developed countries

发达国家
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    空气污染是当今社会中最大的问题之一。室内外空气污染物的强度和城市化率可以引起或引发许多不同的疾病,尤其是肺癌.在这种情况下,这项研究的目的是揭示室内和室外空气污染物的影响,和城市化率对肺癌病例的影响。
    本研究采用面板数据分析方法。该研究包括1990年至2019年之间的时间序列,变量的数据类型为年度。研究模型中的因变量是每10万人的肺癌病例。独立变量是室外空气污染水平,空气污染程度室内环境与各国城市化率。
    在为发达国家集团开发的模型中,可以看出,对肺癌影响最高的变量是室外空气污染水平。
    在国家发展的同时,已经确定工业生产废物的增加,换句话说,空气质量恶化,可能会导致肺癌病例的增加。室内空气质量对人体健康也至关重要;这一变量的负面变化可能会对个人健康产生负面影响。尤其是肺癌.
    UNASSIGNED: Air pollution is one of the biggest problems in societies today. The intensity of indoor and outdoor air pollutants and the urbanization rate can cause or trigger many different diseases, especially lung cancer. In this context, this study\'s aim is to reveal the effects of the indoor and outdoor air pollutants, and urbanization rate on the lung cancer cases.
    UNASSIGNED: Panel data analysis method is applied in this study. The research includes the period between 1990 and 2019 as a time series and the data type of the variables is annual. The dependent variable in the research model is lung cancer cases per 100,000 people. The independent variables are the level of outdoor air pollution, air pollution level indoor environment and urbanization rate of countries.
    UNASSIGNED: In the modeling developed for the developed country group, it is seen that the variable with the highest level of effect on lung cancer is the outdoor air pollution level.
    UNASSIGNED: In parallel with the development of countries, it has been determined that the increase in industrial production wastes, in other words, worsening the air quality, may potentially cause an increase in lung cancer cases. Indoor air quality is also essential for human health; negative changes in this variable may negatively impact individuals\' health, especially lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    像Aotearoa新西兰这样的高收入国家正在努力应对不平等的医疗服务。自付费用可能导致减少使用适当的医疗保健服务,较差的健康结果,和灾难性的医疗费用。为了提高我们的知识,这个系统的审查要求,“在高收入国家,哪些干预措施旨在降低卫生用户在获得初级医疗保健时的成本障碍?”搜索策略包括三个书目数据库(Dimensions,Embase,和MedlineWebofScience)。两位作者选择了纳入研究;第三位审阅者解决了差异。从2000年到2022年5月,所有以英文发表的文章以及报道旨在减少高收入国家卫生用户获得初级医疗保健的成本障碍的干预措施的结果的文章都有资格被纳入。两名盲目的作者使用关键评估技能计划独立评估文章质量。在叙事综合中提取和分析相关数据。涉及18,861,890名参与者和6831名实践(或医生)的43份出版物符合纳入标准。文献中报告的干预措施包括消除自付费用,实施非营利组织和社区计划,额外的劳动力,和替代付款方式。涉及消除或减少自付费用的干预措施大大提高了医疗保健利用率。据报道,倡议通常在系统一级找到财务节省。卫生系统倡议一般,但并非始终如一,与改善获得医疗保健服务有关。
    High-income countries like Aotearoa New Zealand are grappling with inequitable access to healthcare services. Out-of-pocket payments can lead to the reduced use of appropriate healthcare services, poorer health outcomes, and catastrophic health expenses. To advance our knowledge, this systematic review asks, \"What interventions aim to reduce cost barriers for health users when accessing primary healthcare in high-income countries?\" The search strategy comprised three bibliographic databases (Dimensions, Embase, and Medline Web of Science). Two authors selected studies for inclusion; discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. All articles published in English from 2000 to May 2022 and that reported on outcomes of interventions that aimed to reduce cost barriers for health users to access primary healthcare in high-income countries were eligible for inclusion. Two blinded authors independently assessed article quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed in a narrative synthesis. Forty-three publications involving 18,861,890 participants and 6831 practices (or physicians) met the inclusion criteria. Interventions reported in the literature included removing out-of-pocket costs, implementing nonprofit organizations and community programs, additional workforce, and alternative payment methods. Interventions that involved eliminating or reducing out-of-pocket costs substantially increased healthcare utilization. Where reported, initiatives generally found financial savings at the system level. Health system initiatives generally, but not consistently, were associated with improved access to healthcare services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解专利到期如何影响药品价格至关重要,因为价格变化直接为准确的成本效益评估提供依据。这项研究调查了8个高收入国家的专利到期与药品价格之间的关系,并评估了这些变化如何影响成本效益评估。
