developed countries

发达国家
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:比较1990年至2018年六个高收入英语国家的预期寿命水平和国内预期寿命的地理差异。
    方法:使用汇总死亡率数据进行人口统计学分析。
    方法:六个高收入英语国家(美国,英国,加拿大,澳大利亚,爱尔兰和新西兰),按性别,包括对每个国家内死亡率的国家以下地理不平等的分析。
    方法:数据来自人类死亡率数据库,世卫组织死亡率数据库和六个高收入英语国家的生命统计机构。
    方法:出生时和65岁时的预期寿命;年龄和死亡原因对国家间预期寿命差异的影响;国家内部死亡率地理差异的差异指数。
    结果:在六个高收入英语国家中,澳大利亚显然是出生时预期寿命表现最好的国家,2018年,女性领先其同行国家1.26-3.95岁,男性领先0.97-4.88岁。虽然澳大利亚人在整个年龄段的死亡率较低,他们的大部分预期寿命优势都在45岁到84岁之间。澳大利亚在外部原因(包括与毒品和酒精有关的死亡)的死亡率方面表现尤其出色,可筛选/可治疗的癌症,与其他国家相比,心血管疾病和流感/肺炎等呼吸系统疾病。考虑到每个国家不同地理区域的预期寿命差异,澳大利亚的不平等程度往往最低,而爱尔兰,新西兰和美国往往经历最高水平。
    结论:澳大利亚在英语国家中获得了最高的预期寿命,并且在总体预期寿命的国际比较中排名较高。它是表现较低的国家减少过早死亡率和预期寿命不平等的潜在模式。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare life expectancy levels and within-country geographic variation in life expectancy across six high-income Anglophone countries between 1990 and 2018.
    METHODS: Demographic analysis using aggregated mortality data.
    METHODS: Six high-income Anglophone countries (USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland and New Zealand), by sex, including an analysis of subnational geographic inequality in mortality within each country.
    METHODS: Data come from the Human Mortality Database, the WHO Mortality Database and the vital statistics agencies of six high-income Anglophone countries.
    METHODS: Life expectancy at birth and age 65; age and cause of death contributions to life expectancy differences between countries; index of dissimilarity for within-country geographic variation in mortality.
    RESULTS: Among six high-income Anglophone countries, Australia is the clear best performer in life expectancy at birth, leading its peer countries by 1.26-3.95 years for women and by 0.97-4.88 years for men in 2018. While Australians experience lower mortality across the age range, most of their life expectancy advantage accrues between ages 45 and 84. Australia performs particularly well in terms of mortality from external causes (including drug- and alcohol-related deaths), screenable/treatable cancers, cardiovascular disease and influenza/pneumonia and other respiratory diseases compared with other countries. Considering life expectancy differences across geographic regions within each country, Australia tends to experience the lowest levels of inequality, while Ireland, New Zealand and the USA tend to experience the highest levels.
