direct identification

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    正在尝试许多方法来快速和准确地鉴定引起败血症的微生物。我们分析了三种不同制备方法的性能[MBTSepsityperIVDKit(BrukerDaltonicsGmbH,德国),十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)裂解,和蛋白质提取的差速离心(离心PE)],并在BrukerBiotyperMALDI-TOFMS的标准和Sepsityper模块中进行了比较,以直接鉴定来自240个BACTECFX阳性血液培养瓶的细菌(BectonDickinson,美国)。通过使用标准模块,在SDS裂解的46.7%的样品中,在物种水平(评分≥2)进行了正确的鉴定,44.2%离心+PE,和25.4%与Sepsityper套件。这些比例在属水平(得分范围为1.70-1.99)为34.6%,31.3%,32.5%,分别。用SDS裂解(195),与离心+PE(181)和Sepsityper试剂盒(139)相比,更多的细菌被正确鉴定。在SDS和Sepsityper试剂盒以及离心+PE和Sepsityper试剂盒之间发现了统计学上的显着差异(P<0.001,两者)。通过使用Sepsityper模块,74.2%的样本采用SDS裂解和离心+PE,55%的样本采用Sepsityper试剂盒进行了物种水平的正确鉴定(评分≥1.8).这些比例在属水平(得分范围为1.60-1.79)为16.3%,10%,和19.2%,分别。SDS裂解(217)的识别率显著高于离心+PE(202)和Sepsityper试剂盒(178)(P=0.028和P<0.001)。在离心+PE和Sepsityper试剂盒之间也观察到统计学上的显著差异(P<0.001)。在这些方法中,用SDS裂解获得最佳性能。尽管使用Sepsityper软件模块实现了更好的性能,不应忽视错误识别的风险。
    目的:脓毒症是一种危及生命的疾病,从血液培养物中快速准确地鉴定致病微生物对于及时有效的治疗至关重要。尽管有许多关于使用MALDI-TOFMS从血液培养物中直接鉴定的研究,仍然需要进一步标准化。在我们的研究中,我们分析了三种不同制备方法的性能,并通过使用BrukerBiotyperMALDI-TOFMS的两个分析模块对众多阳性血培养瓶中细菌的直接鉴定进行了比较.文献报道了有限数量的研究,这些研究比较了直接血培养鉴定的不同制备方法,同时处理大量血液样本,并评估与我们研究相同的样本。此外,尽管SDS在医学实验室中使用非常频繁,关于从血液培养瓶中直接鉴定的研究很少。在我们的研究中,SDS法的正确识别率最高。
    Many methods are being tried for rapid and accurate identification of sepsis-causing microorganisms. We analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods [MBT Sepsityper IVD Kit (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis, and differential centrifugation with protein extraction (Centrifugation +PE)] and compared in standard and Sepsityper modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from 240 positive blood culture bottles of BACTEC FX (Becton Dickinson, USA). By using the standard module, correct identification at species level (score ≥2) was done in 46.7% of the samples with SDS lysis, 44.2% with centrifugation +PE, and 25.4% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.70-1.99) were 34.6%, 31.3%, and 32.5%, respectively. With SDS lysis (195), more bacteria were identified correctly than centrifugation +PE (181) and the Sepsityper kit (139). A statistically significant difference was found between SDS and the Sepsityper kit and Centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001, both). By using the Sepsityper module, correct identification at species level (score ≥1.8) was determined in 74.2% of the samples with SDS lysis and centrifugation +PE each and 55% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.60-1.79) were 16.3%, 10%, and 19.2%, respectively. SDS lysis (217) had significantly higher identification rates than centrifugation +PE (202) and the Sepsityper kit (178) (P = 0.028 and P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was also observed between centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001). Best performance was obtained with SDS lysis among the methods. Although better performance was achieved by using Sepsityper software module, risk of misidentification should not be ignored.
