UNASSIGNED: The primary objective was to investigate if treatment with artificial tears affected the variability of keratometry measurements for subjects with dry eyes prior to cataract surgery. The secondary objectives were to investigate whether treatment with artificial tears improved refractive precision and whether subjects with non-dry eyes had better refractive precision than subjects with dry eyes.
UNASSIGNED: Prospective randomized controlled trial with three arms.
UNASSIGNED: Dry eye diagnostics according to DEWS II were performed, and subjects with dry eyes were randomized to no treatment (group A1) or treatment with artificial tears two weeks prior to cataract surgery (group A2), with the third group (Group B, non-dry eyes) as a control. Keratometry was performed twice at baseline and twice after two weeks at the time of cataract surgery with three different optical biometers. The change in mean variability of keratometry (average K and magnitude of vector differences) and percentages of outliers after two weeks versus baseline were compared for group A2. The refractive and astigmatism prediction errors were calculated eight weeks after cataract surgery and compared for all three groups.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred thirty-one subjects were available for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean variability of keratometry or percentages of outliers for group A2 from baseline to the time of cataract surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in refractive precision (absolute error and astigmatism prediction error) between any groups.
UNASSIGNED: Subjects with dry eyes (treated and non-treated) achieved the same refractive precision and percentages of outliers as subjects with non-dry eyes. Treatment with artificial tears for two weeks appeared inadequate to significantly affect variability in biometric measurements for patients with dry eyes prior to cataract surgery. DEWS II criteria for DED may not be optimal in a cataract setting.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the effects of cyclosporine 0.05% and artificial tears on dry eye disease following cataract surgery.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial enroled 60 eyes of 60 eligible cataract patients who completed the study. Patients were randomized to receive either cyclosporine 0.05% or artificial tear four times daily for 1 month following cataract surgery. Clinical assessments included refraction, corrected distance visual acuity, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer\'s test, and the visual analogue scale (VAS). An independent sample t-test was used to compare the means of the variables between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: Mean patient age was 64.15±9.17 (range, 45-90), of which 53% (n=32) were female. There was no significant difference in mean age (P=0.308) between the two groups. One month postoperatively, the cyclosporine 0.05% group had a significantly higher TBUT value (P=0.004). Schirmer\'s result (P=0.095) and the VAS questionnaire scores (P=0.374) did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the visual outcomes (P>0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Cyclosporine 0.05% was superior to artificial tears in improving tear stability after cataract surgery in the management of immediate postoperative dry eye. It may provide a more effective therapeutic option for the management of dry eye symptoms in the clinical setting.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a chronic ocular surface disorder often characterized by decreased tear production and rapid tear evaporation that affect tear film stability and homeostasis. The common symptoms of DED include ocular discomfort, visual disturbances, dryness, and itching. Artificial tears are the mainstay of DED management and supplement one or more layers of the tear film. Artificial tear drops are available as a combination of viscosity-enhancing agents (demulcents/lubricants), humectants, and buffers either with or without preservatives. Artificial tears, as a combination of components (polymers/demulcents/viscosity-enhancing agents), can provide synergistic action compared with a single component for the management of multifactorial signs and symptoms of DED. This review describes the formulation components, physicochemical properties, mechanism of action, and summary of preclinical and clinical evidence on the hydroxypropyl guar-hyaluronic acid (HPG-HA) dual-polymer lubricant eye drops (SYSTANE™ HYDRATION). The dual-polymer eye drops consist of dual demulcents (propylene glycol and polyethylene glycol 400) and the polymers hydroxypropyl guar (HPG) and hyaluronic acid (HA). When instilled on the ocular surface, HPG forms a cross-linked gel matrix with borate ions that prolongs the retention of demulcents, thus providing long-lasting lubrication and ocular surface protection. Additionally, HA stabilizes the tear film, increases corneal wettability, and reduces friction during blinks due to its hygroscopic and viscoelastic properties. Preclinical evidence demonstrates that HPG HA dual-polymer lubricant eye drops provide protection against desiccation by cell hydration and surface retention, cell barrier protection, prolonged lubrication, and promotion of corneal re-epithelialization. Clinical scientific evidence demonstrates that HPG HA dual-polymer lubricant eye drops are safe and effective in the management of DED. Specifically, they reduce the signs and symptoms of DED, reduce dry eye symptoms post-cataract surgery, and improve tear film quality in healthy eyes.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate multi-symptom relief of dry eye manifestations with the use of propylene glycol-hydroxypropyl-guar (PG-HPG) nanoemulsion lubricant eye drops, among subjects with dry eye disease (DED).