    CONCLUSIONS: Australia has achieved the highest life expectancy among Anglophone countries and tends to rank well in international comparisons of life expectancy overall. It serves as a potential model for lower-performing countries to follow to reduce premature mortality and inequalities in life expectancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数流行病学研究的重点是死亡率或临床事件,与基本日常功能相关的活动限制及其后果的信息较少。来自世界不同地区不同经济水平的多个国家关于活动限制及其与临床结果的关联的标准化数据很少。我们旨在量化25个国家(按不同经济水平分组)的活动限制和辅助设备使用的普遍性以及限制与不良结果的关联。
    方法:在此分析中,我们从25个高收入人群中获得了数据,中等收入,和低收入国家的前瞻性城市农村流行病学(PURE)研究(175660名参与者)。在PURE研究中,我们邀请年龄在35~70岁,打算继续在目前的家庭居住4年的个体完成一份关于活动限制的问卷.参与者计划每3年通过电话或亲自进行一次随访。活动限制屏幕包括关于自我报告的行走困难的问题,抓,弯曲,近距离观察,看得很远,说话,听力,和辅助设备的使用(步态,愿景,和助听器)。我们估计了自我报告的活动限制和辅助设备使用的粗略患病率,以及按年龄和性别标准化的患病率。我们使用逻辑回归来调整教育和社会经济因素的患病率,并按年龄估计活动限制和辅助设备的可能性,性别,国家收入。我们使用Cox衰弱模型来评估每种活动限制与死亡率和临床事件(心血管疾病,心力衰竭,肺炎,falls,和癌症)。PURE研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT03225586。
    结果:在2001年1月12日至2019年5月6日之间,175584人完成了活动限制问卷中的至少一个问题(平均年龄50·6岁[SD9·8];103625[59%]女性)。在完成所有问题的人中,平均随访10·7年(SD4·4)。最常见的自我报告活动限制是弯曲困难(175515名参与者中有23921名[13·6%]),近距离观察(167801名参与者中的22532[13·4%]),和步行(175554名参与者中的22805[13·0%]);限制的患病率随着年龄的增长和女性的增加而增加。按年龄和性别标准化的所有限制的普遍性,除了听证,在低收入国家和中等收入国家最高,在调整了社会经济因素后,这仍然是一致的。步态的使用,视觉,低收入国家和中等收入国家的助听器最低,尤其是在女性中。在低收入国家,近距离视距的患病率高四倍(37926名参与者中的6257[16·5%]与18039名参与者中的717[4·0%]),远距离视距的患病率高五倍(37923名参与者中的4003[10·6%]与18038名参与者中的391[2·2%]),但低收入国家的眼镜使用率是高收入国家的一半。行走受限与死亡率相关性最强(校正风险比1·32[95%CI1·25-1·39]),与其他临床事件相关性最强。观察到远处的局限性和死亡率之间的其他显著关联,掌握限制和心血管疾病,弯曲限制和下降,在说话限制和中风之间。
    结论:全球妇女活动受限率明显高于男性,低收入国家和中等收入国家与高收入国家相比,再加上步态的使用要低得多,视觉,和助听器。需要采取战略来防止和减轻全球活动限制,特别是低收入国家和妇女。
    背景:本文末尾列出了资金来源。
    BACKGROUND: The focus of most epidemiological studies has been mortality or clinical events, with less information on activity limitations related to basic daily functions and their consequences. Standardised data from multiple countries at different economic levels in different regions of the world on activity limitations and their associations with clinical outcomes are sparse. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of activity limitations and use of assistive devices and the association of limitations with adverse outcomes in 25 countries grouped by different economic levels.
    METHODS: In this analysis, we obtained data from individuals in 25 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study (175 660 participants). In the PURE study, individuals aged 35-70 years who intended to continue living in their current home for a further 4 years were invited to complete a questionnaire on activity limitations. Participant follow-up was planned once every 3 years either by telephone or in person. The activity limitation screen consisted of questions on self-reported difficulty with walking, grasping, bending, seeing close, seeing far, speaking, hearing, and use of assistive devices (gait, vision, and hearing aids). We estimated crude prevalence of self-reported activity limitations and use of assistive devices, and prevalence standardised by age and sex. We used logistic regression to additionally adjust prevalence for education and socioeconomic factors and to estimate the probability of activity limitations and assistive devices by age, sex, and country income. We used Cox frailty models to evaluate the association between each activity limitation with mortality and clinical events (cardiovascular disease, heart failure, pneumonia, falls, and cancer). The PURE study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03225586.