    分析药品专利到期与药品价格变化的关系,并评估这些价格变化对成本效益评估的影响。
    这项队列研究使用来自8个高收入国家的数据进行了事件研究设计,以评估专利到期与药品价格之间的关联。并创建了一个模拟模型,以了解成本效益分析的含义。模拟成本效益模型分析了包括或忽略专利后价格动态的含义。
    药品专利到期。
    考虑与忽略专利后价格动态时,药品价格的变化和增量成本效益比的差异。
    样品包括505种在澳大利亚专利到期的药物,加拿大,法国,德国,Japan,瑞士,英国,和美国。在专利到期后的8年内,价格下降具有统计学意义,在美国观察到的价格下降最快:专利到期后第1年为32%(95%CI,24%-39%),专利到期后8年为82%(95%CI,71%-89%)。其他国家的估计在到期后的8年内从澳大利亚的64%下降到瑞士的18%。成本效益模拟模型表明,不考虑仿制药进入市场可能会产生40%~-40%的偏差增量成本效益比,取决于场景。
    这项队列研究的结果表明,在高收入国家,专利到期后药品价格大幅下降。因此,在成本效益评估分析中纳入有关专利状况和定价动态的信息对于对新药进行准确的经济评估是必要的。
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding how patent expirations affect drug prices is crucial because price changes directly inform accurate cost-effectiveness assessments. This study investigates the association between patent expirations and drug prices in 8 high-income countries and evaluates how the changes affect cost-effectiveness assessments.
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze how the expiration of drug patents is associated with drug price changes and to assess the implications of these price changes for cost-effectiveness evaluations.
    UNASSIGNED: This cohort study performed an event study design using data from 8 high-income countries to assess the association between patent expiration and drug prices, and created a simulation model to understand the implications for cost-effectiveness analyses. The simulation cost-effectiveness model analyzed the implications of including or ignoring postpatent price dynamics.
    UNASSIGNED: Drug patent expiration.
    UNASSIGNED: Change in drug prices and differences in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering vs ignoring postpatent price dynamics.
    UNASSIGNED: The sample comprised 505 drugs undergoing patent expiration in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, UK, and US. Price decreases were statistically significant over the 8 years after patent expiration, with the fastest price declines observed in the US: 32% (95% CI, 24%-39%) in year 1 after patent expiration and 82% (95% CI, 71%-89%) in the 8 years after patent expiration. Estimates for other nations ranged from a decrease of 64% in Australia to 18% in Switzerland in the 8 years after expiration. The cost-effectiveness simulation model indicated that not accounting for generic entry into the market may produce biased incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 40% to -40%, depending on the scenario.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of this cohort study demonstrate that drug prices were reduced substantially after patent expirations in high-income countries. Therefore, incorporating information on patent status and pricing dynamics in cost-effectiveness assessment analyses is necessary for producing accurate economic evaluations of new drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    本研究旨在系统地评估高收入国家在Alpha变异占主导地位期间(2020年1月至2021年4月)与SARS-CoV-2感染相关的危险因素。
    使用四个电子数据库搜索观察性研究。文献检索,研究筛选,数据提取和质量评价由两名作者独立进行.对每个危险因素进行了荟萃分析,在适当的时候。
    来自12,094项研究,27人被包括在内更大的样本量是17,288,532名参与者,更多的女性被包括在内,年龄范围为18-117岁。荟萃分析确定男性[赔率(OR):1.23,95%置信区间(CI):1.97-1.42],非白人种族(OR:1.63,95%CI:1.39-1.91),家庭数量(OR:1.08,95%CI:1.06-1.10),糖尿病(OR:1.22,95%CI:1.08-1.37),癌症(OR:0.82,95%CI:0.68-0.98),心血管疾病(OR:0.92,95%CI:0.84-1.00),与SARS-CoV-2感染相关的哮喘(OR:0.83,95%CI:0.75-0.92)和缺血性心脏病(OR:0.82,95%CI:0.74-0.91)。
    这项研究表明了SARS-CoV-2感染的几个危险因素。由于所包括的研究的异质性,需要更多的研究来了解增加SARS-CoV-2感染风险的因素.
