BACKGROUND: Mortality reviews examine US military fatalities resulting from traumatic injuries during combat operations. These reviews are essential to the evolution of the military trauma system to improve individual, unit, and system-level trauma care delivery and inform trauma system protocols and guidelines. This study identifies specific prehospital and hospital interventions with the potential to provide survival benefits.
METHODS: US Special Operations Command fatalities with battle injuries deemed potentially survivable (2001-2021) were extracted from previous mortality reviews. A military trauma review panel consisting of trauma surgeons, forensic pathologists, and prehospital and emergency medicine specialists conducted a methodical review to identify prehospital, hospital, and resuscitation interventions (e.g., laparotomy, blood transfusion) with the potential to have provided a survival benefit.
RESULTS: Of 388 US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities, 100 were deemed potentially survivable. Of these (median age, 29 years; all male), 76.0% were injured in Afghanistan, and 75% died prehospital. Gunshot wounds were in 62.0%, followed by blast injury (37%), and blunt force injury (1.0%). Most had a Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale severity classified as 4 (severe) (55.0%) and 5 (critical) (41.0%). The panel recommended 433 interventions (prehospital, 188; hospital, 315). The most recommended prehospital intervention was blood transfusion (95%), followed by finger/tube thoracostomy (47%). The most common hospital recommendations were thoracotomy and definitive vascular repair. Whole blood transfusion was assessed for each fatality: 74% would have required ≥10 U of blood, 20% would have required 5 to 10 U, 1% would have required 1 to 4 U, and 5% would not have required blood products to impact survival. Five may have benefited from a prehospital laparotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: This study systematically identified capabilities needed to provide a survival benefit and examined interventions needed to inform trauma system efforts along the continuum of care. The determination was that blood transfusion and massive transfusion shortly after traumatic injury would impact survival the most.
METHODS: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level V.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between patient age and guideline adherence for prehospital care in emergency medical services (EMS) for moderate to severe trauma.
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study that used a nationwide EMS-based trauma database from 2016 to 2019. Adult trauma patients whose injury severity score was greater than or equal to nine were screened, and those with cardiac arrest or without outcome data were excluded. The enrolled patients were categorized into four groups according to patient age: young (<45 years), middle-aged (45-64 years), old (65-84 years), and very old (>84 years). The primary outcome was guideline adherence, which was defined as following all prehospital care components: airway management for level of consciousness below verbal response, oxygen supply for pulse oximetry under 94 %, intravenous fluid administration for systolic blood pressure under 90 mmHg, scene resuscitation time within 10 min, and transport to the trauma center or level 1 emergency department. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs).
RESULTS: Among the 430,365 EMS-treated trauma patients, 38,580 patients were analyzed-9,573 (24.8 %) in the young group, 15,296 (39.7 %) in the middle-aged group, 9,562 (24.8 %) in the old group, and 4,149 (10.8 %) in the very old group. The main analysis revealed a lower probability of guideline adherence in the old group (aOR 95 % CI = 0.84 (0.76-0.94)) and very old group (aOR 95 % CI = 0.68 (0.58-0.81)) than in the young group.
CONCLUSIONS: We found disparities in guideline adherence for prehospital care according to patient age at the time of EMS assessment of moderate to severe trauma. Considering this disparity, the prehospital trauma triage and management for older patients needs to be improved and educated to EMS providers.

