developed countries

发达国家
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数流行病学研究的重点是死亡率或临床事件,与基本日常功能相关的活动限制及其后果的信息较少。来自世界不同地区不同经济水平的多个国家关于活动限制及其与临床结果的关联的标准化数据很少。我们旨在量化25个国家(按不同经济水平分组)的活动限制和辅助设备使用的普遍性以及限制与不良结果的关联。
    方法:在此分析中,我们从25个高收入人群中获得了数据,中等收入,和低收入国家的前瞻性城市农村流行病学(PURE)研究(175660名参与者)。在PURE研究中,我们邀请年龄在35~70岁,打算继续在目前的家庭居住4年的个体完成一份关于活动限制的问卷.参与者计划每3年通过电话或亲自进行一次随访。活动限制屏幕包括关于自我报告的行走困难的问题,抓,弯曲,近距离观察,看得很远,说话,听力,和辅助设备的使用(步态,愿景,和助听器)。我们估计了自我报告的活动限制和辅助设备使用的粗略患病率,以及按年龄和性别标准化的患病率。我们使用逻辑回归来调整教育和社会经济因素的患病率,并按年龄估计活动限制和辅助设备的可能性,性别,国家收入。我们使用Cox衰弱模型来评估每种活动限制与死亡率和临床事件(心血管疾病,心力衰竭,肺炎,falls,和癌症)。PURE研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT03225586。
    结果:在2001年1月12日至2019年5月6日之间,175584人完成了活动限制问卷中的至少一个问题(平均年龄50·6岁[SD9·8];103625[59%]女性)。在完成所有问题的人中,平均随访10·7年(SD4·4)。最常见的自我报告活动限制是弯曲困难(175515名参与者中有23921名[13·6%]),近距离观察(167801名参与者中的22532[13·4%]),和步行(175554名参与者中的22805[13·0%]);限制的患病率随着年龄的增长和女性的增加而增加。按年龄和性别标准化的所有限制的普遍性,除了听证,在低收入国家和中等收入国家最高,在调整了社会经济因素后,这仍然是一致的。步态的使用,视觉,低收入国家和中等收入国家的助听器最低,尤其是在女性中。在低收入国家,近距离视距的患病率高四倍(37926名参与者中的6257[16·5%]与18039名参与者中的717[4·0%]),远距离视距的患病率高五倍(37923名参与者中的4003[10·6%]与18038名参与者中的391[2·2%]),但低收入国家的眼镜使用率是高收入国家的一半。行走受限与死亡率相关性最强(校正风险比1·32[95%CI1·25-1·39]),与其他临床事件相关性最强。观察到远处的局限性和死亡率之间的其他显著关联,掌握限制和心血管疾病,弯曲限制和下降,在说话限制和中风之间。
    结论:全球妇女活动受限率明显高于男性,低收入国家和中等收入国家与高收入国家相比,再加上步态的使用要低得多,视觉,和助听器。需要采取战略来防止和减轻全球活动限制,特别是低收入国家和妇女。
    背景:本文末尾列出了资金来源。
    BACKGROUND: The focus of most epidemiological studies has been mortality or clinical events, with less information on activity limitations related to basic daily functions and their consequences. Standardised data from multiple countries at different economic levels in different regions of the world on activity limitations and their associations with clinical outcomes are sparse. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of activity limitations and use of assistive devices and the association of limitations with adverse outcomes in 25 countries grouped by different economic levels.
    METHODS: In this analysis, we obtained data from individuals in 25 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study (175 660 participants). In the PURE study, individuals aged 35-70 years who intended to continue living in their current home for a further 4 years were invited to complete a questionnaire on activity limitations. Participant follow-up was planned once every 3 years either by telephone or in person. The activity limitation screen consisted of questions on self-reported difficulty with walking, grasping, bending, seeing close, seeing far, speaking, hearing, and use of assistive devices (gait, vision, and hearing aids). We estimated crude prevalence of self-reported activity limitations and use of assistive devices, and prevalence standardised by age and sex. We used logistic regression to additionally adjust prevalence for education and socioeconomic factors and to estimate the probability of activity limitations and assistive devices by age, sex, and country income. We used Cox frailty models to evaluate the association between each activity limitation with mortality and clinical events (cardiovascular disease, heart failure, pneumonia, falls, and cancer). The PURE study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03225586.