METHODS: This was a post-marketing, prospective, single-arm study conducted in the USA. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years, with tear breakup time (TBUT) ≤ 10 s for both eyes, dry eye questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5) \"watery eyes\" symptom score 1-4, symptoms of burning/stinging, sore and tired eyes as determined by impact of dry eye on everyday living-symptom bother (IDEEL-SB) questionnaire, and IDEEL-SB score 16-65 were included. Subjects were required to complete IDEEL-SB and DEQ-5 at days 0, 14 ± 2, and 28 ± 2, and self-administer one drop of PG-HPG four times daily for 28 ± 2 days. Primary endpoints were change from baseline at day 28 in symptoms of sore, stinging/burning, and tired eyes on IDEEL-SB; and symptom of watery eyes on DEQ-5. Other endpoints evaluated were corneal staining and TBUT at baseline and day 28 ± 2; symptom relief (5-point Likert scale) at day 28 ± 2, and safety.
RESULTS: Of 119 subjects enrolled, 95 completed the study (mean ± SD age 61.2 ± 13.0 years; female 69.5%). Mean IDEEL-SB scores reduced significantly from baseline at day 28 for symptoms of aching/sore eyes (change from baseline - 1.0 ± 1.1), burning/stinging eyes (change from baseline - 1.1 ± 0.9), and tired eyes (change from baseline - 1.1 ± 1.0) (all p < 0.0001). Mean DEQ-5 score for watery eye symptoms significantly reduced from baseline at day 28 (change from baseline - 0.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001). Corneal staining at day 28 was comparable to baseline. TBUT improved from baseline to day 28. On a Likert scale, more than 50% of subjects reported relief from symptoms of sore, stinging, and burning eyes. Three (3.1%) subjects reported treatment-emergent adverse events (non-ocular).
CONCLUSIONS: PG-HPG nanoemulsion lubricant eye drops significantly improved multiple dry eye symptoms in subjects with DED over 28 days, with no new safety concerns.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT05056155.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the effects of 0.3% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) tear substitute treatment in dry eye disease (DED), as well as treatment compliance and adverse events (AEs).
METHODS: In this prospective, longitudinal study, a total of 30 eyes receiving 0.3% CMC tear substitute four times daily for DED were evaluated. Clinical endpoints included an ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, average non-invasive tear film break-up time (A-NIBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), and a Schirmer test with anesthesia (ST). Treatment compliance and AEs were also assessed. All evaluations were performed at 2, 4, and 12 weeks of follow-up.
RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, significant improvement was observed in all clinical endpoints with the following mean values: ΔOSDI questionnaire of -22.53 ± 14.68 points, ΔA-NIBUT of 4.81 ± 2.88 s, ΔLLT of 5.63 ± 6.53 nm, and ΔST of 2.8 ± 2.1 mm (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Although repeated measures analysis showed that all clinical endpoints presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.001 for all comparisons LLTBaseline-LLT2-weeks (p = 0.460) and LLT4-weeks-LLT12-weeks (p = 0.071) were the only pairs of measures that reported non-statistically significant differences). In addition, treatment compliance was 94.3 ± 5.2% and transient AEs related to the use of 0.3% CMC tear substitute were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: 0.3% CMC tear substitute treatment seems to achieve beneficial effects on the OSDI questionnaire, A-NIBUT, LLT, and ST. However, further studies at this concentration are needed to confirm these results.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effect of two preservative-free (PF) artificial tears, one containing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) (control group) vs another containing hyaluronic acid and hydroxypropyl guar (HA + HP-guar) (study group), on the healing of the corneal epithelium and the ocular discomfort after bilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery.
METHODS: A total of 68 patients that were scheduled to have PRK to correct myopia were randomized into two groups: 34 patients (68 eyes) in the study group and 34 patients (68 eyes) in the control group. Ocular examinations were performed on postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 30, and 90, evaluating the diameter of the de-epithelized cornea, the fluorescein staining using the Oxford scale, the tear film osmolarity and stability (tear breakup time), and the pain using visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS: On postoperative day 4, 97% of the study eyes vs 84.4% of the control eyes were completely re-epithelized (p = 0.01). Less ocular pain was observed on postoperative day 3 in the study group (5.0 (3.0-6.0) vs 6.0 (3.5-7.0), p = 0.03). No differences were observed beyond postoperative day 7 in the healing of the corneal epithelium, non-invasive Keratograph breakup time (NIKBUT), and the self-perceived ocular discomfort between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows faster healing of the corneal epithelium and less ocular pain and discomfort in the first days after PRK with the use of topical lubricants containing HA + HP-guar compared to conventional CMC artificial tears, probably due to the different trophic effect of the aforementioned tears on the corneal epithelial cells.