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021244148,PROSPERO注册号,CRD42021244148。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to systematically appraise risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in high-income countries during the period of predominance of the Alpha variant (January 2020 to April 2021).
    UNASSIGNED: Four electronic databases were used to search observational studies. Literature search, study screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two authors independently. Meta-analyses were conducted for each risk factor, when appropriate.
    UNASSIGNED: From 12,094 studies, 27 were included. The larger sample size was 17,288,532 participants, more women were included, and the age range was 18-117 years old. Meta-analyses identified men [Odds Ratio (OR): 1.23, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.97-1.42], non-white ethnicity (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.39-1.91), household number (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.06-1.10), diabetes (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.08-1.37), cancer (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.98), cardiovascular diseases (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.00), asthma (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92) and ischemic heart disease (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74-0.91) as associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    UNASSIGNED: This study indicated several risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies included, more studies are needed to understand the factors that increase the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021244148, PROSPERO registration number, CRD42021244148.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人口结构变化,人口老龄化,医疗保健需求的增加导致了全球医疗保健工作者的短缺。通过从中低收入国家(LMICs)向高收入国家(HICs)寻求更好的机会,移民卫生保健工作者(MHCWs)是减少这种短缺的关键贡献者。经济因素和卫生劳动力需求推动他们的迁移,但他们也面临着适应新国家和新工作环境的挑战。为了有效应对这些挑战,建立基于证据的政策至关重要。如果不这样做,可能会导致移民医疗工作者(MHCW)离开东道国,从而加剧了医护人员的短缺。
    目标:回顾和综合MHCW在适应新国家和新的国外工作环境时遇到的障碍。
    方法:我们遵循了PRISMA指南,并在PubMed和Embase数据库中进行了搜索。我们纳入了2000年后发表的横断面研究,涉及从LMIC国家迁移到高收入国家的MHCW,并以英文出版。我们建立了数据提取工具,并使用横断面研究评估工具(AXIS)根据预定类别评估文章质量。
    结果:通过有针对性的搜索,我们确定了14篇文章。这些文章涵盖了来自中低收入国家的11,025个MHCWS,专注于欧洲,美国,加拿大,澳大利亚,新西兰,和以色列。参与者和受访者的比率各不相同,从12%到90%不等。研究涵盖了各种医疗保健角色和年龄范围,主要是25-45年,一个重要的女性存在。与会者平均在东道国居住3-10年。结果根据河滨文化适应压力清单(RASI)进行分类,并扩展到包括官僚和就业障碍,性别差异,原住民vs.非本地人,和定向计划。
    结论:研究结果强调了文化能力培训和量身定制的支持对MHCW整合和工作满意度的重要性。在新的医疗保健环境中花费的时间和定向计划的影响是塑造他们留下或离开意图的关键因素。尽管有局限性,这些研究提供了有价值的见解,强调持续需要采取整体战略以促进成功整合,最终有利于医疗保健系统和所有利益相关者的福祉。
    BACKGROUND: Shifting demographics, an aging population, and increased healthcare needs contribute to the global healthcare worker shortage. Migrant Health Care Workers (MHCWs) are crucial contributors to reducing this shortage by moving from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) to high-income countries (HICs) for better opportunities. Economic factors and health workforce demand drive their migration, but they also face challenges adapting to a new country and new working environments. To effectively address these challenges, it is crucial to establish evidence-based policies. Failure to do so may result in the departure of Migrant Healthcare Workers (MHCWs) from host countries, thereby worsening the shortage of healthcare workers.