    RESULTS: Between Jan 12, 2001, and May 6, 2019, 175 584 individuals completed at least one question on the activity limitation questionnaire (mean age 50·6 years [SD 9·8]; 103 625 [59%] women). Of the individuals who completed all questions, mean follow-up was 10·7 years (SD 4·4). The most common self-reported activity limitations were difficulty with bending (23 921 [13·6%] of 175 515 participants), seeing close (22 532 [13·4%] of 167 801 participants), and walking (22 805 [13·0%] of 175 554 participants); prevalence of limitations was higher with older age and among women. The prevalence of all limitations standardised by age and sex, with the exception of hearing, was highest in low-income countries and middle-income countries, and this remained consistent after adjustment for socioeconomic factors. The use of gait, visual, and hearing aids was lowest in low-income countries and middle-income countries, particularly among women. The prevalence of seeing close limitation was four times higher (6257 [16·5%] of 37 926 participants vs 717 [4·0%] of 18 039 participants) and the prevalence of seeing far limitation was five times higher (4003 [10·6%] of 37 923 participants vs 391 [2·2%] of 18 038 participants) in low-income countries than in high-income countries, but the prevalence of glasses use in low-income countries was half that in high-income countries. Walking limitation was most strongly associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1·32 [95% CI 1·25-1·39]) and most consistently associated with other clinical events, with other notable associations observed between seeing far limitation and mortality, grasping limitation and cardiovascular disease, bending limitation and falls, and between speaking limitation and stroke.
    CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence of activity limitations is substantially higher in women than men and in low-income countries and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries, coupled with a much lower use of gait, visual, and hearing aids. Strategies are needed to prevent and mitigate activity limitations globally, with particular emphasis on low-income countries and women.
    BACKGROUND: Funding sources are listed at the end of the Article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球化,收入增长和不断变化的文化趋势被认为会促使低收入国家的消费者采用高收入国家更富裕的饮食。这项研究调查了全球食品支出模式的趋同,关注食品总支出,在过去的几十年中,超过90个国家的原料食品类别和超加工食品和饮料。与先前的信念相反,我们发现,低收入国家的粮食支出模式与高收入国家的粮食支出模式并不普遍一致。这种趋势在大多数生食品类别和超加工食品和饮料中都很明显,因为一个国家的收入水平在决定其粮食支出模式方面继续发挥着至关重要的作用。重要的是,支出模式提供的是估计,而不是精确的饮食摄入量,反映了受经济约束而不是精确的饮食消费影响的消费者选择。
    Globalization, income growth and changing cultural trends are believed to prompt consumers in low-income countries to adopt the more affluent diet of high-income countries. This study investigates the convergence of food expenditure patterns worldwide, focusing on total food expenditure, raw food categories and ultra-processed foods and beverages across more than 90 countries over the past decades. Contrary to prior belief, we find that food expenditure patterns of lower-income countries do not universally align with those of higher-income nations. This trend is evident across most raw food categories and ultra-processed foods and beverages, as the income level of a country continues to play a crucial role in determining its food expenditure patterns. Importantly, expenditure patterns offer estimates rather than a precise idea of dietary intake, reflecting consumer choices shaped by economic constraints rather than exact dietary consumption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着所有年龄段的互联网使用趋势的增加,互联网使用是否可以预防中老年人的虚弱仍不清楚。
    方法:五个队列,包括健康与退休研究(HRS),中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS),健康调查,欧洲的老龄化和退休(SHARE),英国衰老纵向研究(ELSA),墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS)在这项研究中使用。互联网使用,社会孤立,使用类似的问题评估虚弱状态。广义估计方程模型,随机效应荟萃分析,COX回归,并利用调解分析。
    结果:在多队列研究中,共有155,695名参与者被纳入主要分析.互联网使用的比例因国家而异,从中国的5.56%(CHARLS)到丹麦的83.46%(份额)不等。根据广义估计方程模型和荟萃分析,互联网使用与脆弱成反比,合并OR(95CIs)为0.72(0.67,0.79)。COX回归还显示,使用互联网的参与者的虚弱发生率风险较低。此外,这种关联部分是由社会隔离介导的,在65岁及以上的参与者中略有明显,男性,不为付款而工作,没有结婚或伴侣,不吸烟,饮酒,而不是与孩子共同居住。
    结论:我们的研究结果强调了使用互联网在预防虚弱方面的重要作用,并建议更多参与社会交往和活动,以避免中老年人的社会隔离。
    BACKGROUND: With increasing trend of internet use in all age groups, whether internet use can prevent frailty in middle-aged and older adults remains unclear.