BACKGROUND: The presented evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) is proposed as a National CPG where we adapted the international recommendations for the emergency management of seizures in children beyond the neonatal period to suit the health care in Egypt. The quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations are indicated. This study aimed to standardize the treatment of acute epileptic seizures and to provide an easy-to-apply acute treatment protocol that will allow immediate and appropriate seizure control.
METHODS: This is part of a larger program by the Egyptian Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee (EPG) in collaboration with the staff of pediatric departments of 15 Egyptian universities and the National Research Centre. EPG was affiliated later to the Supreme Council of the Egyptian University Hospitals aiming to define the topics of, assign authors to, and assist in the adaptation of pediatric evidence-based CPGs according to a national strategic plan (http://epg.edu.eg). The committee is guided by a formal CPG adaptation methodology: the \"Adapted ADAPTE.\"
RESULTS: The Egyptian Childhood Seizure Group (ECSG) reviewed the results of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II assessment and decided to adapt the recommendations of three source CPGs: American Epilepsy Society, Italian League Against Epilepsy, Neurocritical Care Society, and Neurologic & Psychiatric Society of Zambia. Eight implementation tools were included. A comprehensive set of multifaceted CPG implementation strategies was provided for the clinicians, patients, nurses, and other relevant stakeholders contextualized to the national settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with this adaptation methodology provides useful insight into its national utilization in Egypt.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish a consensus among experts in prehospital work regarding the management of difficult airways in prehospital care in Sweden. The results were subsequently used to develop an algorithm for handling difficult airway in prehospital care, as there was none available in Sweden prior to this study.
METHODS: This two-round Delphi study was conducted by forming an expert panel comprising anesthesiologists and anesthesia nurses working in prehospital setting in Sweden. The expert panel responded digital forms with questions and statements related to airway management. The study continued until consensus was reached, defined as more than 70% agreement. The study took place from December 4, 2021, to May 15, 2022.
RESULTS: In the first round, 74 participants took part, while the second round involved 37 participants. Consensus was reached in 16 out of 17 statements. 92% of the participants agreed that an airway algorithm adapted for prehospital use is necessary.
CONCLUSIONS: The capacity to adapt the approach to airway management based on specific pre-hospital circumstances is crucial. It holds significance to establish a uniform framework that is applicable across various airway management scenarios. Consequently, the airway management algorithm that has been devised should be regarded as a recommendation, allowing for flexibility rather than being interpreted as a rigid course of action. This represents the inaugural nationwide algorithm for airway management designed exclusively for pre-hospital operations in Sweden. The algorithm is the result of a consensus reached by experts in pre-hospital care.

BACKGROUND: There are concerns that airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury may exacerbate an existing neurological deficit, cause a new spinal cord injury or be hazardous due to precautions to avoid neurological injury. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for practicing clinicians to support safe and effective airway management in this setting.
METHODS: An expert multidisciplinary, multi-society working party conducted a systematic review of contemporary literature (January 2012-June 2022), followed by a three-round Delphi process to produce guidelines to improve airway management for patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury.
RESULTS: We included 67 articles in the systematic review, and successfully agreed 23 recommendations. Evidence supporting recommendations was generally modest, and only one moderate and two strong recommendations were made. Overall, recommendations highlight key principles and techniques for pre-oxygenation and facemask ventilation; supraglottic airway device use; tracheal intubation; adjuncts during tracheal intubation; cricoid force and external laryngeal manipulation; emergency front-of-neck airway access; awake tracheal intubation; and cervical spine immobilisation. We also signpost to recommendations on pre-hospital care, military settings and principles in human factors.
CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that the pragmatic approach to airway management made within these guidelines will improve the safety and efficacy of airway management in adult patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury.

Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) services are at the heart of recovery plans for Emergency Care in the National Health Service. There are no validated metrics for the quality of care in SDEC. The Society for Acute Medicine\'s Quality Improvement Committee invited to a three-stage modified Delphi process to gather metrics used by clinicians. Proposed metrics were ranked and further explored by 33 participating experts from a broad range of backgrounds including clinicians, data scientists and operational managers. Experts ranked five system-based metrics highest. These focus on optimisation of the proportion of patients receiving same day care in and out of SDEC units. Patient and staff experience metrics were ranked low, possibly due to present lack of viable examples. The paper adds a glossary with the rationale for ranking of metrics and their use for the improvement of quality and safety of clinical care.