    OBJECTIVE: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition, and rapid and accurate identification of the causative microorganisms from blood cultures is crucial for timely and effective treatment. Although there are many studies on direct identification from blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS, further standardization is still needed. In our study, we analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods and compared by using two analysis modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from numerous positive blood culture bottles. The literature reports a limited number of studies that compare different preparation methods for direct blood culture identification, processing a large number of blood samples concurrently and evaluating the same samples as in our study. Moreover, although SDS is used very frequently in medical laboratories, there are few studies on direct identification from blood culture bottles. In our study, the highest correct identification rate was observed with the SDS method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱技术作为一种新兴的微生物快速鉴定技术得到了广泛的应用。SakazakiiCronobacter(C.Sakazakii)是一种食源性病原体,由于其在婴儿中的高致死率,对婴儿配方奶粉(PIF)加工环境特别重要。然而,传统的对MALDI-TOFMS样品进行预处理的固体点样检测方法仅导致对Sakazakii的定性检测。我们开发了一种新的,低成本,稳健的液体斑点预处理方法,并使用响应面法优化其参数。适用性,准确度,并对不同类型的样品进行了定量电位测量。该方法的最佳参数如下:70%甲酸的体积为25μL,用350W超声治疗3分钟,和加入75μL体积的乙腈。这些条件导致了对Sakazakii的最高鉴定得分(1926.42±48.497)。发现该方法可以准确且可重复地检测细菌。用这种方法分析了70株崎氏杆菌分离株,识别准确率为100%。Sakazakii在环境和PIF样品中的检出限为4.1×101cfu/mL和2.72×103cfu/mL,分别。
    Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry has been widely used as an emerging technology for the rapid identification of microorganisms. Cronobacter sakazakii (C. sakazakii) is a food-borne pathogen of particular importance to the powdered infant formula (PIF) processing environment due to its high lethality in infants. However, the traditional solid spotting detection method of pretreating samples for MALDI-TOF MS leads only to qualitative detection of C. sakazakii. We developed a new, low-cost, robust liquid spotting pretreatment method and used a response surface methodology to optimize its parameters. The applicability, accuracy, and quantitative potential were measured for different types of samples. The optimal parameters of this method were as follows: a volume of 70% formic acid of 25 μL, treatment with ultrasound at 350 W for 3 min, and a volume of acetonitrile added of 75 μL. These conditions led to the highest identification score for C. sakazakii (1926.42 ± 48.497). This method was found to detect bacteria accurately and reproducibly. When 70 strains of C. sakazakii isolates were analyzed with this method, the identification accuracy was 100%. The detection limit of C. sakazakii in environmental and PIF samples was 4.1 × 101 cfu/mL and 2.72 × 103 cfu/mL, respectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经授权:为了缩短血液培养(BC)分析的周转时间,开发了一种快速的直接鉴定方法,抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST),和细菌阳性BCs的多重耐药性检测。
    UNASSIGNED:用此处开发的多步离心方法和基于常规培养的方法处理BC瓶中的混合物。用MALDI-TOFMS和Vitek2Compact直接分析离心后获得的细菌沉淀物,AST直接用Kirby-Bauer(K-B)圆盘扩散进行,VITEK2紧凑型,和电子测试方法。用含有头孢噻肟的圆盘检测出超广谱内酰胺酶(ESBLs),头孢噻肟/克拉维,头孢他啶,和头孢他啶/克拉维酸,用改良的碳青霉烯类灭活法(mCIM)和EDTA-mCIM(eCIM)检测碳青霉烯酶。
    UNASSIGNED:将所有直接测试的结果与常规方法的结果进行了比较,评估直接方法的准确性。直接Vitek2Compact和MALDI-TOFMS方法的准确性分别为95.5%(214/224)和90.2%(202/224),分别。直接AST与K-B,Vitek2和E-test显示类别一致性为96.0%(2611/2721),96.1%(2614/2721),和97.4%(2650/2721),分别,三种方法的主要误差和非常大的误差均<2%。在直接测定ESBLs中,头孢噻肟与头孢噻肟/克拉维酸盐联用的结果与标准分离方法完全一致。直接mCIM和eCIM的碳青霉烯酶检出率与标准方法完全相同。
    UNASSIGNED:这些基于多步离心的直接程序不仅精度高,而且适合临床实验室使用,因为周转时间更短。
    UNASSIGNED: To shorten the turnaround time for blood culture (BC) analyses, a rapid method was developed for the direct identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), and multidrug resistance testing of bacteria-positive BCs.