    METHODS: Five cohorts, including Health and Retirement Study (HRS), China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), and Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), were used in this study. Internet use, social isolation, and frailty status was assessed using similar questions. The Generalized estimating equations models, random effects meta-analysis, COX regression, and mediation analysis were utilized.
    RESULTS: In the multicohort study, a total of 155,695 participants were included in main analysis. The proportion of internet use was varied across countries, ranging from 5.56% in China (CHARLS) to 83.46% in Denmark (SHARE). According to the generalized estimating equations models and meta-analysis, internet use was inversely associated with frailty, with the pooled ORs (95%CIs) of 0.72 (0.67,0.79). The COX regression also showed that participants with internet use had a lower risk of frailty incidence. Additionally, the association was partially mediated by social isolation and slightly pronounced in participants aged 65 and over, male, not working for payment, not married or partnered, not smoking, drinking, and not co-residence with children.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the important role of internet use in preventing frailty and recommend more engagements in social communication and activities to avoid social isolation among middle-aged and older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抑郁症是全球残疾和健康状况不佳的主要原因,预计到2030年将在全球排名第一。本研究的目的是通过利用全球疾病负担(GBD)数据库和Joinpoint回归模型,分析中国和各个收入水平国家的抑郁症负担的转变和趋势。此分析旨在了解不同收入地区抑郁症负担的变化,并评估其发展模式。
    方法:基于GBD2019开放数据集,这项研究提取了YLD(残疾寿命年)的数据,DALY(残疾调整寿命年),与抑郁症相关的发病率。分析的重点是1990年至2019年,涵盖全球数据,区分高收入、中上收入,中低收入,低收入国家,和中国。我们利用Joinpoint回归模型拟合了不同收入水平国家之间的时空趋势变化。进行了成对比较,以检查并行性,并确定各个地区之间趋势变化的差异是否具有统计学意义。
    结果:从1990年到2019年,女性抑郁症的年龄标准化YLD和DALY高于男性。抑郁症男性的YLD总变化率高于女性。中国在性别之间的总YLD变化率方面表现出最大的差距,达到0.08在1990年至2019年期间,2005-2019年中高收入国家女性抑郁症的发病率增加,低收入国家,与1990-2005年相比,中国。值得注意的是,中国女性发病率增加最多(从-0.4%增加到0.84%)。此时期中国抑郁症患者的YLD变化最为显著(AAPC=0.45,95%CI=0.41,0.48,P<0.01)。与全球相比,中国的YLD/发病率更高,HIC,UMCs,LMC,和LIC。在中国,YLD/抑郁症的发病率在1994年开始上升,在2010年左右达到峰值,然后逐渐下降.自2010年以来,中国抑郁症DALYs的增长率一直高于全球平均水平,高收入国家,中上收入国家,中低收入国家,和低收入国家。HLC的DALY的AAPC值最高(AAPC=0.24,95%CI=0.22,0.25,P<0.01)。UMCs,与其他地区相比,AAPC发生率最高(AAPC=0.48,95%CI=0.46,0.50,P<0.01)。
    结论:鉴于不同收入水平国家的抑郁症负担存在显著差异,未来旨在减轻抑郁症负担的战略应根据每个国家的具体需求和发展阶段采用量身定制的差异化方法。
    BACKGROUND: Depression is a leading cause of disability and poor health worldwide and is expected to rank first worldwide by 2030. The aim of this study is to analyze the transition and trend of depression burden in China and various income-level countries by utilizing the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database and the Joinpoint regression model. This analysis seeks to comprehend the variations in the burden of depression across different income regions and evaluate their developmental patterns.