    RESULTS: Between Jan 12, 2001, and May 6, 2019, 175 584 individuals completed at least one question on the activity limitation questionnaire (mean age 50·6 years [SD 9·8]; 103 625 [59%] women). Of the individuals who completed all questions, mean follow-up was 10·7 years (SD 4·4). The most common self-reported activity limitations were difficulty with bending (23 921 [13·6%] of 175 515 participants), seeing close (22 532 [13·4%] of 167 801 participants), and walking (22 805 [13·0%] of 175 554 participants); prevalence of limitations was higher with older age and among women. The prevalence of all limitations standardised by age and sex, with the exception of hearing, was highest in low-income countries and middle-income countries, and this remained consistent after adjustment for socioeconomic factors. The use of gait, visual, and hearing aids was lowest in low-income countries and middle-income countries, particularly among women. The prevalence of seeing close limitation was four times higher (6257 [16·5%] of 37 926 participants vs 717 [4·0%] of 18 039 participants) and the prevalence of seeing far limitation was five times higher (4003 [10·6%] of 37 923 participants vs 391 [2·2%] of 18 038 participants) in low-income countries than in high-income countries, but the prevalence of glasses use in low-income countries was half that in high-income countries. Walking limitation was most strongly associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1·32 [95% CI 1·25-1·39]) and most consistently associated with other clinical events, with other notable associations observed between seeing far limitation and mortality, grasping limitation and cardiovascular disease, bending limitation and falls, and between speaking limitation and stroke.
    CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence of activity limitations is substantially higher in women than men and in low-income countries and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries, coupled with a much lower use of gait, visual, and hearing aids. Strategies are needed to prevent and mitigate activity limitations globally, with particular emphasis on low-income countries and women.
    BACKGROUND: Funding sources are listed at the end of the Article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在发达国家,心脏病仍然是导致死亡的主要原因,和吸烟导致相当比例的心血管相关死亡。戒烟可显著降低复发性心肌梗死的风险。
    在这项横断面研究中,通过随机抽样招募384名急性心肌梗死(MI)后参与者,以探讨吸烟状况与戒烟意愿之间的关系。在三级保健医院进行了为期6个月的数据收集,伊斯兰堡,巴基斯坦。
    大多数参与者是男性(59.9%),年龄为46-50岁(37.5%)。每日大量吸烟者是最大的吸烟群体(41.6%),非ST段抬高型MI是最常见的亚型(40.1%)。参与者戒烟的意图各不相同,沉思前阶段的代表性最高(19.3%),其次是沉思(25.8%)。值得注意的是,相当比例的参与者表示不打算戒烟(35.4%).
    多项逻辑回归分析确定当前吸烟是准备和沉思阶段戒烟意向的重要预测因素。总的来说,这项研究强调了在评估MI后戒烟意向时考虑吸烟行为的重要性,并强调需要有针对性的干预措施和支持策略来解决该人群的戒烟问题.这些发现为制定旨在减少MI后持续吸烟和改善患者预后的有效策略提供了有价值的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in developed countries, and cigarette smoking contributes to a significant proportion of cardiovascular-related deaths. Abstaining from tobacco use is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent myocardial infarctions.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, 384 participants post-acute myocardial infarction (MI) were recruited through random sampling to explore the associations between smoking status and intention to quit smoking. Data collection took place over a 6-month period at a tertiary care hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    UNASSIGNED: The majority of participants were male (59.9%) and fell into the age category of 46-50 years (37.5%). Heavy daily smokers comprised the largest smoking group (41.6%), and non-ST-elevated MI was the most common subtype (40.1%). Intention to quit smoking varied among participants, with the pre-contemplation stage having the highest representation (19.3%), followed by contemplation (25.8%). Notably, a significant proportion of participants expressed no intention to quit smoking (35.4%).
