on the mental health impacts and concurrent crisis challenges to develop comprehensive disaster management practices that enhance community resilience against future hurricanes and public health crises.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the main benefits and limitations of applying technology in integrating prehospital care into the health network.
METHODS: Systematic review based on the PRISMA statement, carried out between July and October 2020, databases used: Pubmed, BVSalud, Cinahl, Scielo, and Scopus with MeSH search engines: [\"Emergency medical service\"], [\"prehospital, [\"Technology\"], [\"System integration\"], [\"Intersectorial collaboration\"], [\"Telemedicine\"], [\"Emergencies technology\"], [\"Medical informatics\"], and boolean operators AND, OR. Between 2010 and 2020, in English and Spanish. Theses, conference abstracts and editorials were excluded. Out of 4719 articles, 16 were selected according to the methodological quality Mixed Methods Appraisal Toll.
RESULTS: The Infoway Benefits Evaluation Framewor Model was used for the analysis.
RESULTS: Optimization of information between hospital centers and rescue teams, real-time access to patient records, early preparation of receiving hospitals. Consolidation of system productivity, minimization of waiting times, referrals, and patient transfers; Limitations: Problems with internet access and quality, unreliable technology providers, slow response, or difficulties with funding and privacy of the system, which generates frustration in the teams.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of technology in integrating prehospital care into the health network generates benefits and should consider the use of information systems and user satisfaction to achieve integration with health systems, considering the limitations of the context.

BACKGROUND: The global impact of COVID-19 has been profound, with efforts to manage and contain the virus placing increased pressure on healthcare systems and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in particular. There has been no previous review of studies investigating EMS interventions or experiences during pandemics. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and present published quantitative and qualitative evidence of EMS pandemic interventions, and how this translates into practice.
METHODS: Six electronic databases were searched from inception to July 2022, supplemented with internet searches and forward and backward citation tracking from included studies and review articles. A narrative synthesis of all eligible quantitative studies was performed and structured around the aims, key findings, as well as intervention type and content, where appropriate. Data from the qualitative studies were also synthesised narratively and presented thematically, according to their main aims and key findings.
RESULTS: The search strategy identified a total of 22,599 citations and after removing duplicates and excluding citations based on title and abstract, and full text screening, 90 studies were included. The quantitative narrative synthesis included seven overarching themes, describing EMS pandemic preparedness plans and interventions implemented in response to pandemics. The qualitative data synthesis included five themes, detailing the EMS workers\' experiences of providing care during pandemics, their needs and their suggestions for best practices moving forward.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns for their own and their families\' safety and the many challenges they are faced with, especially their knowledge, training, lack of appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and constant protocol changes, EMS personnel were willing and prepared to report for duty during pandemics. Participants also made recommendations for future outbreak response, which should be taken into consideration in order for EMS to cope with the current pandemic and to better prepare to respond to any future ones.
BACKGROUND: The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/2pcy7).