    METHODS: Based on the GBD 2019 open dataset, this study extracted data on YLD (Years Lived with Disability), DALY (Disability-Adjusted Life Years), and incidence related to depression. The analysis focused on the period between 1990 and 2019, covering global data and distinguishing between high-income, upper-middle-income, lower-middle-income, low-income countries, and China. We utilized the Joinpoint regression model to fit the spatiotemporal trend changes among different income-level countries. Pairwise comparisons were conducted to examine the parallelism and to determine if the differences in trend changes among various regions were statistically significant.
    RESULTS: From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized YLD and DALY for depression female were higher than that in male. The YLD total change rate of depression men was higher than that of women. China exhibited the largest disparity in total YLD change rates between genders, reaching 0.08. During 1990 to 2019, the incidence of depression in 2005-2019 increased among females in middle to high-income countries, low-income countries, and China as compare to that of 1990-2005. Notably, China shown the most increase the incidence rate of females (from -0.4 % to 0.84 %). China experienced the most significant change in the YLD of depression during this period (AAPC = 0.45, 95 % CI = 0.41, 0.48, P < 0.01). China\'s YLD/Incidence rate was higher compared to the global, HICs, UMCs, LMCs, and LICs. In China, the YLD/incidence rate of depression began to rise in 1994, peaking around 2010, and then gradually declining. Since 2010, the growth rate of depression DALYs in China has been higher than the global average, high-income countries, upper-middle-income countries, lower-middle-income countries, and low-income countries. The DALY\'s AAPC value for the HLCs was the highest (AAPC = 0.24, 95 % CI = 0.22, 0.25, P < 0.01). The UMCs, in comparison to other regions, incidence rate had the highest AAPC value (AAPC = 0.48, 95 % CI = 0.46, 0.50, P < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Given the significant variations in the burden of depression across countries with different income levels, future strategies aimed at reducing the burden of depression should adopt tailored and differentiated approaches according to each country\'s specific needs and developmental stages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)的协作努力在高收入国家(HIC)和中低收入国家(LMICs)之间越来越普遍。鉴于LMIC经常遇到的资源限制,协作对于汇集资源至关重要,专业知识,和知识。尽管有明显的优势,确保这些合作模式的公平性和公平性至关重要,特别是考虑到LMIC和HIC医院之间的明显差异。在这项研究中,我们表明,协作AI方法可以导致HIC和LMIC设置中不同的性能结果,特别是在数据失衡的情况下。通过一个真实世界的COVID-19筛查案例研究,我们证明,实施算法水平偏倚缓解方法显著改善了HIC和LMIC位点之间的结果公平性,同时保持了较高的诊断敏感性.我们将我们的结果与以前的基准进行比较,利用来自英国四家独立医院和一家越南医院的数据集,代表HIC和LMIC设置,分别。
    Collaborative efforts in artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly common between high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). Given the resource limitations often encountered by LMICs, collaboration becomes crucial for pooling resources, expertise, and knowledge. Despite the apparent advantages, ensuring the fairness and equity of these collaborative models is essential, especially considering the distinct differences between LMIC and HIC hospitals. In this study, we show that collaborative AI approaches can lead to divergent performance outcomes across HIC and LMIC settings, particularly in the presence of data imbalances. Through a real-world COVID-19 screening case study, we demonstrate that implementing algorithmic-level bias mitigation methods significantly improves outcome fairness between HIC and LMIC sites while maintaining high diagnostic sensitivity. We compare our results against previous benchmarks, utilizing datasets from four independent United Kingdom Hospitals and one Vietnamese hospital, representing HIC and LMIC settings, respectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在全球范围内,接受和接受癌症治疗的癌症幸存者人数正在上升。了解全球范围内提供的社会心理护理服务的范围和类型至关重要。我们评估了癌症生存护理的模型,治疗后生存阶段的社会心理护理实践,以及提供心理社会护理服务的障碍/促进者,包括低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。
