Welfare

福利
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管关于跑步对鸡的影响的研究过多,关于在有或没有进入豆类或草基牧场的深窝房屋中饲养的母鸡的福利和行为特征的信息很少。因此,这项研究旨在评估通过产蛋母鸡进入草地或豆科植物牧场对行为的影响,生理反应和细菌负荷。进行这项研究是为了评估蛋型鸡在草地或豆类牧场上奔跑对其福利和行为的影响。该研究涉及从12周龄开始使用240ISA棕色小母鸡,并持续了48周。处理方法是采用草基牧场(PG)的深层垃圾房,带有豆科植物牧场(PL)的深层垃圾房和无牧场的深层垃圾房(LD),有80个小鸡,每个小鸡有四个重复,每个20只鸟。在52周龄时对每个围栏中的母鸡进行行为观察,并通过使鸟类仰卧并将其头部放在U形木摇篮中来评估补品的不动性。在下午1:00在不同的产蛋阶段评估母鸡的呼吸频率和直肠温度的测量。在60周龄时进行胃肠道和卵细菌计数。结果表明,在深窝住房系统中,进食时间的比例最高(p<0.05),而豆科植物和草地是相似的。母鸡在三种治疗方法中大部分时间都在站立和进食。然而,PL和PG的站立时间相似,但明显高于LD(p<0.05)。补品不动持续时间的结果表明,母鸡在LD反应中花费的时间明显长于最初的PL和PG,实验的第二和第三阶段。然而,母鸡在PL和PG中花费的时间相似。在第二阶段,PL和PG鸟的直肠温度与LD相当,并且高于LD。另一方面,呼吸频率没有差异。母鸡的血浆三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)不遵循一致的模式。LD和PL的大肠细菌计数相似,但显着(P<0.05)高于PG。结论是,进入牧场会影响母鸡的行为,并且牧场上母鸡的补品不活动持续时间较短,这表明进入牧场有利于母鸡的福利。
    Despite the plethora of studies on the impacts of access to runs on chickens, there is a paucity of information on the welfare and behavioural repertoire of hens raised in the deep litter houses with or without access to legume- or grass-based pasture. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of access to grass or legume pastures by laying hens on behaviour, physiological responses and bacterial load. The study was conducted to evaluate the influence of exposure of egg-type chickens to runs on grass or legume pastures on their welfare and behaviours. The study involved the use of 240 ISA brown pullets from 12 weeks of age and and lasted for 48 weeks. The treatments were deep litter housing with grass-based pasture run (PG), deep litter housing with legume-based pasture run (PL) and deep litter housing without runs (LD) having 80 pullets with four replicates of twenty birds each. Behavioural observations of the hens in each pen were made at 52 weeks of age and tonic immobility was assessed by making the birds lie on their back with their head resting in a U-shaped wooden cradle. The measurements of the respiratory rate and rectal temperature of the hens were assessed at 1:00 p.m. at different laying phases. The gastrointestinal and egg bacterial counts were conducted at 60 weeks of age. Results revealed that the proportion of time spent eating was highest (p < 0.05) in the deep litter housing system, while the legume and grass pasture were similar. The hens spent most of their time standing and eating in the three treatments. However, the time spent standing in PL and PG was similar but significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in LD. Results on tonic immobility duration showed that the time spent by the hens in LD during the reaction was significantly longer than those of the PL and PG in the first, second and third phases of the experiments. However, the time spent by the hens in PL and PG was similar. The rectal temperatures of PL and PG birds were comparable and higher than those of LD during the second phase. On the other hand, there was no difference in the respiratory rate. Plasma triiodothyronine (T3) of the hens did not follow a consistent pattern. The bacterial count in the large intestine in LD and PL was similar but significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of the PG. It was concluded that access to pasture influenced the behaviours of hens and that tonic immobility duration was shorter in the hens on the pasture, suggesting that access to pasture favoured hens\' welfare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行给澳大利亚年轻人造成了经济困难和心理困扰。