    UNASSIGNED: The mixtures in BC bottles were treated with the multistep centrifugation method developed here and the conventional culture-based method. The bacterial sediment obtained after centrifugation was analyzed directly with MALDI-TOF MS and Vitek 2 Compact, and AST was performed directly with the Kirby-Bauer (K-B) disk diffusion, VITEK 2 Compact, and E-test methods. Extended spectrum lactamases (ESBLs) were detected with discs containing cefotaxime, cefotaxime/clavulanate, ceftazidime, and ceftazidime/clavulanate, and carbapenemase was detected with the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and EDTA-mCIM (eCIM).
    UNASSIGNED: All the results of direct testing were compared to those of the conventional methods, to evaluate the accuracy of the direct methods. The accuracies of the direct Vitek 2 Compact and MALDI-TOF MS methods were 95.5% (214/224) and 90.2% (202/224), respectively. Direct AST with K-B, Vitek 2, and E-test showed category agreement of 96.0% (2611/2721), 96.1% (2614/2721), and 97.4% (2650/2721), respectively, and the major errors and very major errors were < 2% for all three methods. In the direct determination of ESBLs, the results for cefotaxime combined with cefotaxime/clavulanate were completely consistent with those after the standard isolation method. The carbapenemase detection rate with direct mCIM and eCIM was exactly the same as that with the standard method.
    UNASSIGNED: These direct procedures based on multistep centrifugation are not only highly accurate but are appropriate for clinical laboratory use because the turnaround time is shorter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:快速准确的微生物鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST)对于及时使用适当的抗菌药物治疗血流感染至关重要。为了缩短从阳性血培养物中分离菌落的时间,开发了使用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOFMS)系统直接鉴定的各种制备方法。这里,我们评估了SepsiPrep套件(ASTACorp.)用于使用MicroIDSysEliteMALDI-TOFMS系统从阳性血液培养物中直接鉴定微生物和AST(ASTACorp.)和VITEK-2系统(bioMérieux)。
    方法:对于直接识别,共纳入124个前瞻性单抗微生物阳性血液培养瓶.为了直接识别,通过离心和洗涤两次制备沉淀。对于直接AST,将沉淀悬浮在0.45%盐水中并调节至McFarland0.5。将使用MicroIDSysElite和VITEK-2系统直接鉴定和AST的结果与在琼脂平板上继代培养的纯菌落进行的常规方法的结果进行了比较。
    结果:与使用纯菌落的常规方法相比,57株革兰氏阳性菌株和67株革兰氏阴性菌株的正确率分别为96.5%和98.5%,分别。对于直接AST,在55株革兰氏阳性菌株中,葡萄球菌的分类协议(CA),链球菌,肠球菌占96.7%,98.4%,94.1%,分别。对于66个革兰氏阴性分离株,肠杆菌和非发酵革兰阴性杆菌的CA分别为99.0%和96.6%,分别。
    结论:SepsiPrep试剂盒易于与MicroIDSysElite和VITEK-2系统结合使用,正确的鉴定和AST率很高。
    BACKGROUND: Rapid and accurate microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are essential for timely use of appropriate antimicrobial agents for bloodstream infection. To shorten the time for isolating colonies from the positive blood culture, various preparation methods for direct identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system were developed. Here, we evaluated the SepsiPrep kit (ASTA Corp.) for direct identification of microorganisms and AST from positive blood cultures using MicroIDSys Elite MALDI-TOF MS system (ASTA Corp.) and VITEK-2 system (bioMérieux).