    方法:国际心理肿瘤学会(IPOS)生存特别兴趣小组在2022年3月至11月期间领导了一项横断面在线调查。通过IPOS全球会员邀请了心理肿瘤学方面的卫生保健专业人员和研究人员,社交媒体,滚雪球。这项调查是针对个人进行的,但包括了与本国在国家一级的做法有关的问题。
    结果:来自37个国家的二百八十三名受访者参加了会议(40%来自低收入国家),具有12年的经验中位数(IQR,6-20)在心理肿瘤学领域。参与者报告说,常规生存护理的最常见要素与复发/新癌症的预防/管理有关(74%)。物理迟发效应(59%),和慢性疾病(53%),而心理社会晚期效应(27%)和心理社会/支持性治疗(25%)的监测/管理最不常见.在高收入国家(HIC),与生殖健康相关的服务可用性比LMIC更为普遍(29%对17%),遗传咨询/支持(40%对20%),并识别/管理痛苦(39%对26%)和疼痛(66%对48%)。主要障碍包括专注于治疗而不是幸存者的提供者(57%),医疗而不是社会心理护理(60%),缺乏提供心理社会护理的专职医疗服务提供者(59%)。
    结论:即使在HIC中,癌症患者的心理社会需求也无法在治疗后的生存中充分获得和/或提供。因为病人的障碍,提供者,和系统级别。
    OBJECTIVE: The number of cancer survivors living with and beyond cancer treatment is rising globally. It is fundamental to understand the extent and type of psychosocial care services offered worldwide. We evaluated models of cancer survivorship care, psychosocial care practices in the post-treatment survivorship phase, and barriers/facilitators to delivery of psychosocial care services, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
    METHODS: The International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS) Survivorship Special Interest Group led a cross-sectional online survey between March and November 2022. Health care professionals and researchers in psycho-oncology were invited through the IPOS global membership, social media, and snowballing. The survey was administered to individuals but included questions related to practices in their country at a national level.
    RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three respondents from 37 countries participated (40% from LMICs), with a median of 12 years of experience (IQR, 6-20) in the psycho-oncology field. Participants reported that the most common elements of routine survivorship care were related to the prevention/management of recurrences/new cancers (74%), physical late effects (59%), and chronic medical conditions (53%), whereas surveillance/management of psychosocial late effects (27%) and psychosocial/supportive care (25%) were least common. Service availability was more commonly reported in high-income countries (HICs) than LMICs related to reproductive health (29% v 17%), genetic counseling/support (40% v 20%), and identifying/managing distress (39% v 26%) and pain (66% v 48%). Key barriers included providers focusing on treatment not survivorship (57%), medical not psychosocial care (60%), and a lack of allied health providers to deliver psychosocial care (59%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The psychosocial needs of people living with cancer are not adequately available and/or provided in post-treatment survivorship even in HICs, because of barriers at patient, provider, and system levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与急诊手术和麻醉相关的死亡和心脏骤停风险的大小尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估围手术期和与麻醉相关的死亡和心脏骤停的风险是否已经降低。以及发达国家和发展中国家之间的下降速度是否一致。
    方法:使用电子数据库进行系统评价,以确定接受急诊手术的患者围手术期死亡率的研究,术后30天死亡率,或者围手术期心脏骤停.根据国家人类发展指数(HDI),进行具有95%置信区间(CI)的荟萃回归和比例荟萃分析,以评估上述三个指标随时间变化的全球数据。并根据国家HDI状况(低与高HDI)和时间段(2000年前与2000年代后)。
    结果:35项研究符合纳入标准,代表超过309万个麻醉剂管理部门,用于接受急诊手术麻醉的患者。Meta回归显示围手术期死亡风险与时间之间存在显著关联(斜率:-0.0421,95CI:从-0.0685到-0.0157;P=0.0018)。随着时间的推移,围手术期死亡率从2000年代之前的227/10,000(95%CI134-380)下降到2000-2020年代的46(16-132)(p<0-0001),但不是随着HDI的增加。术后30天死亡率没有显着变化(2000年代之前的346[95%CI:303-395]到2000年代至2020年期间的292[95%CI:201-423],P=0.36),并且不随HDI状态的增加而降低。围手术期心脏骤停率随着时间的推移而下降,从2000年前的每10000人中113人(95%CI:31-409)到2000-2020年的31人(14-70),并且随着HDI的增加(低HDI组的68[95%CI:29-160]到高HDI组的21[95%CI:6-76],P=0.012)。
    结论:尽管基线患者风险增加,围手术期死亡率在过去几十年显著下降,但术后30天死亡率没有。全球优先事项应该是提高发达国家和发展中国家的长期生存率,并通过发展中国家的循证最佳实践减少整体围手术期心脏骤停。
    BACKGROUND: The magnitude of the risk of death and cardiac arrest associated with emergency surgery and anesthesia is not well understood. Our aim was to assess whether the risk of perioperative and anesthesia-related death and cardiac arrest has decreased over the years, and whether the rates of decrease are consistent between developed and developing countries.