这项研究调查了澳大利亚政府的紧急现金转移支付-特别是大流行前失业者的福利扩张(在澳大利亚称为冠状病毒补充)和JobKeeper(对因大流行而减少或停止就业的人的现金支持)-是否与冠状病毒大流行期间有和没有精神障碍(包括焦虑,抑郁症,ADHD和自闭症)。样本包括902名年轻人,他们参加了澳大利亚儿童纵向研究(LSAC)的最后三波(8、9C1、9C2),具有全国代表性的队列研究。使用改进的Poisson回归模型评估紧急现金转移支付对18-22岁青少年自我评估应对水平的影响,对有和没有精神障碍的人进行分层分析。所有模型都根据性别进行了调整,employment,location,家庭凝聚力,吸烟史,酒精摄入量,和COVID-19测试结果。在分析的902人样本中,41.5%(n=374)报告高水平的应对,18.9%(n=171)报告了精神障碍,40.3%(n=364)收到了冠状病毒补充剂,16.4%(n=148)收到了Jobkeeper付款。分析总样本表明,与未收到JobKeeper付款的参与者相比,收到JobKeeper付款的参与者更有可能具有更高的应对水平。分层分析表明,那些先前存在精神障碍的人从JobKeeper支付中获得了显着的收益,与那些没有接受JobKeeper的人相比。相比之下,接受冠状病毒补充剂与较高的应对水平没有显着相关。在那些没有精神健康障碍的人中,冠状病毒补充剂和JobKeeper对应对水平均无统计学意义的影响。这些发现表明,在大流行期间,现金转移对应对水平的积极影响仅限于那些已经患有精神疾病并接受JobKeeper的人。
    The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has caused financial hardship and psychological distress among young Australians. This study investigates whether the Australian Government\'s emergency cash transfer payments-specifically welfare expansion for those unemployed prior to the pandemic (known in Australia as the Coronavirus Supplement) and JobKeeper (cash support for those with reduced or stopped employment due to the pandemic)-were associated with individual\'s level of coping during the coronavirus pandemic among those with and without mental disorders (including anxiety, depression, ADHD and autism). The sample included 902 young adults who participated in all of the last three waves (8, 9C1, 9C2) of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC), a nationally representative cohort study. Modified Poisson regression models were used to assess the impact of emergency cash transfer payments on 18-22-year-old\'s self-rated coping level, stratifying the analysis by those with and without mental disorders. All models were adjusted for gender, employment, location, family cohesion, history of smoking, alcohol intake, and COVID-19 test result. Of the 902-person sample analysed, 41.5% (n = 374) reported high levels of coping, 18.9% (n = 171) reported mental disorders, 40.3% (n = 364) received the Coronavirus Supplement and 16.4% (n = 148) received JobKeeper payments. Analysing the total sample demonstrated that participants who received the JobKeeper payment were more likely to have a higher level of coping compared to those who did not receive the JobKeeper payment. Stratified analyses demonstrated that those with pre-existing mental disorder obtained significant benefit from the JobKeeper payment on their level of coping, compared to those who did not receive JobKeeper. In contrast, receipt of the Coronavirus Supplement was not significantly associated with higher level of coping. Among those with no mental health disorder, neither the Coronavirus Supplement nor JobKeeper had a statistically significant impact on level of coping. These findings suggest the positive impacts of cash transfers on level of coping during the pandemic were limited to those with a pre-existing mental disorder who received JobKeeper.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    单禁房会给家养马带来福利风险。这项研究调查了在热带稀树草原地区将马限制在不同稳定设计中的单个摊位时的应激反应,以解决文献中的空白。总的来说,23匹马被分配到具有中央走廊和坚固外墙的马stable(A)(N=8),一侧走廊和坚固外墙的马厩(B)(N=6),或具有中央走廊且没有坚固外墙的稳定(C)(N=9)。空气速度,相对湿度,空气温度,在马厩内测量有毒气体,还测定了马的心率和HRV。稳定C的相对湿度低于稳定A(p<0.05),而白天稳定C的空气温度高于稳定B(p<0.05)。稳定C中的气流和氨水平高于稳定B和A中的气流和氨水平(p<0.01-0.0001)。总的来说,马A的HRV低于马B和C的HRV(p<0.05-0.01)。马在稳定的A往往经历更多的压力比那些在其他马厩。