The aim of the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) is to design a data dictionary to inform data collection and facilitate prediction of outcomes for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Australia. The process has engaged diverse stakeholders across six areas: social, health, clinical, biological, acute interventions, and long-term outcomes. Here, we report the results of the clinical review. Standardized searches were implemented across databases to April 2022. English-language reports of studies evaluating an association between a clinical factor and any clinical outcome in at least 100 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. Abstracts, and full-text records, were independently screened by at least two reviewers in Covidence. The findings were assessed through a consensus process to determine inclusion in the AUS-TBI data resource. The searches retrieved 22,441 records, of which 1137 were screened at full text and 313 papers were included. The clinical outcomes identified were predominantly measures of survival and disability. The clinical predictors most frequently associated with these outcomes were the Glasgow Coma Scale, pupil reactivity, and blood pressure measures. Following discussion with an expert consensus group, 15 were recommended for inclusion in the data dictionary. This review identified numerous studies evaluating associations between clinical factors and outcomes in patients with moderate-severe TBI. A small number of factors were reported consistently, however, how and when these factors were assessed varied. The findings of this review and the subsequent consensus process have informed the development of an evidence-informed data dictionary for moderate-severe TBI in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Medical emergencies are the leading cause of high mortality and morbidity rates in rural areas of higher and lower-income countries than in urban areas. Medical emergency readiness is healthcare providers\' knowledge, skills, and confidence to meet patients\' emergency needs. Rural healthcare professionals\' medical emergency readiness is imperative to prevent or reduce casualties due to medical emergencies. Evidence shows that rural healthcare providers\' emergency readiness needs enhancement. Education and training are the effective ways to improve them. However, there has yet to be a scoping review to understand the efficacy of educational intervention regarding rural healthcare providers\' medical emergency readiness.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to identify and understand the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving rural healthcare providers\' medical emergency readiness globally.
METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews were used to select the papers for this scoping review. This scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, CINHAL, SCOPUS, PUBMED and OVID databases. The Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome [PICO] strategies were used to select the papers from the database. The selected papers were limited to English, peer-reviewed journals and published from 2013 to 2023. A total of 536 studies were retrieved, and ten studies that met the selection criteria were included in the review. Three reviewers appraised the selected papers individually using the Joanna Briggs Institute [JBI] critical appraisal tool. A descriptive method was used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: From the identified 536 papers, the ten papers which met the PICO strategies were selected for the scoping review. Results show that rural healthcare providers\' emergency readiness remains the same globally. All interventions were effective in enhancing rural health care providers\' medical emergency readiness, though the interventions were implemented at various durations of time and in different foci of medical emergencies. Results showed that the low-fidelity simulated manikins were the most cost-effective intervention to train rural healthcare professionals globally.
CONCLUSIONS: The review concluded that rural healthcare providers\' medical emergency readiness improved after the interventions. However, the limitations associated with the studies caution readers to read the results sensibly. Moreover, future research should focus on understanding the interventions\' behavioural outcomes, especially among rural healthcare providers in low to middle-income countries.

Same-day emergency care (SDEC) in unplanned and emergency care is an NHS England (NHSE) priority. Optimal use of these services requires rapid identification of suitable patients. NHSE suggests the use of one tool for this purpose. This systematic review compares studies that evaluate the performance of selection tools for SDEC pathways. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Three scores were evaluated: the Amb score (seven studies), Glasgow Admission Prediction Score (GAPS) (six studies) and Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) (two studies). There was heterogeneity in the populations assessed, exclusion criteria used and definitions used for SDEC suitability, with proportions of patients deemed \'suitable\' for SDEC ranging from 20 to 80%. Reported score sensitivity and specificity ranged between 18-99% and 10-89%. Score performance could not be compared due to heterogeneity between studies. No studies assessed clinical implementation. The current evidence to support the use of a specific tool for SDEC is limited and requires further evaluation.