    UNASSIGNED: Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified current smoking as a significant predictor of intention to quit in the preparation and contemplation stages. Overall, this study underscores the importance of considering smoking behaviour when evaluating the intention to quit smoking post-MI and highlights the need for tailored interventions and support strategies to address smoking cessation in this population. These findings offer valuable insights for the development of effective strategies aimed at reducing persistent smoking following MI and improving patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康保险是社会福祉的一个关键方面,对经济发展的总体格局有着深远的影响。现有的研究,然而,对健康保险与经济表现之间的关系缺乏共识,也没有提供相关程度的证据。这种信息的缺乏严重阻碍了医疗保健系统的高质量发展。因此,为了科学地阐明两者之间的关系,这项研究涉及荟萃分析,分析来自34个独立研究样本的479个效应值。结果表明,健康保险与经济绩效之间存在强烈的正相关[r=0.429,95%CI=(0.381,0.475)]。研究结果表明,发达国家的健康保险比发展中国家更有效地促进经济表现。此外,公共健康保险比商业健康保险对经济绩效的促进作用更强。医疗保险与经济绩效之间的关系受数据类型的调节,研究方法,样品原产国,文献类型,期刊影响因子,出版年份,健康保险的类型,和研究人群。基于荟萃分析,这项研究不仅科学地回应了医疗保险与经济绩效之间关系的争议,以及相关性的大小,而且还进一步揭示了两者之间的内在传导机制。我们的研究结果对于政策制定者根据其独特的属性选择合适的医疗保健策略是有意义的,推动经济可持续发展。
    Health insurance stands as a pivotal facet of social wellbeing, with profound implications for the overarching landscape of economic development. The existing research, however, lacks consensus on the relationship between health insurance and economic performance and provides no evidence about the magnitude of the correlation. This lack of information seriously impedes the high-quality development of the healthcare system. Therefore, to scientifically elucidate the relationship between the two, this study involved a meta-analysis, analyzing 479 effect values derived from 34 independent research samples. The results reveal a strongly positive correlation between health insurance and economic performance [r = 0.429, 95% CI = (0.381, 0.475)]. Findings show that health insurance in developed countries more effectively fosters economic performance than in developing countries. Moreover, public health insurance exerts a stronger promoting effect on economic performance than commercial health insurance. The relationship between health insurance and economic performance is moderated by data type, research method, country of sample origin, literature type, journal impact factor, publication year, type of health insurance, and the research populations. Based on meta-analysis, this study not only scientifically responds to the controversy of the relationship between health insurance and economic performance, and the magnitude of a correlation, but also further reveals the inner conduction mechanism between the two. Our research findings are meaningful for policymakers to choose an appropriate healthcare strategy according to their unique attributes, propelling sustainable economic development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    惩教设施是协调公共卫生应对COVID-19大流行的高度优先设置。由于监狱中的人之间以及与更广泛的社区之间的密切接触,这些设施具有很高的疾病传播风险。由于合并症的负担很高,监狱中的人也容易患严重疾病。
    我们开发了一个数学模型来评估各种公共卫生干预措施的效果,包括疫苗接种,关于缓解COVID-19疫情,将其应用于澳大利亚和加拿大的监狱。
    我们发现,在没有任何干预的情况下,在索引病例发生后的20天内,爆发并感染几乎100%的监狱人员。然而,与其他非药物干预措施一起迅速推出疫苗将几乎消除爆发的风险。
    我们的研究强调,对于具有高传播概率的变种,需要高疫苗接种覆盖率,以完全减轻监狱中的爆发风险。
    Correctional facilities are high-priority settings for coordinated public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. These facilities are at high risk of disease transmission due to close contacts between people in prison and with the wider community. People in prison are also vulnerable to severe disease given their high burden of co-morbidities.
    We developed a mathematical model to evaluate the effect of various public health interventions, including vaccination, on the mitigation of COVID-19 outbreaks, applying it to prisons in Australia and Canada.
    We found that, in the absence of any intervention, an outbreak would occur and infect almost 100% of people in prison within 20 days of the index case. However, the rapid rollout of vaccines with other non-pharmaceutical interventions would almost eliminate the risk of an outbreak.
    Our study highlights that high vaccination coverage is required for variants with high transmission probability to completely mitigate the outbreak risk in prisons.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多个长期条件(MLTC,多发病率)已被确定为优先研究主题,全球。从患者和研究资助者的角度描述了研究重点。尽管MLTC的大多数护理都是在初级保健中提供的,学术初级保健的优先事项尚未确定.