    Single-confinement housing can pose welfare risks to domestic horses. This study investigated horses\' stress responses when confined to single stalls in different stable designs in a tropical savanna region to address a gap in the literature. In total, 23 horses were assigned to a stable with a central corridor and solid external walls (A) (N = 8), a stable with one side corridor and solid external walls (B) (N = 6), or a stable with a central corridor and no solid external walls (C) (N = 9). Air velocity, relative humidity, air temperature, and noxious gases were measured inside the stables, and the heart rate and HRV of the horses were also determined. The relative humidity was lower in stable C than in stable A (p < 0.05), while the air temperature was higher in stable C than in stable B (p < 0.05) during the day. The airflow and ammonia levels were higher in stable C than in stables B and A (p < 0.01-0.0001). Overall, horses\' HRV in stable A was lower than in those in stables B and C (p < 0.05-0.01). Horses in stable A tended to experience more stress than those in other stables.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是评估仔猪对不同治疗方案的短期行为和生理反应,以控制缺铁性贫血(IDA)和囊孢子虫病。用(1)注射铁并通过滴注口服托曲唑(TLZ)或(2)注射TZLgleptoferron的组合治疗仔猪;然后评估仔猪的行为。对于这项研究,将288只仔猪分为三个实验组:96只仔猪未经处理(对照组);96只仔猪在相同的处理下口服基于TZL的通用抗球虫药(20mg/kgBW)以及肌内施用右旋糖酐铁(200mg/mL;1mL/仔猪)(口服肠胃外组,O+P);96只仔猪接受了组合产品的肌内施用(肠胃外组,P).对于每只处理过的仔猪,总处理时间,飞行反应,使用Scollo等人描述的方法确定发声的强度和频率。(2020年)。发现OP组的仔猪在治疗期间比P组的动物发出更多的尖叫声(21.05%vs.8.42%的动物;p<0.05)。OP组的仔猪对操作和口服给药的反应较差,因为即使在处理后,仍有较高比例的动物继续烦躁不安(32.63%vs.12.63%;p<0.05)。在我们的研究中没有观察到各组之间生长性能的差异(p>0.05)。总之,组合产品的给药减少了给药期间的压力,如减少的发声和对操纵的反应所表明的。
    The aim of the present study was to assess the short-term behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to different treatment protocols for the control of iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) and cystoisosporosis. Piglets were treated with either (1) an injection of iron combined with an oral application of toltrazuril (TLZ) by drenching or (2) a combination injection of TZL + gleptoferron; the behavior of the piglets was then evaluated. For this study, 288 piglets were divided into three experimental groups: 96 piglets were kept untreated (control group); 96 piglets received an oral administration of a generic TZL-based anticoccidial agent (20 mg/kg BW) along with intramuscular administration of iron dextran (200 mg/mL; 1 mL/piglet) at the same handling (oral + parenteral group, O + P); and 96 piglets received an intramuscular application of the combination product (parenteral group, P). For each treated piglet, the total handling time, flight reaction, and the intensity and frequency of vocalizations were determined using the methodology described by Scollo et al. (2020). Piglets in the O + P group were found to emit more screams during treatment administration than animals in the P group (21.05% vs. 8.42% of animals; p < 0.05). Piglets in the O + P group reacted worse to manipulation and oral administration because a higher percentage of animals continued to fidget even after handling (32.63% vs. 12.63%; p < 0.05). Differences in growth performance between the groups were not observed in our study (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the administration of a combination product reduced stress during administration, as indicated by reduced vocalizations and reactions to manipulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了圈养条件对圈养期间猪的福利和肉质的影响。