    OBJECTIVE: To review and synthesize the barriers experienced by MHCWs as they adjust to a new country and their new foreign working environments.
    METHODS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines and conducted a search in the PubMed and Embase databases. We included cross-sectional studies published after the year 2000, addressing MHCWs from LMIC countries migrating to high-income countries, and published in English. We established a data extraction tool and used the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) to assess article quality based on predetermined categories.
    RESULTS: Through a targeted search, we identified fourteen articles. These articles covered 11,025 MHCWS from low- to medium-income countries, focusing on Europe, the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Israel. Participants and respondents\' rates were diverse ranging from 12% to 90%. Studies encompassed various healthcare roles and age ranges, mainly 25-45 years, with a significant female presence. Participants resided in host countries for 3-10 years on average. Results are categorized based on the Riverside Acculturation Stress Inventory (RASI) and expanded to include bureaucratic and employment barriers, Gender differences, Natives vs. non-natives, and orientation programs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize the importance of cultural competence training and tailored support for MHCWs integration and job satisfaction. Time spent in the new healthcare setting and the influence of orientation programs are key factors in shaping their intentions to stay or leave. Despite limitations, these studies provide valuable insights, emphasizing the ongoing need for holistic strategies to facilitate successful integration, ultimately benefiting healthcare systems and well-being for all stakeholders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数老年人希望随着年龄的增长留在家中和社区。尽管有这种普遍的偏好,在健康结果和获得医疗保健和社会支持方面的差异可能会造成年龄能力的不平等。我们的目标是使用交叉透镜综合老年人中老龄化社会不平等的证据,并评估用于定义和衡量不平等的方法。
    方法:我们进行了一项混合研究系统综述。我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycINFO,CINAHL和AgeLine提供定量或定性文献,研究了经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国中65岁及以上的成年人在老龄化方面的社会不平等。纳入研究的结果是在PROGRESS-Plus框架的指导下使用定性内容分析进行综合。
    结果:在4874条确定的记录中,共纳入55项研究。农村居民,种族/族裔少数,移民和那些具有较高社会经济地位和更多社会资源的人更有可能在当地老化。女性和受教育程度较高的女性似乎不太可能在原地变老。社会经济地位的影响,教育和社会资源因性别和种族/民族而异,表明跨社会维度的交叉效应。
    结论:社会维度影响经合组织环境中的年龄能力,可能是由于整个生命周期的健康不平等,获得医疗保健和支持服务的差距,以及对老化的不同偏好。我们的结果可以为制定政策和方案提供信息,以公平地支持不同人群的老龄化。
    BACKGROUND: Most older adults wish to remain in their homes and communities as they age. Despite this widespread preference, disparities in health outcomes and access to healthcare and social support may create inequities in the ability to age in place. Our objectives were to synthesise evidence of social inequity in ageing in place among older adults using an intersectional lens and to evaluate the methods used to define and measure inequities.
    METHODS: We conducted a mixed studies systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AgeLine for quantitative or qualitative literature that examined social inequities in ageing in place among adults aged 65 and older in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries. Results of included studies were synthesised using qualitative content analysis guided by the PROGRESS-Plus framework.