    目的:确定并优先考虑MLTC的学术初级保健研究议程。
    方法:与来自英国和其他高收入国家的初级保健MLTC研究人员进行的三阶段研究。
    方法:(i)不限成员名额调查问题;(ii)与英国和爱尔兰的研究人员进行面对面的研讨会,以阐述问题;(iii)与国际多发病率研究人员进行两轮德尔菲共识调查。
    结果:25名初级保健研究人员回答了最初的开放式调查,并提出了84个潜在的研究问题。在随后的研讨会讨论中(18名与会者),这个列表被减少到31个问题。Delphi第一轮中包含了31个研究问题的一长串;第一轮50个(54%)中的27个和第二轮27个(89%)中的24个参加了Delphi。十个问题最终达成共识。这些广泛集中于解决患者群体的复杂性,(a)开发新的多发病率护理模式,(b)方法和数据开发。
    结论:这些高度优先的研究问题为资助者和研究人员提供了一个基础,可以在此基础上建立未来的赠款调用和研究计划。需要解决我们研究的复杂性,以改善我们的护理和预防系统。
    BACKGROUND: Multiple long-term conditions (MLTC), also known as multimorbidity, has been identified as a priority research topic globally. Research priorities from the perspectives of patients and research funders have been described. Although most care for MLTC is delivered in primary care, the priorities of academic primary care have not been identified.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise the academic primary care research agenda for MLTC.
    METHODS: This was a three-phase study with primary care MLTC researchers from the UK and other high-income countries.
    METHODS: The study consisted of: an open-ended survey question, a face-to-face workshop to elaborate questions with researchers from the UK and Ireland, and a two-round Delphi consensus survey with international multimorbidity researchers.
    RESULTS: Twenty-five primary care researchers responded to the initial open-ended survey and generated 84 potential research questions. In the subsequent workshop discussion (n = 18 participants), this list was reduced to 31 questions. The longlist of 31 research questions was included in round 1 of the Delphi; 27 of the 50 (54%) round 1 invitees and 24 of the 27 (89%) round 2 invitees took part in the Delphi. Ten questions reached final consensus. These questions focused broadly on addressing the complexity of the patient group with development of new models of care for multimorbidity, and methods and data development.
    CONCLUSIONS: These high-priority research questions offer funders and researchers a basis on which to build future grant calls and research plans. Addressing complexity in this research is needed to inform improvements in systems of care and for disease prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:互联网的使用对老年人的健康是一把双刃剑。互联网使用是否可以预防老年人的心脏代谢疾病和死亡仍然存在争议。
    方法:中国各地的四个队列,墨西哥,美国,欧洲被利用了。使用类似的问题定义了互联网使用。心血管代谢疾病包括糖尿病,心脏病,和中风,2个或更多表示心脏代谢多重性。使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和欧洲抑郁量表评估抑郁症状。基于子分布风险回归的竞争风险分析,随机效应荟萃分析,并利用调解分析。
    结果:共纳入104,422名50岁或50岁以上的老年人。互联网用户(与数字排斥)患糖尿病的风险较低,中风,和死亡,合并的sHR(95%CI)为0.83(0.74-0.93),0.81(0.71-0.92),和0.67(0.52-0.86),分别,这在敏感性分析中仍然很重要。在墨西哥,互联网使用与新发心脏代谢疾病和死亡的负相关逐渐显着,中国,美国,和欧洲。例如,欧洲老年互联网用户的心脏代谢风险降低14-30%,死亡风险降低40%.这些关联部分是由抑郁症状减少介导的,并且在具有高社会经济地位和女性的人群中更为明显。此外,以前有心脏代谢疾病的患者如果使用互联网,死亡风险降低约30%,这也是由抑郁症状减少介导的。然而,65岁以下人群使用互联网的某些心脏代谢危害,社会经济地位低下,男人,也观察到单身。
    结论:加强老年人的互联网使用可以减少抑郁症状,从而降低心脏代谢疾病和死亡的风险。互联网使用的平衡,社会经济地位,在老年人普及互联网时,应考虑健康素养。
    Internet use is a double-edged sword for older adults\' health. Whether internet use can prevent cardiometabolic diseases and death in older adults remains controversial.