根据照度(在40勒克斯(LX)以下,以2×3阶乘设计将总共3070头育肥猪分配到两个试验中排列的六组之一中,超过40勒克斯(HX))和放养密度(低密度(LD),高于0.83m2/100kg;正常密度(ND),0.50-0.83m2/100kg;高密度(HD),低于0.50m2/100kg)高温(HT),高于24°C;低温(LT),低于10℃放养HD的猪比在LT放养LD的猪表现出更低的攻击行为和重叠行为。放养HD的猪显示出较高的站立,坐着,和侵略行为比HT有LD的行为。在LT时,放养HD的猪的pH值比放养LD的猪高。在HT,储存LD的猪表现出更高的pH值,WHC,DL,和CL比那些储存有HD的。在LT,储存有LD的猪的皮质醇水平高于储存有HD的猪。然而,在HT时,用LD放养的猪的皮质醇水平低于用HD放养的猪。根据获得的结果,在HT下放养密度过高(低于0.50m2/100kg)和在LT下放养密度过低(高于0.83m2/100kg)通常不利于肉质和动物福利。
    This study investigated the effects of lairage conditions on the welfare and meat quality of pigs during lairage periods. A total of 3070 finishing pigs were assigned to one of six groups arranged in two trials in a 2 × 3 factorial design according to the illuminance (under 40 lux (LX), over 40 lux (HX)) and stocking density (low density (LD), higher than 0.83 m2/100 kg; normal density (ND), 0.50-0.83 m2/100 kg; high density (HD), lower than 0.50 m2/100 kg) with high temperature (HT), higher than 24 °C; low temperature (LT), lower than 10 °C. Pigs stocked with HD showed lower aggression behavior and overlap behavior than those stocked with LD at LT. Pigs stocked with HD showed higher standing, sitting, and aggression behavior than those stocked with LD at HT. Pigs stocked with HD showed higher pH than those stocked with LD at LT. At HT, pigs stocked with LD showed higher pH, WHC, DL, and CL than those stocked with HD. At LT, pigs stocked with LD showed higher cortisol levels than those stocked with HD. However, pigs stocked with LD showed lower cortisol levels than those stocked with HD at HT. Based on the obtained results, stocking of too-high (lower than 0.50 m2/100 kg) density at HT and stocking of too-low (higher than 0.83 m2/100 kg) density at LT are generally not good for meat quality and animal welfare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于一个理性的个体来说,更多的知识总是一个优势。然而,这篇文章表明,对于一群理性的个体来说,更多的知识可能适得其反,给所有人带来更糟糕的结果。令人惊讶的是,即使新知识并不意味着发现新行动,而只是提供了对利害关系的相互作用的更深入理解,这种情况也可能发生。更具体地说,增强对当前自然状态的了解可能会阻碍纯粹自利的个人之间的合作。本文描述了这种自相矛盾的可能性-“知识诅咒”-并分析了在以下情况下发生的进化过程:最初,只有少数人能获得更多的知识。最后对避免这种潜在知识反弹的方法进行了初步评论。
    Greater knowledge is always an advantage for a rational individual. However, this article shows that for a group of rational individuals greater knowledge can backfire, leading to a worse outcome for all. Surprisingly, this can happen even when new knowledge does not mean the discovery of a new action but simply provides a deeper understanding of the interaction at stake. More specifically, enhanced knowledge about the current state of nature may hinder cooperation among purely self-interested individuals. The paper describes this paradoxical possibility-a \'knowledge curse\'-and analyses the evolutionary process that occurs if, initially, only a few people have access to the greater knowledge. It concludes with a tentative comment on ways to avert this potential knowledge backlash.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:进行了当前研究,以评估不同LED光颜色对番鸭福利指标的影响。这些福利参数包括增长绩效,具体的行为,音调不动(TI),羽毛得分,血液学,和血清生化指标。根据不同的LED灯颜色,将84只两周大的健康无性别的番鸭随机分为四组(3个重复/组;每个重复包含7只鸟)。第一组是在白光下长大的,第二个在红灯下,第三个在蓝光下,第四个在黄光下。为了评估各种LED灯颜色对福利的影响,生长性能指标(体重,体重增加,饲料摄入量,和饲料转化率)进行测量。行为模式,包括喂养,饮酒,站立,走路,坐着,羽毛啄食,并记录了其他活动。在3、6和10周龄时进行补品不动测试(TI)和羽毛状况评分。在研究结束时,收集血液样品用于血液学和血清生化分析。