    METHODS: A systematic review was performed using electronic databases to identify studies in which patients underwent emergency surgery with rates of perioperative mortality, 30-day postoperative mortality, or perioperative cardiac arrest. Meta-regression and proportional meta-analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed to evaluate global data on the above three indicators over time and according to country Human Development Index (HDI), and to compare these results according to country HDI status (low vs. high HDI) and time period (pre-2000s vs. post-2000s).
    RESULTS: 35 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing more than 3.09 million anesthetic administrations to patients undergoing anesthesia for emergency surgery. Meta-regression showed a significant association between the risk of perioperative mortality and time (slope: -0.0421, 95%CI: from - 0.0685 to -0.0157; P = 0.0018). Perioperative mortality decreased over time from 227 per 10,000 (95% CI 134-380) before the 2000s to 46 (16-132) in the 2000-2020 s (p < 0-0001), but not with increasing HDI. 30-day postoperative mortality did not change significantly (346 [95% CI: 303-395] before the 2000s to 292 [95% CI: 201-423] in the 2000s-2020 period, P = 0.36) and did not decrease with increasing HDI status. Perioperative cardiac arrest rates decreased over time, from 113 per 10,000 (95% CI: 31-409) before the 2000s to 31 (14-70) in the 2000-2020 s, and also with increasing HDI (68 [95% CI: 29-160] in the low-HDI group to 21 [95% CI: 6-76] in the high-HDI group, P = 0.012).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing baseline patient risk, perioperative mortality has decreased significantly over the past decades, but 30-day postoperative mortality has not. A global priority should be to increase long-term survival in both developed and developing countries and to reduce overall perioperative cardiac arrest through evidence-based best practice in developing countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,全球数字浪潮蓬勃发展,数字技术革命已经出现。数字化在推动现代经济社会发展中的作用不可否认,社会,创新,公共服务和可持续发展,我国的数字化应用也在迅速发展。为了更好地衡量我国数字化发展水平的现状,本文从数字领域人才四个维度构建了数字化发展综合评价指标体系,数字基础设施建设,数字化创新能力和国际竞争力,并测试指标体系。运用熵值法测算中美之间的数字化发展水平,联合王国,法国等世界主要发达国家,和变异系数法,采用核密度估计和Dagum基尼系数方法分析了7个国家数字化发展水平的时空特征和区域差异。本文从技术经济范式演进的历史视角对中国与主要发达国家进行了比较分析。以期从中总结和探索,借鉴发达国家长期积累的先进经验,为中国进一步提升数字化发展水平提供有益的启示和依据。
    The global digital wave has flourished in recent years, and the digital technology revolution has emerged. Digitalization plays an undeniable role in promoting modern economic and social development in multiple aspects such as economy, society, innovation, public services and sustainable development, China\'s digitalization application is also developing rapidly. In order to better measure the current situation of China\'s digitalization development level, this paper constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system of digitalization development from four dimensions of talents in the digital field, digital infrastructure construction, digitalization innovation ability and international competitiveness, and tests the index system. The entropy method is used to measure the level of digitalization development between China and the United States, the United Kingdom, France and other major developed countries in the world, and the coefficient of variation method, kernel density estimation and Dagum Gini coefficient method are used to analyze the temporal and spatial characteristics and regional differences of digitalization development level of seven countries. This paper makes a comparative analysis between China and major developed countries from the historical perspective of the evolution of the techno-economic paradigm. With a view to summarizing and exploring from it and drawing on the advanced experiences accumulated by the developed countries over a long period of time, so as to provide China with useful insights and bases for further enhancing its digitalization development level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于信通技术传播在金融部门发展中的重要性,本分析旨在分析2001-2019年高收入和中低收入经济体两者之间的传导渠道。我们使用了三个变量,包括ICT指数,个人使用互联网,和移动用户,代表ICT和三个指数,包括金融发展指数,金融机构指数,和金融市场指数,使我们的结果可靠和稳健。我们利用GMM方法进行了实证分析。一般来说,我们的研究结果表明,信息和通信技术扩散对高收入经济体的金融发展产生积极影响,对中低收入经济体产生负面影响。我们的研究结果表明,中低收入经济政策制定者应遵循高收入经济体的足迹,并增加ICT在金融部门发展中的作用。