    RESULTS: Of 4874 identified records, 55 studies were included. Rural residents, racial/ethnic minorities, immigrants and those with higher socioeconomic position and greater social resources are more likely to age in place. Women and those with higher educational attainment appear less likely to age in place. The influence of socioeconomic position, education and social resources differs by gender and race/ethnicity, indicating intersectional effects across social dimensions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Social dimensions influence the ability to age in place in OECD settings, likely due to health inequalities across the lifespan, disparities in access to healthcare and support services, and different preferences regarding ageing in place. Our results can inform the development of policies and programmes to equitably support ageing in place in diverse populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    铁补充剂通常被推荐用于预防和治疗母体铁缺乏(ID)或缺铁性贫血(IDA)。然而,预防性治疗性产前补铁对中上收入(UMI)和高收入国家(HIC)儿童神经发育的影响,在广泛的营养缺乏不太常见的地方,不清楚。为了调查这一点,我们进行了系统的审查,搜索四个数据库(Medline,CINAHL,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆)至2023年5月1日。评估报告儿童神经发育的孕妇口服或静脉补铁的随机对照试验(RCT)(主要结果:年龄标准化认知评分)是合格的。我们纳入了来自两个HIC(西班牙和澳大利亚)的三个RCT(五个出版物)(N=935名儿童;N=1397名母亲)。由于随机对照试验的临床异质性,荟萃分析是不合适的;研究结果是叙述性综合。在非贫血孕妇中,用于预防IDA的产前铁剂在产后40天的认知方面几乎没有差异(1个RCT,503名婴儿;非常低的确定性证据)。同样,对四年智商的影响非常不确定(2项RCT,509个孩子,非常低的确定性证据)。没有用于ID治疗的RCT评估后代认知。对语言和运动发育相关次要结局的影响,或其他认知功能的测量,不清楚,除了一个以预防为重点的RCT(302名儿童),该报告报告可能对儿童的行为和情绪功能造成伤害。没有来自UMI国家的证据,HIC的证据不足以支持或反驳预防性或治疗性产前补铁对儿童神经发育的益处或危害。
    Iron supplementation is commonly recommended for the prevention and treatment of maternal iron deficiency (ID) or iron deficiency anemia (IDA). However, the impacts of prophylactic of therapeutic prenatal iron supplementation on child neurodevelopment in upper middle-income (UMI) and high-income countries (HICs), where broad nutritional deficiencies are less common, are unclear. To investigate this, we conducted a systematic review, searching four databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) through 1 May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing oral or intravenous iron supplementation in pregnant women reporting on child neurodevelopment (primary outcome: age-standardized cognitive scores) were eligible. We included three RCTs (five publications) from two HICs (Spain and Australia) (N = 935 children; N = 1397 mothers). Due to clinical heterogeneity of the RCTs, meta-analyses were not appropriate; findings were narratively synthesized. In non-anemic pregnant women, prenatal iron for prevention of IDA resulted in little to no difference in cognition at 40 days post-partum (1 RCT, 503 infants; very low certainty evidence). Similarly, the effect on the intelligence quotient at four years was very uncertain (2 RCTs, 509 children, very low certainty evidence). No RCTs for treatment of ID assessed offspring cognition. The effects on secondary outcomes related to language and motor development, or other measures of cognitive function, were unclear, except for one prevention-focused RCT (302 children), which reported possible harm for children\'s behavioral and emotional functioning at four years. There is no evidence from UMI countries and insufficient evidence from HICs to support or refute benefits or harms of prophylactic or therapeutic prenatal iron supplementation on child neurodevelopment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经济救济计划是旨在在区域或全球规模的传染病爆发期间维持社会福利和人口健康的策略。虽然在区域或全球卫生危机期间,经济救济计划被认为是必不可少的,关于它们的健康和非健康益处以及它们对促进公平的影响,文献中没有明确的共识。
    方法:我们进行了范围审查,从2001年1月1日至2023年4月3日,使用文本单词和主题词搜索8个电子数据库中的近期病原体(冠状病毒(COVID-19),埃博拉病毒,流感,中东呼吸综合征(MERS)严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)艾滋病毒,西尼罗河,和Zika),和经济救济计划;但由于数量限制了高收入国家和选定疾病的资格。标题和摘要筛选由训练有素的审稿人和DistillerAI软件进行。数据由两名经过训练的审阅者使用预先测试的表格重复提取,并使用叙事方法绘制了关键发现。
    结果:我们确定了27,263个去重复的记录,其中50人符合资格。纳入的研究涉及COVID-19和流感,2014年至2023年出版。MERS的合格研究为零,SARS,Zika,埃博拉病毒,或西尼罗河病毒。我们确定了七种项目类型,其中现金转移(n=12)和疫苗接种或测试激励(n=9)是最常见的。据报道,个人层面的经济救济计划对公共卫生措施产生了不同程度的影响,有时会影响人群的健康结果。扩大带薪病假计划的研究报告了与健康相关的结果,并对公共卫生措施产生了积极影响(隔离,接种疫苗的吸收)和健康结果(病例数和医疗服务的利用)。最常报告的股权影响是现金转移计划和疫苗接种计划的激励措施。对总体福祉和非健康结果的积极影响包括改善心理健康和生活质量,粮食安全,财务弹性,和工作保障。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,个人层面的经济救济计划可以对公共卫生措施产生重大影响,人口健康结果和公平。随着各国为未来的流行病做准备,我们的研究结果为利益相关者提供了证据,让他们在设计大流行防范政策时将卫生公平视为基本公共卫生目标.