    结果:结果显示,使用蓝色,黄色,红色对鸭的最终体重无不良影响(P>0.05)。不像红灯,蓝光显著减少了羽毛的啄食,TI时间和皮质醇浓度改善了羽毛状况评分(P≤0.05)。
    结论:目前的研究结果表明,蓝光的应用有效地改善了福利指数,并且对番鸭的生长性能没有不利影响,从而对其福利做出了积极贡献。
    BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to assess the impact of different LED light colors on welfare indicators in Muscovy ducks. These welfare parameters encompassed growth performance, specific behaviors, tonic immobility (TI), feather score, haematological, and serum biochemical parameters. Eighty-four healthy unsexed Muscovy ducklings aged two weeks were randomly assigned to four groups (3replicates/group; each replicate contains 7 birds) based on different LED light colors. The first group was raised under white light, the second under red light, the third under blue light, and the fourth under yellow light. To assess the impact of various LED light colors on welfare, growth performance indicators (body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio) were measured. Behavioral patterns including feeding, drinking, standing, walking, sitting, feather pecking, and other activities were recorded. Tonic immobility test (TI) and feather condition scoring were conducted at 3, 6, and 10 weeks of age. At the end of the study blood samples were collected for hematological and serum biochemical analyses.
    RESULTS: The results revealed that using blue, yellow, and red colors had no adverse effect on the final body weight of the ducks (P > 0.05). Unlike to red light, blue light significantly reduced feather pecking, TI time and cortisol concentrations and improved the feather condition score (P ≤ 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that the application of blue light effectively improves welfare indices and has no detrimental impact on the growth performance of Muscovy ducks thereby positively contributing to their welfare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CRISPR相关蛋白和成簇规则间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR-Cas)技术已成为动物和家禽营养领域的突破性进展,以提高饲料转化效率。增强抗病性,提高畜产品的营养质量。尽管取得了重大进展,在对CRISPR-Cas方法在畜禽营养中的系统理解和综合运用方面存在研究空白。本研究的目的是通过CRISPR-Cas基因组编辑技术阐明动物和家禽营养的最新进展,专注于新陈代谢中的基因操纵,豁免权,和增长。遵循荟萃分析和系统评价指南中的首选报告项目,我们使用几个数据库进行了系统的搜索,包括Scopus,PubMed,和WebofScience,直到2024年5月,最后,本研究共纳入108篇文章.本文探讨了CRISPR-Cas系统在益生菌和酶等饲料添加剂发展中的应用。这可以减少抗生素在动物生产中的使用。此外,本文讨论了动物和家禽营养中与基因编辑相关的伦理和监管问题,包括对动物福利的担忧,食品安全,和环境影响。总的来说,CRISPR-Cas系统具有克服现代畜牧业挑战的巨大希望。通过丰富畜产品的营养品质,提高抗病性,提高饲料效率,它提供了可持续和具有成本效益的解决方案,可以彻底改变动物和家禽的营养。
    CRISPR-associated proteins and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas) technology has emerged as a groundbreaking advancement in animal and poultry nutrition to improve feed conversion efficiency, enhance disease resistance, and improve the nutritional quality of animal products. Despite significant advancements, there is a research gap in the systematic understanding and comprehensive use of the CRISPR-Cas method in animal and poultry nutrition. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the latest advancements in animal and poultry nutrition through CRISPR-Cas genome editing technology, focusing on gene manipulation in metabolism, immunity, and growth. Following preferred reporting items in meta-analysis and systematic reviews guidelines, we conducted a systematic search using several databases, including Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, until May 2024, and finally, we included a total of 108 articles in this study. This article explores the use of the CRISPR-Cas system in the advancement of feed additives like probiotics and enzymes, which could reduce the use of antibiotics in animal production. Furthermore, the article discusses ethical and regulatory issues related to gene editing in animal and poultry nutrition, including concerns about animal welfare, food safety, and environmental impacts. Overall, the CRISPR-Cas system holds substantial promise to overcome the challenges in modern animal agriculture. By enriching the nutritional quality of animal products, increasing disease resistance, and improving feed efficiency, it offers sustainable and cost-effective solutions that can revolutionize animal and poultry nutrition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医疗保健系统承受着巨大的压力。缓解这种压力的一种可能的解决方案是使用积极的健康,以“健康”为起点,而不是“疾病”。积极健康为刺激综合护理提供了机会。
    方法:本文研究了荷兰的3例病例。他们与积极健康合作的方式是通过半结构化和叙述性访谈进行调查的,使用现实主义评价和专题分析。
    结果:确定了七个“工作要素”,这些要素增加了在实践中成功实施“积极健康”的机会(第1部分)。采访显示,医疗保健专业人员已经注意到,人们采用更健康的生活方式,并获得对自己健康的更大程度的控制。这也提高了医疗保健专业人员的工作满意度。参与的组织和专业人员热衷于与积极健康合作,但仍然遇到障碍(第2部分)。
    结论:这项研究的结果表明,在实践中实施积极健康可以促进不同学科的组织和专业人员之间的合作,比如医疗保健,福利,和市政卫生服务。从共同目标的角度出发,来自不同学科的专业人士会发现,联合组织促进公民健康的活动会更容易。此外,更多关注影响人们福祉的非医疗问题,比如孤独或财务问题。
    BACKGROUND: The healthcare system is under tremendous pressure. One possible solution towards relieving some of this pressure is to use Positive Health, which takes \'health\' as a starting point, rather than \'illness\'. Positive Health provides opportunities for stimulating integrated care.
    METHODS: Three cases in the Netherlands are studied in this paper. Their way of working with Positive Health is investigated through semi-structured and narrative interviews, using realist-evaluation and thematic analyses.
    RESULTS: Seven \'working elements\' are identified that enhance the chances of successfully implementing Positive Health in practice (part 1). The interviews show that healthcare professionals have noticed that people adopt a healthier lifestyle and gain a greater degree of control over their own health. This boosts job satisfaction for healthcare professionals too. The organisations and professionals involved are enthusiastic about working with Positive Health, but still experience barriers (part 2).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study imply that implementing Positive Health in practice can facilitate collaboration between organisations and professionals from different disciplines, such as healthcare, welfare, and municipal health services. Operating from the perspective of a shared goal, professionals from different disciplines will find it easier to jointly organise activities to foster citizens\' health. Additionally, more attention is paid to non-medical problems affecting people\'s well-being, such as loneliness or financial problems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大多数关于住房和畜牧业对动物情感状态和福利的影响的研究都调查了稳定生活条件的影响。例如,比较,生活在丰富环境中的动物和生活在非丰富环境中的动物。生活条件的变化,包括从更丰富到更不丰富的环境,还发现对某些物种的情感状态和福利措施有影响。但是这些研究并没有调查是否是变化的轨迹影响了动物(例如,条件恶化),或者仅仅是他们最终环境的性质(例如,非丰富)。这里,我们假设产蛋鸡在六周内生活在恶化的条件下(逐渐从首选到非首选的生活条件;“对非首选的轨迹”,TNP,n=30),与那些在相同持续时间内连续生活在非首选条件下的人相比,将显示出更多的负面情感状态和更差的福利(“稳定的非首选”,SNP,n=30)。