BACKGROUND: In pre-hospital settings, identifying a deteriorating child can be challenging, especially considering that the proportion of paediatric patients with acute illnesses is lower compared with adults. This challenge is exacerbated in pre-hospital settings, where information might be scarce. Physiological alterations indicating changes in a patient\'s condition can be detected hours preceding a cardiac arrest. Therefore, maintaining continuous monitoring of the patient\'s clinical condition is crucial to detecting any physiological changes promptly, facilitating early identification of critical illness. This scoping review aims to assess the extent, range and nature of published research related to recognising paediatric out-of-hospital clinical deterioration by pre-hospital staff.
METHODS: This scoping review is registered with the Open Science Framework. The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus) will be conducted. In this scoping review, all types of study designs including quantitative and qualitative studies will be considered. The inclusion is limited to English-language studies published between January 1990 and March 2024. Two independent reviewers (AG and SS) will conduct a thorough screening of titles and abstracts against the pre-defined inclusion criteria for the review. For the selected citations, the full texts will undergo detailed assessment by the two reviewers, ensuring alignment with the inclusion criteria. A quality assessment of the included studies will be done using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The findings will be presented using diagrams or tables, supplemented by narrative summaries following the JBI guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at conferences and/or seminars.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital blood gas analysis (BGA) is an evolving field that offers the potential for early identification and management of critically ill patients. However, the utility and accuracy of prehospital BGA are subjects of ongoing debate.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature on prehospital BGA, including its indications, methods, and feasibility.
METHODS: We performed a scoping review of prehospital BGA. A thorough search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify relevant studies focusing on prehospital BGA in adult patients.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Prehospital BGA was most frequently performed in patients in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, followed by traumatic and nontraumatic cases. The parameters most commonly analyzed were pH, pCO2, pO2, and lactate. Various sampling methods, including arterial, venous, and intraosseous, were reported for prehospital BGA. While prehospital BGA shows promise in facilitating early identification of critical patients and guiding resuscitation efforts, logistical challenges are to be considered. The handling of preclinical BGA is described as feasible and useful in most of the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital BGA holds significant potential for enhancing patient care in the prehospital setting, though technical challenges need to be considered. However, further research is required to establish optimal indications and demonstrate the benefits for prehospital BGA in specific clinical contexts.

BACKGROUND: Inter-hospital transfer is necessary for the transport of patients to specialized treatment. Rotor-wing aircraft may be used in lieu of ambulances in time-critical conditions over long distances and when specialist team skills are called for. The purpose of the review is to assess the current scientific literature that describes the scenario to develop a national guideline for inter-hospital transfers using rotor-wing aircraft. The aim is to describe the patterns and challenges.
METHODS: The authors will conduct a scoping review as per Joanna Briggs Institute guideline. The protocol for the scoping review will adhere to the Open Science Framework guideline for scoping reviews and we will report the findings of the scoping review as per PRISMA-ScR guideline. We have developed the search strategy with the help of a research librarian and will conduct search in relevant electronic databases and include gray literature as well, using the PRESS and PRISMA-S guidelines. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion as per eligibility criteria and conflicts will be resolved by a third reviewer. Full text retrieval will be conducted accordingly. We will analyze the extracted data using validated statistical methods.
BACKGROUND: According to Danish law, scoping reviews are exempt from ethics committee approval. The findings of this scoping review will provide the scientific foundation for a national guideline on rotor-wing aircraft conveyed inter-hospital transfers in Denmark. Furthermore, we will publish the results of the scoping review in a relevant scientific journal.

BACKGROUND: Prompt identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is crucial for expedited endovascular therapy (EVT) and improved patient outcomes. Prehospital stroke scales, such as the 3-Item Stroke Scale (3I-SS), could be beneficial in detecting LVO in suspected patients. This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of 3I-SS for LVO detection in AIS.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until February 2024 with no time and language restrictions. Prehospital and in-hospital studies reporting diagnostic accuracy were included. Review articles, studies without reported 3I-SS cut-offs, and studies lacking the required data were excluded. Pooled effect sizes, including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included in the present meta-analysis. A 3I-SS score of 2 or higher demonstrated sensitivity of 76% (95% CI: 52%-90%) and specificity of 74% (95% CI: 57%-86%) as the optimal cut-off, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84). DOR, PLR, and NLR, were 9 (95% CI: 5-15), 2.9 (95% CI: 2.0-4.3) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.61), respectively. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the analyses\' robustness in suspected to stroke patients, anterior circulation LVO, assessment by paramedics, and pre-hospital settings. Meta-regression analyses pinpointed LVO definition (anterior circulation, posterior circulation) and patient setting (suspected stroke, confirmed stroke) as potential sources of heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: 3I-SS demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy in identifying LVO stroke and may be valuable in the prompt identification of patients for direct transfer to comprehensive stroke centers.