    Four cohorts across China, Mexico, the United States, and Europe were utilized. Internet use was defined using similar questions. Cardiometabolic diseases included diabetes, heart diseases, and stroke, with 2 or more denoting cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale and Europe-depression scale. The competing risk analysis based on subdistribution hazard regression, random-effects meta-analysis, and mediation analysis were utilized.
    A total of 104,422 older adults aged 50 or older were included. Internet users (vs. digital exclusion) were at lower risks of diabetes, stroke, and death, with pooled sHRs (95% CIs) of 0.83 (0.74-0.93), 0.81 (0.71-0.92), and 0.67 (0.52-0.86), respectively, which remained significant in sensitivity analyses. The inverse associations of internet use with new-onset cardiometabolic diseases and death were progressively significant in Mexico, China, the United States, and Europe. For instance, older internet users in Europe were at 14-30% lower cardiometabolic risks and 40% lower risk of death. These associations were partially mediated by reduced depressive symptoms and were more pronounced in those with high socioeconomic status and women. Furthermore, patients with prior cardiometabolic conditions were at about 30% lower risk of death if they used the internet, which was also mediated by reduced depressive symptoms. However, certain cardiometabolic hazards of internet use in those aged < 65 years, with low socioeconomic status, men, and single ones were also observed.
    Enhancing internet usage in older adults can reduce depressive symptoms and thus reduce the risks of cardiometabolic diseases and death. The balance of internet use, socioeconomic status, and health literacy should be considered when popularizing the internet in older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:对COVID-19疫苗犹豫的国家和国家以下轨迹的持续监测可以为设计量身定制的政策提供支持,以提高疫苗的吸收。
    目的:我们旨在追踪主要英语国家在整个大流行期间在Twitter上表达的COVID-19疫苗犹豫和信心的时空分布。
    方法:我们在2020年1月1日至2022年6月30日期间,在6个国家-美国收集了5,257,385条关于COVID-19疫苗接种的英文推文,联合王国,澳大利亚,新西兰,加拿大,和爱尔兰。开发了基于Transformer的深度学习模型,将每条推文分类为接受或拒绝COVID-19疫苗接种的意图,以及认为COVID-19疫苗有效或不安全的信念。使用双变量和多变量线性回归分析了美国与COVID-19疫苗犹豫和信心相关的社会人口统计学因素。
    结果:6个国家经历了类似的COVID-19疫苗犹豫和信心演变趋势。平均而言,接受COVID-19疫苗接种意向的患病率从2020年3月的44,944条推文中的71.38%下降到2022年6月的48,167条推文中的34.85%,并出现波动。从2020年3月(44,944条推文中的2.84%)到2022年6月(48,167条推文中的21.27%),认为COVID-19疫苗不安全的患病率连续上升7.49倍。COVID-19疫苗的犹豫和信心因国家而异,疫苗制造商,和一个国家内的国家。民主党和较高的疫苗信心与美国各州较低的疫苗犹豫显着相关。
    结论:在大流行期间,COVID-19疫苗的犹豫和信心不断演变,并受到疫苗和病毒开发的影响。社交媒体和深度学习模型上的大规模自我生成话语为监测常规疫苗犹豫提供了一种经济高效的方法。
    An ongoing monitoring of national and subnational trajectory of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy could offer support in designing tailored policies on improving vaccine uptake.
    We aim to track the temporal and spatial distribution of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and confidence expressed on Twitter during the entire pandemic period in major English-speaking countries.