    METHODS: For direct identification, a total of 124 prospective monomicrobial positive blood culture bottles were included. For direct identification, the pellet was prepared by centrifugation and washing twice. For direct AST, the pellet was suspended in 0.45% saline and adjusted to McFarland 0.5. The results from the direct identification and AST using MicroIDSys Elite and VITEK-2 system were compared to those from the conventional method performed with pure colony subcultured on agar plate.
    RESULTS: Compared to the conventional method using pure colony, correct direct identification rate was 96.5% and 98.5% for 57 gram-positive isolates and 67 gram-negative isolates, respectively. For direct AST, among the 55 gram-positive isolates, the categorical agreement (CA) for staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci was 96.7%, 98.4%, and 94.1%, respectively. For 66 gram-negative isolates, the CA for Enterobacterales and non-fermentative gram-negative rods was 99.0% and 96.6%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SepsiPrep kit was easy to use combined with MicroIDSys Elite and VITEK-2 system and also, the correct identification and AST rate were very high.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Early and rapid identification of microorganisms is critical for reducing the mortality rate caused by bloodstream infections (BSIs). The accuracy and feasibility of directly identifying pathogens in positive blood cultures by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been intensely confirmed. In this study, we combined density centrifugation and extra chemical lysis-extraction to develop an optimized method in the blood culture process, which significantly improved the effectiveness of direct identification by MALDI-TOF MS. The accuracy was evaluated by 2,032 positive blood culture samples (115 species of microorganism). The overall MALDI-TOF MS based identification rate with scores ≥ 1.700 was 87.60%. 94.06% of gram-negative bacteria were identified consistently to the genus level, followed by anaerobes (93.33%), gram-positive bacteria (84.46%), and fungi (60.87%). This protocol could obtain results within 10-20 min at a cost of less than $0.1 per sample, which saved up to 24 h in identifying 87.60% of the microorganism from positive blood cultures. This rapid and simplified protocol facilitates the direct identification of microorganism in positive blood cultures, and exhibits the advantages of cost-effective, time-saving, and easy-to-use. It could provide the causative organism of the patient to clinicians in time for targeted treatment and reduce mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:将基于MALDI-TOF-MS的鉴定和抗真菌敏感性(AFST)标准化,以直接从自动血液培养物中获得酵母,以减少周转时间。材料和方法:裂解-离心后的直接ID(0.5%SDS)在40个酵母阳性样品中标准化并在250个酵母阳性样品中验证。用氟康唑(28个样品)对直接-AFST进行了标准化,并对7种抗真菌药进行了评估(70个样品)。结果:Direct-ID具有较高的敏感性(97.2%)和特异性(94.3%)。正确的物种水平鉴定在热带梭菌中显示100%,C.Krusei,C.近平滑。直接-AFST与泊沙康唑的培养-AFST有100%的绝对一致性,Anidulafungin和两性霉素B>90%的分类一致性,伏立康唑和氟康唑.结论:直接ID和随后的直接AFST是一种快速,可靠的方法,可以减少诊断侵袭性念珠菌病的周转时间。
    Aim: To standardize MALDI-TOF-MS based identification and antifungal susceptibility (AFST) for yeasts directly from automated blood cultures to reduce turnaround time. Materials & methods: Direct-ID after lysis-centrifugation (0.5% SDS) standardized in 40 and validated in 250 yeast positive samples. Direct-AFST was standardized with fluconazole (28 samples) and evaluated (70 samples) for seven antifungals. Results: Direct-ID had a high sensitivity (97.2%) and specificity (94.3%). Correct species-level identification showed 100% in C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis. Direct-AFST had a 100% categorical agreement with culture-AFST for posaconazole, anidulafungin and >90% categorical agreement for amphotericin B, voriconazole and fluconazole. Conclusion: Direct-ID and subsequent direct-AFST is a rapid and robust method to reduce the turnaround time for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    直接在尿液上使用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI)可以显着改善诊断尿路感染(UTI)的周转时间。本研究计划将MALDI直接在尿液样本上的性能与常规尿液培养进行比较,并评估使用明显的脓尿和MALDI直接在尿液样本上的组合作为诊断UTI的筛查方法的算法。
    分析了来自症状提示UTI的患者的总共1000个尿液样本。尿液显微镜检查,对所有样本同时进行尿培养和MALDI.