UNASSIGNED: Standards for Emergency Medical Services [EMS] have recently been introduced in South Africa in a movement towards the promotion of quality improvement. While these standards identify a minimum set of criteria for EMS quality they do not differentiate between services just meeting them and those exceeding them. Benchmarking may be a helpful exercise in beginning to address the question of comparative levels of capability in EMS beyond a set of minimum standards. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based capability benchmarking tool for EMS organizations within the South African context.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 experts in the field of EMS in South Africa consented to participate in two Delphi Surveys in order to achieve consensus on the core components of an EMS organization as well as relevant level descriptors for those components. The resulting data was used to develop a consensus-based capability benchmarking tool for EMS organizations in South Africa.
UNASSIGNED: A consensus-based capability benchmarking tool was developed that allows organizations to distinguish whether the organization\'s capability, as a whole, is underdeveloped, developing, or well-developed. This is in addition to identifying how capable they are in all individual components or sub-components.
UNASSIGNED: It is recommended that further research be conducted to assess this tool\'s implementation within different EMS organizations in South Africa, and that this study is used as a stepping-stone for additional research into meaningful quality improvement in emergency medical services in South Africa.

To address the lagging status of aviation medical rescue in China compared to developed countries, the focus is on critical weaknesses such as the inadequate aviation rescue communication network and communication technology. The team has established an efficient network among rescue helicopters, emergency centers, and hospitals using 5G technology, achieving millisecond-level speed and real-time data transmission. The Professional Committee of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine of Chinese Medical Doctor Association integrated emergency experts, medical institutions, and emergency rescue teams to jointly draft Chinese expert consensus on 5G+ helicopter aviation medical rescue (2024 edition). The consensus recommends the widespread application of 5G technology in aviation medical rescue, utilizing 5G technology for warning and dispatch during the initiation of aviation medical rescue, and using 5G technology for real-time transmission of vital signs and high-definition videos to emergency centers and receiving hospitals during rescue operations and flight. Successful cases fully demonstrate the potential of 5G technology in aviation medical rescue. The consensus aims to standardize and guide 5G+ helicopter medical rescue, ultimately achieving the goal of patients being \"admitted upon boarding\".

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to establish appropriate quality standards for emergency departments (EDQS) in Palestine.
METHODS: The study comprised four phases. First, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to develop a framework for assessing healthcare services in EDs. Second, the initial set of EDQS was developed based on the review findings. Third, local experts provided feedback on the EDQS, suggesting additional standards, and giving recommendations. This feedback was analysed to create a preliminary set of EDQS. Finally, an expanded group of local emergency care experts evaluated the preliminary set, providing feedback on content and structure to contribute to the final set of EDQS.
RESULTS: We identified quality domains in EDs and categorised them into clinical and administrative pathways. The clinical pathway comprises 39 standards across 7 subdomains: triage, treatment, transportation, medication safety, patient flow and medical diagnostic services. Expert consensus was achieved on 87.5% of these standards. The administrative domain includes 64 consensus-based standards across 9 subdomains: documentation, information management systems, access-location, design, leadership, management, workforce staffing, training, equipment, supplies, capacity-resuscitation rooms, resources for a safe working environment, performance indicators and patient safety-infection prevention and control programmes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study employed a rigorous approach to identify QS for EDs in Palestine. The multiphase consensus process ensured the appropriateness of the developed EDQS. Inclusion of diverse perspectives enriched the content. Future studies will validate and refine the standards based on feedback. The EDQS has potential to enhance emergency care in Palestine and serve as a model for other regions facing similar challenges.

Since the first documented use of a tourniquet in 1674, the popularity of tourniquets has waxed and waned. During recent wars and more recently in Emergency Medical Services systems, the tourniquet has been proven to be a valuable tool in the treatment of life-threatening hemorrhage. However, tourniquet use is not without risk, and several studies have demonstrated adverse events and morbidity associated with tourniquet use in the prehospital setting, particularly when left in place for more than 2 h. Consequently, the US military\'s Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care has recommended guidelines for prehospital tourniquet conversion to reduce the risk of adverse events associated with tourniquets once the initial hemorrhage has been controlled. Emergency Medical Services systems that operate in rural, frontier, and austere environments, especially those with transport times to definitive care that routinely exceed 2 h, may consider implementing similar tourniquet conversion guidelines.