    BACKGROUND: Economic relief programs are strategies designed to sustain societal welfare and population health during a regional or global scale infectious disease outbreak. While economic relief programmes are considered essential during a regional or global health crisis, there is no clear consensus in the literature about their health and non-health benefits and their impact on promoting equity.
    METHODS: We conducted a scoping review, searching eight electronic databases from January 01, 2001, to April 3, 2023, using text words and subject headings for recent pathogens (coronavirus (COVID-19), Ebola, Influenza, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), HIV, West Nile, and Zika), and economic relief programs; but restricted eligibility to high-income countries and selected diseases due to volume. Title and abstract screening were conducted by trained reviewers and Distiller AI software. Data were extracted in duplicates by two trained reviewers using a pretested form, and key findings were charted using a narrative approach.
    RESULTS: We identified 27,263 de-duplicated records, of which 50 were eligible. Included studies were on COVID-19 and Influenza, published between 2014 and 2023. Zero eligible studies were on MERS, SARS, Zika, Ebola, or West Nile Virus. We identified seven program types of which cash transfer (n = 12) and vaccination or testing incentive (n = 9) were most common. Individual-level economic relief programs were reported to have varying degrees of impact on public health measures, and sometimes affected population health outcomes. Expanding paid sick leave programs had the highest number of studies reporting health-related outcomes and positively impacted public health measures (isolation, vaccination uptake) and health outcomes (case counts and the utilization of healthcare services). Equity impact was most often reported for cash transfer programs and incentive for vaccination programs. Positive effects on general well-being and non-health outcomes included improved mental well-being and quality of life, food security, financial resilience, and job security.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that individual-level economic relief programs can have significant impacts on public health measures, population health outcomes and equity. As countries prepare for future pandemics, our findings provide evidence to stakeholders to recognize health equity as a fundamental public health goal when designing pandemic preparedness policies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着所有年龄段的互联网使用趋势的增加,互联网使用是否可以预防中老年人的虚弱仍不清楚。
    方法:五个队列,包括健康与退休研究(HRS),中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS),健康调查,欧洲的老龄化和退休(SHARE),英国衰老纵向研究(ELSA),墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS)在这项研究中使用。互联网使用,社会孤立,使用类似的问题评估虚弱状态。广义估计方程模型,随机效应荟萃分析,COX回归,并利用调解分析。
    结果:在多队列研究中,共有155,695名参与者被纳入主要分析.互联网使用的比例因国家而异,从中国的5.56%(CHARLS)到丹麦的83.46%(份额)不等。根据广义估计方程模型和荟萃分析,互联网使用与脆弱成反比,合并OR(95CIs)为0.72(0.67,0.79)。COX回归还显示,使用互联网的参与者的虚弱发生率风险较低。此外,这种关联部分是由社会隔离介导的,在65岁及以上的参与者中略有明显,男性,不为付款而工作,没有结婚或伴侣,不吸烟,饮酒,而不是与孩子共同居住。
    结论:我们的研究结果强调了使用互联网在预防虚弱方面的重要作用,并建议更多参与社会交往和活动,以避免中老年人的社会隔离。
    BACKGROUND: With increasing trend of internet use in all age groups, whether internet use can prevent frailty in middle-aged and older adults remains unclear.