    We collected 5,257,385 English-language tweets regarding COVID-19 vaccination between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022, in 6 countries-the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Ireland. Transformer-based deep learning models were developed to classify each tweet as intent to accept or reject COVID-19 vaccination and the belief that COVID-19 vaccine is effective or unsafe. Sociodemographic factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and confidence in the United States were analyzed using bivariate and multivariable linear regressions.
    The 6 countries experienced similar evolving trends of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and confidence. On average, the prevalence of intent to accept COVID-19 vaccination decreased from 71.38% of 44,944 tweets in March 2020 to 34.85% of 48,167 tweets in June 2022 with fluctuations. The prevalence of believing COVID-19 vaccines to be unsafe continuously rose by 7.49 times from March 2020 (2.84% of 44,944 tweets) to June 2022 (21.27% of 48,167 tweets). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and confidence varied by country, vaccine manufacturer, and states within a country. The democrat party and higher vaccine confidence were significantly associated with lower vaccine hesitancy across US states.
    COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and confidence evolved and were influenced by the development of vaccines and viruses during the pandemic. Large-scale self-generated discourses on social media and deep learning models provide a cost-efficient approach to monitoring routine vaccine hesitancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:低母乳喂养开始和排他性持续时间使农村母亲和婴儿面临发病率和死亡率的风险以及巨大的经济成本。这项范围研究旨在确定高收入国家农村二元之间母乳喂养差异的决定因素及其可改变的因素。方法:采用Arksey和O\'Malley方法学框架。使用PubMed进行了文献综述,CINAHL完成,Embase,和APAPsycInfo数据库,以确定符合2012年至2022年发布的标准的农村母乳喂养相关研究。结果:共纳入25项研究。来自高收入国家的农村母亲更有可能更年轻,未婚,受教育程度较低,社会经济地位较低,烟雾,孕前体重指数比城市的高。白人各地的农村母亲,黑色,与城市母亲相比,西班牙裔种族和族裔群体的母乳喂养率明显较低。产妇的生理准备,母乳喂养问题,生活方式的选择,来自家庭的支持,循证实践,工作场所支持,促进母乳喂养的政策制定和实施被确定为可改变的因素。使用技术进行干预是克服乡村主义的新兴领域。结论:尽管农村二元体系普遍存在母乳喂养差异,母乳喂养普及时母亲面临的基本挑战,尽管地理位置在高收入国家。需要为母乳喂养提供更具体的支持,以继续母乳喂养。需要改进资源分配,以增加获得护理的机会。以患者为中心的技术干预措施可以减少农村地区的母乳喂养障碍。
    Background/Objective: Low breastfeeding initiation and duration of exclusivity put rural mothers and infants at risk for morbidity and mortality and significant economic costs. This scoping study aimed to identify determinants of breastfeeding disparities among rural dyads in high-income countries and their modifiable factors. Methods: The Arksey and O\'Malley methodological framework was used. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Embase, and APA PsycInfo databases to identify studies related to rural breastfeeding that met criteria published between 2012 and 2022. Results: Twenty-five studies were included. Rural mothers from high-income countries are more likely to be younger, be unmarried, have lower educational attainment, have lower socioeconomic status, smoke, and have a higher prepregnancy body mass index than their urban counterparts. Rural mothers across White, Black, and Hispanic racial and ethnic groups have significantly lower breastfeeding rates compared to urban mothers. Maternal physiological preparedness, breastfeeding problems, lifestyle choices, support from family, evidence-based practice, workplace support, and policy development and implementation for breastfeeding promotion were identified as modifiable factors. Interventions using technology are an emerging field to overcome rurality. Conclusions: Although breastfeeding disparities are prevalent in rural dyads, the basic challenges mothers face when breastfeeding are universal, despite geographical locations in high-income countries. More specific support needs to be provided for breastfeeding dyads to continue breastfeeding. Resource allocation needs to be improved to increase access to care. Patient-centered technology interventions may decrease breastfeeding barriers in rural areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号