我们还假设母鸡生活在改善的条件下(逐渐从非首选到首选的生活条件;“轨迹到首选”,TP,n=30),与那些连续生活在首选条件下的人相比,将显示出更积极的情感状态和更好的福利(“稳定的首选”,SP,n=30)。首选的生活条件提供了广泛的资源和间歇性奖励事件(例如提供食物对待),这些事件被大多数母鸡所重视和喜欢,而非优先生活条件仅提供基本资源和间歇性厌恶事件(例如,噪音很大)。母鸡的情感状态和福利是使用家庭围栏行为观察来衡量的,身体状况评估,生理应激措施(例如,血皮质酮,葡萄糖,等。),物理挑战测试,和判断偏差测试。发现母鸡的轨迹和稳定的生活条件之间存在许多差异:TP母鸡较轻,比SP母鸡表现出更多的觅食行为和更少的站立警觉和摇头,而TNP母鸡表现出更多的摇头,比SNP母鸡温和的羽毛啄食和对围栏伴侣的攻击性攻击。然而,在Benjamini对多重测试进行校正后,其中一些差异未能达到显著性.各组的判断偏差也没有差异(在每个实验组12只母鸡的子样本中测量),对身体挑战的反应,或测量生理压力。我们得出的结论是,本研究中的母鸡在其生活条件下表现出对“情感轨迹”的反应性的一些证据,但对他们的情感状态和福利没有明确的影响。
    Most studies of the effects of housing and husbandry on animals\' affective states and welfare investigate the impact of stable living conditions, comparing for example, animals living in enriched environments with those living in non-enriched ones. Changes in living conditions, including from more to less enriched environments, have also been found to have effects on measures of affective state and welfare in some species. But these studies have not investigated whether it is the trajectory of change that has affected the animals (e.g., worsening conditions), or simply the nature of their final environment (e.g., non-enriched). Here, we hypothesised that laying hens living in worsening conditions across a six-week period (gradually moving from preferred to non-preferred living conditions; \"Trajectory to Non-Preferred\", TNP, n = 30), would show evidence of more negative affective states and poorer welfare than those living continuously in non-preferred conditions for the same duration (\"Stable Non-Preferred\", SNP, n = 30). We also hypothesised that hens living in improving conditions (gradually moving from non-preferred to preferred living conditions; \"Trajectory to Preferred\", TP, n = 30), would show evidence of more positive affective states and better welfare than those living continuously in preferred conditions (\"Stable Preferred\", SP, n = 30). The preferred living condition provided extensive resources and intermittent rewarding events (such as the delivery of food treats) known to be valued and preferred by most hens, while the non-preferred living condition provided just basic resources and intermittent aversive events (e.g., loud noises). The hens\' affective states and welfare were measured using home-pen behavioural observations, body condition assessments, physiological stress measures (e.g., blood corticosterone, glucose, etc.), physical challenge tests, and judgement bias tests. A number of differences between hens in the trajectory and stable living conditions were found: TP hens were lighter, showed more foraging behaviour and less standing alert and head-shaking than SP hens, while TNP hens showed more head-shaking, mild feather pecking and aggressive attacking of pen mates than SNP hens. However, some of these differences failed to reach significance following Benjamini adjustments for multiple testing. The groups also did not differ in their judgement biases (measured in a sub-sample of 12 hens per experimental group), response to physical challenges, or measures of physiological stress. We conclude that the hens in the present study showed some evidence of responsiveness to \'affective trajectories\' in their living conditions, but no definitive effects on their affective states and welfare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号