    Given the importance of ICT diffusion in the development of the financial sector, this analysis is an effort to analyze the transmission channels between the two in high-income and middle and low-income economies over 2001-2019. We have used three variables, including the ICT index, individuals using the internet, and mobile subscribers, to represent ICT and three indices, including the financial development index, financial institution index, and financial market index, to make our results reliable and robust. We utilized a GMM method for conducting the empirical analysis. Generally, our results imply that ICT diffusion positively impacts financial development in high-income economies and negatively impacts middle and low-income economies. Our findings suggest that middle- and low-income-economy policymakers should follow the footprint of the high-income economies and increase the role of ICT in the financial sector for its development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康保险是社会福祉的一个关键方面,对经济发展的总体格局有着深远的影响。现有的研究,然而,对健康保险与经济表现之间的关系缺乏共识,也没有提供相关程度的证据。这种信息的缺乏严重阻碍了医疗保健系统的高质量发展。因此,为了科学地阐明两者之间的关系,这项研究涉及荟萃分析,分析来自34个独立研究样本的479个效应值。结果表明,健康保险与经济绩效之间存在强烈的正相关[r=0.429,95%CI=(0.381,0.475)]。研究结果表明,发达国家的健康保险比发展中国家更有效地促进经济表现。此外,公共健康保险比商业健康保险对经济绩效的促进作用更强。医疗保险与经济绩效之间的关系受数据类型的调节,研究方法,样品原产国,文献类型,期刊影响因子,出版年份,健康保险的类型,和研究人群。基于荟萃分析,这项研究不仅科学地回应了医疗保险与经济绩效之间关系的争议,以及相关性的大小,而且还进一步揭示了两者之间的内在传导机制。我们的研究结果对于政策制定者根据其独特的属性选择合适的医疗保健策略是有意义的,推动经济可持续发展。
    Health insurance stands as a pivotal facet of social wellbeing, with profound implications for the overarching landscape of economic development. The existing research, however, lacks consensus on the relationship between health insurance and economic performance and provides no evidence about the magnitude of the correlation. This lack of information seriously impedes the high-quality development of the healthcare system. Therefore, to scientifically elucidate the relationship between the two, this study involved a meta-analysis, analyzing 479 effect values derived from 34 independent research samples. The results reveal a strongly positive correlation between health insurance and economic performance [r = 0.429, 95% CI = (0.381, 0.475)]. Findings show that health insurance in developed countries more effectively fosters economic performance than in developing countries. Moreover, public health insurance exerts a stronger promoting effect on economic performance than commercial health insurance. The relationship between health insurance and economic performance is moderated by data type, research method, country of sample origin, literature type, journal impact factor, publication year, type of health insurance, and the research populations. Based on meta-analysis, this study not only scientifically responds to the controversy of the relationship between health insurance and economic performance, and the magnitude of a correlation, but also further reveals the inner conduction mechanism between the two. Our research findings are meaningful for policymakers to choose an appropriate healthcare strategy according to their unique attributes, propelling sustainable economic development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号