Many methods are being tried for rapid and accurate identification of sepsis-causing microorganisms. We analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods [MBT Sepsityper IVD Kit (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis, and differential centrifugation with protein extraction (Centrifugation +PE)] and compared in standard and Sepsityper modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from 240 positive blood culture bottles of BACTEC FX (Becton Dickinson, USA). By using the standard module, correct identification at species level (score ≥2) was done in 46.7% of the samples with SDS lysis, 44.2% with centrifugation +PE, and 25.4% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.70-1.99) were 34.6%, 31.3%, and 32.5%, respectively. With SDS lysis (195), more bacteria were identified correctly than centrifugation +PE (181) and the Sepsityper kit (139). A statistically significant difference was found between SDS and the Sepsityper kit and Centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001, both). By using the Sepsityper module, correct identification at species level (score ≥1.8) was determined in 74.2% of the samples with SDS lysis and centrifugation +PE each and 55% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.60-1.79) were 16.3%, 10%, and 19.2%, respectively. SDS lysis (217) had significantly higher identification rates than centrifugation +PE (202) and the Sepsityper kit (178) (P = 0.028 and P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was also observed between centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001). Best performance was obtained with SDS lysis among the methods. Although better performance was achieved by using Sepsityper software module, risk of misidentification should not be ignored.
OBJECTIVE: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition, and rapid and accurate identification of the causative microorganisms from blood cultures is crucial for timely and effective treatment. Although there are many studies on direct identification from blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS, further standardization is still needed. In our study, we analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods and compared by using two analysis modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from numerous positive blood culture bottles. The literature reports a limited number of studies that compare different preparation methods for direct blood culture identification, processing a large number of blood samples concurrently and evaluating the same samples as in our study. Moreover, although SDS is used very frequently in medical laboratories, there are few studies on direct identification from blood culture bottles. In our study, the highest correct identification rate was observed with the SDS method.

The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic performances of three Bruker MALDI-TOF MS target plates. A combination of two or three targets results in an increase of the identification percentage, especially in problem isolates as gram-positive cocci and yeast.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry has been widely used as an emerging technology for the rapid identification of microorganisms. Cronobacter sakazakii (C. sakazakii) is a food-borne pathogen of particular importance to the powdered infant formula (PIF) processing environment due to its high lethality in infants. However, the traditional solid spotting detection method of pretreating samples for MALDI-TOF MS leads only to qualitative detection of C. sakazakii. We developed a new, low-cost, robust liquid spotting pretreatment method and used a response surface methodology to optimize its parameters. The applicability, accuracy, and quantitative potential were measured for different types of samples. The optimal parameters of this method were as follows: a volume of 70% formic acid of 25 μL, treatment with ultrasound at 350 W for 3 min, and a volume of acetonitrile added of 75 μL. These conditions led to the highest identification score for C. sakazakii (1926.42 ± 48.497). This method was found to detect bacteria accurately and reproducibly. When 70 strains of C. sakazakii isolates were analyzed with this method, the identification accuracy was 100%. The detection limit of C. sakazakii in environmental and PIF samples was 4.1 × 101 cfu/mL and 2.72 × 103 cfu/mL, respectively.

This study aimed to assess the performance of our in-house method for rapid direct bacterial identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using a positive blood culture (BC) broth. For Gram-negative bacteria, 4 mL of BC broth was aspirated and passed through a Sartorius Minisart syringe filter with a pore size of 5 µm. The filtrate was then centrifuged and washed. A small volume of the pellet was used for ID, using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and for AST, using automated broth microdilution. For Gram-positive cocci, 4 mL of BC broth was passed through the Minisart syringe filter. Then, 4 mL of sterile distilled water was injected in the direction opposite to that of the filtration to collect the bacterial residue trapped in the filter. Compared with the conventional method performed with pure colonies on agar plates, 94.0% (234/249) were correctly identified using the in-house method, with rates of 91.4% (127/139) and 97.3% (107/110) for Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates, respectively. Of 234 correctly identified isolates, 230 were assessed by AST. Categorical agreement and essential agreement were 93.3% and 94.5%, respectively, with a minor error rate of 3.8%, a major error rate of 3.4%, and a very major error rate of 1.6%. Our in-house preparation method showed good performance in rapid direct ID and AST using positive BC broths compared to the conventional method. This simple method can shorten the conventional turnaround time for ID and AST by at least 1 day, potentially contributing to better patient management.

OBJECTIVE: Bacteriemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients worldwide. Early identification of microorganisms from blood culture can lead to improvement of treatment and outcomes.
METHODS: The study was divided into two phases. The first phase when a comparison of the methods was made to check the concordance between them, using as a reference the standard method implemented in the laboratory. In a second phase, both methods are combined. We used the rapid identification method and when it could not identify we used the standard method. The microorganisms that were not identified by either of the two methods were identified from colony at 24 hours.
RESULTS: A total of 589 microbial positive blood cultures have been included in the present study. With the rapid method we obtained 96% and 88% identification results for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and Gram-positive cocci (GPC) respectively. In this study we observed that the combination of the rapid and standard method achieved identifications of 98% and 97% for GNB and GPC respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The data analysed shows that both methods combined perform better than individually. We achieved an optimization of the identification of microorganisms directly from positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF. This combination identified 98% of the microorganisms in between ten minutes to one hour and a half since the blood culture flagged positive.