BACKGROUND: EudraCT No. 2020-003488-25.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combination therapy with diquafosol sodium and sodium hyaluronate in dry eye patients after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on consecutive patients who were diagnosed with dry eye disease (DED) and ready to accept SMILE from January 2021 to December 2021. The participants were randomly allocated to either a combination with diquafosol sodium 3% and sodium hyaluronate 0.3% group (DQS group, n=40) or a sodium hyaluronate 0.3% group (HA group, n=41). Dry eye disease parameters included tear film break-up time (TBUT), Shirmer I test (SIT), corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining score (FS score), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI); tests were conducted before surgery and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: At 1 week after surgery, there were no statistically significant overall differences in DED parameters between the 2 groups. At postoperative month 1, the FS score was significantly lower in the DQS group than in the HA group (1.20±1.06 vs. 1.83±1.41 respectively, p=0.026). At 3 months after the surgery, the DQS group was significantly superior to the HA group in OSDI (12.98±7.29 vs. 16.82±8.25, p=0.029), TBUT (5.83±2.02 vs. 4.24±0.94, p=0.0002), and SIT (7.75±3.92 vs. 5.24±3.42, p=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that combination therapy with diquafosol and hyaluronate was beneficial for improving both signs and symptoms of dry eye patients after small incision lenticule extraction.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid and trehalose (HA/trehalose) eyedrops in managing dry eye disease (DED) symptoms by measuring tear stability and administering a DED questionnaire. Sixty patients were treated with either HA/trehalose eyedrops (Tear A) or carmellose sodium eyedrops (Tear B) as controls. The tear breakup time (TBUT) and non-invasive breakup time (NIBUT) were monitored, and patients completed the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED) questionnaire. After two months of twice-daily applications, patients treated with the HA/trehalose eyedrops demonstrated significant improvements in the NIBUT (12.98 ± 3.22 s) and TBUT (12.95 ± 2.98 s), indicating increased tear stability. Moreover, they reported lower dry eye sensation (6.70 ± 4.94 SPEED score points), suggesting a reduction in DED symptoms. These findings underscore the efficacy of HA/trehalose eyedrops in improving both the objective and subjective signs of DED, with twice-daily application enhancing ocular surface conditions and reducing patient-reported symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the effect of regular application of perfluorohexyloctane (F6H8; Evotears®) on the tear film lipid layer, higher order aberrations (HOA) and the repeatability of measurements in healthy eyes.
METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 104 eyes treated with F6H8 four times daily for four weeks (group A) and 101 eyes that served as controls (group B). Measurements were performed with the WASCA aberrometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec GmbH, Jena, Germany). Main outcome measurement in addition to subjective refraction were the root mean square values of HOA measured before and after the intervention.
RESULTS: Regular use of F6H8 over a period of four weeks significantly increases HOA in healthy eyes (p < 0.05). In addition, the repeatability of measurement increases after the application of F6H8.
CONCLUSIONS: F6H8 may be a suitable treatment option to improve the accuracy of refractive assessment, although it increases HOA. Further studies are needed to confirm the effect on HOA and the repeatability of measurement.

UNASSIGNED: Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a multifactorial chronic inflammatory condition of the corneal surface, attributed to insufficient or low-quality production of tears, accounting for 5-50% of the cases globally. Artificial tears are the first line of treatment as they reduce ocular surface tension, and improve film stability and optical quality. EzriCare Artificial Tears are preservative-free, multi-dose, readily accessible eye drops containing carboxymethylcellulose sodium solution (10 mg in 1 ml) aiming for relief against DED. This article discusses the public health challenges faced by the use of EzriCare Artificial Tears and emphasizes the need for alternative therapies for the effective management of DED.
UNASSIGNED: We searched for articles documenting the incidence of the current multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strain outbreak caused by the use of preservative-free artificial tears and the challenges faced through the use of artificial tears on PubMed, and Google Scholar.
UNASSIGNED: EzriCare and other preservative-free artificial tears have been reported to pose a serious public health risk as they have been found to be the commonly used product among the people infected with the current multi-state outbreak of the multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strain.
UNASSIGNED: The current multi-state outbreak of the multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strain has raised concerns about the safe use of other artificial products. It is high time that further trials should be conducted on other alternative strategies and evaluate the safety and efficacy of nanotechnology in the treatment of dry eye disease.