    MALDI正确鉴定了73.83%的单抗微生物样品中的微生物。在显示两种和三种以上生物混合生长的培养物中,MALDI能够在27.58%和15.78%的样本中鉴定出一种微生物,分别。在464个无菌样品的93.53%中,MALDI没有峰。使用尿液显微镜和MALDI的顺序算法可以正确识别66.23%的UTI。
    MALDI可用于排除>93%的无菌尿液样品中的细菌尿。未发现显著脓尿和直接MALDI作为诊断UTI(无论是单微生物还是多微生物)的筛选方法的组合优于单独对尿液样品使用直接MALDI。
    The use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) directly on urine can significantly improve turnaround time for diagnosing urinary tract infection (UTI). The present study was planned to compare the performance of MALDI directly on urine samples with conventional urine culture and evaluate an algorithm using a combination of significant pyuria and MALDI directly on urine samples as a screening method for diagnosing UTI.
    A total of 1000 urine samples from patients with symptoms suggestive of UTIs were analysed. Urine microscopy, urine culture and MALDI were performed simultaneously on all the samples.
    MALDI correctly identified the microorganisms in 73.83% monomicrobial samples. In culture showing a mixed growth of two and more than three organisms, MALDI was able to identify one microorganism in 27.58% and 15.78% of samples, respectively. There were no peaks by MALDI in 93.53% of 464 sterile samples. The sequential algorithm using urine microscopy and MALDI could correctly identify UTI in 66.23% cases.
    MALDI can be utilised to rule out bacteriuria in >93% of sterile urine samples. The combination of significant pyuria and direct MALDI as screening method to diagnose UTI (whether monomicrobial or polymicrobial) was not found to be superior than using direct MALDI on urine samples alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Rapid identification of bacterial pathogens facilitates earlier optimization of antibiotic treatment and reduces morbidity and mortality in sepsis patients. The aim of this research was to design an in-house chemical-free method for direct bacterial identification in positive blood culture (BC) broths and to compare the performance of this method with that of the commercial Sepsityper® kit. The overall species identification rates for the in-house and Sepsityper methods were 88.4% and 85.8%, respectively (n = 190). Among 146 facultative anaerobes, 92.5% and 95.9% were identified to the species level using the in-house and Sepsityper methods, respectively. For 32 anaerobic bacteria, the in-house method showed a higher species identification rate (75.0%) than the Sepsityper method (53.1%). The in-house method correctly identified more Bacteroides species (100.0%) than the Sepsityper method (18.2%). Our novel in-house method and the Sepsityper method showed a high accuracy for direct bacterial identification in positive BC broths using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has become one of the most popular methods for the rapid and cost-effective detection of clinical pathogenic microorganisms. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of MALDI-TOF MS with that of conventional approaches for the direct identification of pathogens from urine samples. A systematic review was conducted based on a literature search of relevant databases. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of the combined studies were estimated. Nine studies with a total of 3920 subjects were considered eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.90), and the pooled specificity was 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-0.97). The PLR and NLR were 11.51 (95% CI 4.53-29.26) and 0.16 (95% CI 0.11-0.24), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95). Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of this meta-analysis were stable. MALDI-TOF MS could directly identify microorganisms from urine samples with high sensitivity and specificity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号