UNASSIGNED: To shorten the turnaround time for blood culture (BC) analyses, a rapid method was developed for the direct identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), and multidrug resistance testing of bacteria-positive BCs.
UNASSIGNED: The mixtures in BC bottles were treated with the multistep centrifugation method developed here and the conventional culture-based method. The bacterial sediment obtained after centrifugation was analyzed directly with MALDI-TOF MS and Vitek 2 Compact, and AST was performed directly with the Kirby-Bauer (K-B) disk diffusion, VITEK 2 Compact, and E-test methods. Extended spectrum lactamases (ESBLs) were detected with discs containing cefotaxime, cefotaxime/clavulanate, ceftazidime, and ceftazidime/clavulanate, and carbapenemase was detected with the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and EDTA-mCIM (eCIM).
UNASSIGNED: All the results of direct testing were compared to those of the conventional methods, to evaluate the accuracy of the direct methods. The accuracies of the direct Vitek 2 Compact and MALDI-TOF MS methods were 95.5% (214/224) and 90.2% (202/224), respectively. Direct AST with K-B, Vitek 2, and E-test showed category agreement of 96.0% (2611/2721), 96.1% (2614/2721), and 97.4% (2650/2721), respectively, and the major errors and very major errors were < 2% for all three methods. In the direct determination of ESBLs, the results for cefotaxime combined with cefotaxime/clavulanate were completely consistent with those after the standard isolation method. The carbapenemase detection rate with direct mCIM and eCIM was exactly the same as that with the standard method.
UNASSIGNED: These direct procedures based on multistep centrifugation are not only highly accurate but are appropriate for clinical laboratory use because the turnaround time is shorter.

BACKGROUND: Rapid and accurate microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are essential for timely use of appropriate antimicrobial agents for bloodstream infection. To shorten the time for isolating colonies from the positive blood culture, various preparation methods for direct identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system were developed. Here, we evaluated the SepsiPrep kit (ASTA Corp.) for direct identification of microorganisms and AST from positive blood cultures using MicroIDSys Elite MALDI-TOF MS system (ASTA Corp.) and VITEK-2 system (bioMérieux).
METHODS: For direct identification, a total of 124 prospective monomicrobial positive blood culture bottles were included. For direct identification, the pellet was prepared by centrifugation and washing twice. For direct AST, the pellet was suspended in 0.45% saline and adjusted to McFarland 0.5. The results from the direct identification and AST using MicroIDSys Elite and VITEK-2 system were compared to those from the conventional method performed with pure colony subcultured on agar plate.
RESULTS: Compared to the conventional method using pure colony, correct direct identification rate was 96.5% and 98.5% for 57 gram-positive isolates and 67 gram-negative isolates, respectively. For direct AST, among the 55 gram-positive isolates, the categorical agreement (CA) for staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci was 96.7%, 98.4%, and 94.1%, respectively. For 66 gram-negative isolates, the CA for Enterobacterales and non-fermentative gram-negative rods was 99.0% and 96.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The SepsiPrep kit was easy to use combined with MicroIDSys Elite and VITEK-2 system and also, the correct identification and AST rate were very high.

暂无摘要。

Early and rapid identification of microorganisms is critical for reducing the mortality rate caused by bloodstream infections (BSIs). The accuracy and feasibility of directly identifying pathogens in positive blood cultures by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been intensely confirmed. In this study, we combined density centrifugation and extra chemical lysis-extraction to develop an optimized method in the blood culture process, which significantly improved the effectiveness of direct identification by MALDI-TOF MS. The accuracy was evaluated by 2,032 positive blood culture samples (115 species of microorganism). The overall MALDI-TOF MS based identification rate with scores ≥ 1.700 was 87.60%. 94.06% of gram-negative bacteria were identified consistently to the genus level, followed by anaerobes (93.33%), gram-positive bacteria (84.46%), and fungi (60.87%). This protocol could obtain results within 10-20 min at a cost of less than $0.1 per sample, which saved up to 24 h in identifying 87.60% of the microorganism from positive blood cultures. This rapid and simplified protocol facilitates the direct identification of microorganism in positive blood cultures, and exhibits the advantages of cost-effective, time-saving, and easy-to-use. It could provide the causative organism of the patient to clinicians in time for targeted treatment and reduce mortality.

Introduction. Several studies have used matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight MS (MALDI-TOF) with a serum separator tube (SST) to perform rapid identification of microorganisms directly from positive blood cultures (BCs), with different performances and methodologies.Hypothesis / Gap Statement. The use of TSS could significantly reduce the time of identification of microorganisms that produce bacteremia.Aim. Our goals were to evaluate bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF using a method based on an SST and compare it with MALDI-TOF after subculture for 18-24 h.Methodology. BCs no more than 1 h after a positive growth signal were included in the study. Analysis of results was expressed as a score. Information about time to a positive signal and number of microorganisms was collected.Results. In total, 253 BCs were analysed; 45.5 % gave a reliable result, 23.3 % an unreliable result and 31.2 % an error in identification. In gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, the percentages of reliable results were 83.5 and 21.8 %, respectively. According to time to positive signal, the percentages of correct identification and mean score were 81.1 % (99/122) and 1.89±0.30 in Group 1 (<15 h); and 57.2 % (75/131) and 1.70±0.32 in Group 2 (>15 h), respectively (P <0.001). According to the number of microorganisms, the corresponding percentages of correct identification and mean scores were: Group 1 [≤50 microorganisms observed per field (MOF)], 50/94 (53.19 %) and 1.72±0.32; Group 2 (51-100 MOF): 44/66 (66.67 %) and 1.85±0.34; Group 3 (>100 MOF): 79/93 (84.94 %) and 1.84±0.31.Conclusion. This method allowed us to obtain a high percentage of the aetiological agent of bacteraemia in less than 30 min after a positive BC.