    METHODS: Five cohorts, including Health and Retirement Study (HRS), China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), and Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), were used in this study. Internet use, social isolation, and frailty status was assessed using similar questions. The Generalized estimating equations models, random effects meta-analysis, COX regression, and mediation analysis were utilized.
    RESULTS: In the multicohort study, a total of 155,695 participants were included in main analysis. The proportion of internet use was varied across countries, ranging from 5.56% in China (CHARLS) to 83.46% in Denmark (SHARE). According to the generalized estimating equations models and meta-analysis, internet use was inversely associated with frailty, with the pooled ORs (95%CIs) of 0.72 (0.67,0.79). The COX regression also showed that participants with internet use had a lower risk of frailty incidence. Additionally, the association was partially mediated by social isolation and slightly pronounced in participants aged 65 and over, male, not working for payment, not married or partnered, not smoking, drinking, and not co-residence with children.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the important role of internet use in preventing frailty and recommend more engagements in social communication and activities to avoid social isolation among middle-aged and older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管正在努力,围产期发病率和死亡率在所有环境中持续存在,造成临床和经济压力的双重负担。此外,围产期健康干预措施的经济证据支离破碎,阻碍了有效卫生政策的制定。我们的审查旨在全面和批判性地评估高收入国家此类干预措施的经济证据,健康结果和财政审慎之间的平衡至关重要。
    方法:我们将使用包括EconLit(EBSCO)在内的数据库对研究进行全面搜索,成本效益分析(CEA)登记处,Medline(Ovid),Embase(Ovid),CINAHL终极(EBSCO),全球卫生(Ovid),和PubMed。此外,我们将扩大我们的搜索范围,以包括GoogleScholar,并从包含的最终文章中进行滚雪球。搜索词将包括经济评估,围产期健康干预措施,发病率和死亡率,和高收入国家。我们将包括以成本效益为重点的全面经济评估,成本效益,成本效用,和成本最小化分析。我们将排除部分经济评估,reports,定性研究,会议文件,社论,和系统的审查。日期限制将限制审查2010年以后发表的研究和研究选择过程中的英文研究。我们将使用修改后的Drummond检查表来评估每个纳入研究的质量。我们的研究结果将遵循2020年系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明的首选报告项目。摘要将包括估计费用,有效性,好处,和增量成本效益比(ICER)。我们还计划进行分组分析。为了提高可比性,我们将把所有成本标准化为美元,使用特定国家的消费者价格指数和购买力平价将其调整为2022年的值。
    背景:这项系统审查将不涉及人类参与者,也不需要道德批准。我们将在同行评审的期刊上发布结果。
    背景:我们在PROSPERO上注册了我们的记录(注册号:CRD42023432232)。
    BACKGROUND: Despite ongoing efforts, perinatal morbidity and mortality persist across all settings, imposing a dual burden of clinical and economic strain. Besides, the fragmented nature of economic evidence on perinatal health interventions hinders the formulation of effective health policies. Our review aims to comprehensively and critically assess the economic evidence for such interventions in high-income countries, where the balance of health outcomes and fiscal prudence is paramount.
    METHODS: We will conduct a comprehensive search for studies using databases including EconLit (EBSCO), Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO), Global Health (Ovid), and PubMed. Furthermore, we will broaden our search to include Google Scholar and conduct snowballing from the final articles included. The search terms will encompass economic evaluation, perinatal health interventions, morbidity and mortality, and high-income countries. We will include full economic evaluations focusing on cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-utility, and cost-minimisation analyses. We will exclude partial economic evaluations, reports, qualitative studies, conference papers, editorials, and systematic reviews. Date restrictions will limit the review to studies published after 2010 and those in English during the study selection process. We will use the modified Drummond checklist to evaluate the quality of each included study. Our findings will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. A summary will include estimated costs, effectiveness, benefits, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We also plan to conduct a subgroup analysis. To aid comparability, we will standardise all costs to the United States Dollar, adjusting them to their 2022 value using country-specific consumer price index and purchasing power parity.
    BACKGROUND: This systematic review will not involve human participants and requires no ethical approval. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.
    BACKGROUND: We registered our record on PROSPERO (registration #: CRD42023432232).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号